Consequences For The Little People

The taxi driver who dropped Southport murderer Axel Rudakubana off at a children's dance class has been stripped of his licence...'The council found he did not meet the appropriate standards.'

What are the ‘appropriate standards’ for Taxi drivers encountering murdererous savages? Do they have any? Isn't it just up to normal human morality?

Chris Walker, director of serious injury at law firm Bond Turner, has now said the three bereaved families he represented 'welcome the decision' to revoke Mr Poland's licence 'as a necessary step towards securing individual accountability for those whose actions fell below the standards the public should expect'.

Well, I suppose when you can’t get to the police or social services, you have to settle for the people who are only tangentially responsible. Don’t get me wrong, Mr. Poland, is a craven coward. He should hand back his Man Card immediately, never mind his Taxi license.

The inquiry had heard that Mr Poland, who worked for One Call Taxis, picked up Rudakubana from his home, in Banks, a village around five miles from the seaside town, at 11.31am.

Mr Poland, who has been a cab driver for 27 years, said Rudakubana barely spoke during the 14–minute journey but that gave him no cause for concern. However, when the taxi pulled up outside the dance studio, Rudakubana got out without paying.Mr Poland said he remonstrated with him and threatened to call the police, but Rudakubana simply walked away and up the stairs into the studio.

Even if he had called the police, they would have arrived too late to do anything 

Mr Poland said: 'I was waiting for my money. I thought I would give him a minute or two, which I did, then I heard all the screams.' He claimed that he went into 'panic mode' after hearing what he thought was gun shots and drove off.Despite this, Mr Poland admitted he did not stop or call police, but instead called his best friend, Julian Medlock, who worked in the garage and spray shop next to the dance studio, because he was worried for his safety.

He’s obviously been advised to plead victim status in order to deflect any criticism. 

Mr Poland said he had suffered psychological problems since the attack and no longer picked up fares he didn't know. 'I can't sleep at night,' he said. 'I shut my eyes and I see his face, it's there all the time in my head.'

Mr Poland claimed at the inquiry he accepted his next job, which came through to him via an App on his mobile phone soon afterwards, 'by accident'. 'I took the job, I don't know why,' he said. 'My head wasn't there, I didn't really know what I was doing.'

If it’s true that he’s taken money from a GoFundMe set up for him, then I have no sympathy whatsoever. But I recognise that the people most at fault here will not suffer any punishment whatsoever. And they bear far, far more responibility that this patheric excuse for a man...

Low Hanging Fruit Again...

A woman says she was "shocked" when she was fined £150 for tipping the remnants of her coffee down a road gully in west London. Burcu Yesilyurt, who lives in Kew, said she thought she was acting "responsibly" when she poured out a small amount of coffee from her reusable cup down the drain rather than risk spilling it on the bus she was about to catch to work. But to her surprise, she was then stopped by three enforcement officers at the bus stop near Richmond station and fined under Section 33 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, external. Richmond-upon-Thames Council said its officers "acted professionally and objectively" and that the fine was issued in line with its policies.

Of course they said that! They were hardly going to say ‘Ooops, we got it wrong!’ were they? 

Ms Yesilyurt said she had asked the enforcements officers if there were any signs or information warning people of the law but received no response.

Hardly surprising! 

Section 33 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 makes it an offence to deposit or dispose of waste in a way likely to pollute land or water, including pouring liquids into street drains.

And is coffee considered a pollutant, or would any reasonable person feel that this act referred more to other liquids? Coffee is poured down the drain every day, albeit it’s probably phased through a deliveryman’s or taxi driver’s kidneys first…

The Richmond Council spokesperson said: "Nobody likes receiving a fine, and we always aim to apply our policies fairly and with understanding. "We are committed to protecting Richmond's waterways and keeping our borough's streets clean and safe 

"Enforcement action is only taken when necessary, and residents who feel a fine has been issued incorrectly can request a review."

But now you've backed down and cancelled the fine, so clearly, either you were wrong to issue it, or it's the weight of public ridicule and oprobium thats forced you to back down.

The council spokesperson said: "Fixed Penalty Notices clearly outline that there is an appeal process available to anyone who wishes to challenge them 

"It is likely that, had this case progressed through that route, the notice would have been rescinded because it is a minor contravention which the recipient agreed not to repeat."

Ah. Wrong then. Figures.