Culpability

The point of this post now is not to analyse the deathjab any further … there is much med lit out there, esp. on X … the purpose is to look at three sshots and see what can be concluded about culpability.

That last one … admittedly you’d need to go into X, to that account, find and expand the chart. But you still get the idea, unexpanded. The one I’m looking at closely, on the grounds that being male, prostate is an issue and having a stent in … ditto … before even looking at the other poisons in sky, land, water now ... is the folic acid.

in short, these bstds are most certainly trying to kill us. And the political class? Acolytes, believing the guff about being the “useful eaters” saved, safe in their leafy suburbs, knowing that the genocide of the masses was well worth it for their own healthy longevity. In Britain, we’re talking “good areas” of the leafy south-east … the post war, aspirational, NIMBY middle class.

Now, from my style of writing, it must be obvious that I too had “an education”, so why should I be concerned with dead plebs? Simple … I don’t think like the political class or above them, the Rothschild-Sabbatean or European Old Families, pitiless and sicko, psycho. Our people are our people.

And that lot in power are trying to kill us. The supermarkets did not wait for December, nor gladly accept the the exceptions … jope, they got in as quickly as they could to add health-averse substances. Who made those decisions? The boards, the CEOs, warrnt it. That managerial class, low on ability, high on ego, lacking moral compasses.

Do you see your own progeny as “below you” in intellect, no class, fit only for abuse or for sending to the war front, as the Ukrainian monsters are currently doing to their orphanages? Silly question when applied to you and me … by no means a silly question for those with no state, no loyalty to any cultural maxims … people such as Peter Sutherland. Gates. Fauci. Blair.

If They Ever Invent A Time Machine...

...they should go back in time and run this survey again, during the Blitz.

Accusations that the young are a snowflake generation are wrong, the head of an independent review into mental health, ADHD and autism has told the BBC. Prof Peter Fonagy said in an exclusive interview that there had been a real rise in mental distress among children and young people, with anxiety, depression, self-harm and eating disorders the most common.

Because it’s been accepted and tolerated for too long, too many people have heard sob stories about how hard the millennials have it, and haven’t challenged that! 

He said it was "harder to be young" now given the economic and employment uncertainty young people face, coupled with the challenges presented by social media.

His review was ordered nine months ago by Wes Streeting after the then-health secretary claimed in an interview that young people were over-diagnosed and "written off".

And so all those who owe their very positions to the ‘need’ for cosseting professions to suckle at the taxpayer teat immediately scrambled to try to disprove it.

It is likely to feed into government policies on everything from NHS services and benefits to support for young people who are not in education, employment or training. Fonagy said he chose to speak to the BBC ahead of the publication, which is expected later this week, because he was concerned the debate around ADHD and autism would "obscure" the wider issue of mental health.

He said it will conclude that the rise in mental health problems since the 1990s was real, with about one in four 16 to 24-year-olds now struggling.

'Struggling' with what exactly, compared to other generations? How is this 'data' gathered? It sounds dodgy to me...

The data on this is contested as some sources rely on self-reporting, while sceptics argue greater awareness and reduced stigma around mental health mean more people are coming forward.

Aha!  

Last year, the BBC found that many GPs had concerns about over-diagnosis and felt normal life stresses were being over-medicalised.

They are, and they are often the one's doing it! 

"Adults have let them down. We're the first generation that probably collectively feels we had a better life than our children will have. 

"So, to the person who says it's a snowflake generation, just try living 24 hours as a 16-year-old."

If I could take the tech that we have now back with me I'd happily go back in time to my teenage years. Never has the phrase 'You've never had it so good' be more appropriate. 

Conscripted boots in the Ukraine

First three screenshots:

Many times at the old blog and new, the whole question of natural resources in the Donbass, plus oil/gas, plus biolabs, child trafficking … article after after article went up. But the one which sticks in every Russian craw is the Trades Hall events in Odessa.

I don’t expect any reader to be interested in this above but throw in the factors of Nuland and Johnson a few years back … and now the spectre of conscription of British males and Uke females … and it takes on a whole different look. And yes, of course Russia and China are backing the baddies in Iran … what is … is.

Plus we have to throw The Falklands into the mix as well when we’re talking conscription … plus the age verification idiocy so that we can no longer report on any of it.

Think on’t.

If You Just Did What We Wanted, There'd Be No Problems

Nesrine Malik decides to give her take on the Ed Sheeren concert affair and once again, says the quiet bit out loud:

A form of disciplining is dispensed. Please, Mr or Miss Moneybags, with your preening notions that you have anything intelligent or informed to say about immigration policy or Palestine. Stick to football. Stick to pop music. Stick to acting. Stick to children’s shows.

Yes, please just do what you’re paid to do - act, sing, write, paint. Indulge your obsession in private. 

The horror of Gaza has broken the art world, roiled Hollywood, fractured literary institutions. And still, as Ed Sheeran stands alone on stage following the withdrawal of all his support acts (in solidarity with Macklemore, who was removed from the tour due to a pro-Palestinian speech), he told his audience that he wants his music to be “about unity, not division”.

The speed at which his tour unravelled is not evidence of the incompatibility of music and politics, necessitating that they remain separate to avoid that “division”. It is a study in how it is becoming increasingly unnatural to separate them.

His tour hasn’t ’unravelled’ at all of course, no one was buying a ticket to see some unknown support artists…

The enmeshment of entertainment and politics is organic and part of many conflicts and political outrages in recent memory. Vietnam, South Africa, Darfur – all had a cohort of celebrities involved in objecting, lobbying and raising awareness. Figures such as Macklemore or Gary Lineker or Mark Ruffalo or Ms Rachel (who? Wll,  she's an Amerucan educator on YouTube you wouldn't want anywhere near your kids in real life ) are not breaking with convention and plunging industries into turmoil and controversy, but partaking in a long legacy of activism that includes, to name a few, Nina Simone, Donald Sutherland, Kurt Vonnegut, Marlon Brando, Mia Farrow, George Michael and George Clooney.

You can disagree with the stances they have taken. But the belief that they are somehow not qualified to take and express them, and that art and entertainment are sacrosanct, is ignorant at best, disingenuous at worst.

No it isn’t, if I buy a ticket for a pop concert that’s what I expect to get, not a jumped up fluffer hectoring me about a non-existent genocide. 

Public figures are people who have the same passions that everybody else has, and they have politics that they wish to advance with the tools at their disposal.

They can do it on their own time, not when someone's paying them to do something else. 

And I suspect the reason they are met with such belittlement and outrage by their opponents is that there is an understanding that once politics spills over into entertainment, an uncontainable sort of trouble starts.

Once politics enters that relationship, it becomes ungovernable. It can move the parameters of public opinion and discourse in ways that are hard to mediate, so direct is the relationship between the artists and their audience.

Only fools and children treat the words of 'celebrities' protected by their wealth from the consequences of the cause they champion as gospel.

But when artists’ politics clashes with powerful sponsors, as it did when Gillette Stadium owner Robert Kraft removed Macklemore from the Sheeran lineup, it all becomes less straightforward, so complicated, so bedevilled by nuance that could not possibly be litigated adequately by dilettantes.

These collisions are an automatic feature of societies in which politics is failing. The outrage in Palestine is roiling culture because it has been so smothered in politics, because the pain and fury resulting from what the world is witnessing has not been appropriately channelled or responded to by a representative leadership – in fact, it has been policed and criminalised.

Yes, she really said it: 'Celebrities will shut up about this when politicians do what we tell them regardless of the voters' wishes!' 

A healthy political culture should view these spillovers not as crude transgressions into private spaces of consumption, but democracy by other means, because electoral democracy has not squared up to the task.

The problem is not the outspoken artists and entertainers; the problem is what they are speaking about. I wish that the enduring agony of Palestinians were not litigated by the sound and fury and discursive froth of high entertainment, but this is where the politics has brought us. If you want to leave politics out of it, then demand that the politics do the work.

I demand my politician focus on my country, not one inhabited by whinging Muslims, Nesrine!  

Just a bit more on the weird events at Fairford

Steve at Unherdables:

Fairford – apparently on the village noticeboard in Whelford there’s a telephone number for RAF Fairford, which you can use if you see anything suspicious. Unfortunately the lady farmer who called it didn’t get an answer, so she called the police. The base had been on high alert for months as it hosts the ongoing B-1B Lancer operations in the Middle East – not answering the phone is a massive security fail. The three white medium-sized panel vans she observed near Whelford were being driven by men of ‘middle eastern’ appearance. They were EV’s and each of them were filled with barrels of..

ANFO, also written as AN/FO (an acronym for ammonium nitrate/fuel oil; is a widely used bulk industrial high explosive. It consists of 94% porous prilled ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) (AN), which acts as the oxidizing agent and absorbent for the fuel, and 6% number 2 fuel oil (FO) road diesel.

The use of ANFO originated in the 1950s. It is highly insensitive as an explosive, requiring a quantity of secondary explosive, known as a primer or a booster (larger than a standard blasting cap), in order to be detonated. One or two sticks of dynamite were historically used; current practice is to use Tovex or cast boosters of pentolite (TNT/PETN or similar compositions). That is all.

Update 2: Unbeknownst to her in calling the police the lady farmer triggered an active counter-terrorism operation. To avoid exposure they went from observation to capture in a matter of minutes. If this had been a base in the USA they’d all be dead.

Update 3: Newspapers are saying the villagers were told of an ‘imminent threat’ to the base the day before it all kicked off? This afternoon Trump revealed they knew all about them (the five arrested) and he was surprised they were released [bailed]. He said: “I wouldn’t have done that”. SNAFU if you ask me.

Right. Rubio is getting into it:

Mor Edge on X (254.7K following):

I spent over two decades in counterterrorism and I’m still involved in many ways, so here are my views on what I see has happened over the past 24-36 hours in the UK:

Five British men in their twenties were arrested on Sunday near RAF Fairford on suspicion of explosives offences and the preparation of a terrorist act. On Monday they were released on police bail. That’s not what the terrorism clock looks like when the investigators are still in charge of it.

Under ordinary UK criminal law a suspect can be held for 24 hours, stretched to 36 by a superintendent, and to 96 hours by a magistrate. But under section 41 of the Terrorism Act the first hold is 48 hours, not 24 hours. A judge can then extend it, in stages, up to 14 days without a charge. If the case merits it, it can even be pushed to 28 days. That 14-day cap exists for exactly this kind of file of vans, an airbase the United States uses, a possible foreign hand, explosives (if there were any) and interviews that are not finished on the first night.

Counter-terrorism police said the inquiry isn’t over. They said conditions apply. They said a state link has not been ruled out. Those sentences he said only make sense if the evidence trail was still live. A live trail is why Parliament built the two-week window. But watching the guy read out the statement showed me in his body language, tone and eye movements that releasing those five men was NOT his or his department’s decision.

Walking five men after roughly a day is what you do with a pub fight, not with a suspected terrorist attack on a bomber base. I’ve sat in enough interrogation rooms to know the difference between a custody clock and a political ceiling. Nobody had to shout an order down a phone. Someone in the political building above the investigators decided that charging British nationals on Monday, with Iran already denying it, Washington watching the runway, and a Labour conference where the main topics of discussion were prioritizing Palestinian and other refugees settling in the UK, was uglier than bail and a holding statement.

The law allowed them to keep the door shut. Yet the door opened anyway in half of the most minimum time. That’s the story. That for me is the only story here. Not “they were innocent.” Not “the case collapsed.” The statute was not exhausted, but the appetite was. The real question is who, and most importantly, why?

Because Competence Is Just For The 'Little People'

The stories told in the controversial BBC documentary Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone still need to be aired, according to a co-director of the film, despite the “serious mistake” he acknowledges it made.

Some ‘mistake’. Let me remind you what that was: 

In his first interview since the corporation pulled the programme after it emerged its then 13-year-old narrator was the son of a Hamas official, Jamie Roberts apologised for the part his independent production company, Hoyo Films, played in the controversy and said he regretted that it “upset a lot of people”.

Not regretted it as the unconscionable error it was, regretted what people felt about it. A very modern ‘apology’…

Speaking ahead of his new Channel 4 immigration documentary England ‘Til I Die, the Bafta and Emmy award-winning producer said Hoyo had “learned from” the mistake it made and “changed to improve things” by focusing on its editorial procedures to “make sure that never happens again”.

Again. Who’d ever employ someone like this ever again? Well, it appears Channel 4 will....

Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone aired last February and was narrated by a Palestinian boy called Abdullah – one of four contributors living in Gaza’s so-called “safe zone”. However, after details of Abdullah’s father’s employment became public, the film was removed from BBC iPlayer and the corporation ordered a review. That revealed last July that the programme breached accuracy guidelines. Hoyo had not “intentionally misled” the BBC about Abdullah’s father’s position, which it believed was “a civilian or technocratic position”, but did not inform the corporation about it. It concluded the BBC also bore responsibility for leaving some questions unanswered.

And now, despite that, he’s at it again. This time banging another progressive drum. If this one has flaws, Channel 4 can't say they weren't warned:

Hoyo’s first major project since Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone is on another controversial subject. England ‘Til I Die involves Roberts following anti-immigration supporters – filming protests, intimidation and violence in English towns.Roberts said England ‘Til I Die was an attempt to understand why the issue had escalated, most recently with the rise of balaclava-clad far-right protesters.

We all know why the situation has escalated.  And we won't get any documentary produced by this hack to tell us the truth.

Welfare

This did catch me offguard after a rough night but it certainly deserves at least reading through. It's today's TPA newsletter.

Welfare Hotspots

We kicked things off on Monday with the news that 2.4 million working age Brits (6.5 per cent) were, as of March 2026, receiving universal credit (UC) with no requirement to work, entitling them to an additional UC payment worth up to £429.80 per month, on top of any other benefits they receive. 

In 25 council areas, at least one in ten working age adults hold limited capability for work and work-related activity (LCWRA) status. Blackpool had the highest proportion of their population with LCWRA at 14.1 per cent, compared to an average of 8.3 per cent across the North West.

Our findings showed a big regional divide with Wales, the North East, and North West making up 9 of the top 10 local authorities with the highest rates of LCWRA. By contrast, 8 out of the 10 council areas with the lowest rates are in the South East.

Particularly alarming was that 804,476 people in their 20s and 30s were holding LCWRA status, 4.2 per cent and 5.5 per cent respectively. Indeed, in seven local authorities, the share of 20 to 29 year olds on LCWRA was higher than 60 to 64 year olds, places like West Devon, North Norfolk, Monmouthshire, and Wealden. Check out the full briefing paper here. 

As John O’Connell told the Sun: “These welfare hotspots underline just how severe Britain’s benefits crisis has become. The health element of universal credit is supposed to be for special cases, but now it means millions of working age people are given extra money to sit at home without any requirement to look for work.”

One-in-Five Receiving UC

Of course this was just the tip of the iceberg. On Tuesday, we revealed that one-in-five working age people are now claiming universal credit.

Of those aged between 20 and 64 in England and Wales, 20.3 per cent were receiving universal credit as of May 2026. Again, there were particularly worrying figures for younger age groups as 1.3 million (17 per cent) of those in their 20s and 2 million (23 per cent) in their 30s claimed UC. Together this was 3.3 million people under the age of 40. 

Among those in their 20s, claims for UC reached 33.9 per cent in Blackpool followed by Thanet at 31.6 per cent, and Great Yarmouth and Hartlepool at 30.8 per cent. The picture was even bleaker for those in their 30s as it hit 40.6 per cent in Blackpool, 38.4 per cent in Great Yarmouth, and 38 per cent in Hartlepool. At the other end of the spectrum, council areas in London occupied 8 out of the top ten spots for claims among people aged 60 to 64, with 51 per cent in Tower Hamlets.

In 15 council areas, at least 30 per cent of the working age population received UC while in 54 local authorities, the figures showed that a quarter are claiming. Blackpool topped this list too with 35.2 per cent in receipt in May 2026. 

Speaking to journalists, William Yarwood said: “In some places, dependency on universal credit has become endemic. Generations are being dumped on benefits: written off and condemned to a life of dependency as ministers make it harder for them to find a job. If Andy Burnham was serious about growth in every postcode, he would be making it more affordable to hire young people.” Soon enough he followed up on Talk explaining to Julia Hartley-Brewer which you can watch here.

While some of those who are receiving universal credit are in work, having 20 per cent of the population reliant on benefits is clearly unsustainable.

Young People PIP Surge in Home Counties

Universal credit claims are just part of the problem. 

On Wednesday, more headline-setting analysis from the TPA wonks found a 17.1 per cent increase in working age personal independence payment (PIP) claims between April 2024 and April 2026, with the largest percentage increases among younger claimants. 

The number of 16 to 19-year-olds receiving PIP rose by 22.8 per cent, equivalent to an additional 37,957 claimants, while the number in their twenties increased by 23.6 per cent, or 87,919, the highest rate amongst working age groups. Nigel Farage’s Clacton constituency had the highest proportion of 16 to 19 year olds at 16.3 per cent, while 6 of the top 10 are found in the North West, including Liverpool Walton (15.6 per cent), Wallasey (15.5 per cent), Birkenhead (14.9 per cent), and Bootle (14.8 per cent). For those in their 20s, Isle of Wight East had the highest proportion at 13.4 per cent.

Four of the ten constituencies recording the fastest increases for 16 to 19 year olds were in the South East, despite enjoying some of the strongest educational, earnings and employment prospects in Britain. Another three could be found in the East of England. Kemi Badenoch’s North West Essex came out top (54.7 per cent), along with places like Sussex Weald (54.4 per cent), Chichester (51.2 per cent), and Canterbury (50.8 per cent). See the full findings here.

Shimeon Lee was absolutely right when he spoke to the Daily Mail, questioning whether we’re really witnessing such a substantial deterioration in health or if the criteria for claiming PIP, changes in diagnosis, and the benefits system itself are driving younger people in affluent areas to claim state support: “The explosion of PIP claims in leafy parts of the Home Counties begs the question of whether there are people with sharp elbows gaming the system. Ministers must urgently review eligibility for PIP, ensure support only goes to those truly in need by means-testing, and ease the burden on hard-working taxpayers.”

What’s being claimed for?

A key issue here is what people are being able to claim for. Diving into the data, the TPA team uncovered a massive explosion in claims for autism, mixed anxiety and depressive disorder (MADD), and ADHD. Across parliamentary constituencies in England and Wales, PIP claims for MADD increased by an average of 108.5 per cent between April 2021 and April 2026, while autism claims rose by 136.6 per cent.

Overall, psychiatric disorders accounted for an average of 39 per cent of PIP claims across constituencies, rising to 51.7 per cent in Bristol Central. ADHD, autism and MADD together accounted for more than half of all PIP claims attributed to psychiatric conditions.

Alongside the rise in psychiatric disorders, we found 52,210 are now getting PIP for non-specific back pain, where no specific underlying cause has been identified making symptoms harder to verify independently. The number of claimants with non-specific back pain as their main disabling condition increased by 58.9 per cent in five years.

London had the highest rate in England and Wales, with 2.2 per cent of PIP claimants, or 10,966, compared with 1.3 per cent nationally. Indeed, all ten constituencies with the highest rates were in London. Queen’s Park and Maida Vale topped the table at 4.2 per cent, more than three times the England and Wales average.

Perhaps most shockingly, areas with the greatest concentrations of physically demanding employment actually had lower rates of non-specific back pain claims. Among the quarter of constituencies with the lowest levels of manual and industrial employment, non-specific back pain accounted for 1.55 per cent of PIP claimants compared to 1.17 per cent with the highest.

Anne Strickland was bang on in her assessment that the findings should “set alarm bells ringing about how easily hard-to-verify conditions can qualify for Pip. When claims are highest in areas with the least manual and industrial work, taxpayers are entitled to ask whether the system is being gamed.”

Taking to Talk, John told listeners: “The concerning thing is actually the growth since 2021… it is that rise that’s giving people a sense of ‘hang on, are we really on top of this? Are we really making sure that the eligibility criteria are stringent enough to make sure that people aren’t gaming the system?’”

A nation of taxpayers

Of course, there was only one topic of conversation for this week’s episode of a nation of taxpayers. Shimeon and William joined Duncan Barkes in the TPA studio to discuss the growing cost of Britain’s welfare state, examining the rise in working-age benefit claims, the sharp growth in PIP claims linked to mental health conditions, the parts of the country where dependency is most concentrated, and what these trends mean for taxpayers.

Catch the latest episode of a nation of taxpayers on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, or watch now on YouTube.

Not forgetting the cars

Rounding off the week, yesterday we revealed the shocking 79.9 per cent average rise in enhanced mobility PIP claims, giving those who qualify access to the Motability scheme. Over 2 million people.

In case you were wondering, the Motability scheme allows the extra benefit to be exchanged for a far more generous package including a new car on a rolling three year lease, multiple driver insurance, breakdown cover, servicing & MOT, a home charging point for electric vehicles, and an exemption from vehicle excise duty.

And now for something completely different

This week’s blog comes to us from former TPA chairman and ex-treasury economist, Mike Denham. Mike takes a look at recent productivity data from the Office for National Statistics and whether it means good news for taxpayers. Spoiler: not likely.

……

JH: Phew, I was not expecting that much in the TPA newsletter but obviously we must run it … going to put it at OoL and Jstack as well, plus hopefully Julia will link to it later on X. Hoping that makes up for reprinting 90% of today’s newsletter.

Decision time is nearing

First some general principles, then some specifics:

The most serious political delusion in the UK:

First up is the “hold your nose and vote Reform” strategic stance, on the evidence of faux polls from YouGov, Survation and others, whilst the reality is that they, the MSM, both national and regional and the Establishment in general, are putting out this “framing”, which middle-Britain laps up … relying heavily on the second dellusion.

The second delusion is that Reform is somehow “rightwing” and so all “the right” need do is “patch up differences and unite”. The reality is that “the right” which the Establishment are putting out as existing, is really all of us people wanting it all to stop, from the massed invasion pressuring everything from housing to medical services.

There are many current Reform leaners I know on X, ground level folk, good people, and they and we are all putting out exactly the same concerns, though with different angles up front. For example, our corner is behind the raped girls and women.

The third illusion is that the Reform honchos are somehow anything like the ground level voters … they are two completely different things. Farage is a showman, charismatic to middle-class ladies watching tele … the agenda is so simple to see, and it comes down to globalist and mussie money … he gets power and it’s Mahmoud 2.0, through Taqiyya Zia. See Tracy above.

As for Restore … they have to sort out the birthright ethnicity versus ancestral ethnicity question … perfect example:

Screenshot only, not clip

The perfect example of “really British” against “foreign agent” is Mahmoud. What of the Danny Thommo saga? There’s a cynical theory that he is three letter agency, that the whole thing is kabuki theatre, the real issue being legal immigration and massive procreation beyond anything the fractured west can achieve, esp. given the male-female divide, plus vaxxes and food poisoning.

But don’t ignore the fighting age men in boxes, fed, clothed, ready to be used against Britain.

What to do? Sit at home and wait for Danny Thommo and two thou hotheads in balaclavas to do all our fighting, while we hope the crocodile eats us last?

Oh and don’t forget conscription to send youth to the Russian meat mangler.

The 'Guardian' Is Against The Idea...

..but it'd be all for it if the men just called themselves women.

It is not hard to see why ministers are considering converting parts of the women’s prison estate for use by men. While Andy Burnham’s decision to narrow the early-release scheme was born of political necessity, it has made an already acute capacity problem worse.so far. 

That seems to be Bodybag's only talent, so far, everything he touches unravels at speed. Even Starmer didn't disappoint so early into his reign.  

The government is trying to innovate. Last week it was announced that £110m will be spent on creating new cells in existing jails, by converting underused spaces such as storage and laundry areas. Deportations are to be speeded up, if foreign governments can be persuaded to cooperate.

And if they won’t, then we should immediately cut off any aid we give them, plus visa privileges, and send any ambassadorial staff home. 

But nobody believes that these schemes will be enough.

Here it comes, the hidden motive… 

Most women are imprisoned for non-violent offences and pose no threat to public safety. Two out of three have been victims of domestic abuse; one in three have a child under 10. More than a quarter are on remand, so have not even been sentenced. The social and financial costs of locking them up are shockingly high. It is good to see these arguments gaining traction. A landmark review by Jean Corston proposed the replacement of women’s jails with smaller local custodial centres nearly 20 years ago.

Poor weak women shouldn't be expected to face justice like men have to! Typycal... 

But rushing to close a women’s prison, or part of one, in order to free up space for men would be damaging, as experts have pointed out.

Oh! That’s refreshing! 

The single most pressing question is

... just how to stop these psychopaths?

An excerpt from Will Jones at Lord Toby's site, on the latest Net Zero lunacy, a standing joke in the west but fervently believed by the weak of mind and short of real data wokerati:

Labour has launched a Net Zero scheme to transport hot water on barges on the River Thames to heat London homes instead of each home having a gas boiler. The Telegraph has the story.

The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) has earmarked £41 million for a project to launch electric boats that will travel upriver from a power plant in Belvedere, south east London, before pumping water into storage tanks on riverside pontoons.

From here, the water, heated to almost 100 degrees Celsius, would flow through pipes into nearby heat networks, which are systems that supply hot water to multiple buildings from a centralised heat source, rather than each property having its own boiler. The Government has claimed the project could eventually supply up to 650,000 homes.

The scheme, believed to be the first of its kind anywhere in the world, could also serve London landmarks, including the National Theatre, when it launches in 2028.

The Telegraph understands that most of the £41 million funding will go towards extracting waste heat from the Belvedere power plant to warm the water, as well as building four barges. Each barge could hold two million litres of water, equivalent to 80% of the volume of an Olympic-sized swimming pool.

Clearly a very dark joke upon the people of the land, with no regard for the science of the madcap scheme, nor the eye-watering costs.  Someone in power is most certainly "extracting the micturation" as they wipe us out.  You can just picture the planning meeting coming up with this bollox.

And from the comments thread:

Putting this lunacy together with, say, the performing seal, muderous Mengele-Hancock psychopathy of the "Covid" response and killer vaxxes years ... together with young British boots in the paedo, child trafficking, money-laundering, biolab, meat-mangler horror of the Ukraine and you start to see the diseased minds behind all this.

Or Mind, if we wish to get metaphysical about it.

The sole question is ... how to stop these maniacs, the henchmen, myrmidons and the brainwashed, before we truly are largely destroyed, our remnantvenslaved in perpetuity?