Tuesday 15 October 2024

True history of America or far-right fiction?

There are difficulties either buying or rejecting this below:

Interesting Columbus Day thought

… from a Gab a/c called Geiger Counter … could not possibly endorse the sentiment, more than our blog’sworth …

The “stolen land” people are simply low IQ with zero understanding of history or how the world works … America was not stolen. It was conquered. The Native Americans were not skipping through a meadow when Europeans arrived … They were savages. Tribes constantly at war, taking resources (and land!) from each other. They raided, raped, tortured and literally scalped each other. They were then conquered themselves by a people far more advanced in every quantifiable metric. The natives didn’t even have a common written language, let alone any concept of an advanced civilization. They were living thousands of years behind the rest of the world. America was conquered. The Natives lost. It resulted in the greatest country in human history.

Let’s say, for argument’s sake, that you do not buy the above … the implications are reparations forever to whichever tribe wants to try for the gravy train, plus deep guilt forever and ever for even being Caucasian or whatever in the first place.

Let’s say, for argument’s sake, that you do buy the opener … all right, apply it to Canada, NZ and Australia. In Australia, for example, various tribes came to the land, e.g. the Negritos, Murrayans, Carpentarians, one after the other over time, pushing the previous (defeated) tribe further inland. The French, Dutch, British, in turn arrived or did not and history continued.

Now let’s apply the argument to current Britland … waves of much more battle hardened and ruthless savages arrive, slaughter the “natives”, not unlike the barbarians sacking Rome, much mass rape and muder of the women, many sold into slavery … funded by Them above.

Is that fine? Just the natural course of history?



1 comment:

  1. How many times of the years, have the Australian aborigonals stated that the land does not belong to them, but rather that they belong to the land? Then, having received education, and political nous, they start thinking that they could have power, and make a shed load of !money. Who'd have thought it?
    Penseivat

    ReplyDelete

Unburden yourself here: