Reasons not to rejoin

Caught this the other day and thought it worth saying.  Wonder what you think of the various arguments.

Any major changes since 2006/7?  I think not.  My main reason is more personal ... Remoaners and Rejoiners tend in the main to be as morally bereft, bankrupt, as the Demrats across the pond. A perfect recent example is the Harman Uniparty's decision to "do a Donald" on Boris.

I'm not defending Boris who jumped before he was pushed, certainly not defending him for WA3 after Pigboy Dave and May Not extended the middle finger to the British public ... yet it was the unprincipled manner by which it was done which galls ... just what sort of a scumbag is Heseltine for example? And who was the Chief Whip at the time, out of curiosity?

And digressing a bit ... am I imagining it or has Mr. Fawkes-Staines surrounded his visage in the avatar with rainbow shite?

Imagine Letting A 'Guardian' Sourpuss Tell You What To Spend Your Money On...

So says Hannah Fearn, according to her 'Guardian' bio, a freelancer writer and reporter specialising in social affairs. And doesn't her picture do her column justice?

Fifteen years ago, it was the wood burner: an unnecessary middle-class indulgence that, despite causing untold environmental damage, started popping up in homes across the country. They became symbolic of a certain affluence that allows a privileged few to live in optimum comfort at all times. Now there’s a new kid on the block: the portable air-conditioning unit.

Oh, horrors! People might be able to keep cool! This will never do! 

At between £300 and £1,000 a pop, they’re not cheap – but they certainly make three or four weeks of good UK weather each year easier to handle.

Great! Right? No. Of course not. 

At what cost?

You just told us, love. Between £300-1000.  

This week National Grid readied another coal-fired power station to cope with the extra demand placed on the energy networks by offices and homes switching on air-conditioning units.

Well, maybe it's me, but isn't that a good thing? A company reacting to demand from its customers? Planning ahead? 

Well, Reader, not in Ms PursedLips' world, it's not...  

Just as wood burners are being phased out by law as we start to fully understand the damage they do to climate and also lung health, we now need to consider a ban on some air-conditioning units – particularly when used at the mildest of warm temperatures.

Yes, of course, a ban is the first - and often only - thing these NuPuritans reach for.  

When it’s 26C outside, the average British home simply doesn’t need air-conditioning. It might feel nicer, but making you a little more comfortable isn’t the government’s job.

Really? So we can start dismantling the panoply of 'hate crime' legislation then? And all those proposals for limiting freedom of speech on the Web?

Oh, that wasn't what you meant? *shrugs* Can't put that genie back in the bottle, can we? 

A Sunday thought

In short, govt and all associated institutions and fanbois … get out of our lives until you’re both needed and called for.

Do I detect some scholastic sophistry at TDS in headline clickbait?

This is reposted, with specific N.O. additions, across the way. These are the main points below:

Do I detect some scholastic sophistry at TDS in headline clickbait?  There are three aspects here ... the subject material itself, the way it does NOT accord with the headline:

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/16/nurses-are-free-to-criticise-lockdowns-and-vaccines-regulator-confirms/

... but in fact makes clear that such has NOT been the case ... freedom to criticise ... and the third aspect is a most valuable statement he did make:

Much to the disappointment of my supporters, the NMC decided to proceed with the investigation and, as if to prove what has become a dictum, that “the process is the punishment” I was kept waiting eight months for a decision. However, finally, a decision was conveyed to me this week that I had “no case to answer” for which I was very grateful.

It's all in that paragraph.  The medical profession is a vast collection of disciplines and to look at those participating in practices ranging from criminal gender mutilation to late term abortion to the use of intubation and the "remsthingy" drug whilst suppressing "I've a" and HCQ and going after anyone criticising it on medical advice from brave medicos ... that does not mean that all medicos are Drs Mengeles or similar. 

Many are though and it's a bit like Russian roulette when faced by a medico whether he/she is one of Them or is a perfectly decent person with mouths to feed at home ... silent but not agreeing with the horrors perpetrated by the "profession" 2020 to 2023.  

You just can't know, except in the overall demeanour and way the person handles the patient. Not a satisfactory arrangement.

Coming back to Dr. Watson, my beef is not with what happened within his profession but with his clickbait headline, which I've had to unclickbait for readers. To my mind, it's a scurrilous method of "sneaky gain of hits" and the ultimate responsibility lies with both the moderator/admin and the platform provider itself.

Yes, there really is that aspect of ggl for example where there is reason not to allow quite defamatory statements ... and yet how can they police it across the world? I'd say through algorithms and key weasel words picked up by bots but what is defamatory and what is fact? Almost all major institutions seem to be plagued by Wokery today ... which is anti-fact.

But generally it's the moderator held responsible, e.g. Kathy Gyngell and yet, as a fellow moderator, how can she know every word Dr. Watson wrote?  How many minutes are there in the day? It really depends on someone else picking up on and flagging but here's the crux ... do they report her like a naughty schoolgirl or do they put it to her, herself?

On the other hand, where does Dr. Watson get off with clickbait like that?  Too much more of that sort of thing and it will start to reflect on Kathy.  Just as what Julia or I ultimately click through determines the tone of that blog.

'Agony Aunts' Are Somewhat...Different...In The Dear Old 'Guardian'

*blinks* 

One of the common mistakes white people make is to overestimate their importance in the lives and imaginations of people of colour.

Could that possibly be because race baiters like you never shut up about it? 

Racism matters, and microaggressions are important because they often impede our ability to function in the world with ease by stopping us from conducting basic activities like driving, shopping, or even just walking down the street.

*skepticism intensifies* 

But at the level of whether a particular white person is interested in dating us or not, I think you would have a hard time finding any woman of colour who would be even mildly concerned about this.

Sisonke is just brimming with compassion for us honkeys, isn't she?

I feel bad for him: one of the burdens of whiteness is how much it stunts the lives of those who buy into its deceits.

It's not the first thing that springs to mind when 'the burden of whiteness' crops up, actually... 

The bigger question you need to ask yourself is whether your values and his still align. Surely this is not the only area where his attitudes on race show up.

Yes, it must be racism that drives sexual preferences. I mean, what else could it possibly be? 

Notes on a psycho

And I mean by this Harari clown, not the noble Noha.  It’s a comment yesterday at t’other place, unabridged, by Noha:

RE "Yuval Harari" and "AI"

Yuval Harari, Schwab's WEF's frontman psychopath [https://www.bitchute.com/video/Alhj4UwNWp2m], who is sold as an intellectual "genius" or "prophet" by this crazy world is the person who called you and me and all other commoners “useless people” [https://archive.ph/KlOKx] --- while millions of those "useless people" have been buying and recommending his books like candy (to learn his "lessons"), serving him very usefully. It's one proof that most people anywhere are stupid and crazy (while "thinking" they're intelligent).

The WEF cabal of psychopaths, including Harari, has always promoted and invested into artificial intelligence or AI are now, starting in early 2023, suddenly supposedly have a change of heart makes it clear that their warnings about AI and having it regulated is just a manipulative tactic to misdirect and deceive the public, once again.

The manipulative "AI open letter" scheme is part of The Hegellian Dialectic in action: problem-reaction-solution. 

This bogus letter campaign is meant to raise public fear/hype panic about an alleged big "PROBLEM" (they helped to create in the first place) so the public demands (REACTION) the governments regulate and control this technology =they provide the "SOLUTION' FOR THEIR OWN INTERESTS AND AGENDAS... because... all governments are owned and controlled by the leading psychopaths in power .... www.CovidTruthBeKnown.com (or https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html).

What a convenient self-serving trickery ... of the ever foolish public. Because it's an OLD trick...

"That’s what snake-oil salesmen do. They convince us that we have a fictitious problem, and then they sell us the elixir as the solution to the problem. They’ve been doing it for hundreds of years." ---Unknown

"We'll know our Disinformation Program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---William Casey, a former CIA director=a leading psychopathic criminal of the genocidal US regime

"AI responds according to the “rules” created by the programmers who are in turn owned by the people who pay their salaries. This is precisely why Globalists want an AI controlled society- rules for serfs, exceptions for the aristocracy." ---Unknown

“Who masters those technologies [=artificial intelligence (AI), chatbots, digital identities, synthetic biology] —in some way— will be the master of the world.” --- Klaus Schwab, member of the dictatorial ruling mafia of psychopaths, at the World Government Summit in Dubai, March 2023

“COVID is critical because this is what convinces people to accept, to legitimize, total biometric surveillance.” --- Yuval Noah Harari, member of the dictatorial ruling mafia of psychopaths, World Economic Forum

"The whole idea that humans have this soul, or spirit, or free will ... that's over." --- Yuval Noah Harari, member of the dictatorial ruling mafia of psychopaths, World Economic Forum 

That Long March Reached Some Pretty Exclusive Institutions...

Teachers at a leading sixth form will no longer answer to “Sir” and “Miss”, because they’re “deeply unequal” and feed into a view of the world that diminishes women, the school’s executive principal has told students.

Students will instead be required to address staff by their name – as in “Mr Handscombe” – and failing that, in an emergency where a pupil may have forgotten and needs a swift alternative, “teacher” will be acceptable, “in a pinch”.

How nice of him! It seems I've heard this before, though...

It is not the first time the school has tried to make the switch. When it opened in 2014, the same approach was attempted but there was too much else to think about, staff could not make it stick and “sank into cultural misogyny”, Handscombe told students.

Ah! But presumably, he thinks he's got a better chance now. I wonder why? 

“Which is what this is,” he said. “I don’t think that any of you are being actively woman-hating when you call ‘Miss’ over to get help with your chemistry, but we’re all feeding into a view of the world that diminishes women.

“Men get to be fearless leaders and alpha types, get credited for hustling whilst behind the backs of women it’s asked whether they deserve it, whether their career comes from good ideas or good looks, power moves or diversity lists.”

Maybe it's because everyone seems like they are just going to roll over and take it? 

Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “Addressing teachers as ‘Sir’ and ‘Miss’ is as old as the hills and something you’ll hear in many schools. It’s a way of implicitly reaffirming the authority of staff. But we live in changing times and obviously people are giving more and more thought to the use of language and its connotations.”

No, most people couldn't give a monkeys, Geoff ol' chum. It's a tiny unrepresentative selection that are driving this. Because people like you are too afraid to stand up to them. 

The peasants are revolting

Richard the Second, treacherous little bstd, set the tone for monarchs and PMs to this day.

Jail time for an abortion. How sickening, how terrible. Bollocks!

 

The BBC Today programme’s radio waves were full to overflowing with liberals, lefties and all the usual suspects; all condemning the perfectly justified prison sentence on a woman who had deliberately lied to gain access to abortion drugs, and aborted her unborn child despite being at least ten weeks over the maximum time allowed for legal terminations.

All the vituperation showered down upon the judge who made the wise decision to jail this woman, is, to my mind, just what we have come to expect from those who would rule that abortion should be available until the child is ready to pass down the birth canal, and be born.

Abortion Laws have been stretched to the point of stressed elasticity, with abortion-on-demand almost guaranteed, and still the fanatics wish for more.

This case, with the ‘redeeming’ factor being that the woman already had three kids, one of which had ‘special needs’; was mentioned at least twelve times during the three hours of the BBC Today’s broadcast, inclusive of a ten minute sob session between the various dissidents against the sentence, and the ultra-liberal Muslim female broadcaster.And to all the arguments that she shouldn’t have been imprisoned, etc., etc., not one made the case that she wasn’t guilty, or that the sentence was too harsh: I say that she knew exactly what she was doing, she eventually plead ‘guilty’ after initially denying the offence: and the learned judge bent over backwards to give her the most lenient sentence he could. She’ll only serve half the sentence anyway, so what is all the fuss about?

Don't Bother, We Know What The Answer's Going To Be...

The UK charities watchdog is assessing whether it will take action against Oxfam after receiving complaints about a cartoon published by the charity that ignited a row about transgender issues.

This watchdog has no teeth, after all. And no backbone. 

Oxfam International, which commissioned the cartoon as part of its gender justice campaign strand, subsequently published a re-edited version. It apologised for the “offence it caused” and said it had “made a mistake”.

Why on earth should a charity set up to feed starving children even have a 'gender justice strand' in the first place? 

The Charity Commission said it was assessing the complaints in the context of its regulatory and risk framework, which requires it to take action if it considers a charity has undermined public trust and confidence in the charity sector.

There's a long, long list of those before you get around to Oxfam, isn't there?