This is illustrated in a study reported on the N.O. second page, concerning a 'covid' so-called study.
Scientists looked at MRI scans from people who have been infected with Covid. Revealed tissue damage and shrinking in regions of the brain linked to smell. Examined the brains of 785 participants aged 51-81 who had received scans.
Reader contributor DAD’s comment: "No mention if the people were vaccinated."
Precisely. Whcih renders the 'study' worthless before it even starts, let alone the tiny sample size they needed to at least run a 'study'. Will that stop the entire woke MSM apparatus latching onto it and trumpeting it around the world?
It will not stop it, it was designed for that purpose - syndication to the normies, the karens, those who still use the MSM as their reality source.
But there's a second danger, good reader, and that's the notion of insulting writing. I mean my writing, allow me to explain. In this war for hearts and minds waged by GloboCabal against the dissidents [see Freedom Convoy], we get frustrated and annoyed by such obvious ploys as that 'study' which completely ignores the whole point of the convoys and the Pfizer documents.
Therefore, we explode, rant apoplectically, and it's a fair question to ask whom would you rather believe - a calm, erudite, respectable, Sientifik study with seemingly eminent doctors behind it ... or a raving conspiracy theorist who has form ... and who is insulting you from his post?
Small example - the Arizona Senate voted 24-3 to censure Wendy Rogers, the dissident MAGA Senator and so, the Senate's spokes-karen told the assembled press that it was all because of Rogers's hurty words - she'd called them all [dab the eyes, sniffle sniffle] 'communists'.
LOL. Question is why did Wendy say that?
It was because they'd failed to act on the mountain of evidence of voter fraud [posts passim, mainly Steve's at N.O.]. I did smile, dear oh dear, Wendy, just like MTG, just like Lauren Boebert, just like Katy Hopkins, just like Laura Loomer, just like Emerald Robinson ... these ladies are not noted for their hanging back once something is so bleedin' obvious that it at least requires independent investigation.
May I close with a quote:
We believe a scientist because he can substantiate his remarks, not because he is eloquent and forcible in his enunciation. Infact, we distrust him when he seems to be influencing us by his manner.
- I.A. Richards, Science and Poetry, 1926
The cabal are nothing if not good scholars, they note that and thus the IPCC and others all present their findings in the most respectable journals, written in the most conventional and believable way, reinforced by Nobel prizes etc. Except, as we've seen of late, they're lying through their keyboards. Who funds them?
A 12-year-old who raped and abused a neglected nine-year-old schoolboy wasn't prosecuted due to a bungled investigation by his teachers, a report has shown.
Aren't the wokies always demanding universities do the same for rape allegations of (supposed) adults?
The abuse happened while the unnamed boys were both students at Appletree School in Cumbria, a special school for children who have been abused or neglected.
Obviously, so they can be abused properly this time...
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) heard how the victim was repeatedly sexually abused, 'maybe 100 times', by the 12-year-old and others while at the school.
Which others? More children? Or teachers?
The damning findings are part of a report into abuse at residential schools published today.
Ooh, a government report, those are really worth paying attention t...
An Ofsted inspection report from 2006 said that Appletree was 'an effective school which meets successfully the academic, personal and social needs of its pupils', adding that there was a 'consistent management of pupils' behaviour, for which there are high expectations'.
I understand that Pfizer's immunity to being sued evaporates if it can be shown that it committed fraud in reporting the trials. What madness enticed them to "bet the farm" on a single dud vaccine?
... and if we can provide the company's own literature which buries in the final pages multiple adverse, reactive events, then can I ask these questions:
1. What sort of company makes it 'against community guidelines' to ask such questions, implying that we are the criminals for asking?
2. What sort of company has the power to roll out a worldwide experiment on populations, whilst arranging for the medical practitioners in every nation to keep the reactions hidden, backed by the police, courts and media, and also has the power to arrange for multiple governments to give them, themselves, immunity from prosecution in those lands and at the same time tries to bury the data on the experiment for 75 years?
3. What sort of prosecution awaits any who were party to such a thing, calling it ethical?
Fewer workers returning to the office and a shift to hybrid working have caused the owners of Pret A Manger to warn it could go bust.
Oh well, shame.
The coffee shop chain said there were 'uncertainties' that may cast 'significant doubt' over its ability to continue trading in accounts filed earlier this month.
Among these was the 'unpredictability of consumer behaviour' as well as the possibility of new pandemic restrictions and the ability to keep paying its debts.
They've realised that the government can shut their business whenever it wants. Perhaps they shouldn't have slavishly allowed them to think that, then?
Pret, which has nearly 470 branches, relies heavily on office workers and commuters.
As I've said before, if the customers' habits change, then the business must too. Or die.
Take three people in three regions of the world, bound by other friends and years of knocking about together and in general, we're in agreement on the types of people we like. My Russian mate is a male of a certain era, with a certain strength of character, so is my South African mate, so am I.
We're not in disagreement on many things, we're all to an extent cavalier and maverick but we do have our hobbyhorses and these tend to dominate our thinking. None of that matters as long as we don't constantly push these angles in private ad nauseam [not counting the blog here, which is for this purpose].
So far, all good and life proceeds as it's wont to do.
Along comes an issue though, inserted from outside and we find ourselves taking sides on it. So far I'm speaking nebulously but here's a case which defines how we can fall onto opposite sides of the fence if we're not careful. My Russian mate sends footage and no reason to doubt that it is the town he speaks of, in the town centre.
They started bombing Kharkov ( 1000 000 + the biggest Russian speaking and ethnic Russians populated city in Ukraine) with cassete bomb. They just bombed its central square ( Freedom Square, by the way ) just for the heck of it. Fascists. Thoroughbred.
He's referring to Russian fascists on innocent Ukrainians. All right, I looked at comments as ususual and this one came up:
# Azov is sitting there, he was warned! All major cities in the ring
# It flew in from the northwest, where the Azov people are now retreating. in deceleration, you can see from the silhouette of the rocket that this is point U, rashists don’t shoot like that.
# They hit early, at 10 o’clock a gathering of Nazis was planned near the tent, the tent is their agitation and recruitment point, in the building itself is the headquarters of the territorial defense.
# You can see from the southwest, look at the map, and you know where the launch came from, from the outskirts of the Dnipropetrovsk region two Ukrainian point-y missiles, one of our armor managed to shoot down, there will be no thanks from the inhabitants of Kharkov.
# What are your guesses? just on a freeze frame it looks like a U point
# Y has wider options. It's more like MLRS "Smerch".
Whoa! Westerners, pause for a moment and look at this:
Soviet 80s weaponry but still used. By whom? By the Russians? Vot:
It was also used by Russia-backed militants to deliver explosive and cluster munitions to Ukrainian military positions and likewise by the Ukrainian Army.
You see the difficulty for us as westerners? And that was translating Russian language comments as well. Now, what's this Azov they speak of?
We've already looked at Right Sektor and Svoboda groups, the head of the former appointed in 2015 as adviser to Ukraine Govt on tactics. We know they were missile attacking Donbass Russian positions continually, under the advice of the CIA and NATO as well. Villagers we had in footage on the former blog were speaking of Americans speaking that they saw.
Conclusion? No conclusion from me, apart from knowing about the CIA and others - we've been onto them for a decade and a half now. It's quite clear though in my Russian mate's eyes, who knows not of the things we've uncovered in the west.
Now let's go to my South African mate and he opens with this:
Much like what I have been saying: Putin (a) doesn't care a toss; and (b) is out to prove that the Western nations are chicken.
The rules of the ‘rules-based order’ were simple. We make the rules, you follow them. We reserve the right to change the rules whenever we want to suit our purpose.
It was the geopolitical equivalent of Sam Francis’ idea of ‘anarcho-tyranny,’ which boils down to, “rules for thee, but not for me.”
We’ve heard the Russian diplomats complain about this for years. Why have these rules if they are not ever enforced?
As I point out all the time when talking about leftist ideologues purity spiraling towards self-destruction, we have these rules because only others’ hypocrisy counts. Sub-humans are not allowed to talk or even be a part of the conversation.
And in the world of diplomacy as practiced by the collective West, the Russians are definitely sub-human, just like the unvaxxed and now anyone to the immediate right of Karl Marx and isn’t a furry.
Precisely. Is that the same spirit in which my South African mate sent it do you feel? You can see how our own angles keep coming through, whether mine or the commenters under that Russian video. Everyone will interpret according to his/her angle.
Paul Joseph Watson said, in his vid clip on Gab, that he trusts no one - not the cabal, not Russian govt, none of em. He judges by what he sees coming out.
Noble, but what would he conclude about Kharkov? Now I'm not saying that either of my two mates are wrong, I am saying that the potential for division among us needs to be guarded against. Long term friendships, in my eyes, are more important.
Until someone does something which cannot be accepted, such as launching a missile at the other. Let's just see what unfolds.
As for our angle which is heat-seeking missile straight at the NWO global cabal, no cessation of hostilities there. In fact today is US convoy day in DC. Gird up, chaps and chapesses.
On to Mamet’s much-documented swing to conservatism, from his stand against the NFL’s kneeling-during-the-anthem protests to his support for Donald Trump. It seems so far away from the leftist leanings of his youth, the critiques of capitalism clearly visible in American Buffalo and Glengarry Glen Ross.
“I was never, ever a communist,” he says. “All you need to know about communism is that Marx was a sponger. He lived off Engels’ family who had a furniture factory.”
He was raised as a “red diaper baby”, he adds – meaning his parents were communists – so even to say he is a Republican “sticks in my throat”. But he is a conservative because “I would like to conserve those things I grew up with: the love of family, the love of the country, love of service, love of God, love of community.”
You can just imagine the look on the interviewer's face at this point, can't you? And there's more:
And love of the American constitution too. “For those who say the constitution is over 200 years old and can’t still be relevant, I say, ‘Well, what about the Ten Commandments?’ What’s going to rule in its place? Savagery.”
And there's still no escape for our hapless interlocutor:
Mamet became a vocal Trump supporter during his presidency, which can’t have been easy in the Democratic stronghold of California. “Well, he did a great job as a president.” Really? “Well, if you put everything you see on these little screens aside and look at what happened during the Trump presidency. We told China to knock it off. We told Nato to start paying their fair share. We moved the Embassy of the United States to Jerusalem in Israel, fixing the only instance in history of a country that didn’t have an embassy in its capital city. Gas prices were down. There was the lowest black unemployment in history …”
The sweat must by now be rolling down his back.
There was also Trump’s claim that the 2020 election was rigged. Does Mamet believe America’s democratic process to be flawed too? “It’s an interesting question. I grew up in Chicago, which was run as a mob’s fiefdom by Mayor Richard J Daley. So all elections were rigged. The idea that people are not going to steal elections is ignorance because people steal elections all the time. The question is: ‘What was the extent of the election rigging?’ I don’t know. But was it questionable? Yes.”
"The US Army regularly produces deadly viruses, bacteria and toxins in direct violation of the UN Convention on the prohibition of Biological Weapons. Hundreds of thousands of unwitting people are systematically exposed to dangerous pathogens and other incurable diseases. Bio warfare scientists using diplomatic cover test man-made viruses at Pentagon bio laboratories in 25 countries across the world. These US bio-laboratories are funded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) under a $ 2.1 billion military program– Cooperative Biological Engagement Program (CBEP), and are located in former Soviet Union countries such as Georgia and Ukraine, the Middle East, South East Asia and Africa."
...it seems some take it just that little bit too far!
Despite his PCSO role having been based in Derbyshire, he lives in Wales, according to a statement on the Constabulary's website.
Well, when your work is virtual, why not?
Bennett also presided over 74 misconduct hearings, involving 90 officers, between June 2010 and February 2012, according to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request lodged in 2021.
Out of these hearings involving Bennett, 56 officers were dismissed - more than 75%.
