The nuts and bolts of censorship ...

... a brief glimpse inside:

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/09/06/government-intelligence-and-security-agencies-behind-ngo-demands-for-more-censorship-by-twitter/

Following the news that Elon Musk is considering taking legal action against the ADL over its outsize role in the advertising boycotts of social media firms, Alex Gutentag and Michael Shellenberger have a new article in Public underlining the links between censorious NGOs like ADL and state intelligence and security agencies. Here’s an excerpt.

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) are nongovernmental organisations, their leaders say. When they demand more censorship of online hate speech, as they are currently doing of X, formerly Twitter, those NGOs are doing it as free citizens and not, say, as Government agents.

But the fact of the matter is that the U.S. and other Western Governments fund ISD, the U.K. Government indirectly funds CCDH, and, for at least 40 years, ADL spied on its enemies and shared intelligence with the U.S., Israel and other Governments.

The reason all of this matters is that ADL’s advertiser boycott against X may be an effort by governments to regain the ability to censor users on X that they had under Twitter before Musk’s takeover last November.

Esentially, Twitter is now Yaccarino, a dyed-in-the-wool WEFer. 

In the light of the previous post about "It’s never about what they say it’s about – what are they hiding?" ... it's not too much of a stretch to see the humble employee of Musk as his actual controller ... same corporate structure of state as Colonel House with Woodrow Wilson, leading into WW1 and Jeckyl Island before that, an event run by Warburg, who again is industrial Germany ... one of the old families ... and coming back to Svali in 2000 on Toronto radio ... a nasty place, Toronto, spawning Ewen Cameron and Meghan Markle for a time ... but I digress.

If I state, categorically, that none of this is bollox, that it can all be researched ... but not using the key engines ... then you're getting an inkling of the real dilemma for onliners ...

Lively debate within a range of preapproved topics and views within those topics, with rhetoric and magnificent dramatics ... but quite missing the real point in each case. A bit like parliament.

The aim in this new sceptical age is to contain debate within a newly redpilled public space, where we've all eoken up to the Woke and sre right chuffed with ourselves for our heightened knowledge ... except we're missing out on key data.

For example, why did Svali say they all needed rudimentary German? Why were training courses in Germany?  A pesky little item ... ravings of a loony? And coming full circle, from the very beginnings of my blogging getting on for two decades ago, this post:

Perry Mason, advocate, had just finished pointing out an anomaly in Sergeant Holcombe’s evidence in a murder trial and now asked, ‘Does that seem logical to you?’

Sergeant Holcombe hesitated a moment, then said, ‘Well, that’s one of those little things. That doesn’t cut so much ice. Lots of times you’ll find little things which are more or less inconsistent with the general interpretation of evidence.'

‘I see,’ Mason said. ‘And when you encounter such little things, what do you do, Sergeant?’

‘You just ignore ’em,’ said Holcombe.

‘And how many such things have you ignored, Sergeant, in reaching your [current] conclusion?’