Strong, Modern Confident Women...

When Ruth O'Grady reluctantly joined a swinging website, having been persuaded by her husband, she says, she told him she would never have sex in a car with a stranger. However, within months she was doing exactly that, and filming it to send to him. She says she had sex with strangers more than 100 times through the website, over an 18-month period. Ruth says she is traumatised and continues to suffer flashbacks.

Ha, angling for sympathy for her own actions, and to think a woman threw herself in front of a racehorse for this woman to plead weakness at the first opportunity. 

She first approached us three years ago and now, after careful consideration, has decided to tell her story using her full name. She wants it to be a warning to other women. She feels anger towards her former husband, Chris, but she also blames the UK's biggest swinging website. It gave him access to hundreds of men, she says, who he could ask to have sex with her.

Of course she does, after all big tech is the villain in every story these days. 

For eight months, prompted by Ruth's story, the BBC has been investigating the UK's swinging scene. Some people told us they take part because they genuinely want to, but we found this is not always the case.

Oh how I long for the days when journalists ‘made their excuses and left’!

Within months, she was having sex with multiple men a week, Ruth says, sometimes as many as four in a day. She did arrange some of the meetings herself, she says, and would appear enthusiastic about swinging, but she now says this was something she never truly wanted to do.

Sounds like a rationalisation to me. 

Ruth says the encounters took an horrific toll. She contracted sexually transmitted infections, she got pregnant, and while recovering from an abortion she says Chris arranged for someone to have oral sex with her. "I realised [Chris] really doesn't care about my body or the pain I was going through," Ruth says.

Chris was investigated by the police under coercive control and other laws after Ruth made a report, but no charges followed. Police pointed to instances in the couple's WhatsApp messages where Ruth had appeared enthusiastic about swinging.

Hoist by her own petard, oh dear! 

Ruth's story raises a central question: how and why can people appear to agree, even enthusiastically, to sex they do not want? Consent can be complicated, an expert tells us. "It's quite possible for people to appear to consent to sex they don't want," says Prof Nicola Gavey, from the University of Auckland, who has researched unwanted sex since the 1980s.

What a job! I wonder if anyone vets his hard drive? 

Intelligence

Lord T, our near resident computer boffin, may have been referring to this:

... when commenting across the way:

Intelligence isn’t a very good measure. We class intelligence as memorising a list of numbers and a few processes or someone that can speak properly with big words. Some people are great at exams but have no common sense. Some people have several Phds but can’t balance a cheque book. 

People are generally dumb because they are no taught to think for themselves. Those that can have real intelligence but don’t get any credit because they don’t have a certificate or the right background.

Mice have more intelligence than our highly educated elite. Mice can easily be fooled because we can set traps for them, they need food and they can’t think things though. Our elite do stupid things because they think what the want is a need and they must have it and they can’t think things though to a conclusion. 

They are the lemmings of our society but unlike lemmings they will take us with them, by trying to talk us into their schemes or guilt tripping us, I can’t be around someone who supports that, or if you loved me you would. At a last resort campaigning to get it made law so you would be forced to. They know best, I’ve a degree you know and know better than you.

That may have been true in the 1800 when degrees meant education but with most degrees today being worthless such as degrees in gender studies or medieval flower arranging that is basically indoctrination in wokeness it simply isn’t true.

So, how should we measure intelligence. I don’t know but the way we do it now isn’t right.

From National Treasure To National Scandal

The report of the inquiry into the biggest maternity scandal in NHS history will outline “horrendous” failings in the care provided to women in Nottingham, the Guardian can reveal. A catalogue of appalling behaviour over many years by staff at the city’s two hospitals – Queen’s Medical Centre and Nottingham City hospital – included racism towards mothers, it will say.

And it was indeed as bad as predicted. 

The NHS is bracing itself for the publication on Wednesday of a report by Donna Ockenden on 2,500 cases involving babies and mothers dying or being injured, and babies being stillborn, while under the care of Nottingham university hospitals NHS trust between 1 April 2012 and 31 May 2025. A senior source with knowledge of Ockenden’s conclusions said: “The findings in the Nottingham report will be very bad. It’s going to be horrendous. There will be some pretty challenging stuff in the report.”

It's certainly been challenging (that insidious modern term) to hear, of course that only applies to the public, for those who let it happen it won't be quite so challenging, because they will, as usual, escape any consequences, retiring on wholly underserved fat pensions.

Nottinghamshire police are still considering whether to charge the trust with corporate manslaughter. The force’s Operation Perth has been examining the care that at least 200 families received.

What could be taking them so long? 

James Murray, the health secretary, has vowed to push through major changes to maternity care and not let Ockenden’s recommendations – or those from Valerie Amos’s government-commissioned inquiry into maternity care across England, which is due to report next week – “sit on a shelf”, as many of those produced by previous childbirth care investigations have done.

Yes, yes, we’ve heard it all before so many times… but you can’t even keep your staff from accessing records they have no right to!

Surveillance

This comes from one of our chaps across the way who shall remain nameless but regulars over there know who it is.  The article the quote is from covers various aspects of surveillance, so lets focus on just this for now.  It refers to a firm in the States but bright minds instantly realise how this quickly becomes Westwide:

The dominant maker of these cameras is Flock Safety, an Atlanta company with more than 80,000 license-plate readers across over 5,000 communities. The cameras themselves are almost dumb. The intelligence lives in a product Flock unveiled in early 2025 called Nova, and Nova is where a car becomes a person. 

Flock describes Nova as a way to unify its camera data with police records so investigators can solve cases faster. The blunter description came from inside the company. In leaked internal audio reported by 404 Media, a Flock employee said the tool lets users “jump from LPR to person” and link that person to others “through marriage or through gang affiliation,” adding, “there’s very powerful linking.” Internal messages said Nova draws on about 20 toggleable data sources.

So a single camera hit becomes a seed: your name, your address, your relatives, your phone, the people you live with, mapped automatically, in seconds, with no warrant.

Plate readers tell you where a car has been. Nova tells you who the person is, who they know, and how to reach them.

There is an unresolved and serious dispute about how far Nova’s data reaches. Flock published a rebuttal in May 2025 insisting Nova would never supply data from hacked breaches.

But in December 2025, a security researcher analyzing Nova’s own front-end code reported a live data source labeled “Dark Data,” with fields for Social Security numbers, credit cards and crypto wallets, the vocabulary of breach archives, and said routine phone searches auto-called it.

You need to understand, reader, that if you've ever clicked on something, especially when a panel suddenly popped up and offered you a way out of it without refreshing or closing tab and coming back ... you have been surveilled and your visits and habits noted.

Further ... do you really believe that this laughable incognito rubbish really is incognito?  The most each of us can do is minimise ... don't do naughty things which are unnecessary, keep your nose clean, a veritable new saint and start to understand things such as dark web. To this point, most people have got as far as VPN and encryption.

Not Content With Ruining The Country, They Want To Burn It Too.

The inferno on Tintwistle Moor, near Glossop, Derbyshire, broke out on Wednesday night as Britain recorded its, then, hottest ever June day, leaving the ground dangerously dry. Multiple fire engines and two helicopters battled the blaze, which sent thick smoke and ash billowing for miles across neighbouring towns and villages.

While the cause of it remains unknown, the Government was warned its rewilding policies may have added fuel to the flames, which only came under control on Friday night.It says curbs on traditional land management have allowed dangerous build-ups of dry vegetation, turning large swathes of countryside into tinderboxes primed to ignite in heatwaves.

Sounds a lot like the case in California where wildlife management by the state ends up causing wildfires, and indeed that is exactly the case here.

Rewilding involves allowing nature to look after itself without human interference. Gamekeepers and farmers have traditionally carried out controlled burning of heather and grasses in the cooler months – encouraging new shoots which grouse and sheep graze. Last year, the Government brought in strict rules preventing controlled burning of heather on more than 1.6million acres of land. They claim the measure targeted at peatlands will improve air quality and ‘protect environmental and public health’.

I wonder if the citizens of Glossop felt their air quality had improved when they had to shut their windows to keep out the smoke! 

But Andrew Gilruth, of the Moorlands Association, said the ‘core problem’ is farmers and gamekeepers have been increasingly stopped from reducing vegetation. ‘The fire on Tintwistle Moor is on land which the RSPB has rewilded. This has created huge amounts of tinder dry dead vegetation which catches fire very easily,’ he said.

All part of Labour’s war on farmers and country sports.

Gavin Lane, President of the Country Landowners and Business Association, said the policies amounted to a de facto ban. ‘The system now required to apply for a licence to burn is so complex, time consuming and unwieldy as to be unfit for purpose,’ he explained. ‘With hotter, drier weather making moorland fires more dangerous, we cannot afford a system that blocks common sense. Government must fix it, fast, so the people who know this land can protect it.’

It won’t happen, because common sense is not common in this government….

Defencelessness

On X, I was just attacked, even called disgusting, because an American "women's safety", antiWoke girl (a nice lady headed the right way) misinterpreted my remarks on Wokery. My crime?

Saying that Iryna was a victim of Wokery.

Why did Iryna walk into that, oblivious? Because she grew up with the same Woke mind virus the rest of the West has done since the late 60s/early 70s ... pushed relentlessly by Them above, in the MSM, entertainment, via peers ... the Eloi notion that they're perfectly safe, defenceless, Big Brother will protect, everyone loves you, is your friend, society is safe, those monster demographics could never hate you.

The reality on the ground is quite different ... western lambs to the slaughter. A previous file pic on X of Iryna has her making the satanic horned sign, believing it means peace and love.  How bleedin' naive.

And it was that defenceless naivety which also led Henry Nowak to have no idea he could be ambushed by a monster. Once he understood, it was too late.  No, he was not "knowingly Woke", pushing Wokery, but he sure was from that defencelessness which Wokery induces in the western brain.  Ditto with Caitlin Clarke.

Sophie though counterattacks. Good.  She has learned the first lesson of selfpreservation.

Just who will bell the cat?

 It’s the wilfulness, the sheer mania to press on with what people clearly do not want, plus it can only mean the destruction of the land … even we who have awakened still gaze on in horror. How physically to stop Ggl, Gates, the WEF, Mad Miliband? Farmland covered with solar panels? Which have their own issues of course?

The main problem is normies in our own society … conned by the state propaganda arm, the MSM. They make a mockery of the voting process.

What chance of that? Obviously the political class with its trolls want that notion shut down, while the normies are gulled by Yusuf Farage promising something their invader voters won’t stomach. What chance anyone will emerge to lead this charge?

Well, They Are Famously Law-Abiding...

..so I'm sure this will work:

Travellers who built a caravan site in the shadow housing secretary's constituency have been hit with a court order banning them from living there.

Which they will pay as much attention to as they do everything else. 

Around 30 cars, vans and diggers descended on a four-acre green space in the hamlet of Willows Green, near Felsted, Essex, under cover of darkness as the early May bank holiday weekend began. They ripped up lush greenery in Sir James Cleverly's Braintree constituency to tarmac the land and lay the ground for 12 families, retrospectively applying for planning permission.

Its always bank holidays, but local councils never learn lessons, do they? 

An injunction against anyone living on the site was granted on May 7, a decision upheld by the High Court after it heard it was 'fanciful' to suggest families were on the site when the injunction was granted.

Caroline Bolton, for the council, asked a High Court judge on Thursday to continue the injunction, saying there was nobody living on the site at the time it was originally granted. She said: 'It is the claimant's position that at the time of applying for the injunction, the site was under construction, not an occupied site.

Should be easy to prove!

'The defendant's position, in essence, is that there are 12 families with children all in occupation of the land prior to the injunction being served'

Should be easy to disprove! 

.Tahseen Choudhry, for the group of travellers, said they should be allowed to stay because of their right to a family life under the European Convention on Human Rights.

A non-English origin lawyer.... 

She also said the council had described the caravans as 'shabby', adding: 'As gypsies and travellers, that is their home, it is how they live. 

'It can be shabby, broken down, derelict, anything, that is their preference. No one can judge that.'

What are you talking about? We allow local councils to judge it all the bloody time!  

Of communism, the EU and Brexit

Single, standalone posts can be great to good, as these two below are. But it’s the combination, including others we see from good sources elsewhere … and that’s the point … forget the MSM … and we start to get a more complete, more rounded picture, with some themes recurring over and over and over.

Enemies Of The State...

Immigration judges granted a convicted child sex offender the right to enter Britain after ruling that barring him would breach his human rights. The latest shocking example of a ‘deeply perverse’ ruling from the immigration courts involves Jamaican paedophile Oniel Spence, who was jailed in the United States for a sexual offence against a 15-year-old girl.

It really shouldn’t surprise me anymore, the depths of depravity of British judges seems fully equal to that of Yank paedophiles...

Details of the case are revealed by the Daily Mail for the first time today after Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp this week blasted judges’ ‘tyranny’ over the immigration system.

It’s nice to see a Tory speaking out about this, though one wonders why he didn’t speak before when his party was in a position to do something about it. 

Spence, now 43, applied to come to the UK in 2023 to join his wife and child - who are both British nationals - but was blocked by the Home Office. Officials barred his application on the grounds his exclusion was ‘conducive to the public good’. The paedophile then lodged an appeal at the lower immigration tribunal and won permission to come here from immigration judge Jonathan Greer.

It’s nice to see that they’re naming the judges, and I would hope that people in a position to provide services and goods to them take note of this 

His lawyers argued preventing him from entering Britain had breached Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which covers the right to ‘private and family life’. The Home Secretary at the time, Yvette Cooper, appealed to the upper immigration tribunal against the decision. But judges Madeleine Reeds and Nathan Moxon refused her arguments.

Did no one point out that there was nothing stopping them from going to him to resolve this? 

Current Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood then brought a further case at the Court of Appeal.Earlier this month senior judges overturned the original decision, describing it as ‘perverse’, and ordered the case to be re-heard by the first-tier tribunal.A Home Office spokesman said: ‘We will do everything in our power to continue contesting this case.'

Well, why not? It’s just taxpayers money after all.