It’s not just Nige v Rupert nor Reform v GB Farage news, nor Uniparty v Nige, nor Sotland v UK … it’s almost everyone, even within Restore, esp. over the past few days.
Phew! Then we get the people saying: “Stop it! Stop all the acrimony! Let’s love one another, let’s not argue about who killed whom, let’s all combine in bonhomie and hug trees … Blair, Starmer, Nige, Ben, Rupert, Tommy.
It takes God to achieve that. “Who,” the humanists scream. And certain manipulators grin and order another drink. Going swimmingly, chortles Van Laying and Co.
Meanwhile, Astorgirl just wants people to follow her, to build numbers.
Er. Right. Oops … left. Far left. Far right? You’re all a pack of racists anyway.
For me, it’s mostly sadness. Among others, the overriding emotion is fear. For some, it’s anger. It was certainly anger that was most vividly on display in Golders Green after the stabbing on Wednesday of two men, both Jews, in the broad daylight of a spring day – much of that fury directed at the government. When the prime minister came to visit, they shouted: “Keir Starmer, Jew harmer.”
I understand that fury, even if I think it’s aimed at the wrong address.
Do you? Oh, silly me. Of course you do.
Ministers say the right things and pledge more money for the security measures that have been necessary at Jewish buildings for decades – the guards who stand outside Jewish schools and synagogues, the reinforced glass in our windows – and, of course, community organisations are grateful. But no one wants to live in a fortress. The solution cannot be to confine ourselves behind ever-higher walls.
I wouldn't mind, actually. After all, the ones who direct our lives do, after all. Look at all the protection around Downing Street and the Mayor of London's bulletproof Range Rover.
There are some indications that these attacks could be orchestrated by Iran, paying local people with a history of violence or criminality to attack Jews. Hence the demand for the government to proscribe Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organisation. It would be comforting to tell ourselves that this is all the work of foreign actors, that we have no homegrown problem of our own. But let’s say Tehran is involved: that it could recruit Britons so easily to the task of attacking Jews would tell its own story.
Indeed, if it did originate in Iran, they found themselves pushing on an open door, thanks to our encouraging of the scum of the earth to settle here:
Jonathan Hall KC, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, who this week described the recent attacks on Jews as a “massive national security emergency”, has also said that talk of Jews and Israelis as “if they are demonic, as if they are the source of the world’s problems” has been “very present on the streets” and “it’s painting a target on Jews’ backs”. He has suggested a moratorium on the marches.
And surely you agree?
Still, I’m uneasy about a ban.
Oh. Of course. 🙄
Part of my objection arises, obviously, from a belief in free speech. It’s also clear from the Palestine Action precedent that it would never work: the marches would still happen, almost certainly bigger than before.
In other words, we have no control over them. And that doesn't worry you?
Now, dearest readers, this below is formulaic, it opens with the word “shocking” or similar, the narrative might be high noise AI data plant, who knows … it’s everything I can’t stand in youtubes but … and it’s a big butt … the topic and treatment do have merit, I suspected this, so did fellow coffee drinkers.
I’ve gone back to perc coffee, slow infuse … but still the taste is not right. What the hell have they inserted, surreptitiously?
Thought this might have been one post too many and yet ... and yet ... it's an interesting look back at that critical point in time.
Jago is left-leaning as a rule, so I was expecting this to be an anti Thatcher/Major tirade and yet the chronology seemed right, at least for the first minutes I checked out.
I’ve been uneasy for quite a few decades about privatisation in Britain, as it’s been far more about corporatism, managerialism, incompetence and greed … and yet the old BR was socialist by the end.
... let alone agree with … this was at the top of Lord Toby’s newsletter this morning:
“Nigel Farage has begged Keir Starmer not to quit today, quipping he’s the “greatest asset we’ve got”, as Labour’s catastrophic local election bloodbath prompts fresh calls for the PM to go. The Mail has more.”
Right … I don’t necessarily mean the difference in narcissistic arrogance between Farage and Lowe … you saw both reactions to their victories but I do ask which of the two seems closer to Starmer’s arrogance?
Also remember the footage in parlmt a year or so ago when, during a break, Starmer crossed the floor to chat with Farage, they embraced at one point, Nige was right chuffed. Do those two embrace and love Rupert to the same degree?
All right, what does it all signify? Many pundits, inc. the MSM, see Farage as PM, inc. Starmer coming out and saying it. Also, he’s not going to resign and “plunge the country into chaos” … not yet at any rate … neither is “ready”.
At the same time, Lady Julia was saying her district in London went Labour. I asked if that was the imported vote, she said … not all. In other words, there is a problem with the indigenous too who just can’t see or choose not to.
Yes, there’s certainly that mode but I’m not sure that that completely explains it. I don’t even mean “politically dumb”, under the control of the MSM … it’s not only that.
Last evening, I explored this word I hear from downunder … Teals … apparently a political grouping but why the colour teal, more associated with old Brexit Party here? The “respectable right”, let’s say, whilst hardheads here tend more Restore … dark navy, meaning truly conservative?
Well, ggl Teals and it’s illuminating. It says that they’re “fiscally conservative” but socially … well my interpretation is Woke left, in dogooder, nicely nice ways behind the clipped lawns, the herbaceous borders. Much NIMBYism … demand people take invaders into their “spare” bedrooms but of course not in their district please. Quite similar to Martha’s Vineyard across the pond. Aspirationally upper middle, the Teals’ only MPs are feminist women, with hubbies with “good” jobs in the city.
One of this type was once my spouse and I’ll say this … we never truly fought the entire time … there were silences of course. So I do know Conservative women, if not small c … many was our pool party on the patio. There’s one in the better part of town over in my “hometown” across the Pennines.
They would never vote Restore … a farmer? Town and country, don’t forget. Nice city boy Nige is far more their flavour. But Nige is being groomed for office, right? By the PTB? Would you not say so? And his politics is downunder type or Martha’s Vineyard type Teal. I’m scrambling for the word here and can only come up with the term “upper middle aspirant”.
Nowt wrong with aspirations, dreams, doing the best we can … but while completely unaware of what’s going down? Not wishing to know? Until it’s all taken away?
...and the predators will be circling. It's early as I type this and the majority of results aren't it, and some won't be until the weekend but enough are in that the verdict on Starmer's Premiership has been heard loud and clear.
Who will make the first move? And will he see it coming?
19. June's projection, on X, to close off this liveblog
18. That London Lady, on X, retweeted by Subrosa
At the polling station I just visited, the staff working there were wearing giant Green Party rosettes . Surely this shouldn’t be allowed & the staff should remain impartial?!
More intriguing this year. I've been putting my view on X but here at our site, best I zip it. However, that does not take away how intriguing it is.
There are agendas going on of course. The PTB see Reform dominating but at a GE, having to share with the Tories, with Farage as PM. Such a deal might see off Restore.
On the other hand, just how disgruntled are people about the mass immigration? If a lot, maybe any Unideal might not cut it, not even Kemi Badenough who's been making stateswomanlike noises I believe.
Incidentally, it's a bit annoying for an ex English teacher to read ... I'm holding the nose and voting Reform as the "least worst" ... the term, ladies and gentlemen, is "least bad".
Great Yarmouth ... another interesting watch. In our area, there are no elections, so I watch from a distance.
The narrative that the parents should have done more to let the authorities know about their son and that the authorities could then have done something is purely magical thinking.
Well, when it comes to magical thinking, there's nothing to beat the idea that people from another culture, one steeped in violence and misogyny, will adopt Englishness by osmosis once given asylum here.
You can certainly section patients who pose a risk to themselves or others if there is a bed available (there often isn’t), and in the case of very high-risk or violent patients the capacity is even more restricted in terms of beds in specialist units.
We need to start having some much more honest conversations about how this issue is to be dealt with, what options the taxpayer can and will fund, how much capacity we want to have in the system, and what we’re going to pay the staff who care for these patients.
There’s a lot the taxpayer is willing to fund, and this is one! It is, after all, the taxpayer who is most at risk. Not the people making the decisions, and probably not the people writing letters in the comfort of their no-doubt enrichment-free middle class houses.
To blame the parents is to take the easy and lazy solution, and that will do nothing to keep children like Alice da Silva Aguiar, Bebe King and Elsie Dot Stancombe safe.
Brave word, who from?
Name and address supplied
Oh.
Yes, ideally the parents should have done more, but there but for the grace of God go many parents.
What sort of idiot says that?
Jane Ghosh
Bristol
Figures. Bristol. Another hive of wooly-thinking.
What’s missing in the discussion of parental culpability is the concept of support. Rudakubana’s parents, like many others, seem to have believed that the only role of social workers is to remove children. If we had a system, fully funded and with appropriate training, that aimed to support parents through all the complex decisions they have to make, parents might find it easier to raise concerns and consider the consequences.
Ah, another bit og magical thinking, if only we had unlimited funding to play softly, softly with foreign thugs everything would be roses! Is it another middle class 'Guardian' reading woman?
The income tax personal allowance is presently frozen at £12,570 and the full New State Pension for 2026/27 tax year is £12,548, a hair’s breadth away. Next tax year, it’s a mathematical certainty that a full New State Pension, according to the triple lock, will exceed the income tax personal allowance. The government will need to address this as it isn’t feasible to drag many millions of low-income pensioners into declaring and paying tax. So far Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said that people whose only income comes from the state pension will not have to pay tax, but how this will work in practice is uncertain. Plus, many existing state pensioners under the pre-2016 system do already pay tax on amounts exceeding the personal allowance, so devising a fair and workable framework may be a challenge. One option would be to increase the income tax personal allowance each year in line with the level of the New State Pension, but this will cost the Treasury in terms of the income tax take.
Maybe read that in conjunction with this on the "triple lock"
There are other complications, in some individual cases, which would follow being taxable in this sense. It would disqualify you for some benefits, maybe substantial ones.
Which brings us to the whole question of whether this actually is a benefit or just an earned payout at the end of a long, multi-generation time period. Consider:
There are many reading this who are standard income tax payers and have done that for a long time, maybe even having an occupational pension coming up - this whole triple lock biz might not mean a lot to you but the thing is ... it does mean a lot to many voters ... that's the key word ... voters. It's not just that the council elections are in two days but Starmer has issues at the top now too and thus the Reform v Labour tussle might mean a lot after Friday. Plus there are so many now so thoroughly Ped off with all of it ... invaders too. In other words, there's a quite volatile situation just now.
