The baddies ALWAYS revert to the same playbook

(By the way, good reader ... Julia will reappear, thank goodness, on June 1st.)

I see the Weimar all over again, with useless socialists hamstrung by ideology, while the infrastructure goes to pot and all sorts of overrunning and behaviour goes on … and the response? Bleedin’ warning signs on roadsides. Not troops.

Even were there troops, there are no parents left of any youthfulness, only single mothers with no control over the spotty herberts.

And that comes back to no underpinning code any more … the Science is God lot, with zero idea how the universe really works, proposing soft, love-everyone Babylon solutions or heaven forbid … tech solutions, e.g. fantasy worlds in 4D. Even My Mate up the Road. a dyed-in-the-wool techie, knows that true tech innovation ended in the 90s … everything now is keeping vast armies of techies employed … university graduates, not hands-on oldies.

And the social fabric, regulated by the underpinning social code of Christendom? Gone.

What always appears in times of trouble? First the strongman, deeply flawed, with his own agenda, so easily recruited by the real enemy, the hidden perverted intellect … and the mass of godless humanity flock to that solution. “Right wing govts” are put in, they storm in.

However, a large number go the opposite way and the Trinity makes a resurgence, foreseen by the true baddies, who know this will happen, so they put charlatans in charge of official churches, from that rainbow one railing at Donny and entourage … even Pence and Johnson pretend they’re Christian … then that clown in Lambeth Palace, then the Chicago Fabian in Rome … and so it goes on.

Those who do know have no way of convincing the secularati. This post is mainly read by secularati … at least on the whole not wokerati, plus a percentage of the trad type who at least can see through all the BS, plus Kabuki theatre.

Back to specific cases:

Sigh. Any solution? I think so … for awhile. Yuri Bezmenov in the 80s said it would take two generations. So, if not Zoomers, then late Zoomers and early Alphas. But will it be biblical, or some mish mash of pop tech culture of 2030, with highsounding biblucal quotes. Which gets into Revelation territory. I wrote a 1500 page book called Masque which ended with a fanciful idea of Wills being the antiC, many false prophets, endless war fomented by “someone”. I finished that book around 2017.

Any humanist solution? They always believe in the perfectability of Man as his own god, pure Babel. Ends up as Sodom and Gomorrah. Techies? The great god AI of course. Then we have the Annunaki fans, always a good one … is it Rubio who’s ordered the releasing of data on aliens? Interesting timing, eh?

Anything except a metaphysical scenario … one can never admit a metaphysical scenario, in which we are but a physical component. Can’t be admitted by the intelligentsia coz it bgrs up The Philosophers … Plato, Kant, Nietzsche, Zarathustra … or we could go oriental … that’s respectable enough for the intelligentsia, in thrall, unwittingly, to the dark side.

And so the whole shebang goes on, everyone at each other’s throats, disdaining the others, nothing being done. Society paralysed.

All hell breaks loose this morning on X

 It was always going to happen. Just as X was flooded by Reform propaganda this morning … 140 pieces of the most virulent kind against Restore, not against Labour (2 pro Restore pieces only in reply), so the Pope was sooner or later going to have to speak to the worldwide billion Catholics … still quite a formidable lobby … about ML (machine learning), erroneously and for propaganda reasons called AI.

H/T DAD: https://brusselssignal.eu/2026/05/pope-leo-xiv-urges-fast-from-ai-in-first-encyclical/

Cynics, inc. non-Catholic Christians, might in varing degrees agree that AI is taking over, to the delight of the Faucis, Gateses and Mengeles, the Ewen Camerons, the Science is God fanbois, the Blairs and Obamas. Such cynics could easily point to Leo cosying up to the Moose Limb mufti to facilitate the Malsi takeover of the west … all the same Club sfter all, along with the Rothschilds and Scottish Rite, playing for the anti-human side.

Fatherless, total freedom, zero protection

... plus zero sense of self-protection.

There’s only so much protecting of kids a parent can do … it’s always been the case that the parenting is crucial, esp. up till adolescence … look st the street savagery just now and from which demographics.

So the parenting is n1. The teachers in schools are n2 … and if they’re just overgrown adolescents with rainbow flags … nuff said, yes? Three Rs? Not a chance for those kids, let alone any learning of heritage, of Christian civic society et al.

Then comes the internet for kids, in their bedrooms, gaming, “entertainment”.

I’m assuming here that this is a file photo, not the felon. Last evening was footage on X of a drunk, Woke girl coming home after drinking out, alone. Whaa? Not the slightest notion of personal safety, reinforced by ideology driven into their heads during the formative years. Plus total female entitlement and victimhood (don’t you oppress me).

The Change You Want Is Not The Change The Country Needs

The focus shouldn’t be on rearranging the deckchairs, but on how the party might save itself from oblivion.

Who better to tell us what went wrong and what to do now than one of the Lanyard Class?  

How did it come to this? Ultimately the answer is simple. Labour has strayed a very long way from its founding mission when it was set up by the labour movement well over a century ago: to unashamedly represent the interests of the working class and its organised industrial expressions.

And I suspect you’ll tell us nothing to make us think you’ve learned that lesson yourself and are going to suggest any different tack.

The prime minister has deliberately hollowed out the Labour party, completing its transformation from a mass social democratic party into a brittle elite club.

The Greens under Zack Polanski have gained so much support because they are defending the progressive values Starmer has abandoned. It is always welcome to see political leaders defending migrants, opposing Israel’s genocide and arguing for economic justice.

Yes, as I figured - none of these are subjects that the average man on the Clapham omnibus thinks is a burning issue.

Time is short – and as we look to Labour’s near-future, there can be no doubt that a radical policy rethink is necessary. Repairing our public services by taxing extreme wealth should be the starting point.

And neither is that and it’s not why the Greens picked up so many votes either. Or if it was, the voters were ignorant of the facts about the Greens.

Then we need to see a restoration of pay for all the public-service heroes on whom we rely so much (many of them represented by Unison), and on whose backs the government hopes to rebuild the country: nurses, paramedics, care workers, council staff.

Job for my boys in other words:

As the leader of the UK’s biggest trade union and Labour’s largest affiliate, though, I don’t hesitate to say that this stuff really is the bare minimum.

Unions will try to convince you to join because they are protecting your rights, but these days, that's no longer true - they are cut from the same cloth as the politicians anxious to give away the country.

Entrenched enforcement of the unfair

Julia and I do not have a rule but a convention that she posts one day, me the next, Grandpa whenever, with her say prevailing when we discuss things. I try not to run two posts between hers unless it's obviously of immediate relevance ... and so is this one this morning.

That Scottish football game

Anyone who follows the football of these isles will already know all about this … perhaps anyone outside these isles might not.

There was a title game between Celtic and Hearts teams for the Premiership and, with 30 seconds of regular time left, Celtic were 3-1 up. Fairly straightforward victory, you’d think. Celtic fans invaded the pitch, bringing the game to a (temporary) stop. The refereee should have called a halt until the pitch had been cleared and then …

… well, that’s the thing … what then? The ref called the game “ended”, not “abandoned”.

A freelance Scot at Lord Toby’s site (Daily Sceptic) writes, this morning:

“Hearts have protested about the treatment of their team and staff and the “menacing atmosphere” they had to endure. They have also called for “the strongest possible action to protect player safety and the integrity of the Scottish game”.

The last part of that sentence may be a coded signal that they do not accept the result and are putting the SPFL on notice. The police are investigating the allegations of assault.”

Yes, dear reader, the Celtic crowd started menacing and assaulting the Hearts players on the pitch … during the game.

“In response, the SFPL has insisted the game was ended appropriately and have tweeted its congratulations to Celtic. The league has stressed that the referee said the game was ended, not abandoned, and it has not been recorded as such. A report will be submitted, but I’d be surprised if the SPFL deviates from this position now.”

And more to the point:

“Here is the problem: referees cannot simply end the game early. The exact wording of the law is “additional time may be added but not reduced”. If a referee is forced to curtail a match before time, for whatever reason (weather, floodlight failure, medical emergency, violence) the game has not been ended but abandoned.

Thus, Celtic vs Hearts was not ended naturally, but abandoned, unnaturally, due to a pitch invasion by home fans. According to SPFL rules, the consequence of that is a victory for the opposition, or a replay.”

Interestingly for me, last night I'd been watching that McEnroe incident when he defaulted at the Australian Open tennis for “code violations” (1990). At his fourth violation for bad manners, he was dismissed from the game. He had calculated that he had one violation left to go but the Tennis Federation had reduced it to three before this game and not “informed him”. That was it.

Back to the Hearts v Celtic thing … the SPFL had acted outside its own rules, rules which were there for a reason. To an English temperament, this was highly unfair, outrageous in fact, more FIFA than British, esp. English.

But this was Scotland, warrnt it? This was where a Moose Limb was shoved in as FM, where Sturgeon had plans that every Scottish child would have a State Mentor, far worse than in the former USSR. It’s ingrained bullying, as in English Public Schools of yore ... and fear … it doth rule.

Entrenched enforcement of the unfair.

For those outside of this culture, a good idea can be had by watching Michael Palin’s school bully episode. With an edge of course, because this is Scotland in this case … a special kind of bullying. Not American military college “hazing”.

Yet another complication is that the worst rivalry in Scottish football is Celtic v Rangers, which is basically Micks versus proddy boys or Catholics v Protestants, which is also behind the Northern Irish “Troubles”, the bombings and shootings. History tells us that the Scots had quite an influence on Northern Ireland.

Throughout my upbringing, the Catholics were seen as rough and not given to non-violent methods … the Protestants had to counter that somehow. Much of Australia was, before the global invasion, Irish Catholic, e.g. Ned Kelly. It was, in fact, behind England v Oz Test Matches and the Rodney Marsh style “sledging”, though I’m not sure he was Catholic.

Also, you may have heard of the violence of nuns on children (watch The Blues Bros).

So let’s just say there’s nothing unusual in any of this. Which does not make it right. Injustice in the past four decades or so has become entrenched … see Farage’s indifference to pack raped girls and Rupert taking up their case.

🍿🍿🍿🍿

When the mentally disturbed become the hegemony

What we have below here is the issue itself of the flooding of western countries but also the added, and in fact underlying issue, of the two young women involved. One is clearly patriotic to her country, people, roots, whilst the other is a traitress, witting or unwitting.

Look at her story, this Frostadottir. I had a fair bit to do with Iceland from the 90s till just past the mid 2000s, a year into my N.O. blogging. In short … I fell out with not only the editor of Iceland Review but with various authors … all girls, all as Woke as communists, totally intolerant of history and culture.

I’d been there, physically, in Iceland by the way.

Same old story … education now politically correct … jump some decades and here’s this bint Frottasdottir, somehow PM of the country … are there no men?

Short answer … no. And the teachers at school and in tertiary? Ditto … Woke insane. Heavy on DEI flooding.

This next below won’t appear in the OoL and Jstack versions … it only expands on WP.

Caught The Lying Bastards At It Again

Body-worn video of a woman's "degrading" arrest, which police falsely told a court did not exist, has been shared exclusively with the BBC.

It's a measure of how confident they are - or perhaps how haplessly incompetent - that it still exists to be found. 

The Chief Constable of Northamptonshire, Ivan Balhatchet, was found guilty of contempt of court in November and fined £50,000 for failing to release the body-worn videos to her.

Whereupon all copies of something they had denied the existence of should have disappeared. Do they learn nothing from the criminal element they deal with?

Both forces declined to comment due to ongoing damages claims for more than £3m, though in its civil defence, Northamptonshire Police insisted the use of force was lawful.

"I don't do well with injustice," says Buzzard-Quashie, 43, from west London, who is the founder of a corporate gifting company.

Oh, make no mistake, the woman herself isn’t a sympathetic character. But that’s ok, she doesn’t need to be to show the Northamptonshire farce up to be almost corrupt to the core!  Why 'almost'? Well...

Radio logs shared with the BBC reveal officers from the Met were in regular contact with their counterparts in Northamptonshire, appearing to press the urgency of apprehending Buzzard-Quashie by claiming she "lacked capacity" and had "indicated she will try [to kill herself]". The BBC asked the Met to explain the basis for this intelligence, but it refused to comment. Meanwhile, officers on the ground appeared to be confused by the level of interest in her. When instructed by a senior officer to "consider using Section 136 powers" to detain her under the Mental Health Act, one of the officers points out: "She presents as having capacity and has made no intent or threats to harm herself." When the same officer is then told to "lock her up for failing to stop", he replies: "Er, we can try that, but at no point have I lit the blue lights of the vehicle up."

So, there are some honest cops -how can they stand what the job has become?

After she was released, the case against her was dropped by the Crown Prosecution Service.

Of course it was. They know a losing case when they see one! 

The Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner for Northamptonshire, Danielle Stone, told a panel she and Balhatchet were not made aware of the proceedings for contempt until October last year, but acknowledged there were "huge questions" about the chief constable's apparent lack of awareness, and has launched a review. The BBC has asked for comment from Balhatchet's predecessor, Nick Adderley, who was chief constable of Northamptonshire Police at the time of the incident in 2021.

Adderley… say, that name seems familiar….. 

Adderley is charged with fraud, misconduct in public office and making a false witness statement in relation to a separate matter and is due to stand trial in 2027.

Oh, right!  

A break from current politics

Yes, this could have looked at Makerfield, Massey in the States, the Dutch fightback against invader dumps ... but this, concerning 911 came up via "Crazy Vibes" on X:

The woman America forgot on purpose

September 2001. The Twin Towers had just fallen. The FBI was buried under years of untranslated wiretaps—foreign language intercepts from people they were actively watching. Conversations that might have stopped the attack, never read. Warnings that might have saved lives, sitting in boxes.

They needed translators. Fast.

Sibel Edmonds was 31. Iranian-born. Turkish-raised. American by choice. She spoke Turkish, Farsi, and Azerbaijani fluently. She passed the background check. Got top-secret clearance. Started translating the most sensitive intelligence the Bureau had.

Six months later, she was gone.

Here's what happened.

She discovered something impossible to ignore. Intercepts were being mistranslated. Documents involving active investigations were disappearing. A colleague had foreign connections that made her a security risk. The translation system designed to prevent another 9/11 was being sabotaged from the inside.

She did everything right. Wrote internal memos. Reported it to her supervisors. When they told her to stay quiet, she went higher. In March 2002, she wrote directly to FBI Director Robert Mueller. Laid out everything she'd seen.

Two weeks later, they fired her. Called it performance issues.

She refused to disappear quietly. Hired a lawyer. Filed whistleblower complaints. Tried to testify before Congress. Tried to tell the 9/11 Commission what she knew. Then the government made her vanish.

In May 2004, Attorney General John Ashcroft did something almost unprecedented in American history. He invoked the State Secrets Privilege over her entire FBI experience. Retroactively classified everything. What she saw. What she said. Even the languages she translated. Even where she was born.

If she repeated in public what she'd already said in unclassified Senate testimony, she could go to prison for life under the Espionage Act.

Her wrongful termination lawsuit? Dismissed. The court said proceeding would reveal state secrets. The Supreme Court refused to hear her case. No explanation.

The 9/11 Commission wanted to interview her. They were blocked.

She became, in the words of civil liberties advocates, the most gagged person in United States history.

Now think about the whistleblowers whose names you do know.

Edward Snowden. Chelsea Manning. Daniel Ellsberg. Reality Winner. They have documentaries. Books. Movies. Some ran. Some went to prison. All of them got their stories told. Sibel Edmonds came before them all. Was silenced more completely than any of them. And most Americans have never heard her name.

In 2004, the Department of Justice's own Inspector General released his report. Glenn Fine—the man whose job is to investigate when the government lies—confirmed it. He found serious mismanagement in the FBI translation unit. Security concerns about the colleague she'd named. Evidence her firing was retaliation. Real problems with how foreign intelligence was being handled.

The government's own internal watchdog said she was telling the truth.

It didn't matter. The gag order was permanent. The lawsuits were dismissed. The report became one more thing she wasn't allowed to discuss.

She started the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition to help others who'd been silenced. Wrote a memoir in 2012—every single page scrubbed of what she's forbidden to say.

Twenty-three years later, she has never testified under oath in open court. She has never been allowed to tell her full story.

She is alive. In America. Today.

She still cannot speak.

Most forgotten stories fade by accident. By time. By the slow erosion of memory.

This one was forgotten on purpose. By signature. By executive order. By an Attorney General who decided one woman's testimony about FBI failures was too dangerous for Americans to hear.

Edward Snowden's name survived because he fled and the world watched. Daniel Ellsberg's survived because the Pentagon Papers were published.

Sibel Edmonds' name is fading because she did it the right way. Reported through proper channels. Trusted the system. And the system erased her.

She cannot tell her story.

The only way her name survives is if we tell it for her.

Now you know. Say her name, or the silence wins.

WHAT! You Mean We Have To Abide By British Laws?

A kebab in London that has gained fame on TikTok is causing misery for local families - despite being slapped with a zero-star hygiene rating. Lebanese Grill Express on Leather Lane has been the subject of complaints from residents in the nearby Bourne Estate for five years.

Locals have lodged numerous complaints with Camden Council, the police and the takeaway itself.

 And all to little avail.

One mother-of-two living on the estate said: "If this were happening in Chelsea or Hampstead, the place would be shut down."

Yes, it would. But it's not, so it isn't. 

She described the area as Camden's most deprived and claimed the business appears to operate "above the law." "My child goes to bed at nine o'clock, but music is playing until 1am every day of the week. Why do we have to put up with this?" she said.

Because you can't afford to live in  Chelsea or Hampstead where you'd be protected.

Residents report deliveries arriving as early as 5.30am, before the chimney starts belching out smoke from 9am, and continues for as many as 15 hours. "You only have two hours to sleep, if you can," the neighbour added. "I can't sleep. I'm exhausted."

What about the people who are doing it? Isn’t there a similar effect on their jobs? Or don’t they have jobs…

Residents claimed the owner accused police and the council of incompetence - and dismissed neighbours' concerns as racism. Its late-night licence was reviewed last November due to pollution issues, and was subsequently revoked. However, the decision has been appealed, meaning Lebanese Grill Express can continue operating until 1am while awaiting its appeal hearing.

What else to expect from a modern day council?

A Camden Council spokesman said:"Our community safety team will continue to tackle anti-social behaviour and offer reassurance to residents, ahead of the appeal hearing which is scheduled for August." The Metropolitan Police said officers are "aware of ongoing reports of anti-social behaviour in and around the Lebanese Grill Express on Leather Lane, Farringdon".

Everyone's aware of the problem, but not doing anything about it. Classic.

Which immigration is "acceptable"?

Phew. Well, for a start, there’s coming over to make a new life, job, wife, home, having gone through extensive hoops, awarded points … as against flooding in, just to dip the wick into our women … and there was a saying in WW 2 about that: “Overpaid, overfed, oversexed … and over here,” referring to American GIs. Could also have referred to the Vikings way back when.

What of lil ole moi though? WN2 Serbian, fiancee Russian a decade after that fizzled. Now what did the Russki men think of me dipping the wick into their fairhaired girl and producing mixed gene progeny? Plus, in our town, they’d been mixing genes between Bolgars and Russkis for hundreds of years.

Long after that itself was over, in Sicily, at the end of my Russki gal’s visit, we were heading for the airport, up came a Sicilian girl and in their effusive way, she planted one, my Russki turned eyes up to the heavens … she must have thought I was leaving, Claudia.

So who am I to speak of purity of bloodline? And what of my dad and mum? What the heck was a dour Yorkshireman doing dalliance-ing a colleen from County Cork? I mean … what gives here?

And yet the third photo below which I refuse to post … so I’ll describe it instead … I didn’t like it one little bit because shirley it negated everything we are currently trying to do?

All right … to the first pic:

I know nothing of whether she was married, had a child with her, came to marry and for a better life, any of that. She stated that she came for a better life but now it was what it is … readers, I am slowly getting to the point, bear with me.

All right, second pic:

All right, I see a Thomas Sowell type, articulate, loves the culture. Uh huh. I like him. Plus I run reaction vids by blacks. How does that fit in with that rally yesterday?

Before I get to that … the third pic I’m describing, not posting … can’t be unseen. Four late teen, early 20s, whatever. Left to right … black girl, not one of the massive mamas bashing other people … white girl, let’s just call it western, entangled by the typical new thug/spiv middle-eastern or African and he was obviously in for the dipping of the wick, ignoring his own ethnic girl … then a white male, nondescript, slight, weakish.

I’m not sure I need add anything to that pic. The one to ask questions of is obviously the white girl and already I know the answer, judging by the two males.

To my mind, factors in answering the question of which immigration is acceptable include:

a. Connection by family stretching back, bloodline, culture, followed by birthplace
b. Attitude, intention and behaviour
c. Sheer numbers and mass breeding capacity.

“Intention” includes mission, purpose in being here … is it to take over, outbreed, kill off the indigenous? With the ability to do it?

As part of “culture”, I’m including the Christian underpinnings of civility, safety on the streets and so on. I understand the pagans were here earlier but look at them and their wickerman savagery, the druids, oak grove sacrifices etc. … very appealing, for example, to woke left women … throw soup and paint over old art, the little savages.

What’s the solution, good reader?