No Amount Of Pieces Of Paper Or Government Proclamations Will Change The Basic Fact...

 …that you are a man, and always will be!

Things have been getting worse, but until recently, my life as a transgender woman had not been consumed with worrying about how I’m supposed to live it. That is, until last year’s UK supreme court ruling.

🥱 

In fact, when I’ve worried about needing a bathroom or felt hesitant about taking up space when invited to join a women’s network, it’s been other women who have made me feel welcome and pushed me to stop worrying. This was the reality for many trans people in the UK until 2025, when the court decided that “man” and “woman” in the Equality Act must refer to “biological sex”, upending decades of shared understanding of the law.

The handmaidens who are pleased to sell their sisters’ rights out for woke brownie points have overstepped one too many times. Your movement has proved to be a liability.

In a human sense, the government is leading us into a dark reality with its eyes wide open. It can stop this at any time. The government’s own equality impact assessment admits that the impact on all trans people will likely be wide-ranging and negative, and notes trans women could face “disproportionate risk of violence and sexual assault” if we are left only with access to men’s services.

Yes, men are a threat to women’s safety, that’s exactly why we don’t want you in our spaces! 

Trans people will be left with a choice between researching toilet provision every time we go out or living our lives as we always have – only now without the protection of the law. In reality, our worlds will get smaller, and so many trans people who enrich our communities will self-exclude, leaving everyone worse off.

How exactly do they do that?  

Far from Andy Burnham’s preferred “live and let live”, not fixing this will define Labour’s legacy on LGBTQ+ rights for a generation.

We tried 'live and let live', but you weren't satified with that, it wasn't enough that you were tolerated in your kink, you always pushed for more, more, more - insisting on changing birth certificates and invading female spaces, and women finally had enough and the Supreme Court agreed.

Trans people’s legal protections, hard-won and vital, clearly no longer work. We elect our politicians to be legislators, and they must fix the law itself. Not doing so is a political choice, and they cannot hide behind the courts in making it.

That's exactly how laws are made in this country, you loon!

The next loony idea

Over at Unherdables (click my name in sidebar if interested) is a look at an act of treason over this past year by one person and in one of the twelve screenshots (near impossible to redact at Orphans so shan’t), it shows that the whole cause of abused girls has been subverted during that time into three separate “support” groups, of which she was one, plus there’s a new one now started by a former female police officer.

Turns out that one of those support group heads, part of Advance, was being paid by a rival, (main) UK political party with a charismatic leader.

Glancing back at recent history … blogger Vox Day, two decades ago, introduced a term called “projection”, in which one political group behaves badly but then accuses its victims of doing or being precisely what it is doing or being. Plus psyops such as NLP, in which one group sends an apparatchik to “chair” a meeting of movers and shakers, thus controlling the framing, even the language used and recorded.

Classic fabianism … or rather classic ideological subversion. One of the first examples of this, shown on the net in the mid 2000s, was by Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov, from a series of lectures and interviews in the mid 80s in America, and below is a summary of how it’s done.

1. Demoralization (15–20 years): A long-term phase aimed at changing the ideological conditioning of a population. Educational systems and cultural institutions are infiltrated to distort public perception of reality. During this time, the public loses the ability to recognize objective truth or assess factual evidence logically.

2. Destabilization: Societal relations, government legitimacy, and fundamental institutions are deliberately destabilized. Operatives who were previously planted in the first phase begin entering leadership positions and taking overt political action.

3. Crisis: Legitimate bodies of power become paralyzed and can no longer cohere around a common narrative or effectively govern. Subversives focus on installing artificial, non-elected bodies or bureaucracies as the new arbiters of public decision-making.

4. Normalization: The crisis culminates in a violent or structural shift where the revolution is declared “over”. The newly self-appointed rulers consolidate power and enforce a new normal, often resulting in totalitarian control.

Taking the words at the end of point 1 above: “During this time, the public loses the ability to recognize objective truth or assess factual evidence logically,” and glancing over at our tele lovin’, World Cup lovin’, Strictly lovin’, Celeb lovin’ or Britain’s Got Talent lovin’ normies in society … what chance do they have to counter fabian psy-ops? Even should they want to?

Thus, any sort of loony ideas without any genuine foundation, from the IPCC to Mad Miliband’s Net Zero obsession, to Harman’s paedo lovin’ policies, breaking down families whilst calling it “freedom to love” or some such crap … this is classic Woke leftism, part of fabianism. Before we even get to the invaders of the west … who enabled these things?

And why? Why would they want to? Why are these essentially unhappy people gaining power and enforcing such ruinous policy? That’s a whole series of posts.

Here’s an example from Lord Toby’s site today:

No, That's Just Called 'Noticing'

Local social media groups are fuelling misinformation in areas with no reliable sources of news, according to an investigation that reveals the scale of fake news flowing to vulnerable communities across Britain. Misinformation was nearly three times more common in areas with little or no recognised local journalism, according to a study of tens of thousands of posts seen by the Guardian. Immigration and Islamophobia were the most common topics of misinformation across Facebook and X.

The findings, by the Social Market Foundation (SMF) thinktank, are based on the analysis of more than 125,000 social media posts across local Facebook groups, X searches and Nextdoor communities. They led to immediate calls for action from senior MPs.

A look at the people involved in this enterprise tell you all you need to know.

MPs are concerned about the growing influence of unreliable online groups. With the decline and financial peril faced by local news outlets, inaccurate online forums are filling the void.

And slowly, but surely, they are drawing their plans against us… 

And for only one reason:

The authors of the SMF study described local online groups as “the silent killer of trust in Britain”. Their analysis uncovered faked local authority communications, AI-generated content and misleading claims of councils behaving corruptly.

Au contraire, the real concern is that we can find out things they won’t allow the legacy media to publish from social media. 

Misleading posts...described the Black Lives Matter campaign as a “terrorist group”, above a picture of Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner taking the knee.

Is it misleading? Their antics certainly caused  lot of terror.

Chi Onwurah, the Labour chair of the science and technology select committee, said the findings were “deeply concerning”.“It’s clear that far more must be done to safeguard the public from unreliable online sources that are filling the void left by trusted local news,” Onwurah said.

Even if that local news weren’t missing, it would no longer be trusted. There's a reason people turn to social media.

The SMF research found that two in five local Facebook groups and more than four in five X searches featured at least one piece of misinformation in their most recent 1,000 posts.

Did anyone thing to run the same scan on the MSM? I wonder what it would have found?

Citadels

There's one topic which stuns and dismays me ... and that's citadels or the lack of anyone preparing some around you.

Where I live, I am safe enough against the usual threat, high on a hill, and high within a vast complex, but do you think I go onto the street unprepared?  Even to pick the post up?  The prevailing mood is never self-satisfaction, only "Have I prepared enough?" 🫣

What I am NOT safe against is when that army of orcs, brought in by the politicians, now start their slaughter door to door, on cue - convert or be gouged, mained, raped, murdered.  Arms caches in religious building cellars.  The average dissident has zero concept, zero defences.

Yesterday, "Young Bob", the new Restorer, did an insane thing, actually believing he'd be safe on a British street!

Randomly?  These are Orc details, sent out to prevent anything like what Young Bob was doing, attempting to ... stopping him by whatever means necessary.  Readers, this is not random and feral, it is military and it is psy-ops on the enemy, as they see us, ripe for takeover.

Another thing Young Bob has zero idea of is that this is but one squad from one cult.  There are also packs of blacks.  There are also leftdimwitted feral antifa types ... again, militarily organised.

And what defences did Young Bob have?  He was an overgrown kid, had never had a fight in his life, his body already going into curled up mode.  Where were his bleeding minders?  Where was his DEW by phone?  WTF did he think he was up to?  These backsides are emboldened through Starmer.  He's a weak lump of lard.

What should he have done?  Well for a start, stop thinking any cavalry would save him ... the average Brit on the street is craven.  Any defences he needed to bring ... there are wings of Restore which are trained to headkick.  He could have brought one of those possies of football lads.

But that's not enough. Look, if you're outnumbered, that initial move into your personal space is when you kick off your attack.  Aim?  To disable soft body parts on the other(s), even up the odds, BEFORE initial contact.  Anyone can do that, even a girl.

You'll go to jail.  Yes. True.  In today's effed up law ... yes.

They'll get you within prison.  Yes.

But what's the alternative? To lie on the ground being kicked and stabbed?  That's humiliating, esp. for the country, for the nation.

It's such a strategically bad venue too ... at least by a wall, for crying out loud, with your back covered.

But the single worst characteristic of British people right now is to think that this is not happening ... never to them, personally.

Farage is bad news because he's controlled.  Forget any other party for now.  The mindset of a (especially south-eastern) expectation that this cannot happen to you, personally, is insane.

WAKE UP !

At a minimum, where is your action plan you implement the instant you realise they're closing in?  Have you practised that?  But what about those surrounding you?

Well why are they able to get in behind you anyway?  Where are your minders?  Wot, you never thought of that?

Aaaaagggghhhh!!!

I'm talking here about preparation, then mindset, people.  Harden up your minds for goodness sake, do some training ... I do, even now, even unwell.  It's a mental outlook. Where's mine stem from?  From youth ... boys fighting the whole time ... we were such a bore.

Today's yoof?  Blancmanges inside, viciousness on the outside, zero moral compass.  Brought up by single THOTs.

To keep these isles safe, it needs a fighting mentality for a very start.

Drawing The Wrong Conclusion Again...

 

In preparation for interviewing Pussy Riot’s Maria “Masha” Alyokhina at the Charleston festival, I was reading her new memoir, Political Girl. I thought I remembered the group’s origin story pretty well – in 2012, they performed their anthem, Punk Prayer (Virgin Mary Banish Putin), and two band members were imprisoned for two years in a penal colony, then released slightly early in order to sanitise the country’s reputation before the Sochi Olympics in 2014.

Oh, Russia, awful country where you aren't free to say what you think, eh Zoe?  

The detention of Pussy Riot signalled a significant shift towards the aggressive authoritarianism that is now self-evident, and, in those early days, was expressed and mobilised through misogynistic, patriarchal values-setting built on Christian nationalist foundations.

Say, isn’t there a religion with all those hallmarks that's not Christian, Zoe? I'm sure there is.

Far-right movement-building always includes, and very often starts with, the repression of women. The obvious jumping-off point is reproductive rights, since that’s easily the most effective: a woman who can’t control when and whether to have children isn’t in control of anything.

Funny you should mention repression of women, Zoe…. 

This is why Reform’s Makerfield candidate, Robert Kenyon – surprise, surprise – allegedly has been both anti-abortion and toxically misogynistic on social media and this, crucially, is why Reform’s high command has said explicitly that it has no plans to censure or investigate him.

Reform may not be the answer in the end, but their refusal to play along with the fake concerns from the progressives and censor themselves will get them my vote every time! And focusing on Christians is like shrieking in terror at seeing a grass snake in the garden, while importing black mambas into the neighbourhood.

Again, liberal arguments go in on exactly the wrong pressure point, trying to make it make sense – why, when women constitute so very much of the electorate, would any politician set out to alienate us? We know, from any democracy on Earth that has thrown up a far-right victor, that women don’t vote en masse in the interests of their gender; that some are as susceptible to the politics of domination as some men are. Yet we try to rationalise it on our own terms, and treat misogyny simultaneously like a side dish to the meat of a policy platform, and like a mistake so self-evident that people can be argued out of it.

Now who is making 'a mistake so self-evident'? And if you've failed to notice the elephant in the room marked 'Islam' in this column, I don't feel like wasting time trying to argue you out of ir, I'll just point and laugh instead.

Eight days after Dunkirk

To Orphans readers … apologies for being ill for two days … just could not blog, even at Unherdables.  There is a post about a chart on Digital ID but it’s quite complex to load and I’m not up to it yet.

There’s a two screenshot history though, not all that long after D Day.

Who actually kicked off this rampant raping and murdering?

Decision time … whether to run the lengthy spread on digital ID’s insidious entry to the UK … or look at the court judgment which vindicated these two girls:

Also, how should faces be portrayed by social media … for example, should they be blanked out?

Next aspect … are the girls “feral”, as the SNP and politicians immediately leapt at, the MSM too, their ages not relevant, the youngest charged with offensive weapons, plus lying?

Reminds me of Tulsi outing Mitt Romney yesterday over the trafficking of kids, biolabs etc. and how does he counter it? Russian propaganda he says.  Oh fine, Mitt, let's just skip over it, yes?

Not long after that verdict over Lola and mates, a 17 year old girl was stabbed and slashed, is in hospital … a lady on X wrote this:

And lastly, that evil cow at the EU has rolled out “migration quotas”, i.e. has completely ignored what’s going on and is forcing more of the same over the whole of Europe, on pain of steep penalties, arbitrarily enforced:

But I have not yet answered the question in the post heading ... my take on that question will be across at Unherdables.

But How Was The Food And Drink?

 

Una Grande Libre reads the sign above the entrance to a bar-restaurant in Madrid’s Usera neighbourhood. This was Francisco Franco’s motto for Spain – one, great, free – and it is accompanied by a large portrait of the dictator superimposed on to the window.The exteriors of El Cangrejo in Ciudad Real and Casa Pepe in Despeñaperros are a little bit more subtle, but not much: decorated ostentatiously in the red and yellow of the Spanish flag. The accompanying historical symbols on display, such as the yoke and arrows of the Falange and the Eagle of San Juan, remove any doubt: the year is 2026 and you have encountered one of Spain’s network of bars and restaurants that proudly glorify Franco and his dictatorship.

*shrugs* 

These unsettling and unusual places tell a vivid story about the unique way that Spain deals with its past – or fails to. They seem all the more confusing in the context of Pedro Sánchez’s recent historical memory legislation, and beg the question: how do these places still exist?

Mayne because they serve delicious food? 

Looking at the letter of the law, you can’t help but wonder how they have been able to continue operating so brazenly. The Democratic Memory Law requires the removal of any symbols that glorify the dictatorship or its protagonists from spaces “with public access”, which would include bars and restaurants.

The reality of its implementation, lawyer Eduardo Ranz tells me, is very different: “Under this law, it’s only the Ministry of Democratic Memory that has the ability to open an inquiry against these places. What I don’t understand is why, in these last four years, they have not done so, despite these establishments breaking this law. Removing these Francoist symbols is one of the government’s most important unresolved issues.”

Well, that's understandable, spain does after all have far more pressing concerns. 

Despite the many setbacks faced by the historical memory movement – most recently, the overturning of a €10,001 fine levelled at the Falange for its public tributes to its founder, José Antonio Primo de Rivera – there have been some advances in the wake of the 2022 legislation.

But the trend is ever rightwards in Spanish politics for much the same reasons as elsewhere.

Spain’s network of Francoist restaurants and bars is a continual, real-world reminder of this. So until something changes, you will still be able to see a 2-metre tall picture of the Spanish dictator proudly displayed in a restaurant window in the nation’s capital.

'But will I get a decent paella and a good gutsy red there?', is the question most tourists will have.

"Them" are at it again

Quick report first on the condition of Stephen Ogilvie:

Now to Them’s latest (mooted) blow to the peoples of the various western nations, specifically to the EU zone (inc. the UK, thx to Two-Tier) and more specifically again … through the corrupted and egregious Kendall:

And in comments below that X post:

Obviously, Them must quickly kill off this instafeedback, westwide … so the obvious dogooder cause for the normies is to “protect the children”, a variation of the old, faux “for the children” concern that miscreants use to cover themselves.

What all the old-stagers on soc-med remember is the No2ID campaign we supported a couple of decades back.

Now, with me being 14 years old, therefore ineligible for govt issued ID, therefore I cannot comply with all this guff, therefore, like all 14 year olds, I’m looking for ways around it, one being VPN, we Gen Alphas are smiling … there are quite a few ways, though, admittedly, old fuddy-duddy non techies of 50 and over might find it a bit daunting to get around.

Remember, You Clapped For This Wretched 'Service'...

A five-year-old was left traumatised, bleeding and in severe pain after a physician associate wrongly prescribed her a vaginal pessary, according to a damning report by the health ombudsman. The parliamentary and health service ombudsman said there were “multiple failures” in the care of the girl, who saw a physician associate (PA) at a GP practice in the East Midlands after complaining of itching and vaginal discharge. The PA suspected thrush and recommended a vaginal pessary and cream. The five-year-old’s mother, who believed her daughter was being seen by a GP, questioned the treatment and the size of the pessary, but was reassured that it was appropriate.

PAs do not have prescribing rights and their work must be supervised by a doctor who approves the prescription. But the ombudsman found there was no discussion between the PA and GP before the GP authorised the prescription, even though vaginal pessaries are not suitable for prepubescent children and the girl’s symptoms were consistent with vulvovaginitis, not thrush. There was also no questioning of the prescription by the pharmacy that dispensed it.

And then, to compound the error, sicced social services on the mother to prevent complaints:

The mother said that after inserting the pessary, her daughter began to bleed and scream in pain, while the cream burned the girl’s skin. She took her to see an out-of-hours doctor. However, the girl was so distressed and in pain that she asked the doctor not to examine her internally, causing the GP to raise concerns about possible sexual abuse and to contact safeguarding services.

The whole rotton edifice of the NHS needs tearing down. 

She said: “I had huge guilt for doing what the PA, who I thought was a GP, told me and feeling as if I had inflicted this trauma on my daughter. 

“But I trusted what [they] told me. How are we meant to trust healthcare professionals now?”

You never were in the first place, hasn't the mutiple breachs of trust told you that long before this happened? 

The ombudsman said it recommended the GP pay the mother £1,000 and the pharmacy pay £500 and that both organisations had to take action to ensure this did not happen again.

Pitiful, and what would ensure this doesn't happen again would be the sacking of all involved.