Maui and the mishandling of disaster

First up ... Clif:

Toodles from Alabama adds that it looks far more than sheer incompetence:

I am so grieved about the Maui victims. So grieved. 

On a much lesser scale, but still sensitive,  when we were attacked here by our own govt with the oil spill, they tried preventing us or anyone else from doing anything to help - disgusting time. 

Our fire dept and other individuals fashioned something that reached the entrance of the bay which is connected to both rivers.   It helped prevent it or at least lessen oil from seeping up into the upper waters. 

It was an awful time. Sludge and gunk and no one in our govt. caring. The idiot in office cared least of all. He and his goons made a visit here and he showed who he was. Felt like (cause they were) Af. thugs with him on his first visit.  They were mean and woke looking .  Auntie Tiffany looking but wearing Island shirts and Island shoes and guns like in the movies … Island mobster look. 

One time he  brought those stand-in children with him to swim in the waters of Panama City Bch area which at that time had no sludge like us because it was far removed from where the oil well cracked. That area probably eventually got some  sludge. Not at that time though. 

You could tell he was miserable being here…there . I heard they plopped in the water while being filmed and then out they went. The ultimate photo op! 

After that the waters really were polluted! All that faux liberal love really contaminates ….as if they care. The Body Language Guy could have had a field day. Their disgust for the South was so palpable!  

Anyway the govt tried to stop us on every front from fighting the oil getting everywhere.  It seemed so intentional at the time … because it was!  We were not to do anything but wait for them to pitch in . Sure…sure.  

We did wait and wait and wait! 

The thing is the independent minded people who once were younger and stronger and had a positive influence here in the community and who lived and appreciated nature are much older now. Who fills those jobs now? 

But this thing over on the Island  of M is beyond horrible. Evil and creepy. Those who had any hand in it are SINister.  The govt prevented us from helping when Mexico Bch FL was hit and also from helping in Tuscaloosa too after the tornado back when the same Goons were in office and who are still running the show.   It was and is crazy. 

More Retail Cowardice...

Another shop falls prey to the hysterical ninnies amongst us, as Longrider notes:

The shop has since removed the image and apologised on Instagram.

'We will keep this brief,' the post read. 'The image that has caused offence has been removed. We apologise unreservedly for any and all distress that it caused.'

Mr Harriman posted screenshots of the apology, with a tweet from Surrey Police confirming that the image has been taken down.

The 'offending image'..? A photo of a tobacco plantation. In a tobacconist.

After filming inside the store, Harriman, 46, spoke directly to the camera outside it, expressing his fury that a shop in 2023 could use an image of oppression to promote its products, calling it 'triggering' and 'damaging to many people'.

Something's damaging all right, but it isn't a sepia photo of a byegone age... 

The danger we face being normal and sane

A patron across at another site where I write quotes a headline which mentions Transgender ‘Man’.

I’m thinking we need to counter the foe’s hijacking of language by simply not speaking in it … more easily said than done.

At the same time, we need to be pejorative only with perps, advocates for sicko things … all the others, e.g. children, are victims … real ones, not Marklettes … hardly to be pilloried. A sad, sad situation, as with young thots who are increasingly STD ridden.

This will take not only wisdom but some compassion and once sane people see an acceptable term enter the nomenclature … run with that.  

Part of this thing is purporting not to understand the other person in the argument, e.g. anyone using the alphabet soup approach … LBGBheebeegeebee or CISco kid and Pancho.

For example, anyone referring to another person as “gay” … ah, we say, a non-perverted person full of the joy of life … yes, what’s the issue with such a person? No no, says the other … someone otherwise sexually oriented. Ah, say we … you mean a sodomite? At which he balks or baulks, protesting … at which point we say … sorry, just don’t understand your banter, old chum.

The thing turns firstly on whether it’s pejorative or not. Logic dictates that if a person wishes to identify according to sexual proclivity rather than, say, job description, being man or woman, or according to life experience … if he wishes to be known as deviant and with Pride (meaning deviating from the norm as far as where he inserts his tadger or todger) … if he wishes to be identified as such and has hijacked the rainbow in the sky for that purpose, then “sodomite” is an accurate descriptor … it just describes what he does, nothing more, free of value loading.

The second thing it turns on is if there is personal danger involved for us not to use his ideological lexicon in the least, to use other terms. Those terms need to be both accurate and non-pejorative. For example, that girl in the States (I think it was) who referred to her lesbian nan (was that how she termed it?) … well what’s the issue? Lesbian is non-pejorative, it just refers to what two females do to each other at night, does it not?

Should the kid have mentioned it?  Well that rather depends on whether the” lesbian nan” makes a big deal of it or not herself, does it not?  If the nan does, with her multicoloured, cropped hair, nosebones and bits of wire everywhere, sporting tatts … then that’s something that nan wishes to be known for. If the nan does not, is a quiet mouse or maybe is outgoing in a different way, then maybe others have an arguable case against the kid … jury’s out on that.

But it does raise two spectres, does it not? Free speech, which this site embraces, along with censorship … plus whether there are basic things, red lines, over which we really do not agree, nor should we. An example is calling invaders “migrants” rather than fighting age men with money and alien values, plus violent habits.

We do keep coming back to the terms used, every time, and make no mistake … even at this site we need to be careful because one thing you can depend on is the pushers of these things are the most oversensitive snowflakes on the planet, with the State stoopidly behind them all the way.

A distressing situation for the normal and sane today.

Technology Sledgehammer To Crack Justice System Nut...

Home Office officials have drawn up secret plans to lobby the independent privacy regulator in an attempt to push the rollout of controversial facial recognition technology into high street shops and supermarkets, internal government minutes seen by the Observer reveal.

The covert strategy was agreed during a closed-door meeting on 8 March between policing minister Chris Philp, senior Home Office officials and the private firm Facewatch, whose facial recognition cameras have provoked fierce opposition after being installed in shops.

Wouldn't you be better off sorting out the justice system instead, to ensure that theft is properly policed and punished? But no, falling for shiny new toys is so much more fun...

Asking better questions

People do get the govt they deserve. For example, there’s a clip here of a naive young lady who’s dazzled by nu-tech.

https://twitter.com/LaurenWitzkeDE/status/1688360217413554176?s=20

https://nourishingobscurity.wordpress.com/2023/08/09/reader-drops-419/comment-page-1/#comment-6671

The first question for me is why? Why is she excited to be drawn into the mark in the hand or forehead, without which she can neither buy nor sell any more? She’d look blankly at that because she has no grounding in eschatology. Why not? Because parents and schools do not teach it … in fact, they avoid it like the plague and do pride and tranny mutilation instead, thot-ism.

And yet she’ll have the vote … you catch the drift? Ok, look at this one:

First thoughts going through your mind?  Well if you’re one of our readers, you’ll at least start critically, cynically. My first thought is Denileriverafter? And I know he’s one of the good ones on Gab, posting the type of thing we do. So if he quotes CBS, one of the worst of the MSM for Wokery, then I’m expecting a critique.

What next? Weijia Jiang? Oh what a giveaway … French, innit? Next I check the date … ah but is that the original date or reposting date? Well it says. Note that, it might be from two years ago. 

Now comes where following a blog or two closely for a few years helps … because if you had been, you’d know the Chinese have troops on Vancouver Island, p,us their own courts (cf. Sharia), thx to Castro’s possible son. You’d also have known that Seattle’s nearby to Vancouver Island, a hotbed of leftwing music.

Let’s move onto this one:

Fox News … as RINO as GB News is CINO … controlled opposition (see Tucker).  So why is Fox dissing Biden? 🍿🍿🍿

Readers, if you’re here, not just as a stumble upon, then you already know the above in this post. But really … anything whatever we see needs testing against our checklists before we make any statement on it.

Imagine Feeling The Need To Say This..?

The boss of retailer Co-op Food has warned people to not defend shoplifters and that the majority are drug gangsters.

Who on earth is 'defending' shoplifting..? 

Matt Hood, Co-op Food managing director, made the remarks after denying that an uptick in thefts at the retailer's stores was a response to the alleged profiteering by supermarkets during tough times.

Oh, right. Of course! I should have known...

In comments made to the Telegraph, he said that the reason for the slew of thefts was mainly because shoplifters use baby formula 'to cut drugs'. The grocer has recorded its highest levels of crime in the six months to June, seeing almost 1,000 incidents a day. This marks a 35 per cent increase year-on-year.

And it helps if the government has a handy scapegoat to deflect attention from their own lack of competence to deal with such issues as rampant crime caused by lazy cops, doesn't it? 

Many, including the Government, have accused the grocery sector of 'greedflation' over the past 12 months as consumers tighten their belts amid the cost-of-living pressures.

Any, errr, evidence of this so-called 'greedflation'..? 

Despite some supermarkets being accused of ripping their shoppers off, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has said it has not found any evidence of profiteering in the industry.

Didn't think so... 

US women’s “football” is unAmerican

Very unhappy place, America just now, not unlike Britain … due of course to the globo Uniparty, its myrmidons and karens, plus normies who just don’t think. Naturally, this clip (which can be accessed at NOWP or on Twitter) did not go down well with the Wokerati:

Naturally, I’ve a whole range of similar comments up and so many more in a similar vein. Which then leads to De Santis in denial over the plethora of evidence against the sheer mathematical possibility Biden won. This clip also at NOWP.

The More I Hear From Her, The More I Like Her...

Kemi Badenoch has suggested electric vehicle mandates could hamper investment in Britain and lead to job losses, in a sign that another of the government’s green pledges is in doubt.

Don't just suggest it, though, Kemi. State it. Because it's true. 

The zero-emissions vehicle mandate is part of a series of rules to phase out petrol and diesel engine cars in an attempt to reach the government’s legal target of making the UK a net zero carbon emitter by 2050. The UK ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars is due in 2030.

However, there are widespread concerns over whether Britain has adequate infrastructure and capacity for the growth of electric vehicles.

And who says that? Some petrolhead determined not to give up his polluting vehi...

Oh. 

Last weekend, the prime minister ordered a review of low-traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs). It is unknown whether the plan is to seek the removal of all LTNs, even those that have been in place for long periods, or only those installed since 2020 when Boris Johnson’s government provided £200m for more to be created.

It doesn't really matter what his plan is. We all know what it is. Not enough.

And if he doesn't realise that soon, he'll find someone else doing his job instead...  

Diversity, Wokery & HR depts - dragging the west down to its ultimate oblivion, ripe for invasion by the hordes

It started with this screenshot:

Doonhamer:

A good explanation of why the West is circling the gurgler.

https://sonar21.com/why-is-the-west-so-weak-and-russia-so-strong-the-role-of-human-capital-and-western-education/

Ian J:

Larry Johnson is spot on. Our troubles all started when we lost our manufacturing base, the accountants (embezzlers?) deciding it was 'cheaper' to make stuff abroad, turning the west into a 'service' economy - serving whom I wonder?

Steve:

Doonhamer - why the West is so weak (and Russia so strong)? The role of human capital and western education - from Larry Johnson's blog site.

Closing paragraph:

'By putting its societies on an ideological footing the western elite has backed itself into a corner. They can’t compete; they can’t develop their economies or societies; and they can’t go back. Fixing the problems of the West will require an economic revival, where a real economy will replace the current fake financialized service economy. This cannot be done without putting the hated 1.5/8 group into positions of power. Therefore, it will not be done as long as the current western ruling class is in power. Western societies will not survive an economic revival in their current ideological configuration. Conflict is therefore the only remaining option for the ruling class to hang on to power.'

That could have been an Occidental Observer article from ten years ago, or VDARE 20 years back! The same themes crop up in the second half of Ron Paul's conversation with Col. Doug Macgregor (MftWC 2 last night) and Richard Tice this morning on Talk Radio. It's all around us folks.

Are you truly aware just how vile these people are?

… and what a huge thrill it is for them to be doing it? Methinks we really need to think this one through.

Juanita Broaddrick, by and large, would be seen by “our side” as one of the goodies but she’s still afflicted by a particularly virulent strain of dogoodism which is really quite inappropriate:

As explained by a gabber monikered as vaax saabath:

oh Juanita, you have to understand that that's not how any of this works

unless they can force you to unwillingly participate, they don't have a "lifestyle"

that's why they're groomers, that's why they seek out and rape children, it's why they betray people around them every chance they get and why they create storms of drama

this is why it used to be illegal

Every “good” person I know wants to be seen as “eminently reasonable”, which is a commendable stance in a stable, civilised society … a mindset greatly to be desired and admired … except we’re not now in such a society.

For example, Schwab’s daughter has come out saying that there’ll be permanent lockdown whether we like it or not. We need to look hard at our “reasonableness”, which they’re playing on as their main weaponisation.  She’s just one female in one country making such an incendiary statement … it’s for her own cred within the snakepit.  Just as vaax saabath said … without forcing people, which gives them the most enormous buzz, they have no lifestyle.

This thing has zero to do with reasonableness … I was myself called out on the very thing not long ago at the blog for excusing these people and other creeps as well. Look, perhaps this old quote will put it more clearly:

The essence of war is violence … moderation in war is imbecility. (John Arbuthnot Fisher, lecture notes 1899 to 1902)

There are reports from the Ukraine of dead soldiers discovered with organs missing … guess which refrigerated vans they went into, and for what purpose.  It’s near impossible for western normies to gather even the slightest inkling of just how bad things are.

Once again, I can be accused of refusing to plaster shots of that across the blog(s) … and I still flatly refuse, as it achieves precisely the ends of those desperate for us to go out of our minds … that’s why. At any blog I’m involved with, you can rest assured I’ll ensure that that does not appear graphically … it’s enough to know “of” it and have the means to access it if you’re hellbent on it.

But at the same time, please have no illusions just how vile is what we’re up against.