I understand that Pfizer's immunity to being sued evaporates if it can be shown that it committed fraud in reporting the trials. What madness enticed them to "bet the farm" on a single dud vaccine?
... and if another pundit writes elsewhere:
https://beckernews.com/15-worst-covid-lies-that-have-been-completely-exposed-for-all-the-world-to-see-43749/
... and if we can provide the company's own literature which buries in the final pages multiple adverse, reactive events, then can I ask these questions:
1. What sort of company makes it 'against community guidelines' to ask such questions, implying that we are the criminals for asking?
2. What sort of company has the power to roll out a worldwide experiment on populations, whilst arranging for the medical practitioners in every nation to keep the reactions hidden, backed by the police, courts and media, and also has the power to arrange for multiple governments to give them, themselves, immunity from prosecution in those lands and at the same time tries to bury the data on the experiment for 75 years?
3. What sort of prosecution awaits any who were party to such a thing, calling it ethical?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Unburden yourself here: