How to Smother the Truth

 

Over the many years of watching and learning about American politics, media, politicians and media editors, I have learned many truths. Possible the most important ‘truth’ is how an impossibly small number of people judge how any political story can be either spread or ignored, how the facts can be ‘spun’ by those same people: and how the most important of stories, based not upon supposition, but on demonstrable fact, can simply be ignored by ALL the news media in today’s America.

I should begin by reminding people of the sheer amazement in both political reporters and commentators when, against all beliefs, Donald Trump first swept into the White House. TV Station after station, when covering the results, were questioning the polls as the numbers for Trump rose inexorably, with State after State falling to the Man who came from Nowhere. Hillary was supposed to be a shoe-in; some were actually saying that the Election wasn’t necessary; her polling numbers were so good that she would crush this interloper from the world of business in every State.

I had actually watched the former President several times as tv broadcasts of his speeches were becoming more frequent once he had secured the nomination, and: “My prediction at the time? If the ballot-stuffing Democratic bunch can be forced away from the boxes and voting machinery; Trump; the ineffable Donald himself, might just turn the corner and win in the final furlong!”

I think it is a fact that many voters were at least intrigued when Trump lacerated Hillary Clinton’s chances by a carefully contrived, carefully-sensed and timed attack on Hillary’s husband, the well-known philanderer Bill; a.k.a. The loosest Zip in Town. The very fact that Trump was able to locate these four women, rape victims all: hold a mini-styled press conference, with all the accusations recalled about how Hillary knew her client was guilty, but managed to virtually get him off the hook by lacerating the victim in open court: and then place all four in full sightline of Bill Clinton was a demonstration of his determination to take the fight to Hillary, and through her of course to the ex-president. America has always had a sense of ‘fair play’, and those voters who watched that verbal assault knew what had happened, and perhaps that persuaded them that Hillary just was not worth trusting with their votes. 

But Trump’s enemies were legion, and many were highly placed, both in Government and in the many Agencies in Washington, and the plots and planning brought forwards the ‘Russia’ impeachment and also the ‘Jan 6th Insurrection’ Impeachment; but both times Trump survived. But the former President’s many anguished claims of Election Fraud were summarily dismissed, and even the meticulously documented ‘2000 Mules’ was given little coverage. 

However,  in a Federal Court In Atlanta, Georgia, University of Michigan Professor of Computer Science and Engineering J. Alex Halderman testified in front of Judge Amy Totenberg’s courtroom in the Culling vs. Raffensperger lawsuit on the insecure Dominion voting machines used in Georgia elections since 2020.

As reported earlier, during his testimony, Halderman was able to HACK A DOMINION VOTING MACHINE and change the tabulations in front of U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg and the entire courtroom!

Halderman USED ONLY A PEN TO CHANGE VOTE TOTALS! 

But here’s the thing which proves, beyond any doubt, my premise that ‘an impossibly small number of people judge how any political story can be either spread or ignored’. 

The ONLY news media organisation which both published the story and provided a video of the anchor telling how Halderman changed voter totals in front of a Federal Judge was the Gateway Pundit!