...and the predators will be circling. It's early as I type this and the majority of results aren't it, and some won't be until the weekend but enough are in that the verdict on Starmer's Premiership has been heard loud and clear.
Who will make the first move? And will he see it coming?
Finishing up this live blog at 0829 Friday morn, with a projection on X
................................................................
19. June's projection, on X, to close off this liveblog
18. That London Lady, on X, retweeted by Subrosa
At the polling station I just visited, the staff working there were wearing giant Green Party rosettes . Surely this shouldn’t be allowed & the staff should remain impartial?!
The narrative that the parents should have done more to let the authorities know about their son and that the authorities could then have done something is purely magical thinking.
Well, when it comes to magical thinking, there's nothing to beat the idea that people from another culture, one steeped in violence and misogyny, will adopt Englishness by osmosis once given asylum here.
You can certainly section patients who pose a risk to themselves or others if there is a bed available (there often isn’t), and in the case of very high-risk or violent patients the capacity is even more restricted in terms of beds in specialist units.
We need to start having some much more honest conversations about how this issue is to be dealt with, what options the taxpayer can and will fund, how much capacity we want to have in the system, and what we’re going to pay the staff who care for these patients.
There’s a lot the taxpayer is willing to fund, and this is one! It is, after all, the taxpayer who is most at risk. Not the people making the decisions, and probably not the people writing letters in the comfort of their no-doubt enrichment-free middle class houses.
To blame the parents is to take the easy and lazy solution, and that will do nothing to keep children like Alice da Silva Aguiar, Bebe King and Elsie Dot Stancombe safe.
Brave word, who from?
Name and address supplied
Oh.
Yes, ideally the parents should have done more, but there but for the grace of God go many parents.
What sort of idiot says that?
Jane Ghosh Bristol
Figures. Bristol. Another hive of wooly-thinking.
What’s missing in the discussion of parental culpability is the concept of support. Rudakubana’s parents, like many others, seem to have believed that the only role of social workers is to remove children. If we had a system, fully funded and with appropriate training, that aimed to support parents through all the complex decisions they have to make, parents might find it easier to raise concerns and consider the consequences.
Ah, another bit og magical thinking, if only we had unlimited funding to play softly, softly with foreign thugs everything would be roses! Is it another middle class 'Guardian' reading woman?
Ruth Valentine London
Of cours it is!
The income tax personal allowance is presently frozen at £12,570 and the full New State Pension for 2026/27 tax year is £12,548, a hair’s breadth away. Next tax year, it’s a mathematical certainty that a full New State Pension, according to the triple lock, will exceed the income tax personal allowance. The government will need to address this as it isn’t feasible to drag many millions of low-income pensioners into declaring and paying tax. So far Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said that people whose only income comes from the state pension will not have to pay tax, but how this will work in practice is uncertain. Plus, many existing state pensioners under the pre-2016 system do already pay tax on amounts exceeding the personal allowance, so devising a fair and workable framework may be a challenge. One option would be to increase the income tax personal allowance each year in line with the level of the New State Pension, but this will cost the Treasury in terms of the income tax take.
An Iranian migrant, 14, has avoided jail after being convicted of raping a schoolgirl just three months after arriving in Britain on a small boat. The teenager, who arrived as an unaccompanied minor last June and was placed in foster care, was found guilty in January of rape and two counts of sexual assault following an attack on a fellow pupil. Instead of being sent to a young offender institution, he was ordered in mid-March to attend specialist sessions “on the understanding of consent, boundaries, and victim awareness”.
Any other country would throw him onto the first deportation flight and sack the judge. Well, not Canada ot Australia, mind, they are even worse than the UK
The victim's family were reportedly left stunned that he avoided a custodial sentence despite showing no remorse for his actions.
And here comes a man from the party that did nothing while in power to try to gain a little support on the back of them:
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp hit out at the sentence, saying: "This vile attacker should be locked up for his crimes. Custody should be the only punishment for rapists."
Yes, yes, and before the voters kicked you out, what did you do to root out the bleeding hearts in the justice system. Was it 'nothing'? I think it was.
Meanwhile, a Home Office spokeswoman said: “This was a sickening crime, and our thoughts are with the victim and her loved ones. “Sentencing is a matter for the independent judiciary, but foreign nationals who commit these vile crimes will be deported at the earliest opportunity.”
Will they? You speak with forked tongue and you know you do.
Unaccompanied child asylum seekers are afforded greater legal protections than adult migrants, making deportation significantly more challenging. Britain also does not deport offenders to Iran, deeming the country unsafe for returns.
The youth justice system treats custody as a last resort, and there are no fixed sentencing guidelines for juveniles convicted of rape.
And all that is the policy of the Home Office, clearly stated. They want these people here, and they will continue to facilitate them staying here, no matter what lies they tell. So use your vote wisely on Thursday!
- Wind turbines and solar farms- AI and data centre requirements- Seed and other oils, e.g. olive- State pensions- Whitbread- Inheritance tax- Raped girls and princesses- May 7th and the political spectrum
On Saturday, V&A East will open its doors in Stratford, east London, showcasing stunning fabrics, photos and black British music.
While the V&A complies with all legal minimum-wage requirements, with some workers paid a living wage or above, campaigners say some of the lowest-paid contractors in London are not in receipt of the living wage.
But are they getting the legally enforceable minimum wage? Yes, Reader, of course they are...
The UK minimum wage is £12.71 an hour and the living wage in London is £14.80 an hour.
And the ratchet only turns one way.
According to the Living Wage Foundation, the living wage is the only UK wage rate that meets the real cost of living.
So campaign for ir to be made legally enforceable and see how far you get...
The worker-led platform Organise, which aims to secure better rights in the workplace, and Citizens UK, a campaigning organisation, have coordinated an open letter to the V&A director, Sir Tristram Hunt, and other senior V&A officials, calling for the £14.80 rate for all workers at the museums.
Mush less effort to try to shame people into paying something they don't legally have to pay.
Roxy Khan-Williams, the head of campaigns at Organise said: “The public expects institutions funded by taxpayers to treat all workers fairly. Paying the real living wage is not just a moral issue – it directly affects how people engage with these institutions.”
Really? I think if you were planning a trip, the wages paid to the staff would be the last thing on most peoples's minds.
It seems even this is wasted effort:
A spokesperson said: “All V&A staff are paid the London Living Wage or higher, and have been for many years. The majority of our contractors also pay the Living Wage or higher.”
Still, as long as it get you publicity.
Firstly, a quick summary of what happened:
Faulty Fujitsu IT software caused 700+ subpostmasters to be wrongly convicted of theft, fraud, and false accounting between 1999 and 2015.
More detail:
The Cause: Introduced in 1999, the Horizon system was plagued by bugs, errors, and defects that created fake accounting discrepancies, often totaling thousands of pounds.
The Impact: Subpostmasters were forced to repay the "shortfalls" from their own pockets. Those who couldn't—or who challenged the system—were prosecuted, dismissed, and in some cases, imprisoned.
The Cover-up: The Post Office continued to prosecute staff despite knowing the system had bugs and that it was possible to remotely alter branch accounts.
The Turning Point: A 2019 High Court ruling in a case brought by 555 subpostmasters, led by Alan Bates, finally proved that the Horizon system was flawed.
A public inquiry, chaired by Sir Wyn Williams, continues to examine the scandal's full scope, including the actions of the Post Office, government officials, and Fujitsu.
