The limits of socmed reporting and debate

This might become one of two posts from me this weekend, shall see. It came this Saturday morning out of the blue from a lady called Toodles (one of only two ladies across the way willing to speak out ... the other more about gardens and produce).

It's Grifty (long time antiWoke critic) and within 4m 44s into the video, there was a standoff between Kash Patel and the letter agencies versus us (that is, the antiWoke, antiThem online pundits ... that is, the people of the land(s) interested). This is very much an OoL type discussion about the limits of freedom ... shall watch it through and return (it being 0633 at this moment).

Right ... at 0656, I've watched and have not explored the van behind bullet evidence, plus the scramble instantly to get him into the car and to a faroff, not nearest, hospital.

Now, we can go down that route of discussion ... or down the route of my questions about EK, her horned sign onstage plus the maltese cross around her neck beside the Christian cross, plus concerning Ben Shapiro ... or we can go down any route you bring to it ... or we can come back to Kash Patel's very letter agency/Starmer/western head honchos' stance from the start of the video.

Naturally, the letter agencies are privy to far more dirty doings, dirty dealings than we can be under this censorship and that's an argument they can put that we should therefore leave it all to them.  They would also argue that our very interference and "crazy" socmed speculation only hampers their investigations.

Against that is that the Pandora's box opened with JFK 1963 or 911, or since people stopped believing news media ... up to the current day ... and Patel's Ahern attempt at "single point of truth" or Starmer's "jail any dissent" does not wash anymore ... we can even include the million plus march on Sep 13.

Difficult putting the lid back on that box, difficult putting the toothpaste back in the tube.

No Good Deed Goes Unpunished In The Modern World...

Sakir Everett, who is just 11 years old, sprang into action when he spotted another student with a firearm inside Dwight Rich School of the Arts in Lansing. But rather than flee, the seventh grader safely disarmed the weapon, removed the bullets, and dismantled it in an act of bravery that may have averted a mass shooting.

And was immediatly hailed a hero for doing so, right? No, Reader, sadly not: 

However, Sakir was punished by the school for not immediately reporting the incident to staff.

The astonishing decision by the Lansing School District has sparked outrage from parents and community members, who say Sakir is being treated like a criminal instead of a hero.

 'He took the gun from the armed student, disassembled it, and removed the bullets, preventing what could have been an unimaginable tragedy.'

But he didn’t comply with ‘school rules’ and for the progressive teachers, that’s worse than any other issue. 

He used knowledge from his hunting background (Ed: probably a red flag to 'liberal' teavching staff) to safely disarm the weapon, separate the ammunition, and throw the bullets away. He believed he was doing the right thing. But instead of an award, Sakir was expelled.

Thus learning probably the mose useful lesson he's ever learned at this school; progressives are crazy and should be avoided. 

'It's devastating because he's a bright kid and all he wants to do is be a kid,' said McClurkin, who has had to reduce her work hours to educate him at home after he was banned from all school platforms.

If I was you,  Mrs McClurkin, I’d make that a permanent choice.

These two wimmin might know your every thought

This particular case study means more to me perhaps than most, as I use multiple Apple devices and yes ... that includes the iCloud, which has its own laws unto itself.

One spinoff is that I recently lost all capability of storing photos, all 256 of them, on my second or later device, which of course kills the way I present data, as you'll see again below. As you know, many of us have the line from outside (mine was BT), then the airtime provider, the wifi, then the device with its operating system, the browser etc. etc. ... so the specific miscreant is hard to pin down at times but it seemed, in my case, that the Cloud had done this by "optimising" as they call it.

There are also tricky things like the dark net, ecryption, VPN etc. etc., which in my situation, is not the best option, shan't explain.  There's also the useful working mindset of being transparent, assuming that govt has already hacked all data, any promises to the contrary being a dark joke. Works for me anyway.

So the question is ... who specifically destroyed that iCloud capability? Read on:

Makes one feel more secure, somehow, to know these two females are in charge of all recorded thoughts and images.  Oh, small fun extra from our Andy across the way:

The futility of resisting digital IDs. This chap describes the way that it will be inserted into our lives, thin end of the wedge first.

‘How Dare You Defend Yourself!’

A teacher who kicked a pupil and shouted at him after he attacked her has been reprimanded. Nicola Sangster grabbed the waistband and backpack of the boy while he was lying on the floor, before kicking him on the bottom. She shouted near the pupil’s face, “You are not the boss of here, you’re not the boss of the school, and you’re not the boss of my class,” or similar words. She also shouted, “Do not hit your mum, do not hit your mother” or words to that effect.

Good for her - why should she have to put up with violence and aggression in her place of work.

The incident took place in December 2023 while she was employed by Aberdeenshire Council as a primary teacher at Anna Ritchie School, a school for those with complex needs.

Ah. The modern way of excusing the reality of them being ungovernable little shits who act like animals.  

She said that she deeply regretted her actions, but she had suffered a “sustained attack” by the boy prior to the incident, which was confirmed by Police Scotland.

And what action was taken by Police Scotland against the boy? Is it 'none'? I bet it is.  

Poisoned, adulterated food

This was a post on the topic from Nov 27, 2024:

https://orphansofliberty.blogspot.com/2024/11/poisoned-cows-adulterated-milk.html

Today, I noticed this on my milk pack:

That's Morrisons' standard milk now ... the unadulterated seems to be the longlife ... but that in itself has been covered many times.

And even were the cows part of a dwindling number of farms in the UK, there is the chemtrail poisoning of land and water, not to mention solar panel farmland eating up arable and grazing land.

The old question, naturally ... is how to stop these bstds doing this.

Commuters Wondering Why Black Fare Evaders In London Do So With Complete Confidence They Won't Be Challenged...

...wonder no longer:

A Metropolitan Police officer acquitted of grabbing a woman’s arm and arresting her for fare evasion is still facing the sack over his “use of force”.PC Perry Lathwood, 51, had initially been found guilty of common assault at Westminster Magistrates’ Court over the incident in Whitehorse Road, Croydon, south London on July 21, 2023. At Southwark Crown Court last September, his appeal against the conviction and £1,500 fine was upheld.PC Lathwood – who remains on restricted duties – will now face a two-day gross misconduct hearing starting on October 13.

What was his 'crime'? 

A notice of the disciplinary alleges he “detained the female, used force against her, engaged in conversation using inappropriate language and arrested her”.

Ah, so he did his job (rare these days), which was backing up TfL fare evasion teams running an operation (also rare these days), when they are challenged or when commuters refuse to answer to them as this woman did. 

It is claimed his conduct also breached standards of professional behaviour relating to authority, respect, courtesy and equality and diversity.

The final bit is clearly what has prompted action by the thoroughly-captured ptrogressive Met Police. He was insufficiently respectful of a black woman, and treated her in the same manner he would no doubt have treated a white or brown woman. 

Independent Office for Police Conduct regional director Mel Palmer, who led the investigation, added: “This was a high-profile incident that caused significant concern, particularly in the Croydon community, after footage of the incident was published online.”

The only 'community' this would have caused 'concern' for is the community that believes laws and social obligations like paying the fares everyone else pays don't apply to them.  And it's about time we stopped trying to appease them. 

One Login

The fuller context of the Digital ID excrescence can be seen in this below, from Stark Naked Brief on X ... core reason why the whole mess must be implacably opposed.

In which I try to reply to Ada Lluch

Ada is the Spanish lass who spoke at the September 13th rally and fiesta in London. She was popular. Ada is on X and appeared in this exchange:

As with most issues, it's yes and no ... plus it quite depends on what sort of man ... an idealised knight in white armour? Or a satyr, brute, milquetoast, perv, creep or simp? A slob?  Too well fed? Couch potato?

So it's obvious we're talking a reasonable contender for the hand of a fair maid with a moral compass. If I might illustrate with a tale of the noughties ... I was asked to join a faculty in a university teaching English ... it was the language faculty in that city and what became obvious quickly was that 900+ girls went through that place each day and about 50 boys. 

I would say the only reason that wily dean let me anywhere near them was that I had a certain someone at home who was a headturner, not unlike Ada or Leonarda. It was blindingly obvious that I'd have to go one of two ways ... either sleazy professor, availing himself of the obviously constant offers, simply by being the only male in that department ... or else be the bastion of chivalry, which is what Ada's referring to.

You'd agree though that that was a highly unusual situation, almost artificial and without my upbringing by my pre-Boomer parents, plus a good education ... it was never going to be possible to survive. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the central problem with Two Tier's invaders brought in under cover of night ... but also don't forget the white, often older satyrs, brutes, milquetoasts, pervs, creeps and simps.

These things can only be, as in the fall of the Roman Empire, when those at the top are depraved psycho creeps, hating the people who themselves have lost all moral direction ... the men as violent predators and the girls trained to be 304s ... that's before we even get onto the mutilat-ants.

Throw in hypergamy where female 5s or 6s see themselves as worthy of 10s ... chads and adonises. To my mind, they're all zeros to 2s ... we're in the Kardashian Era.  Just glance over some of these sshots below, in no particular order:

Also, ask yourself another question and then go back to Leonarda's opening statement about females making it impossible ... I don't mean to love them but by putting themselves in naive positions, either glued to cellphones, unaware of their surroundings, or meeting an online creep in a park at night or going to Morocco and then wondering why their throats get slit ... just ask Lara Logan about all that.

Often, the ladies and girls are nowhere near sufficient men who can then step in and rescue the damsel surrounded by rapists ... yes, even Lola and Ruby Moir were nowhere near sufficient white knights.

For all we now revere Lola, why was she even there, unprotected in this day and age?

Which does not answer the main question Ada asks ... there actually were some men around ... so why would they not?  My first reply is they were probably unemployed "modern men", woke left liberals, useless specimens. My second reply is men have had chivalry knocked out of them since toddlerhood now and if they did step in, alone, to stop these imported and local creeps, blades do come into the equation.

But it's not just that ... it's standing up on public transport, opening doors, even caring for females any more ... look at that sshot with the power chick in shades ... it's not that I would not step in ... I'm actually foolish enough to do it, same with many mates ... it's that long before that moment, I'd have crossed the road and gone another route.  This is the reality, girls.

And men ... which of the descriptors used above for us men do you actually aspire to? Which allow you to live with yourself in your head?  Satyr? You do see the issue.  And yet, my fellow men point to having been taken to the cleaners by bad women bringing little to the table. Also true.

Xer Moosh and I were discussing love and partnerships last evening ... she made good points ... I replied that the first requirement was that both in the arrangement, each, first extract ego from the equation. She retweeted that bit.

Anyway, nuff for now.

Who’s Driving Our Tubes?

As many as 300 London Underground staff are at risk of being deported after changes to immigration rules, it is feared.

And the Union is furious. No, Reader, not at the fact that these immigrants have taken jobs from British workers, of course not! 

More than 100 union activists, led by Mr Dempsey, mounted a protest outside the Home Office on Wednesday morning. MPs John McDonnell and Zarah Sultana also attended the demonstration, while Diane Abbott tweeted her support.

All the usual suspect, of course!  

Mr Dempsey told the protesters: “This is a really serious situation. We have got members working for Transport for London who are facing deportation in a few short weeks’ time.

”On Wednesday, Mr Dempsey accused the former Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, of making a “knee-jerk decision” toughening the rules on how long foreign-born workers can remain in the UK, in response to growing political pressure from Nigel Farage’s Reform party over rising immigration levels.

It does seem an answer to the questions of why so many Tube announcements are unintelligible, and why so little is ever done to prevent foreign fare dodgers from jumping the barriers - a significant proportion of the workers on the system are themdselves foreign!   

But what has caused this sudden change?

The new rules increased salary thresholds for visa sponsorship to £41,700 a year for new applicants and removed key transport roles, including station assistant, from the “skilled worker” list - meaning it is harder for some foreign workers to remain in the UK.

Many TfL station staff began their employment on the London Underground on two-year graduate visa schemes believing they could move into skilled worker positions.He said: “Our members were employed with the full expectation that they would become full British citizens and would be staying here. They have brought their families, and bought their homes here. Now they could be forced to leave.

Oh dear, how sad, never mind. 

“This is unfair. We are not for open borders. We are for a fair migration policy – one that is humane and fair and treats people properly. This doesn’t meet that test.

“So what we are calling for, as a bare minimum, is that this should be paused until the Migration Advisory Committee can finish its work. There should be transitional arrangements put in place.”

Good luck arguing that in this political and financial climate! 

I've no devices of any kind ...

... not even a phone, so this post is not going up.  More on that further down.

Meanwhile, decisions decisions ... have to decide whether to go with Canada's ostriches (empire strikes back) or with Rupert Lowe's discovery that Bar internships (law, not t'other place) are black only or with the autopen president or with ... there are dozens of topics.

Thought I might open with this:

... and move onto this:

Think what you will dot dot dot ...