In plain sight in film

 ... and even in the humble bible. It's one of those things we currently have, globally, which has been hidden in plain sight at least for two decades "for those who can see".

Speaking personally, I joined thousands of pundits around 2003 (long before the blog) and our sidebar pic today is not wrong on most of it ... not all, as investigation turns up truths but also clever mistruths which can fool us for sometime, e.g. on climate, on vaxxes.

When we get to the outer reaches of conspiracy though ... that's where the "respectable middle" jumps ship and say, as with a dear friend of mine: "I'm not going there."  And to a point she was right, because there are so many trolls, false prophets about in the dying days of civilisations that it's easier to ignore what's really happening in the dark recesses of the human sewer. That's written in the bible by the way, as well.

This is one such "person" who's easier to understand in Gitler brownshirt or antifa terms:

The leftist caught encouraging attacks on ICE agents, challenging Trump supporters to physical fights, and threatening tribunals against the current administration is, in fact, a convicted felon who is now a radical left-wing activist online. Meet Jason T. Brooks, a man who was sentenced to 32 years in prison for running a $10 million Ponzi scheme out of Colorado. He ended up serving only 10 years — just enough time to get out and rebrand himself as a leftist digital warrior.

Many of our left libertarian colleagues ... and there are many former Labour and left Tories with the mass of us westerners now whom Stasi calls "far right" would be uncomfortable with the word "left" used disparagingly, as they saw "left" as a noble cause, refusing to see the ideological duping, just as I did in student days, being briefly a Fabian, even an anarchist.

Yes it's true ... we started up Anarchist Revolutionary Students in Education (an acronym for the ages, we thought. We sent our demands on loo roll, as befitted such a club. And it seems this Brooks character also had posterior problems in prison, winning a huge payout from the state, natch.

As Arlo Guthrie might have put the words in the mouths of the army, recruiting a new killer: "You're our boy."

Which are the same sentiments in The Parallax View, with Beatty as Joe Fraidy. A reviewer with moniker Puccini wrote:

Terrifying conspiracy thriller that opens a new set of hypothesis in the most infamous and debated political crimes of the twentieth century in the united states. An obscure corporation and its dirty plots to prevent the rise of a different political force, fearing it would destabilize everything the big shots in power have worked for. Both Pakula and cinematographer Gordon Willis know how to heighten the sense of paranoia and anxiety

Obscure corporation? Public Private Partnership? Quango? Or a group working for the deep state, rather than for Stasi type puppets, all "elected" leaders being puppets after all ... just how did they even get into office? Look at Kemi BadEnough, WEFer through and through, just like Tony and the Dark Lord who just lost his job.

Or go to Quantum of Solace and the mysterious Mr. Green drying up the Bolivian water supply for residents ... no hang on ... that was Newsom and Pacific Pallisades ... no, hang on ... Oprah and Maui ... etc. etc. dot dot dot. Chicago police chief teaching antifa new tricks. Oh golly gosh, Donald might need to send in the National Guard.

Every level of western society has its traitors to the nation ... just look at the corrupt activist judges ... Julia usually has that topic in hand.

The things I was repeating in 2003 of course had me categorised on the conspiracy nutter list ... how much of this post so far has been fictional? Calling Net Zero climate bollox ... is that fictional any more? Calling out MKUltra ... was that fictional? Given the 1973 court case and verdict in the US?

What did the state claim? That it was a psych-experiment which has now been shut down. Just as the group Bourne was part of, before a Senate Committee, used those same words at the end of that Bourne episode.

Now hang on ... which is fact here ... which is fiction? Have a lovely Thursday, readers.

Well, They Could Start By Listening?

In June, the London Review of Books published a superb article by the academic and writer William Davies, referring to this phenomenon as “Faragist TikTok”. He described opening an account and sampling what then poured into his “for you” feed: “Clips of masked men cutting down ultra-low emission zone cameras with angle-grinders. Clips of supermarket shelves displaying inflated new prices. Clips of fights breaking out in the street.” More than anything else, he said, he was presented with footage that constantly conveyed the same flailing fury: “Clips of men and women addressing their phones while sitting in cars or out walking, lamenting the state of ‘Starmer’s Britain’, their words appearing in TikTok’s distinctive pink-highlighted font.”

Ah, yes. Of course. It's all the fault of social media. Not government or organisations that have failed the people, and not the people's wishes for a change to their lives and the way they are governed themselves. 

That's not a reality people like this ever want to face.

When I read this, I instantly recognised what he was talking about. On the occasions I had tried to digest what Musk had done to X, scenes of that kind were exactly what I had found. Scrolling through Instagram was sometimes similar. I then did the same thing as Davies and got half-immersed in TikTok (at 55, I had previously assumed it was not for me). Soon enough, what I was expecting materialised: a disused warehouse in Manchester that had been set on fire, a group of hooded youths being arrested by a gaggle of cops, and a crowd of neo-Nazis, marching in front of a union jack and joylessly reciting the chant that echoed around the capital at the weekend: “Keir Starmer is a wanker.”

Do you think he isn't, then, John? You didn't seem too keen when he was threatening to get your hand out of the taxpayer's pocket.

What does this do to people? Where you live might seem stable, uneventful and full of people who are law-abiding. Most places, after all, are like that. But if you are one of the social media users in Britain who spends mind-boggling amounts of time on TikTok (on Android devices, the average was recently put at 49.5 hours a month), the spectacle that erupts on your screens might suggest that venturing outside will soon plunge you into disorder, crime and chaos – and that those things really do define life elsewhere. This, I think, at least partly explains the place of the archetypal city in some people’s modern paranoia: the idea that multiculturalism has turned London into a crime-infested no-go area, or that Washington DC, Chicago and Los Angeles are in such a state of social disrepair that Trump has no option but to send in the national guard.

All social media accounts do is give people a voice, John. Why is the Left always so agin that? Is it because they know what they'd say? 

In 2008, Gordon Brown attempted a rebuttal in the speech he made at the Labour party conference. “The Conservatives say our country is broken – but this country has never been broken by anyone or anything,” he said. “This country wasn’t broken by fascism, by the cold war, by terrorists. Of course there are problems, but this is a country being lifted up every day by the people who love it.” When I read those words and thought about that great ocean of online video, a thought came to mind: these days, could anyone imagine a Labour politician saying anything similar? And, if they did, would they not look like the epitome of complacency and denial? And then I once again realised how absurd all of this is, and how much the supposed reality that politicians have to deal with is now confected, overblown and often completely illusory. Such is life in the modern society of the spectacle, and such is the huge change in how people understand the world and their place in it that it starts to look like a sinister kind of magic.

Yes! It must be the technology that's wobven its sinister spell over the populace! It can't possibly be that eventually, they realise what the Left's gameplan is and reject it, can it?? 

We need to have our practised battle plans ready, personally

Over at t'other place, I did touch on October 7th and various thoughts on that and on CK/EK. I was also unfortunate enough to see the footage of Iryna again ... yes, the animal certainly stabbed her, slow execution might be the way, also long prison time for Lola and Ruby's menacers.

Having said that, am going to put something else this morning ... the NHS and Chesterfield

That's all well and good, most noble but is it going to keep your household alive when the creatures attack en masse once the word is given?  There are two aspects of defence imho ... men need to harden up, whatever the age, and have the attack plan ready, plus realise it's microseconds between overcoming and gruesome death.  We do need to be back in WW2 mode again, rationing etc.  Not going anywhere unless necessary, can't be avoided ... and then the route needs planning and your attack mode ready.

Now to the girls from babies to 70 ... we have a major issue in this country ... the females are either worth defending, are onside, therefore need to have their own attack plan practised ... girls, I keep saying that this is all about microseconds, not the slow motion videoo advice you sometimes see.

All right ... now we come to the second biggest problem ... violent soyboys and stoopid girls, mental, man-hating girls, both brainwashed through and through.  Defend them? Even the females are violently attacking now.

That's the more difficult plan for us ... how to deal with our brainwashed indigenous?

This Nonsense Is Why Why We Have 'Contains Nuts' Warnings On Packets Of Nuts...

A Dublin woman was fatally electrocuted while holding a charging mobile phone in a bath last year, an inquest has heard.

🤦‍♀️ 

Her husband, Joe O’Gorman, expressed concern that many people are being lulled into “a false illusion of safety” by mobile phone manufacturers that promote that their equipment is waterproof.

It is, but there’s a reason you don’t have electrical outlets in bathrooms! So how was she charging it? Glad you asked: 

He outlined how a three-metre extension cable had been plugged into a socket in the bedroom. Mr O’Gorman complained that there is no warning on certain phones about the danger of coming into contact with water while being charged.

Why would there be? There’s no warning on my oven that sticking my head in it and turning on the gas isn’t a good idea either! 

Mr O’Gorman told the inquest he wants the message to go out about the hazard created by charging a mobile phone in bathrooms.

No need, Joe, we already know this! 

He said warnings about such a hazard should be displayed prominently on the outside of packaging of all electronic devices.

“The only thing you hear about is how these phones are great in up to six feet of water. It gives people the idea that you can have your phone near water,” said Mr O’Gorman.

And you can! It wasn’t the shock she got from the phone, it was the cable connected to the National Grid that did for her! 

H/T: Angry Exile via Twitter

Drawing a line in the sand

... otherwise known as red lines" or "crossing the Rubicon".

A long, long time ago, in a galaxy far far away called the noughties internet, there was a blog group called Bloghounds, which had people from Old Labour to High Tory in it, probably from devil worshippers and marxists to High Anglicans. And the only way that could survive was first of all, civil discourse at all times, or else blocking and giving reasons why. 

That group did survive for quite awhile but eventually, inevitably succumbed to the actions of the same sort as the current Fabian leaderships in the west, identifying the redlines of western society which some have called cultural Christianity, which meant that you didn't overstep other's lines or as Tim Worstall called it ... classical liberalism ... and trying to wreck them, turning civil society into sodom, gormorrah and permabloodbath on the streets.

Thus you didn't shag goats, knife anyone you didn't like, harass others in the streets and tell them it's your land now, you didn't feel free to gang rape girls as young as kids with the participation of plod, you didn't invite in rainbow coloured drag queens to your class to address seven year olds about anal sex. TDS today:

Why were we westerners against such things ... in fact, never countenanced them? The majority were hardly deeply religious, and yet we'd observe unwritten lines in the sand all the time. Hypocrisy?  Maybe ... Christine Keeler and Mandy Rice Davies, we weren't too impressed by Lord Lucan or Arnie getting his housekeeper preggers. We drew the line at rent boys at the home of the denizen of n10.

Those among us who saw ourselves as libertarian, meaning no holds barred, do as thou wilt and to hell with your neighbour thought it quite a wheeze to bait the high churchies and thus one (an averred marxist by the way) came over to my site or emailed or whatever a cartoon of Jesus urinating ... oh what a hoot. Think I was meant to go all Mary Whitehouse or Bishop Fireandbrimstone but my first thought was that that was God's Department, He could deal with it on Judgement Day.

Lines in the sand. I draw the line at railing against something and then wallowing in that very thing online, saying look at this filth globopsycho's into ... go on, rub your nose in it, throw up.  Or to go all Tolkien about it ... imagine you're in Hobbiton and one night, the dark riders come through, slaughtering like Hamas or whoever.  Or Orcs. Or Morlocks in The Time Machine.  Or like scenes from Podesta cartoons.

Incidentally, this was flying across my window this morning ... what sort of monster is it, would you say?

Then someone thinks wouldn't it be a wheeze to do some spirit cooking or create cartoons of monsters and get someone to send them to "civil" sites with lines in the sand.

We’ve all read The Hobbit I guess. These are some illustrations produced for an unpublished version. | https://monsterbrains.blogspot.com/2020/04/peter-klucik-illustrations-for.html

And what about High Catholicism's Vatican receiving hall's ceiling "art"? Really Christian, dontchafink? On a par with Denver Airport's "art" ... compare to church art over the past eight hundred years, once past the stage of Hieronymus Bosch.

Bottom line of this post is that everyone has personal lines in the sand, red lines, Rubicons we don't cross ... it's just that we each have different lines. I'd argue that even fifty years ago in Britain, most denizens' lines more or less roughly coincided ... at least enough to luve civilly with one another.

Then along came the High Malcontents, Fabian or demonic as you will, and thus we get, this morning, via our author across the way DAD:

Macron deflects.

During a trip to Saarbrücken, Germany, Emmanuel Macron delivered a blistering speech on Friday, October 3, on the responsibility of social media in the weakening of Western democracies. “We were extremely naive to entrust our democratic space to social media that are controlled either by major American entrepreneurs or by large Chinese companies whose interests are not at all the survival or proper functioning of our democracy,” he declared, calling on Europe to “suddenly awaken.”

(In other words – we want to control it.)

I'd say far more than that. To quote Lara Logan:

Lara Logan masterfully deconstructs the architecture of modern control. She reveals a simple, repeating pattern used to dismantle society: the weaponization of our most fundamental truths. The elite create "problems" that are inherently unsolvable. Your race, your biological sex, the very CO2 you exhale—these are framed as existential threats. But how do you "solve" your own skin color? How do "fix" your innate masculine or feminine nature? How do you eliminate a gas that is the bedrock of all plant life? You cannot. That is the entire point. By turning natural human instincts and biological realities into crimes, they manufacture perpetual conflict. They isolate us, break down communication, and ensure we are too busy fighting amongst ourselves to see the real threat. This is the core of the race narrative, the climate agenda, and transgender ideology. It is a deliberate attack on creation itself, designed to foster division and self-loathing so that we become easier to control. They must control our food, our movements, and even our thoughts. Logan reminds us of a simple, powerful truth: it is natural to gravitate toward your own, to find comfort in shared culture and understanding. This is not a war crime; it is human nature. They have made it one because a divided people cannot conquer their oppressors. The tactic is ancient: Divide and Conquer. The solution is to recognize the pattern. Once you see it, you cannot unsee it. It’s not about being a genius; it’s about having the courage to reject the lies and reclaim what is natural, true, and beautiful about our shared humanity.

To overcome the bstds directly threatening us now, there needs to be a situation in society when our lines in the sand are once again tolerable to others at a slight distance ... and for those other fanatical lines refusing to tolerate us ... expunged from our land.

The limits of socmed reporting and debate

This might become one of two posts from me this weekend, shall see. It came this Saturday morning out of the blue from a lady called Toodles (one of only two ladies across the way willing to speak out ... the other more about gardens and produce).

It's Grifty (long time antiWoke critic) and within 4m 44s into the video, there was a standoff between Kash Patel and the letter agencies versus us (that is, the antiWoke, antiThem online pundits ... that is, the people of the land(s) interested). This is very much an OoL type discussion about the limits of freedom ... shall watch it through and return (it being 0633 at this moment).

Right ... at 0656, I've watched and have not explored the van behind bullet evidence, plus the scramble instantly to get him into the car and to a faroff, not nearest, hospital.

Now, we can go down that route of discussion ... or down the route of my questions about EK, her horned sign onstage plus the maltese cross around her neck beside the Christian cross, plus concerning Ben Shapiro ... or we can go down any route you bring to it ... or we can come back to Kash Patel's very letter agency/Starmer/western head honchos' stance from the start of the video.

Naturally, the letter agencies are privy to far more dirty doings, dirty dealings than we can be under this censorship and that's an argument they can put that we should therefore leave it all to them.  They would also argue that our very interference and "crazy" socmed speculation only hampers their investigations.

Against that is that the Pandora's box opened with JFK 1963 or 911, or since people stopped believing news media ... up to the current day ... and Patel's Ahern attempt at "single point of truth" or Starmer's "jail any dissent" does not wash anymore ... we can even include the million plus march on Sep 13.

Difficult putting the lid back on that box, difficult putting the toothpaste back in the tube.

No Good Deed Goes Unpunished In The Modern World...

Sakir Everett, who is just 11 years old, sprang into action when he spotted another student with a firearm inside Dwight Rich School of the Arts in Lansing. But rather than flee, the seventh grader safely disarmed the weapon, removed the bullets, and dismantled it in an act of bravery that may have averted a mass shooting.

And was immediatly hailed a hero for doing so, right? No, Reader, sadly not: 

However, Sakir was punished by the school for not immediately reporting the incident to staff.

The astonishing decision by the Lansing School District has sparked outrage from parents and community members, who say Sakir is being treated like a criminal instead of a hero.

 'He took the gun from the armed student, disassembled it, and removed the bullets, preventing what could have been an unimaginable tragedy.'

But he didn’t comply with ‘school rules’ and for the progressive teachers, that’s worse than any other issue. 

He used knowledge from his hunting background (Ed: probably a red flag to 'liberal' teavching staff) to safely disarm the weapon, separate the ammunition, and throw the bullets away. He believed he was doing the right thing. But instead of an award, Sakir was expelled.

Thus learning probably the mose useful lesson he's ever learned at this school; progressives are crazy and should be avoided. 

'It's devastating because he's a bright kid and all he wants to do is be a kid,' said McClurkin, who has had to reduce her work hours to educate him at home after he was banned from all school platforms.

If I was you,  Mrs McClurkin, I’d make that a permanent choice.

These two wimmin might know your every thought

This particular case study means more to me perhaps than most, as I use multiple Apple devices and yes ... that includes the iCloud, which has its own laws unto itself.

One spinoff is that I recently lost all capability of storing photos, all 256 of them, on my second or later device, which of course kills the way I present data, as you'll see again below. As you know, many of us have the line from outside (mine was BT), then the airtime provider, the wifi, then the device with its operating system, the browser etc. etc. ... so the specific miscreant is hard to pin down at times but it seemed, in my case, that the Cloud had done this by "optimising" as they call it.

There are also tricky things like the dark net, ecryption, VPN etc. etc., which in my situation, is not the best option, shan't explain.  There's also the useful working mindset of being transparent, assuming that govt has already hacked all data, any promises to the contrary being a dark joke. Works for me anyway.

So the question is ... who specifically destroyed that iCloud capability? Read on:

Makes one feel more secure, somehow, to know these two females are in charge of all recorded thoughts and images.  Oh, small fun extra from our Andy across the way:

The futility of resisting digital IDs. This chap describes the way that it will be inserted into our lives, thin end of the wedge first.

‘How Dare You Defend Yourself!’

A teacher who kicked a pupil and shouted at him after he attacked her has been reprimanded. Nicola Sangster grabbed the waistband and backpack of the boy while he was lying on the floor, before kicking him on the bottom. She shouted near the pupil’s face, “You are not the boss of here, you’re not the boss of the school, and you’re not the boss of my class,” or similar words. She also shouted, “Do not hit your mum, do not hit your mother” or words to that effect.

Good for her - why should she have to put up with violence and aggression in her place of work.

The incident took place in December 2023 while she was employed by Aberdeenshire Council as a primary teacher at Anna Ritchie School, a school for those with complex needs.

Ah. The modern way of excusing the reality of them being ungovernable little shits who act like animals.  

She said that she deeply regretted her actions, but she had suffered a “sustained attack” by the boy prior to the incident, which was confirmed by Police Scotland.

And what action was taken by Police Scotland against the boy? Is it 'none'? I bet it is.  

Poisoned, adulterated food

This was a post on the topic from Nov 27, 2024:

https://orphansofliberty.blogspot.com/2024/11/poisoned-cows-adulterated-milk.html

Today, I noticed this on my milk pack:

That's Morrisons' standard milk now ... the unadulterated seems to be the longlife ... but that in itself has been covered many times.

And even were the cows part of a dwindling number of farms in the UK, there is the chemtrail poisoning of land and water, not to mention solar panel farmland eating up arable and grazing land.

The old question, naturally ... is how to stop these bstds doing this.