We always expected HS2 tunneling to go wrong sometimes: but this is a little extreme.

Hey, It Was Panto Season, After All…

 

Well, actually… oh yes there was!

Usual suspects, of course!

The oldest two card trick in the book

The old red or blue "sole" choice.

 https://dailysceptic.org/2024/01/03/voters-want-to-punish-the-tories-reform-u-k-rules-out-election-pact/

Reform U.K. has categorically ruled out striking a General Election pact with the Conservative Party, with leader Richard Tice saying he believes voters want to “punish the Tories for breaking Britain” and that the Conservatives were “terrified” by the threat posed by his party. The Telegraph has more.

The part which concerns me are the stupid voters who probably should not have the vote with their level of political naivety and willingness to buy the two-headed monster wrecking Britain:

There have been suggestions that Reform U.K. candidates could take crucial votes away from the Tories, potentially clearing the way for Labour to seize numerous seats. 

Richard Holden, the Chairman of the Conservative Party, warned in response to Mr. Tice’s remarks that “a vote for Reform will only strengthen Labour’s hand”. 

What sort of political idiocy would have you voting for Labour, with Blair poised for his return? There's a very simple choice indeed:

• Never vote communist or any form of left
• Never vote Woke

That's the starting point, all other discussions follow on from there.  There are a couple more:

• Never vote for an illumined globopsycho puppet like Penny Mordor
• Never vote for a non-indigenous non-European as the least bad option

Now ... how to get the people to see that?

“Your Scientists Were So Preoccupied With Whether Or Not They Could…”

…yeah, I think you can finish that famous line yourself, eh, Reader?

What percentage understand that this is global?

It’s not just the UK, US, France, Australia, New Zealand … it’s all over the west, is organised by outside players so powerful that they control every western govt.

Trouble is, it’s not just the WEF in its decade long C300, Tavistock, illumined Masonic or whatever form … it’s also the other ancient nightmare returned … as Andrew Bolt notes in his column downunder:

How bad is it?  Ask western women and girls living in trepidation … those not stupid enough to be quite unaware … the old people shuffling down to the corner shop, the 11 year old stabbed out of nowhere while looking at the fireworks … the assassin then slinking away in the crowd, the 7 year old girl raped a day ago by a 30 year old Alb****n “child”.

While sheer numbers are a definite problem of the utmost importance, as the superstructure of the country, on taxpayer money, growns and collapses … it’s this other problem of the sneak attack or ambushing, or of sudden mass praying to satan at the houses of parliament … which does globopsycho’s work for it … keeping people behind locked doors at home … itself no guarantee of safety … the climate scam with its hailstoned solar fields, broken windvanes in gales, the ridiculous heatpumps and burning EVs in driveways … on and on and on … all completely unnecessary, except for globopsycho’s plan to make life abject misery for people …

… and the people too stupid and distracted to see what is happening:

And what of those of us who do wake up, who do see?  We write Andrew Bolt type articles in the increasingly censored media for other wokees … living on borrowed time … what, 10% of the overall population are we?

Thus:

Happier New Year we hope, dear reader

First an “official” greeting on behalf of Julia and Mike:

And now some thoughts on’t. I see Laura Dodsworth is doing a Year Review … aaaggghhh, I’d never attempt that, I’ll be glad to see the back of 2023 …

… and yet, how’s 2024 going to be? One has to hope Leggy’s warning does not eventuate … yet Mike has some things to say about that. 

And then there’s this across the dying west:

Now look, I’m not saying don’t go in for your long awaited op … you do what you must … just saying that I plan to stay right away from any medical place, esp. hospitals … easier said than done.

I suppose I can only wish good things for you in 2024 and I’m sure Julia and Mike join me in that.

(Some have asked the question why we three, running our own sites pretty much full-on, persist with Orphans. Reason is that Orphans began in 2012 as one of the last bastions of some sort of freedom … it does have its own readership as well as those of us three … we just feel it’s a nice little site and we care for orphans.)

The future of the workplace?

This is social media we’re on ... therefore we need to cover all the social topics which need covering but many of them are sickening, so we need defences so as to stay on track.

One of the most sickening is betrayal by those we trusted … but to put it less forcefully, less terminally, shall we say … maybe just realising that those we may have been promoting as admirable were actually less admirable than they’d first appeared.

Admittedly, I was the one praising one of those girls in Sat 1 and based on all the dating advice she was giving, she could be said to be admirable.  Trouble was, she was maybe too open in that she was letting things she’d done slip out and her loyal legion of male fans now saw one or two asking questions.

One man’s concern was over her new man … mine was over her ex:

Look at the first guy first … I have not yet seen any of the 138 replies but I do note the 522 likes for his point he makes … I might make that 523 soon.

What caused such a reaction against her suddenly? Well she misread her supporters … while so many in comments are saying how brave she is to speak up, to be honest … imho, she’s not being honest at all … she gives a highly abridged account of some of her mess … from her point of view alone … yet as she continues to justify herself, she digs herself deeper and deeper.

I never asked her her personal life story but if she’s going to give it … plus it’s on this very point of relationships gone wrong … marriage, with children in fact … then surely his story must also be told. She had a boyfriend from 15 she said, “childhood sweetheart”, she married him at 20, 12 years later it ended, which puts her into her 30s now.

Now as she started telling all this publicly, then certain questions needed asking. She said she was naive at 20, rosy eyed, she also said she was “religious”, which I take to mean Christian. So the obvious question is … did she have nooky with this boy, as she puts it … “out of wedlock”, from 15 to 20? She mentions family pressure on her.

Fine … her right to do as she wants, all you libertarians … just don’t call yourself Christian. She can’t have it both ways. So, she married, had two children, he worked, she mentions his promotion in the offing which never happened, so she had to start working … all this is coming out piecemeal. So her dream is shattered, she wanted divorce but in that state, it took time and covid arrived.

What she hinted at was he lost his job, she had to be the breadwinner now … she says she met this other divorcee … when?  There’s just far too much not being said and she’s releasing more and more to justify herself … including saying that there is something more important than religious rules on marriage. Whaa?

So, with divorce finally coming, she falls pregnant to this other man … out of wedlock, which she says she believed in. One thing I’m thinking at this point is why did he lose his job and she didn’t?

Well I’m thinking this next video may well have a say on that matter:

Getting off the topic of her at the top of the post and onto his concerns in the video just now … it’s pretty clear where it’s going, vis-a-vis young white males and employment prospects. A new underclass of white male serfs, under female overlords working for globopsycho, with the massed armies of non whites enforcing this status quo. That’s how the WEFers see it going.

Or do they?  And this is where I’m starting to take onboard what he’s saying … these new superwomen in HR and tech management, management in general … as well as being pretty useless, are being replaced by AI.

If old enough, we retire do we not? At the mercy of pension schemes plus state pension, triple lock not guaranteed.  Plus Net Zero and digital, no cash.  Those under 55?  They’re in trouble, would you not say?

And what of the invading hordes kept in luxury in hotels or occupying forces barracks around the country?

How relevant, in the light of all this, are “relationships” as a blogging topic any more? The narrator in the video speaks of us using our trade skills … what percentage can do that?  Where are the rest?  Down the coalmines again?

The lowlifes in key positions

Were you to consider the factors in all three screenshots together, not in isolation:

... then it's obvious that entirely the wrong people are in key positions and are now abusing their positions ... almost as if on cue.  And the issue for us is simple ... how to reverse it.

Simple what needs doing ... far more difficult organising unherdable cats or sheep to actually think it through ... then rise. Even in that, it's all factored in.

What's the solution?

No, This Is Not A Failure Of The Justice System...

“I thought any sensible judge would dismiss the charge completely. It’s just asinine,” Moore said. “There were failures in the criminal justice system all the way around.”

...this is the justice system working as it should. To prevent First World countries looking (and smelling) like Third World ones.

The child’s mother has said her son urinated behind her vehicle while she was visiting a lawyer’s office in Senatobia, Mississippi, on 10 August. Police officers in the town of about 8,100 residents, 40 miles (64km) south of Memphis, Tennessee, saw the child urinating and arrested him. Officers put him in a squad car and took him to the police station.

Public urination is an offence. Don't want to be arrested for it? Don't do it. Ten years old is surely old enough to learn this. 

It was initially unclear whether prosecutors would take up the case. Moore said he had planned on going to trial, but shifted strategy after prosecutors threatened to upgrade the charges and the child’s family chose to accept the probation sentence because it would not appear on the boy’s criminal record. The 10-year-old is required to check in with a probation officer once per month.

In the States, they probably have those in schools too, as well as police officers. But what's an attorney to do in a case like this?

"Race Card?"

"That'll do nicely..." 

Moore said he doesn’t believe a white child would have been arrested under similar circumstances.“I don’t think there is a male in America who has not discreetly urinated in public,” Moore said.

Does that make it right, then? 

“Sentencing anyone, let alone a young child, to probation under these facts is sure to add to the trauma and denigration this child has suffered since their arrest,” Ndiaye said. “This is all the more proof that we need to severely limit police interactions with civilians, from petty retail theft to traffic stops and even so-called ‘quality of life’ offenses. For Black people in America, it is a matter of life and death.”

Oh, please! Could you lay on the hyperbole any thicker? How exactly are the police supposed to do their job without interacting with civilians? 

A quick tale of projection

Two days ago, through to the ipad ticker came a reply from some clown to my comment in support of a provocateur.

Let’s back it up and people will form their own opinions … I could make a case either way but chose to support one side.  Thing was, it was not even a political forum … it was just a film we’d run. 

This lady had come in scathing about the Woke left’s support for Hamas, she did have a star of David in her moniker … well, did the roaming, surfing Wokerati ever pile in. I do agree she should not have started it but the sort of reaction was truly mental pack behaviour … whereas hers had been deliberately provocative, yet lone wolfette.

I thought whether to let it go or not, esp. their portrayal of the “sane centre-right country, family things” we do labelled as “far right” and “racist”. 

It wasn’t so much that as the way they pack attacked her which got me. More fool me the way she’d left someone like me to be the sole one defending her … I knew what she was doing, I’m sure she did too.

Anyway, the predictable happened and this was the interesting bit. If the prevailing mood on our side of politics could be described as “simmering and not so simmering anger”, his was smug, intellectual correctness … he knew the tropes, the buzz words and phrases, the global narrative and procedure … arrogant plus, pure university undergrad, fed by the professors.

No, I did not reply, which he would interpret as Victory but which, had I engaged, would have trashed the film poster’s comments thread … I was about to start in …

The interesting aspect was that Them, the minds behind the Wokerati, had obviously studied us, our outraged way of writing, speaking, the phrases we use for the Wokerati themselves … and thus he said to me that if I could just get off the kool aid one moment and see what was really happening … his words dripping with sarcasm … I might get half a brain back.

In other words, he’d adopted our very manner, our everything … he’d hijacked it in fact, lock, stock and barrel, undercut us so he’d think, which made me think of Gladstone of all people … I’ve a quote here from the Oxford Book of Quotations … this was the exchange:

Disraeli (on Gladstone): A sophistical rhetorician, inebriated with the exuberance of his own verbosity. (Times, July 29, 1878)

Gladstone: I absorb the vapour and return it as a flood. (In Lord Riddell on public speaking, Some Things That Matter, 1927 ed.)

In other words … Gladstone’s whole shtick was to win debates, appear as a statesman … all me me me, technique, mocking manner … (cough) but nothing about the actual plight of the people suffering.

From there you could go to the Irish “leader’s” doublespeak or Tedros’s narrative trotting-out ad nauseam. The only thing they are after is power, control, corruption of every placeperson, agenda, narrative … again, zero to do with people’s concerns … why should they be concerned? 

Who’s ever going to “vote them out”? They’ve been promised they are the Elect, as safe as houses … maybe Airmiles might remember that in the next few days.