Is there any defence against this global collusion?

One argument goes that if our issues are tackled nationally, e.g. in Poland, hence the all out war between von Leyen’s mob and the Polish President, as it had been against Hungary’s Orban, then the globo-psychos stand a chance of being toppled, despite the civil service, e.g. the FCO.

In a functioning electoral system, perhaps this might bear fruit:

Going back in history to Thanet South, with Nige poised for victory, the Tory number cruncher was interviewed at 11 p.m. and predicted the eventual outcome before the ballot boxes were due to be opened at 2 a.m.

The type of global thing we’re up against across the west, in every western nation, is:

Von Leyen? Australia? And electoral integrity in other nations?

Or this:

Which raises the question of the point of voting in the first place? Let’s say people decide to stay home … then we get Labour majorities on 20+% of the eligible vote.

All right, let’s say a few thousand do a Dover-Portsmouth sit-in and their leader is of course now in prison until June, uncharged, as with J6ers. So old soldiers just press on, selling poppies, right?

Well, the kids doing it can’t be identified, but the woman’s photo can be seen … the chief stompette … she’ll need reparations for that.

Sort of an organised tsunami of assault on us from every direction, would you not say? And as was shown in NIMBY Piddington, if it’s not kids attacking and maiming the elderly, then it’s barracks of fighting age third worlders awaiting the call, raping here and there in the meantime. In villages and towns, let alone in the Lake District.

Is there a Homan or Miller anywhere, as in the States, who could rid the country of the problem? Only if the political leadership was onside with that. Not a lame duck.

Oh, say I, voice heavy with irony … but what if a strong leader were to arise from nowhere in a Hegelian way, offering to scour the land, to wash away the Augean stable ordure, to sweep away the Weimar Republic of deliberate sleaze? And if not national, then how about continental blocs or even One World Govt and Religion?

*Sigh*

 Isn't it all just so bloody tedious?

This is definitely the most niche brag you will read today: with the release of A Wall Is Also a Road, I will have a 5/5 score when it comes to publishing sci-fi books with nonbinary protagonists. No matter the topic of my books—time travel, robots running a noodle restaurant, far-future terraformers—I always include a nonbinary point of view.

Of course you do, dear boy…. 

This is trickier than it sounds, because nonbinary pronouns in science fiction have a pretty checkered history. Over the past century, sci-fi authors have often deployed nonbinary pronouns to make characters seem incomprehensibly abnormal.

Stop sniggering at the back! 

After the rise of feminist science fiction in the 1970s, authors became bolder about using nonbinary pronouns without inserting a judgey, binary-centric protagonist.

There was a rise of ‘feminist science fiction’? Really? 

Marge Piercy consistently uses the neopronoun “per” for the eco-conscious future humans in Woman on the Edge of Time (1975). And Octavia Butler’s female protagonist in the iconic 1980s trilogy Lilith’s Brood has children with an ooloi, the third sex of a spacefaring species called the Oankali.

The fact they probably did this to make characters more ‘other’ and so alien has gone right over his head, hasn’t it? 

But something profound has changed: Today, nonbinary characters are protagonists. Readers are invited to identify with em, table-flip the typical narrative, and perceive binary gender as abnormal.

It isn’t, no matter how you might wish it to be, and ‘queer fiction’ isn’t going to change that one iota. 

Being nonbinary in a binary world feels like living in a state of low-key defamiliarization all the time. I’m constantly confused by the weirdness and artificiality of binary gender, which inspires all kinds of out-of-pocket assumptions about who I am.

We know just who you are, unfortunately… 

Since the 1780s, linguists, journalists, and even mathematicians have been advocating for a simple act of language reform that would give nonbinary people more options. With nerdy fervor, they’ve coined gender neutral neopronouns like ip, thon, xe, ir, and ae. Not for political reasons, or “wokeness.” Just to settle on a grammatically correct way of describing individuals without reference to their genders.

Have they really? Since the 1780S? 

Nonbinary pronouns aren’t mere rhetoric. They’re about selfhood and being seen for who we are. Whether a story introduces 15 wild neopronouns, or a single epicene one, it creates a space for imagining what our hearts might do if we had more choices than two.

Pronouns eh? The dictionary definition of which is 'a word or group of words used to replace a noun or noun phrase to avoid repetition and make sentences flow better'. So you're asking rather a lot of them, aren't you?

The assault on the farm

 … and in particular on the cow

The overriding question, after the deep state attack on farming itself (so many other articles) … is that of food additives … and today, the humble cow.

https://www.farminguk.com/news/arla-and-tesco-suspend-dairy-farms-after-shocking-welfare-allegations_69413.html

Any ideas for a solution to this, some way to stop these deep state monsters doing these things to humans … plus cows themselces?

Here’s one idea:

It's Not The UK, You See...

Two MPs and an MSP have said they were detained by Israeli authorities for eight hours while trying to enter the West Bank.

Well, you see, unlike the UK, the Israelis actually ontrol their borders and don't let in undesirables. I can see why that would baffle UK politicians…

SNP MP Lara Bird, Labour MP Clive Lewis and Scottish Greens MSP Kate Nevens said they were prevented from entering the territory on Monday before being questioned and eventually turned away.

Are there no Scottish issues that need resolving then? 

A spokesperson for the Israeli embassy in the UK claimed the group "failed to cooperate with border officials" and provided "false information about the purpose of their visit".

Gosh, UK politicians, lying? Well I never, said absolutely no one! 

She told BBC Scotland News: "It was an exercise in intimidation and fear. "They said they had evidence that I hate Israel and that, I think, was one of the reasons they didn't want to let us in."

You probably hate England too, but sadly the UK will let you back in… 

Lewis, who represents Norwich South, said the group had been "made to feel as though they had done something wrong" in a post on X.

You should be used to that, frankly! 

US midterms today ... a take from across the pond

Americans for Limited Govt site newsletter:

In elections, midterm and presidential, dating back to 2010, in years the Republicans won the popular vote for the U.S. House of Representatives — in 2024, 2022, 2016, 2014 and 2010 — the Democratic candidate averaged 57 percent of the vote in the Delaware at-large Congressional district. And in years Democrats won the popular vote for the House — 2020, 2018 and 2012 — the Democratic candidate averaged 62.17 percent of the vote in Delaware.

So, if U.S. Rep. Sarah McBride (D-Del.) is coming in well above 60 percent of the vote, it will likely be a Democratic win in the House of Representatives nationally, but if it’s below 60 percent of the vote, it could prove to be a challenging night for Democrats.

The problem with that is both the new electronic voter fraud involving ballots generated from other countries … China, Venezuela etc. … plus the massed invader vote, plus the rampant illegality, mainly Demonrat, e.g. Arizona … it’s how far they can successfully cheat. On a slightly different matter but still the same people behind it …lowlifes with low moral compass and an agenda, largely involving gold, oil and $$$$, plus sophisticated organisation over decades, tweaked for today:

Yeeessss … Slotkin is the new Nuland. And is Donny, at that age, and with those gatekeepers, capable of putting a lid on it? You being more au fait with all this than I am, who knows?

There does appear to be some pushback … while blue state Americans, plus some nominally red states, esp. Bush country, are mired in sleaze, voters Reps and Senators do seem to draw the line at death cult terrorists as the candidate. What have Demonrats against Rogers? AIPAC. Interesting race.

Will Iran and Rubio stop Republicans coming out and voting straight red, or will sufficient move themselves to stand in lines for hours, then meet the Demonrat officialdom near the door, then have their vote refused and/or then flipped, electronically? With no later comeback via activist judges?

🍿🍿🍿🍿 and prayers to the correct God this time.

Your Mother Wouldn't Have Believed The Little Popinjay...

...but you're not your mother, are you? More's the pity.

King Charles’s tour of the Caribbean has been thrown into confusion after Andy Burnham declared that he was ‘open’ to apologising for Britain’s role in the slave trade. The Prime Minister’s comments immediately triggered calls from leaders in the West Indies for Britain to pay billions of pounds in reparations – and sparked questions about the UK’s official stance. Journalists travelling with the King had been assured as late as Thursday evening that the Government’s policy was ‘absolutely no apology’.

Only a man as dim as Charlie boy would trust the jumped up little oik to be telling the truth.. 

Meanwhile, the issue has prompted Tory leader Kemi Badenoch to ask whether the UK should boycott Commonwealth summits if they become ‘an exercise in presenting Britain with demands for cash’.

Of course we should!  

Mr Burnham’s statement has led to speculation as to whether the King, who is head of the Commonwealth, will be forced to make a public apology on behalf of Britain, or at least drastically change his keynote speech to a gathering of leaders in Antigua on Tuesday.

Apoloogy for what, exaclty? Ending the slave trade with the Royal Navy?  

You Could be Forgiven For Thinking It Already Has...

....legalised cannabis, that is.

Basel is orderly, prosperous and bourgeois. It is hosting the next dressage World Cup, the faces of bankers grace advertisements at tram stops and commuters are encouraged to make donations to help protect artisanal alpine beekeeping. The city is perhaps an unlikely place to legalise recreational cannabis. But it has been sold legally here in a dozen high street pharmacies and a dispensary — and across Switzerland’s biggest cities — for the past three years as part of a legalisation pilot project. The nationwide effort to study different models of regulation is not premised on cannabis being entirely harmless. Rather, it asks whether those harms are better managed by the state than left to an illegal market.

Switzerland can play with fire if it wishes, but London is not obliged to follow suit. 

In London, however, the authorities still spend vast sums policing a lucrative cannabis market that remains in criminal hands. Across the capital, almost one in 10 adults are cannabis consumers, the highest proportion of any British region, and polling has shown two-thirds of Londoners favour either legalising or decriminalising cannabis.

Two-thirds of Londoners, or two-thirds of those that are living in London? There’s a difference. 

Last year, an independent London Drugs Commission report commissioned by the mayor, Lord Sadiq Khan, concluded that the “continuation of the law as it currently stands cannot be justified”. The commission recommended the partial decriminalisation of cannabis and noted that prohibition “does little to prevent access to the drug”.

 But, no doubt influenced by his Muslim background, the little poison dwarf didn’t agree.

Cannabis policing also falls disproportionately on black communities, it warned, creating a “pervasive sense of persecution” with “damaging, long-lasting consequences”.

These are the ‘Londoners’ who want to see it decriminalised then! 

Experts, scientists and politicians are now calling for London to follow the Swiss and establish its own pilot scheme to assess the benefits and risks of a regulated cannabis market.

The UK isn't Switzerland, so expecting similar outcomes is a fools game. 

Young western men and women start marrying and procreating ... now!

(Saturday post early)

The two latest posts at Unherdables are firstly by Breanna Morello, on Minnesota trying to put James O’Keefe and Cam Higby away for ten years apiece, on about a certain type seemingly preferring to live in a corrupt, lawless land, always opting to celebrate bad things, breakdowns, rapes, stabbings, murders, inc. babies … surrounded by ordure …

… such as these two girls Roob looked at, of whom this was one:

Orwell weighs in on this with:

And yet Roob is a woman, Julia is a woman, Alice Smith is a woman:

Yep, this is far more the situation => look at Mark Elias, Norm Eisen, Fauci, Brennan, Holder, Obama, Jeffries … and over here Nick Lowles and the whole antifa thug gang, Hancock … ad infinitum. It is the Woke Left, plus their masters, the Old Families, Rothschild paedo globos, illumined so they think, superior beings.

On and on and on and on. A large proportion “sort of men”, with todgers, the others “sort of women” … and then the completely confused mutants in the middle. On top of that, the millions of new doctors and scientists flown and boated in.

On the other side of the chasm are the readers and pundits here … men and women both … combined. The whole point is “combined”. I for one flatly refuse to sheet it home to either men OR women … that’s not what’s happening here. We’re actually talking monsters right at the top, with all their henchmonsters, myrmidons and acolytes below … the mindless sloganeers.

I’m saying this firmly right now … unless the sane men, sane women, preferably young, start getting together, marrying, procreating … there ain’t gonna be a west any more within a generation.

Random notes on the budget

… in no particular order. It’s all been done by every major outlet last night but this below is a summary of what disgruntled pundits observed. Some attributed, most unattributed (just the text, ma’am, just the text).

First, Admit We Have A Problem...

...and then admit WHY we have that problem!

Schools and colleges in England will be expected to take a tougher stance against antisemitism after a report found that three out of five Jewish students said they had been affected.

I thought all schools had to drink from the ‘racism is bad’ cup, why should this one be tolerated in them? 

Sir David Bell, the former chief inspector of Ofsted who was commissioned by the government to lead the independent review, said he found many cases of antisemitism going unreported or unchallenged by students and teachers.

Is it coming entirely from pupils, or could it be the staff members are also a problem? After all, the NHS is infested with them, could it be schools haven’t escaped the infiltration? 

The government is expected to accept the review’s 27 recommendations, including provision of resources to tackle antisemitism in schools, dedicated teacher training in antisemitism awareness and a national hotline where school leaders can quickly get advice on tackling antisemitism.

 Well, quite, what good is the training in the first place if you have to specify that this also falls under the category?

Bell added there needs to be stronger guidance on political impartiality for schools so that students can “debate topical and difficult issues without feeling that teachers are imposing their own views on students”.

Perish the thought! But wait, don’t we encourage that?