Showing posts with label stifling good ideas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stifling good ideas. Show all posts

Friday, 23 February 2024

Genuinely Greening The UK

England is launching a biodiversity credit scheme this week that attempts to force all new road and housebuilding projects to benefit nature, rather than damage it.
The “nature market”, called biodiversity net gain (BNG), means all new building projects must achieve a 10% net gain in biodiversity or habitat. If a woodland is destroyed by a road, for example, another needs to be recreated. This can happen either on site or elsewhere.
The requirement becomes law under the Town and Country Planning Act on 12 February for larger sites, and on 2 April 2024 for smaller sites.

Wow, some genuinely smart and wide ranging legislation! I didn't think the Tories had it in them! 

Internationally, “it’s one of the most ambitious schemes we’ve seen”, said Duffus. “Other places are watching us and seeing how it unfolds. If done well I think it could inspire a lot of other markets to develop in different countries.”
Those already hoping to copy the idea or use it to develop their own include Sweden, Singapore, Scotland and Wales, she said.

Isn't it nice to be a world leader in something good for a change? Surely there's a cloud on the horizon though? 

However, regulators lack the staff to check the pledged habitat benefits actually materialise. Zu Ermgassen was part of a study that found that more than a quarter of BNG units are at risk of leading to no tangible increases in biodiversity because there is no monitoring system in place.

Ah. Of course. Once again, ambition is brought low by lack of support.  

Wednesday, 30 August 2023

So What? That's What They Always Do...

The British Retail Consortium (BRC) claims a nationwide DRS could cost £1.8billion a year, plus the expense of establishing the required recycling infrastructure, and it suggested the industry will pass on these costs to customers through higher prices.

That doesn't make it a bad idea, or mean that the scheme shouldn't go ahead, if we are really serious about pollution in the enviroment.  

Scotland has already been forced to delay the introduction of its scheme until 2025 under pressure from businesses and a dispute with the UK government on how it should operate.

I took a walk along a canal a week or so ago, and the unsightly plastic bottles floating around in the water or discarded in the grass of the local park really showed up our throwaway society. It wasn't for lack of rubbish bins, either. Since we can't seem to educate people to not do this, then this makes sense, no matter how much the supermarkets whine. 

It worked years ago - surely we can make it work now?