Anomalies … we notice them everywhere, esp. in this era now of things being just plain wrong, inverted, twisted.
And as online investigative pundits, if there’s a string of anomalies, we start asking questions after the third or fourth, don’t we … while certain types of “shutdowners” instantly fling “conspiracy theorists” or “far-right racists”.
UH huh. This one starts here:

And somewhere else:

Think she was referring to those Red Cross women handing packages to those gangs kidnapping Ceuta girls and raping them on top of hills. These Ceuta gangs:

A friend downunder wrote:

And I replied:

I just remembered:

And this:

Or the ad on youtube of some wimpy, wispy man saying to his dog good thing you ate my sneakers coz here’s some better ones to buy. Ineffectual men if white but if it needs masculine … always black. Wot, like in Ceuta?
Remember this?

Or this:


One of the rapegang victims at the inquiry, now redeveloping confidence:

There are all sorts of fragments above. You can choose this one or that and say “unreliable” but the cumulative effect of thousands of such reports?
And the second question … who is more likely to protect these vulnerable females? Man-hating feminazis such as Louise Haigh, plus feminised demi-men (usually vicious little bstds if they don’t get their way … ooo, scratch yer eyes out)? Are they going to defend you, ladies?
Especially against the Ceuta types in every town and hamlet across Britain now, let alone no-go cities such as Brummieland?
Have normies any concept whatever of that which these invaders have been invited in for? For what reason do you think? 🤔
No comments:
Post a Comment
A reminder, dear reader, that you're welcome to comment as Anon but if so, please invent a moniker to appear somewhere in your text ... it tells Watchers nothing, it does help the readers.