Enemies Of The State...

Immigration judges granted a convicted child sex offender the right to enter Britain after ruling that barring him would breach his human rights. The latest shocking example of a ‘deeply perverse’ ruling from the immigration courts involves Jamaican paedophile Oniel Spence, who was jailed in the United States for a sexual offence against a 15-year-old girl.

It really shouldn’t surprise me anymore, the depths of depravity of British judges seems fully equal to that of Yank paedophiles...

Details of the case are revealed by the Daily Mail for the first time today after Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp this week blasted judges’ ‘tyranny’ over the immigration system.

It’s nice to see a Tory speaking out about this, though one wonders why he didn’t speak before when his party was in a position to do something about it. 

Spence, now 43, applied to come to the UK in 2023 to join his wife and child - who are both British nationals - but was blocked by the Home Office. Officials barred his application on the grounds his exclusion was ‘conducive to the public good’. The paedophile then lodged an appeal at the lower immigration tribunal and won permission to come here from immigration judge Jonathan Greer.

It’s nice to see that they’re naming the judges, and I would hope that people in a position to provide services and goods to them take note of this 

His lawyers argued preventing him from entering Britain had breached Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which covers the right to ‘private and family life’. The Home Secretary at the time, Yvette Cooper, appealed to the upper immigration tribunal against the decision. But judges Madeleine Reeds and Nathan Moxon refused her arguments.

Did no one point out that there was nothing stopping them from going to him to resolve this? 

Current Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood then brought a further case at the Court of Appeal.Earlier this month senior judges overturned the original decision, describing it as ‘perverse’, and ordered the case to be re-heard by the first-tier tribunal.A Home Office spokesman said: ‘We will do everything in our power to continue contesting this case.'

Well, why not? It’s just taxpayers money after all. 

The Betrayal of Brexit by the political class, under the deep state

The Brexit referendum was on this day in 2016 and the wrongdoers in the heading tried everything to rig it. Having failed, mainly due to the north, the various PMs ensured Brexit never properly happened, the traitors.

Cameron’s promise:

Ethnicity two

Last evening’s post on ethnicity began by looking at a TV show and movie, one from England, one from the US. What I did not mention though was that the Miss Marple series was coproduced by the 7 Network in Australia. Stop watching? Keep watching?

All right, let’s say a film in Arabic came on the box, with the strangled caterwauling of a man having a vasectomy without an anaesthetic, just as Birmingham must be experiencing right now. For added zest, they’ve declared that they’re taking over the country and slaughtering you. Nice.

Then we get the schoolkids of thousand year old British stock (of one of the tribes) being attacked and beaten up by gangs of blacks. Then the habit of British females putting it about with those very blacks. Producing mulatto children. Does it matter at all or should we all, in our most libertarian way, welcome a muddy soup of ethnicities, especially while at least two of those are trying to wipe out the Brit one? It’s not a question resolved by instalabelling Brits in danger of becoming a minority as farrightnazis … thereby closing all discussion, with autocratic govt incarcerating anyone who dares raise the issue, in order to cow the natives.

Am I farrightnazi by asking readers to watch William Powell and Myrna Loy in The Thin Man, an American classic movie? What about the caterwauling movie in Arabic? Or a Bollywood movie? Is my first request there ageist or generationist, the film released in 1941?

In short, what criteria matter and which do not so much? My WN1 was of British stock, WN2 Serbian, fiancee Russian, another close lady Ukrainian, one American, one Australian. Was that muddying the waters? One gf was Muslim until pressure from everyone without exception made it unviable. Another was part Jewish, ended by the Russian fiancee.

Yet I vote Restore, not Reform.

What’s the resolution to the whole thing, poised as we are to be slaughtered by the fighting aged men pouring into the country, installed in hotels and military barracks?  By the way, the calmest and most sane, most fun lady was WN1, of British stock.  Wonder what that says?

Ethnicity

 IYE brought Miss Marple earlier … did I post and get on with the next job? Did I heck … I watched 3×54 mins of it, thinking what to have tomorrow apart from Dragnet.

Suddenly youtube dropped William Powell and Myrna Loy in Shadow of Thin Man in my lap … had to check out the embeddability … yep, fine but British audiences and modern American might not know about this pair.

Essentially, we’re talking screen chemistry and knowing the back story helps too. The pair might not grab you, especially in this slightly lesser third episode but it sure grabbed audiences, that whole series … they could not get enough late 30s till just postwar. I’m sure you can guess why, given the tough wartime and the need for wisecracking comedy.

What audiences also picked up on was the real chemistry too between the the protagonists … the audiences could not get enough, plus the copy is excellent … someone has done a labour of love there. When I was in Russia, similar happened with what they called staroye kino or old cinema … if one such filum was on tele, I observed natives dropping everything, grabbing a drink and sitting around, watching. With the end of communism, it was their equivalent of us and the US.

That’s why the notion of outposts of Christendom being at war with other outposts is sheer bleedin’ stoopid. Or else the psychos above us are pushing this … which is a theme at this blog.

Anyway, Rupert yesterday was goaded into attacking “ethnats” … see the misuse of the label, and Restorers know that behind this was Alistair Hilton, his “media manager” who calls this BNP types, fascists … doing the Left’s work for them.

Stoopid Rupert was doing this Faragist backtracking. Reaction was swift:

Did I ever go out on the street shouting: “Down with Russia, Rule Britannia!” Did I ever try that in the States or Canada? Did I suddenly insist, if the family were watching a movie, to take it out and put one of mine instead? That sort of thing is beyond the pale.

Attitude. Behaviour. When in someone else’s country.

So WTF was Rupert trying to pull?

A 'Far Right' Fantasy? Not So

As all such, it never materialosd, being a figmentt of left wing imagination.

Zürich on a Sunday morning can feel like the day after Armageddon: so empty, so calm, despite being Switzerland’s biggest city. But then the church bells erupt across the lake basin, and a jogger trots by like a polite deer in aerodynamic sunglasses, and one knows that all is fine in this proudly impeccable place, where little is left to chance and the authorities even track the city’s pigeons with GPS.

Sound good to me… 

Swiss people know they are lucky. A highly diversified economy keeps salaries high and income inequality comparatively low. A British friend once remarked that our supermarkets feel like the gourmet hall at Harrods. The state makes business easy. Hiking paths are maintained by armies of volunteers. In a restless world, Switzerland remains a place where one can exhale.

But..? There has to be a ‘but’, right Reader?  This is the ‘Guardian’ after all. 

The problem with luck, of course, is that one becomes afraid of losing it. But fortune has a tendency to make conservatives of us all, of course. Yet how to preserve what one cherishes? The answer offered by the far-right Swiss People’s Party (SVP) is to freeze the country. On 14 June, Swiss voters will decide whether the permanent population should be capped at 10 million. That threshold could be reached sometime between 2033 and 2041. Polls suggest the vote will be on a knife edge.

And what makes them ‘far right’? 

Switzerland’s population has indeed grown rapidly. In the last 25 years, it jumped from 7.2 to 9.1 million, with roughly four-fifths of that increase driven by immigration. The SVP, the country’s largest political party, blames this for rising rents, crowded trains and “density stress”: a reminder to democrats across Europe that a healthy economy won’t stop the far right.

Well, it doesn't stop the conditions that lead to the 'far right' - often nothing of the sort, just ordinary citizens noticing that they are being replaced - so why the surprise?

Should this referendum pass, and should the population then exceed 10 million, Berne would be required to terminate its agreement with the EU on the free movement of people.

Well, now we know.  On a 60% turnout, the vote was rejected by 55% to 45%.

If there is one near-uncontested lesson from modern economic history, it is that open societies win. Openness to immigration was long the defining superpower of the US. Japan’s strict immigration policy explains its dismal growth performance, and the fact that its average effective retirement age for men stands at 69.5 years.

History is not especially kind to societies that confuse preservation with paralysis.

It’s not especially kind to those who welcome in the barbarians at the gates, either. 

A summer solstice tale of the UK media

This is a tale of censorship in which any pundit, pollie or otherwise interviewed person is going to have his/her responses recorded, then later cut behind the scenes in order to either overemphasise what happened or else to misrepresent that.

There's a certain "known-known" about it ... GB News is Farage Media, as with Talk TV, X is maybe more Restore friendly ... any of the MSM tends more Uniparty but if private, then that's a debate for another time.

For example, the egregious Cathy Newman (remember Jordan Peterson) ... well, it's a private company.

Not so the Beeb of course, paid for by tele users and others.  Observe:

In one sense ... to admit you plan to edit and twist something around ... to admit it upfront ... well at least it's admitted.  And GB News is hardly unbiased, is it? It's highly p***ed that this upstart Restore did as it did, even if both votes combined were still fewer than Burnham's.

Which then gets us to how the count was conducted.  Unsupervised by any "independent" for sure.

When the cat gets out of the bag

The Deep State, plus its govt branch in the UK, its organs, plus NGOs, letter agencies, the media, you get the idea, are all hellbent on suppressing details of horrors ... and then this happens:

... then the cat's out of the bag ... innit?

And Them (alluding to those of paragraph one)  either find themselves on the backfoot, trying to suppress X ... or else are all part of the Grand Plan to get the indigenous v invading savages conflagration going ... all those weapons stashes in religious buildings up and down the country are doing nothing, after all.

Next step?

No Amount Of Pieces Of Paper Or Government Proclamations Will Change The Basic Fact...

 …that you are a man, and always will be!

Things have been getting worse, but until recently, my life as a transgender woman had not been consumed with worrying about how I’m supposed to live it. That is, until last year’s UK supreme court ruling.

🥱 

In fact, when I’ve worried about needing a bathroom or felt hesitant about taking up space when invited to join a women’s network, it’s been other women who have made me feel welcome and pushed me to stop worrying. This was the reality for many trans people in the UK until 2025, when the court decided that “man” and “woman” in the Equality Act must refer to “biological sex”, upending decades of shared understanding of the law.

The handmaidens who are pleased to sell their sisters’ rights out for woke brownie points have overstepped one too many times. Your movement has proved to be a liability.

In a human sense, the government is leading us into a dark reality with its eyes wide open. It can stop this at any time. The government’s own equality impact assessment admits that the impact on all trans people will likely be wide-ranging and negative, and notes trans women could face “disproportionate risk of violence and sexual assault” if we are left only with access to men’s services.

Yes, men are a threat to women’s safety, that’s exactly why we don’t want you in our spaces! 

Trans people will be left with a choice between researching toilet provision every time we go out or living our lives as we always have – only now without the protection of the law. In reality, our worlds will get smaller, and so many trans people who enrich our communities will self-exclude, leaving everyone worse off.

How exactly do they do that?  

Far from Andy Burnham’s preferred “live and let live”, not fixing this will define Labour’s legacy on LGBTQ+ rights for a generation.

We tried 'live and let live', but you weren't satified with that, it wasn't enough that you were tolerated in your kink, you always pushed for more, more, more - insisting on changing birth certificates and invading female spaces, and women finally had enough and the Supreme Court agreed.

Trans people’s legal protections, hard-won and vital, clearly no longer work. We elect our politicians to be legislators, and they must fix the law itself. Not doing so is a political choice, and they cannot hide behind the courts in making it.

That's exactly how laws are made in this country, you loon!

The next loony idea

Over at Unherdables (click my name in sidebar if interested) is a look at an act of treason over this past year by one person and in one of the twelve screenshots (near impossible to redact at Orphans so shan’t), it shows that the whole cause of abused girls has been subverted during that time into three separate “support” groups, of which she was one, plus there’s a new one now started by a former female police officer.

Turns out that one of those support group heads, part of Advance, was being paid by a rival, (main) UK political party with a charismatic leader.

Glancing back at recent history … blogger Vox Day, two decades ago, introduced a term called “projection”, in which one political group behaves badly but then accuses its victims of doing or being precisely what it is doing or being. Plus psyops such as NLP, in which one group sends an apparatchik to “chair” a meeting of movers and shakers, thus controlling the framing, even the language used and recorded.

Classic fabianism … or rather classic ideological subversion. One of the first examples of this, shown on the net in the mid 2000s, was by Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov, from a series of lectures and interviews in the mid 80s in America, and below is a summary of how it’s done.

1. Demoralization (15–20 years): A long-term phase aimed at changing the ideological conditioning of a population. Educational systems and cultural institutions are infiltrated to distort public perception of reality. During this time, the public loses the ability to recognize objective truth or assess factual evidence logically.

2. Destabilization: Societal relations, government legitimacy, and fundamental institutions are deliberately destabilized. Operatives who were previously planted in the first phase begin entering leadership positions and taking overt political action.

3. Crisis: Legitimate bodies of power become paralyzed and can no longer cohere around a common narrative or effectively govern. Subversives focus on installing artificial, non-elected bodies or bureaucracies as the new arbiters of public decision-making.

4. Normalization: The crisis culminates in a violent or structural shift where the revolution is declared “over”. The newly self-appointed rulers consolidate power and enforce a new normal, often resulting in totalitarian control.

Taking the words at the end of point 1 above: “During this time, the public loses the ability to recognize objective truth or assess factual evidence logically,” and glancing over at our tele lovin’, World Cup lovin’, Strictly lovin’, Celeb lovin’ or Britain’s Got Talent lovin’ normies in society … what chance do they have to counter fabian psy-ops? Even should they want to?

Thus, any sort of loony ideas without any genuine foundation, from the IPCC to Mad Miliband’s Net Zero obsession, to Harman’s paedo lovin’ policies, breaking down families whilst calling it “freedom to love” or some such crap … this is classic Woke leftism, part of fabianism. Before we even get to the invaders of the west … who enabled these things?

And why? Why would they want to? Why are these essentially unhappy people gaining power and enforcing such ruinous policy? That’s a whole series of posts.

Here’s an example from Lord Toby’s site today:

No, That's Just Called 'Noticing'

Local social media groups are fuelling misinformation in areas with no reliable sources of news, according to an investigation that reveals the scale of fake news flowing to vulnerable communities across Britain. Misinformation was nearly three times more common in areas with little or no recognised local journalism, according to a study of tens of thousands of posts seen by the Guardian. Immigration and Islamophobia were the most common topics of misinformation across Facebook and X.

The findings, by the Social Market Foundation (SMF) thinktank, are based on the analysis of more than 125,000 social media posts across local Facebook groups, X searches and Nextdoor communities. They led to immediate calls for action from senior MPs.

A look at the people involved in this enterprise tell you all you need to know.

MPs are concerned about the growing influence of unreliable online groups. With the decline and financial peril faced by local news outlets, inaccurate online forums are filling the void.

And slowly, but surely, they are drawing their plans against us… 

And for only one reason:

The authors of the SMF study described local online groups as “the silent killer of trust in Britain”. Their analysis uncovered faked local authority communications, AI-generated content and misleading claims of councils behaving corruptly.

Au contraire, the real concern is that we can find out things they won’t allow the legacy media to publish from social media. 

Misleading posts...described the Black Lives Matter campaign as a “terrorist group”, above a picture of Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner taking the knee.

Is it misleading? Their antics certainly caused  lot of terror.

Chi Onwurah, the Labour chair of the science and technology select committee, said the findings were “deeply concerning”.“It’s clear that far more must be done to safeguard the public from unreliable online sources that are filling the void left by trusted local news,” Onwurah said.

Even if that local news weren’t missing, it would no longer be trusted. There's a reason people turn to social media.

The SMF research found that two in five local Facebook groups and more than four in five X searches featured at least one piece of misinformation in their most recent 1,000 posts.

Did anyone thing to run the same scan on the MSM? I wonder what it would have found?