Well, You've Overseen The Change Of Every Other Aspect Of British Culture..

In this fragmented but supposedly mild country, watching and talking about the weather forecast is meant to be a reassuring, unifying activity.

We've done it for years, after all, until it's become as much a sign of British culture as queuing for things.  

Yet like the traditional British climate, that common weather culture may now be evaporating.

It can join all the other things that're disappearing, like queuing for buses, offering a seat on the train or bus, saying 'please and thank you' and tolerance. 

As the climate crisis has affected this country in more and more unmistakable but uneven ways, TV weather forecasters have increasingly struggled to find the right language to describe this transformation’s daily consequences.

Across all the British TV broadcasters, sometimes within the same bulletin, or even the same sentence, weather forecasters now present sunshine as welcome and oppressive; high temperatures as miraculous and unbearable; rain as an inconvenience and desperately needed; cloud cover as depressing and a relief.

Constant sunshine and heat IS oppressive, when it goes on too long in a country where houses aren't buillt for it, and rain IS a relief when the countryside is a tinderbox with nearly empty reservoirs, due to the influx of immigration with no forward planning. 

Tanned forecasters in sundresses, emphasising the positives for domestic holidaymakers of another record-breaking summer, alternate with grim-faced forecasters suggesting we are experiencing a weather apocalypse.

This year, parts of the country have experienced such contrasting summers – wetter than usual in western Scotland, desert-like in southern England – that we can no longer say they share broadly the same northern European climate.

Yet only from 2015 did an “Apocalyptic genre” of heatwave articles begin to become dominant; and a “Romantic genre” of celebratory coverage remains. In a country where many people still spend much of the year feeling cold, the idea of hot weather as a liberation is likely to linger, for some, for decades to come.

Not for me, I will never enjoy the heat as some do, but then, I never sought out foreign holidays for the heat either. I'd far rather visit somewhere cold and interetesting than lie on a beach all day.

During the record heat of 2022, “weather forecasters faced unprecedented levels of trolling”, the BBC reported, including “hundreds of abusive tweets or emails questioning their reports and telling them to ‘get a grip’… ‘it’s just summer’”. Some of these climate crisis deniers described advice on how to stay cool as “pandering to the ‘woke brigade’”, and accused the BBC and Met Office of “scaremongering” to help the then Conservative government impose unneeded green policies.

This summer, some of these conspiratorial arguments have re-emerged. But with the Tories having in effect turned against net zero, joined by Reform UK, Restore Britain and most of the rightwing media, disagreeing with weather forecasters who express alarm about our changing climate has become more mainstream. Discussing the weather is no longer just small talk, but also a battlefield in the culture wars.

EVERYTHING is now... 

“The climate of the 20th century has now gone,” says Mike Kendon, a Met Office scientist and co-author of State of the UK Climate in 2025, published last month. So far, this year’s weather has been more extreme. Even more than the heat, summer drought and winter floods, its key feature has been the weather getting stuck in one state for months – a characteristic of harsh continental climates, rather than the changeable one around which our society has been built.

That change will be lost amid all the other, bigger changes. 

Bankruptcy is but part of it

Once a westerner has lived in an oppressed country, even formerly oppressed, if he’s spoken with the old and young alike, then a quite different perspective emerges, of course incorporating Dr. Jennine’s point about bankruptcy … but much broader.

Yes, certainly it’s that, financially, but in every other way bankrupt too, from heritage to moral compass, to ignorance. Five young people ride by and kill a cop … that’s the sort of degeneracy. A woman murders her children because she’s had a bad day … another one today by the way, reported by Sassafrass … let alone what the savages are doing … women cheering on the murders of thousands of full term babies … a 19 year old athlete collapses and dies. Vaxx …

… and which moral derelicts insisted that happen? Von Leyen? Schultz? To the Covid and Vaxx lies? Back again to this quote:

A concrete example from my town in Russia, as a car driver there once … there are key choke points on the roads, the places Plod know that drivers must pull out to get around parked cars but the instant you do, you have committed an offence … if you are not yet on the system as an offender, that comes up and they do you for it. You’re now in the system as a crim … useful for them.

Thus you collect points, all for revenue and hold over you … they have quotas. So, once a year, you must renew car docs but to do that, you must first get a series of other docs and pay money at various venues in order to get all the paperwork but even then it’s not enough … you don’t have that special code you need.

However, someone you know can get it for you … for a consideration. And so on. My mate there observed what was happening over here now and shook his head. “With our example here, Man, why on earth would you want to lumber yourself with that?”

Short answer … we wouldn’t … but westerners are ignorant of the nuts and bolts of how communism takes over … how can it be otherwise? And so it’s a hot knife through butter. Part of it is suppression of Christian values which underpin a civilised western society. The number of ignorati in the west who utterly fail to understand that is jawdropping.

Against that is simply the cancer of wokery enabling all of it … and we’ve already seen many quotes on this:

And then we get to the end games. One is the financial crash … both in your own life but also the society economically crashing and still Burnham sends foreign aid. Another is the thousands of fighting age rapists and murderers with access to weapons … what do you think that could possibly be about? Who are they soon going to murder do you think, door to door?

Uprising? How? When?

Could we just have a bit of privacy, please?

Guido announces:

.o0o.

We simply ask that that privacy we've been so constantly campaigning for, worldwide will be respected and all you lowlife journos will go take a running jump.

|https://dailysceptic.org/2026/08/21/prince-harry-and-fellow-claimants-must-pay-9-5-million-to-mail-after-judge-rules-hacking-case-was-unreasonable-to-a-high-degree/

Don't Worry About The Ones That Make A List, Worry About The Ones That Don't....

A group of teenage girls have said they feel "worthless" and "frightened" as a result of the extreme misogyny they regularly experience.

The students, from Tyneside, have spoken out after making a film about the language they endure at school and online. Many comments are too explicit to share, but they include threats of violence and rape often masked as "banter". One girl described how disturbed she had been after a "rape list" was made by boys in her school.

Because she was on it? Or because she wasn't? 

The government said it was "taking bold and decisive action to halve violence against women and girls", with changes being introduced from September to help teachers challenge misogyny.

Teachers seem to be co-opted into every barmy government scheme to bring forth a Brave New World, lately...

One girl told the BBC she felt "worthless" after learning of the "rape list" made by boys in her school. "Boys ordering girls, who they want to rape the most and then the least," she explained. "It is frightening because you don't know people's real intentions."

Catherine Marchant, CEO of Impact Family Services in South Tyneside, said young people could become unaware of abuse in real life if violent misogynistic attitudes were normalised in schools and on social media.

Marchant said her charity saw generations of women using its services, with breaking the cycle of abuse having to begin by educating young people. "We're almost having 13-year-old girls being raped by 13-year-old boys," she said.

Almost only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades, Catherine. 

"But nobody's told the girls that boys shouldn't do that to them, and in some cases nobody's told the boys that they shouldn't."

It's not going to work when their holy book and their culture and all the adults around them are telling them they can, is it? 

When we string the anomalies together, join some dots

... then 2 plus 2 again starts to = 4.

Anomalies … we notice them everywhere, esp. in this era now of things being just plain wrong, inverted, twisted.

And as online investigative pundits, if there’s a string of anomalies, we start asking questions after the third or fourth, don’t we … while certain types of “shutdowners” instantly fling “conspiracy theorists” or “far-right racists”.

UH huh. This one starts here:

And somewhere else:

Think she was referring to those Red Cross women handing packages to those gangs kidnapping Ceuta girls and raping them on top of hills. These Ceuta gangs:

A friend downunder wrote:

And I replied:

I just remembered:

And this:

Or the ad on youtube of some wimpy, wispy man saying to his dog good thing you ate my sneakers coz here’s some better ones to buy. Ineffectual men if white but if it needs masculine … always black. Wot, like in Ceuta?

Remember this?

Or this:

One of the rapegang victims at the inquiry, now redeveloping confidence:

There are all sorts of fragments above. You can choose this one or that and say “unreliable” but the cumulative effect of thousands of such reports?

And the second question … who is more likely to protect these vulnerable females? Man-hating feminazis such as Louise Haigh, plus feminised demi-men (usually vicious little bstds if they don’t get their way … ooo, scratch yer eyes out)? Are they going to defend you, ladies?

Especially against the Ceuta types in every town and hamlet across Britain now, let alone no-go cities such as Brummieland?

Have normies any concept whatever of that which these invaders have been invited in for? For what reason do you think? 🤔

What's 'Racist' Today?

 Would you believe, 'clean and tidy nails' instead of dayglo coloured talons of a length that would make a velociraptor feel inadequate? 

Online the “naked” look is credited as part of wider trends, including the “clean girl aesthetic” that has become synonymous with slicked-back hair and dewy skin. Dominated by wealthy, white women, it has been criticised for co-opting black and brown beauty habits. Ranking “naked” nails as more desirable than statement styles, especially when nails and nail art are so rooted in race, further taps into this, with some critics considering it a form of erasure. 

Nail art rooted in race? One for Pseud’s Corner, I think. 

Irene Shelley, the editor of Black Beauty and Hair magazine, says the “trend itself isn’t the problem: minimalism is a valid choice for anyone”. However, she says a problem arises when “a bare aesthetic gets coded as more sophisticated or more professional than a fuller, more expressive one that’s historically been coded as Black or working-class. Nails should be allowed to be a form of self-expression without a hierarchy attached to them.”

Just like visible tattoos, the freakishly long and gaudy fake nails affected by some black women are indeed a sign that you’d be mad to hire them! As well as being unsuitable for keyboard work, their personal hygiene routines must leave a lot to be desired! 🤢

Ateh Jewel, a beauty journalist and broadcaster, compares it to Coco Chanel making tanned skin desirable among the white upper class in the 1920s. “Beauty is just another way to see how culture reflects power, status and racial prejudices,” she says. For Jewel, who has “always loved a ‘naked’ nail as well as “colourful fun nail art”, her own personal preference is now colour. “I only wore black and had naked nails before the BLM movement. Now I’m leaning into nail art and wearing pink as I don’t adhere to old social structures any more.”

How brave! 

Arlay ... psy-op? Kabuki Theatre?

 Let’s start with a generality:

The charlatan was not, imho, only this Arlay himself, whom I believe may well have been “suicided”, a la Killery or letter agency … or else, as “our chap” at Unherdables pointed out – it was just one giant psy-op. Maybe he’s still alive.

How else can you get a massed “We are Charlie Hebdo” type thing going unless you have a sacrificial lamb? The people behind this whole Kabuki Theatre scamfest are nasty indeed. In fact, some people not generally given to overt religiosity have been using words such as “evil” and “demonic” and the perspicacious have noted it:

Fauci? Blair? Obama? And the normies come in like Eloi:

As Nick Dixon said: “All facts (about what Arday and promoters were up to) are lost in a torrent of emotion and identity.”

That’s why, until now, I’ve not bothered with the whole mendacious scamfest.

I Hadn't Noticed....

Journalists are self-censoring their reporting on rightwing protests, Donald Trump’s administration and trans issues because of growing concerns about their personal safety, with newsrooms accused of “normalising” the risks they face. Hundreds of journalists from across the UK have anonymously disclosed increasing nervousness over their security. Some have reported avoiding or altering coverage on certain topics due to intimidation, leading to self-censorship and “a narrowing of the public conversation”.

The press is full of articles criticising Donald Trump and praising diversity and enrichment, and the ‘holocaust ‘ that trannies are supposedly faced with every day. I can’t see how there’d be room for any more! 

But that’s because this article is based on nothing, as usual.

The findings are revealed in a government-backed investigation into the safety of journalists, ordered amid growing hostility to traditional media across the west.

Government investigation finds what it wanted to find, news at eleven! 

Investigators found a widespread belief that abuse linked to reporting has increased, especially online.

A belief isn't proof. 

“Anti-immigration protests were most widely referenced by journalists, both regarding the in-person risks of attending the marches and the backlash to any subsequent reporting,” the investigation found.

One respondent described seeing a female journalist subjected to misogynistic heckling at a “unite the kingdom” rally, with the footage later uploaded to social media.

Quislings are treated harshly by the native population, eh? Get used tto that, because there's more coming.

In praise of dumbphones

The topics dominating this Sunday morn are NHS incompetence, the way the unvaxxed were treated plus the vaxxes being destructive, Somalis … and some crazy alert through people’s phones. Let’s go with some crazy alert.

I was amazed by what I read … I don’t mean that it was possible … it is, they tried it on before if you recall … no it’s just how incompetent, mendacious, malicious people in control of our lives now and drunk on the power are able to disrupt people in their daily lives, let alone within their homes.

So let’s look at that. For a start, I have a dumbphone only, no smartphone. That helps. Plus I live high on a hill, away from people. Having said that, I can still hear people a hundred yards away if it’s loud, which this “alert” appeared to be. Plus I’m unsocial.

Not antisocial, otherwise I’d not be writing to you lot right now … just not bothering with social intercourse face to face … again because I’m using the time more wisely in writing to you lot.

(Wonderful expression, that … “you lot” … I must thank Tice one day.)

Anyway, why not go the dumbphone route instead, leave your net surfing to your home ipads or whatever? Still, what would I know?

For a start, AI is nothing but Machine Learning

… it’s only as good as its human programmers.

Alex Marshall downunder came out with this:

She’s a first rate journo down there but what about a first rate techie here … say our “now and then” Lord T, whom many longtime onliners will recall … he wrote this for the Orphans site:

“Bear in mind that what is talked about as AI is not true Artificial Intelligence but Machine Learning algorithms written by some very smart people and because of how well it works in solving problems, it gives the impression to our simple minds that it is intelligence.

It does so by  running so many options in parallel to work out what is the best one and so can easily appear to be super intelligent to a much slower human who analyses and processed the data in a much different way.  For example a chess computer runs many options from the current state of the board to calculate what move it makes next gives it the highest probability of a win.

There are so many options so it can only analyse so many steps in the time allotted but it still beats most people.  As processors get faster it will be able to do more steps and it has already started beating grandmasters.   It is called AI because that sounds better and sexier for marketing.

So we hear AI is going to change the world and all will be great except for a few jobs being lost.    AI is undoubtedly about to change the world and it isn’t going to be sweetness and light.  In fact it is already not looking good and we are still at an early stage.

The next stage is to integrate AI into robots and we have already started to do that.   Simple robots for companionship, sex, planting and harvesting vegetables, carpet cleaners, pool cleaners, patrol guards, washing and ironing, basic bricklaying, invalid care and more are already here or already at an advanced stage with more being worked on.  These roles are currently usually performed by unskilled workers.

Those workers than cannot get IT or skilled jobs because they don’t have the brainpower or the experience necessary.

As robot dexterity improves, more and more jobs will be able to be performed by robots until eventually all manual labour will be able to be performed by a robot.   With minimum wages increasing all the time and robots not taking sick days, holidays, being late for work or just not turning up at all … and they can work 24/7/365 … then spending £250K for a robot becomes economical.

Robots will end up being our servants, growing all our food, bringing everything to us and cooking it.   It’ll even be able to clean your teeth, make sure you are dressed correctly and even wipe your bottom.

What else will we need?    It will initially vastly improve how we live, increase our free time and increase our lifespans but that comes at a cost and that cost will be our lifestyles and self esteem.  There will be more job losses and very few new jobs will be created but as we are importing more and more unskilled people, the meager jobs created will be insignificant compared to the number of people that will not have a job and no amount of education or training will get them those jobs because people with them won’t be moving on up the ladder.  There will be no ladder for them to move onto.   Who will pay the taxes for all those unemployed?

Now, when the only jobs left are skilled jobs and management type roles, how many employees does a company need?   Especially as there will be no customers because with nobody working, who will have any cash to buy non-essentials?

Sure we will all have the standard TV and the standard electrical gear in the house but as a robot is doing all the work, the basic kit will do but I won’t need a car because I won’t be going to work or going on holiday.   I won’t be able to afford it.  Firms that make cars are already highly automated but there won’t be any design jobs as basic models are fine who needs innovation to get an extra mpg from a engine when there won’t be that many selling? Who can afford meals out, holidays, expensive hobbies?

So the skilled jobs will no longer be required either.   We will all be unemployed, looked after by robots and having simple hobbies that involve TV, social media or anything that doesn’t require money.

Our societies will stagnate.   Why innovate when the robots are doing all the work and nobody has the funds to buy anything? Choice is expensive and robots won’t care what specs the latest appliance has. Why develop new appliances, technology or process methods when robots won’t need to be improved to do what they are doing?   Robots will repair themselves and build new robots for those few that get damaged.

This is inevitable.  Our government knows it, our tech gurus know it and most of us don’t fully realise the implications.   The tech gurus see having nothing but free time as great, it is freeing us up to achieve 
our full potential.    The Tech gurus could be right, we could move to a utopia with no real work, robots looking after us and we have the time to do anything we want.   It isn’t too late but what would that entail?

We would have to control AI and its interfaces to the real world.  No arming robots and allowing them to maintain and repair themselves without human intervention.  No interfaces to real world systems without 
a human having to approve it and similar restrictions.

The rate that AI is being rolled out is out of control and accelerating, look  but the Geeks think it is going to be OK, they always do and they make these mistakes because they always think they can control it and they never think things through.

The governments though.  Well, why do you think they are trying to bump us off with false vaccines, allowing food full of carcinogenic compounds, disarming us while importing violent migrants and pushing for meek societies managed by the state, that state being a totalitarian government.   This is why governments are pushing their agendas, disarming the people, digital currency, make them conform to 15 minute cities, obey instructions mindlessly and make sure they are not educated enough to actually think.

They will still be in charge but they don’t need nor want billions of useless people when they only need a million people for the tasks that robots can’t do and for those governments to oversee with them clearly in charge.

We really underestimate how duplicitous our politicians are. They would destroy our democracies, kill and imprison our people so they could rule the ashes.    By the time we wake up, it will take a civil war with significant losses to take back control. Even the US with its Constitution written by moral geniuses, underestimated the lengths politicians will go to for power and what machinations they will do to work around the wording in that document.

At least in the beginning because politicians and civil servants will stupidly put AI in charge of actions to make their lives easier and already these AIs are protecting other AIs and lying to us.  The simple people we have in government are just too dumb to realise that they won’t be in charge long.

Robots were first thought of as machines to take the drudgery out of work and thus was seen as the future for mankind. Many others went different routes and made slaves of people which is a much easier tried and tested route.   You just don’t want too many to control.

Our last hope will be that the robots in charge want to keep some of us.”