Tuesday, 14 September 2021

Of throngs, dots and pushbacks

There was a powerful message in a video reader Ripper provided at blog N.O...



The logic in the video holds up, it’s pretty well unassailable, until it comes up against certain realities:

a.  The more freedom a people have to think for themselves, the more fragmented they become in all their shades of opinion on every little aspect of life  … therefore:

[i]  They are never able to combine;

[ii]  The dot has for years carried out a blanket campaign of disinformation and false premises, e.g. parliament is sovereign, not the people voting it in;

[iii]  The dot has taken full advantage of [i] and through [ii], it employs a small number of visible stormtroopers, highly armed and trained in intimidation, enforcement techniques.  Even the language used in ‘the discussion’ is set by them, reinforced by the owned MSM and transmitted through 'carriers' called teachers, lecturers and tutors [I was all three over time];

[iv]  Not only can the throng not combine, but they are not a throng at all, they are all individuals when it comes to resisting, yet compliant under threat, because the dot controls their debt, their medication, their homes, their jobs, all aspects of their personal lives … because the dot designed it that way.

In my teenage, I was ‘selected’ for a summer camp with 120 campers, controlled by 30 of us, dressed in black shorts.  We carried whistles for when we were swarmed around by numbers.  All 29 colleagues would rush out to overcome the 10 or so ‘plebs’, who always dropped away … always. They were unarmed and in 'holiday' mode, we were in war mode.  

Powerful lesson.  

We though did all the work at the place, from drain clearing to cooking to organising, we could never have been accused of laziness, we worked day and evening.  They played organised games during the day.  We lived in barrack rooms, they lived in comfort.

There’s a lesson there somewhere.  Just what could that lesson be though?

And how do we combine sufficiently to push back?  And on what grounds do we?  Increased taxation by Boris?  Will we combine?

Monday, 13 September 2021

Good, If It's 'Guidance' I'll Take It Under Advisement...

Stronger guidance on wearing masks is being planned in case coronavirus hospitalisations keep rising.
...but we all know it's not going to be guidance, don't we?
Ministers are now concerned by falling compliance in supermarkets, trains and buses amid rising infection levels. Yesterday there were another 37,622 Covid cases and 147 deaths. There are also 8,098 patients in hospital with the virus – a six-month high and a rise of 6 per cent in a week.

No doubt the Met Police can't wait to act like their Aussie counterparts... 

Although government sources insist a mask mandate is not imminent, the fact it is being considered will concern Tory backbenchers.
Not enough to actusally do anything, I expect. They proved supine enough on everything else, they aren't going to rebel over this.
They are already angry at being asked to renew the emergency Covid powers that allow ministers to impose restrictions.

Yoda says 'Angry they maybe, but ineffectual they also are, mmmm...' 

Saturday, 11 September 2021

On 911

We need to say something officially about this commemorated day ... but what to say?  First look at Grandpa's post below perhaps.  Also Julia's.


Lastly, this also covers some ground.  I've not a lot to add to that.  Thoughts with the victims, including the vilified for speaking out.  It's a long, a very old war.

Friday, 10 September 2021

9/11: Afghan Aftermath. Failure It Was, And Still Is.

After the airborne attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, America and her NATO allies went in to Afghanistan with the following aims: to defeat and remove the Taliban from power, to rid a Foreign Sovereign State of the terrorist training ground it had become; to find and exterminate the pestilence upon the earth of Al Qaeda, along with its leader, Usama bin Laden.
Yes, the Taliban were removed from power, but never militarily defeated, as they simply hid their weaponry, and henceforth became a mobile guerilla army, armed, paid and protected by the well-known but never officially acknowledged ties with Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence. True, the Allies got rid of Al Qaeda; they eventually hunted down and killed Usama bin Laden, hiding in plain sight less than two miles away from Pakistan’s premier military academy. 
And then the mistakes began. The Administrators, such as the blithering British idiot Rory Stewart, forgot about, or rather never really understood; Afghan Society. They forgot that Soviet Russia had invaded, bled and then withdrawn; aided by American missiles, launched by the Mujahideen. They forgot that England, over a century earlier, had also invaded, had her armies cut to pieces, and had withdrawn, defeated. For centuries, it has been built upon one keystone, and that keystone is Islam. The religious, tribal, family and relative structures, refined and honed over some eleven centuries, have made Muslim Afghan society almost impenetrable when it comes to change, despite the so-called Liberal values which some claim enhances Western Democracies.

Protecting Our Borders..?

The number of foreign criminals released from prison on to the streets has reached a record high of almost 11,000.
Official figures show that at the end of June there were 10,882 foreign national offenders who had been released from jail but not deported.
All are subject to deportation because they were handed prison sentences of at least 12 months.

I wonder how many new ones we are unknowingly (or in the case of the 'Tory' government, uncaringly) admitting right now?  

The latest total has rocketed by 176 per cent since 2012, when the number stood at less than 4,000.

Wasn't the Tory Party once the party of law and order? I'm sure I remember it used to be... 

One in eight prisoners in jail in England and Wales are now non-UK citizens, or 9,850 of the 78,000 behind bars.

Will we see that figure rise in the future? I'm not a betting woman, but I'd have a flutter on that. 

Saturday's post a day early

On the face of it, Andrew Torba has it right at Gab when he says:
Call their bluff. Make them fire millions of us. Make them kick millions of us out of college. Make them fine your business for not complying and don’t pay it. Flood the zone with lawsuits. Their house of cards economy will collapse and things will get very interesting then.
Trouble is, 'on the face of it' was factored in well before the push even started.  

Go back to William Jenner, Woodrow Wilson, Brzezinski, Clinton's mentor and what do you have?  All are agreed the thing is highly organised, with all loopholes and response behaviours from us to the provocation factored in well ahead of time.  

We see it with Cv since Event 201.  The vocabulary is organised, the slow filling of key roles organised - just look at Dick and others - Common Purpose is no figment, it exists, Call Me Dave was facilitating it, ask Lord Stoddart of Swindon or Brian Gerrish - ignoring such things, the WEF for example, is simply wilful ostrich head burying.

And yet even good friends of mine flatly refuse to countenance malice aforeplanning.  Look at this quote a fellow blogger posted - I may have misinterpreted this, if so - sorry:

Thursday, 9 September 2021

How to defeat the vaxx passport

Reader Torquaymada with an idea how to defeat the vaxx passport:

The Great Pushback

When there was a walkout at this site around 2014 and we lost about half the readers, the core reason, as Julia pinpointed, was 'religion' raising its ugly head but I could also point to attacks on me being 'a Tory' - interesting.  If you look at any of my writings for five years now, they've been anything but Tory, nor Romney/Ryan/McCain GOP.  

My writings are against all organised, hierarchical parties with a capital P, they're against all organised, hierarchical Churches with a capital C, they're against the socialist/Communist religion, they're against anything or any ideology which would remove our freedom to make a life, to think the way we wish, to make decisions the way we wish.

It was so in 2011, it was so in 2014, it is so today.  But let's look at that offending verse I kept quoting and there was just one - here it is:

Wednesday, 8 September 2021

Vote for the voice that doesn’t promise very much.

I read with great interest the House of Commons debate on the forthcoming Elections BIll. 

Many thousands of words spoken, and sometimes spouted, for and against clauses in the Bill, which is supposed to be about securing the vote process. The proponents bleated on for seemingly hours about voter ID, about who should hold a photograph card, and how it is always the blacks, the asians, the minorities who will be disenfranchised because they don’t have ID; which of course is complete and total bollox.

They went fifteen times around O’Houlihan’s barn nitpicking about inconsequentials, and totally ignored the huge Elephant seated placidly in the corner. The name of that Elephant? Postal Voting. Only one MP bothered to really comment, but the Government ignored his voice.
 
A supporter of Postal Votes seems to want everything handed on a plate to the user, ignoring all the many pitfalls given air space by the fact that no-one, once that ballot paper leaves the issuing authority, knows categorically that the ballot paper has been completed, in secret, by the person to whom that ballot is addressed. To receive, to actually qualify for a postal vote in GB&NI, all you have to do is ask for it. 

You don’t have to have a reason, whether it be a disability, or illness, or sheer laziness, or the fact that, in most Muslim households, and in many Labour-supporting homes as well, the man, acting as head of the household, takes possession of those ballots, and fills them in as he wishes, seals them, and posts them back to the Electoral Officer, and ALL other family members, male and female, are thereby disenfranchised.

I would alter the  requirements dealing with Postal Votes. A Postal or Proxy Vote would be only available if a Document was completed which would certify that:-

  • the voter literally cannot physically move out of the home to gain access to the Polling Station.
  • The voter has a Mental Illness
  • The voter has a verified illness such as Agoraphobia, which precludes his or her movement into the open air.
  • The voter will be out of the country at the time of the Election.
This Document would then have to hold the signatures of three independent doctors, none of whom shall be registered to treat the voter as a patient: or, if an Employer, a minimum of three Directors should sign.

If you cannot bother your arse to get up and either walk or drive the short distance to a Polling Station, then you don’t deserve the rare gift of voting in any Election.

Bringing Back The One Drop Rule...

One of Britain’s greatest painters has fallen victim to woke culture, as art-lovers are being warned not to ‘idolise’ J. M. W. Turner because he once held a single share in a Jamaican business that used slave labour.

One share. One... 

During his lifetime, the artist was a liberal and an abolitionist, and his iconic painting The Slave Ship captured the horror of the trade in human lives. But a new exhibition of his work at Tate Britain comes with a warning that some of his pieces could be considered problematic.

To whom? To the real 'general public', or to the tiny but loud minority of woke activists? And if tenuous  slavery links weren't enough... 

The gallery’s director, Alex Farquharson, even warns that Turner’s depictions of steam power are linked to climate change.

*sighs* 

Mr Farquharson says: ‘We should not idolise Turner. His investment in 1805 in a Jamaican cattle ranch worked by enslaved labour suggests he had reset his own moral compass by 1840 when he painted Slave Ship as an indictment of the slave trade.’
The painting was inspired by the Zong massacre of 1781, in which a captain of a British ship ordered 133 slaves to be thrown overboard when drinking water ran low so he could claim insurance money.
Mr Farquharson describes The Slave Ship as salient today because ‘Black Lives Matter demands we confront histories of enslavement, exploitation and genocide whose legacies live on’, but says some critics ‘see its visual splendour as mitigating the horror of its subject’.

Probably the sort of 'experts' who fawn over modern 'art' like this... 

Michael Daley, the director of ArtWatch UK, said it was wrong to impose modern values on historical figures, adding: ‘The trouble is that everybody in the arts wants to play politics and not talk about art.

Spot on, Mr Daley, and it suffers as a result. 

The episode could expose the Tate to allegations of hypocrisy – ancestors of founder Sir Henry Tate made their fortune from a sugar empire built on the slave trade.

Good. Let them be hoist by their own petard.