One particular section reads:
The income tax personal allowance is presently frozen at £12,570 and the full New State Pension for 2026/27 tax year is £12,548, a hair’s breadth away. Next tax year, it’s a mathematical certainty that a full New State Pension, according to the triple lock, will exceed the income tax personal allowance. The government will need to address this as it isn’t feasible to drag many millions of low-income pensioners into declaring and paying tax. So far Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said that people whose only income comes from the state pension will not have to pay tax, but how this will work in practice is uncertain. Plus, many existing state pensioners under the pre-2016 system do already pay tax on amounts exceeding the personal allowance, so devising a fair and workable framework may be a challenge. One option would be to increase the income tax personal allowance each year in line with the level of the New State Pension, but this will cost the Treasury in terms of the income tax take.
Maybe read that in conjunction with this on the "triple lock"
There are other complications, in some individual cases, which would follow being taxable in this sense. It would disqualify you for some benefits, maybe substantial ones.
Which brings us to the whole question of whether this actually is a benefit or just an earned payout at the end of a long, multi-generation time period. Consider:

Whoever keeps doing this ... please read the opening welcome above each comment, about monikers. We do try to ask an absolute minimum.
ReplyDeleteSomeone commented some days back:
"Fred, I can't accuse you of giving them ideas as there was something I glanced at from one of the MSM sites a year or so ago. They were suggesting that we wash clothes too often."
The comment was a good'un, I feel it might have been one of our chaps just forgetting but please, pretty please, respect the gaff's request, ok? Moniker of some kind required.