The limits of socmed reporting and debate

This might become one of two posts from me this weekend, shall see. It came this Saturday morning out of the blue from a lady called Toodles (one of only two ladies across the way willing to speak out ... the other more about gardens and produce).

It's Grifty (long time antiWoke critic) and within 4m 44s into the video, there was a standoff between Kash Patel and the letter agencies versus us (that is, the antiWoke, antiThem online pundits ... that is, the people of the land(s) interested). This is very much an OoL type discussion about the limits of freedom ... shall watch it through and return (it being 0633 at this moment).

Right ... at 0656, I've watched and have not explored the van behind bullet evidence, plus the scramble instantly to get him into the car and to a faroff, not nearest, hospital.

Now, we can go down that route of discussion ... or down the route of my questions about EK, her horned sign onstage plus the maltese cross around her neck beside the Christian cross, plus concerning Ben Shapiro ... or we can go down any route you bring to it ... or we can come back to Kash Patel's very letter agency/Starmer/western head honchos' stance from the start of the video.

Naturally, the letter agencies are privy to far more dirty doings, dirty dealings than we can be under this censorship and that's an argument they can put that we should therefore leave it all to them.  They would also argue that our very interference and "crazy" socmed speculation only hampers their investigations.

Against that is that the Pandora's box opened with JFK 1963 or 911, or since people stopped believing news media ... up to the current day ... and Patel's Ahern attempt at "single point of truth" or Starmer's "jail any dissent" does not wash anymore ... we can even include the million plus march on Sep 13.

Difficult putting the lid back on that box, difficult putting the toothpaste back in the tube.