You Think You Despise Journalists...?

You don't despise them enough:

A hospital patient who managed to talk a man out of detonating a bomb in a maternity wing said the would-be attacker “asked for a cuddle” before standing down.

And the article concentrates on the bravery of the man who stopped the attacker…oh, no, my mistake, it does its best to humanise the man who tried to blow up a hospital ward because he had a grudge against the nurses:

Nathan Newby, who stopped an atrocity through an act of kindness, spoke publicly for the first time about his encounter with Mohammad Farooq before receiving the George Medal for bravery.

Farooq, a clinical support worker who took a viable pressure cooker bomb into St James’s hospital in Leeds intending to “kill as many nurses as possible” was jailed for at least 37 years last year. After asking for a cuddle, Farooq told Newby to “phone the police before I change my mind”.

Newby, 35, from Leeds, said he thought Farooq was “probably a nice guy” who was “going through bad things at the time”, and saw himself as someone who was “just in the right place at the right time”.

Typical British self-effacing response to honours, but why the excuses on behalf of utter barbarity? And why make the latter such a feature of the article? 

During his trial, Farooq was called “a self-radicalised lone wolf terrorist”, inspired by the so-called Islamic State group, but also chose the hospital as a target as he had been a clinical support worker there and had a long-running grievance with nurses on his ward.

He said Farooq seemed “normal”, adding: “I don’t judge anybody. Everybody’s different and unique in their own ways aren’t they? I didn’t judge him.”

The State did. Rightly so. Has the 'nudge unit' been at this chap like they tried with the victims of Valdo Calocane? 

Smart euthanasia

As we contemplate, on Palm Sunday, the next ratchetted move on the Reform politburo's part, supporters nicely duped by Nige's controllers:

... so also Dr David McGrogan, Associate Professor of Law at Northumbria Law School, writes at Lord Toby's site about smart meters and how they are planned to control the population during the increasingly chemtrail induced new cold climate, along with other gems such as bovaer halal beef and poisoned land and rivers:

I was thinking about this the other day when reading, as one tends to do over a nice lunch at the local Italian bistro with a pizza and a glass of red, a 2015 position paper on ‘Making the electricity system more flexible and delivering the benefits for consumers’. This was issued by Ofgem (the quango which regulates the energy market in the UK) at the start of the ongoing process to transform our energy market into one governed by “energy smart appliances”. 

These, for those who have been paying attention, are electric devices (your fridge, your washing machine, your EV charger, etc.) which are able to respond to ‘load control’ signals issued through the internet, and thereby reduce or delay energy consumption. Or, to put it more bluntly, appliances which can be controlled remotely so as to limit how much electricity households are able to use. Coming soon to a kitchen near you.

The last time I wrote about this issue in substance was in 2023, not long before the Energy Act 2023 was enacted. That statute created the legal framework within which the use of energy smart appliances could be mandated and regulated. We now find ourselves entering the next stage: gradual implementation. A draft set of regulations, the Energy Smart Appliances Regulations 2026, is currently making its way through Parliament. This, we are told, is the “first phase“.

And so it goes.  Better on the Continent, in far-eastern Europe, downunder or on the American continent?  In a few isolated countries, yes, e.g. Hungary or El Salvador, plus there are signs Europe itself is starting to awaken from its duped state. Some hope. 🍿🍿🍿

Some stats and lists

Sometimes it's necessary to note as many snippets as possible, rather than one long narrative, in order to get an overview.  For example:

Of Course You Did, Because Empty Gestures Are Your Raison d’etre ...

The BBC is 'celebrating' the smoking ban, because of course it is...

Kerr is back at the Calderwood Inn in East Kilbride - a place of special significance not just because it's where he met his wife. It was in this cosy South Lanarkshire pub on the morning of 26 March 2006 that he officially launched the smoking ban. 

"Sadly I had to drink an orange juice because the press were here," Kerr tells BBC Scotland News.

Because the press would be utterly astonished by an MP who drinks and folled by a glass of orange juice... 

Due diligence

Yes, I'm even questioning what "due diligence" involves. Yesterday, a post appeared on X by one JFK Jr who died in a plane crash in 1999. So ... obviously someone is using it as a pseudonym.  However, the information, if true, would be regarded as high grade.

Today, there's another up by "him" on Obama's soc-sec number.  Yes, an Assange type could access it but so could someone inside a letter agency.  In a similar way, a lady who seems to have been abused in an organised way in the 60s and 70s got her story out with the help of a Ted Gunderson, whom deep divers discovered was agency himself.

Throughout all these shenanigans, certain names, apart from corrupt pollies, started to come out.  One such name was Sid Gottlieb, a nasty piece of work, psychologist, who conducted experiments on humans, e.g. using LSD.  There was another called Jolyon West, another Ewen Cameron ... and so it went.

Cut to today and an item by names known as medical writers online:

https://www.reseaprojournals.com/journals/cardiovascular-research/archive/myocarditis-after-sars-cov-2-infection-and-covid-19-vaccination-epidemiology-outcomes-and-new-perspectives

https://x.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/2036782064955961616?s=20

What connection is there between PMcC and those back in the 60s/70s? None as far as I can glean ... until one looks at X's peculiar arrangement of quotes and comments. In short, he was quoting this company:

Why Don't People Want To Raise Their Own Children?

It was all going well. Charlotte, five, was chatting with an AI soft toy called Gabbo at a London play centre about her family, her drawing of a heart to represent them and what makes her happy. She even offered a couple of kisses to the £80 toy with a face like a computer screen. It was when she declared: “Gabbo, I love you”, that the fluent conversation came to an abrupt halt. “As a friendly reminder, please ensure interactions adhere to the guidelines provided,” said Gabbo, awkwardly crashing into its guardrails. “Let me know how you would like to proceed.”

All the warmth and compassion of a speak your weight machine, or indeed, our current Prime Minister. So, mums and dads, how about instead of letting Alexa-in-a-teddy raise your child, how about doing it the old fashioned way? 

The moment came during a University of Cambridge study into the growing number of AI-powered toys hitting shop shelves for early years children.

It's not all parents plonking their kiddy in front of a machine  - some outsource it to a third party to do it instead:

The developmental psychologists behind the study are calling for AI toys that “talk” with young children to be more tightly regulated “to ensure psychological safety by limiting toys’ ability to affirm friendship and other sensitive relational areas with young children”.“Because these toys can misread emotions or respond inappropriately, children may be left without comfort from the toy, and without emotional support from an adult, either,” said Dr Emily Goodacre, a developmental psychologist in the University of Cambridge’s faculty of education.

Whether you#re farming your kiddies out to 'early learning resources' or AI - enabled toys, I feel I must ask, as someone who has never wanted children, why did you even have them in the first place?
?

Consequences

First off ... in 1984/5, Yuri Bezmenov, Soviet defector, gave an interview on "demoralisation" of a society, the word used in a broad sense, from loss of moral compass to a feeling of helplessness down the track.

He said that producing such a result in a society was the result of long planning and it crosses generations, to the point that once the disease gets into families, schools, media, entertainment, the judiciary, medicine ... there's no coming back.

He added that people reach a point, esp. on the Left, where they can be presented with "authentic information" and those people are then unable to reason, to draw valid conclusions, to see that their behaviour has consequences.

Contrived, handed down non-reality, disguised as wisdom, or in other words ... narrative ... replaces real reasoning, mental health plummets and behaviour involves deep depression at core level, interspersed with lashing out.

One consequence for this girl below was set in motion long before the actual incident.  For a start, what on earth was she even doing on her own?  Part of the answer appears further down here.  She simply had not adjusted to new societal realities. Just as with Iryna on that subway train. No concept of danger whatever.  But much "independent, strong woman" about it ... cue disaster in 2025/6.

Or this:

Maybe Campaign To Stop Disease Reaching Our Shores Then?

The father of an 18-year-old school pupil who died after the meningitis outbreak in Kent said his family’s devastation is “immeasurable” as he called for better protection for young people.

What sort of protection?  

Along with the Meningitis Research Foundation, Kenny and his family are calling for the UK to take urgent action to improve access to the MenB vaccination for teenagers and young people.“Juliette’s impact on this world must be lasting change. Now is the time to ensure families are safe from the impact of meningitis B.”

Well, I don't suppose you'll be clamoring to halt the importation of people from the parts of the world where its most prevalent, then? 

Nationhood has its advantages you know

Not sure any true thinker wishes for a return to wartorn Europe ... and communism was sold to Brits, for example, in 1975, along those grounds ... all in the market together, old grievances forgotten. The fact that this was a Bro on Bro war, at least at the start, did not register in the mind of Common Man.

Throw in "love everyone, hug a tree" feminazism and "don't you oppress us, we're as good as any man, better in fact" ... that was a very corrosive, addictive fiction for the modern gal.

The real aim was, under the guise of global sisterhood of man ... to split, play on deep resentments like wormtongues, to destroy real history and substitute unreality for reality ... we see it out there all around in 2026.

Add western infertility, emasculation, full term and beyond abortion, kill the elderly medical centres, the creation of the new manly woman ... and add the invasion of the neanderthals to cap it off ... armed ... and the direction is clear enough.

There are some things which are good about nations ... esp. western culture as it was at ground level, built on Christendom in its ethical and moral values, minus theocrats in pointy hats and high ritual, combined with enlightened ideas of classical liberalism.  Never mind the practicability ... the nation was a useful bulwark against the hordes out there, now within.

Nationhood has another advantage in 2026 ... escape from tyranny ... Guido illustrates this below, sent by one of our core readers:

A Very Convenient Illness

The prominent Swiss academic and Islam scholar Tariq Ramadan has not appeared in court for the first day of his trial in Paris on charges of raping three women in France between 2009 and 2016.The head judge in the case adjourned proceedings until Wednesday and ordered a medical report on Ramadan’s health, after his lawyers said he was in hospital in Geneva because of his multiple sclerosis.

How very convenient. 

Ramadan, who advised previous British governments on Islam and society, denies all the charges in a case that has been seen as one of the biggest repercussions of the #MeToo movement in France.Ramadan, 63, was a professor of contemporary Islamic studies at the University of Oxford before taking a leave of absence in 2017 when rape allegations were first made against him. He took early retirement from Oxford in June 2021.

It's always the ones you least suspect, isn't it?  

Henda Ayari, 41, a former Salafist Muslim who is now a feminist campaigner, went to the police in 2017 to accuse Ramadan of rape, sexual violence, harassment and intimidation. She said he had raped her in a hotel room in the east of Paris in the spring of 2012 during a conference where he was speaking.Another woman, known by the pseudonym Christelle, told investigators Ramadan had raped her in a Lyon hotel room in October 2009 during another conference and subjected her to a violent attack. A third woman said Ramadan had raped her in 2016.

At the start of the investigation in 2017, Ramadan, who is married with four children, denied any form of sexual encounter with the first two women. In 2018, he changed his account, telling investigating judges that he did have sexual relations with Ayari and Christelle, but that they had sought the encounters and fully consented to the “dominant-submissive” relationship.

Bang to rights. Is he going to plead Taqyia?

In 2024, a Swiss appeals court found Ramadan guilty of raping a woman in a Geneva hotel in 2008 and sentenced him to three years in prison, two of them suspended. Switzerland’s highest court upheld the conviction in a ruling last year. Ramadan’s Swiss legal team announced they would take the case to the European court of human rights.

Why do human rights apply to those who don't believe in them?