It's in the discussion between these two ladies. It may be the American situation but it’s also here - human trafficking for example. Over here, see the Netherlands, Belgium and Britain, not to mention France. It’s going on and you’revprevented from knowing.
Certainly worth a listen, this podcast.
Nicola Leighton, 36, allegedly drove her son, Tyreese Ulysses, 19, and three other youths to the scene of the killing, a court heard.
Armed with machetes, the four teenagers allegedly stabbed 17-year-old Levi Ernest-Morrison to death.
The killing, in Hazel Grove, Syndenham, on April 10 is said to have been a “pre-planned” attack.
Mommie dearest as your getaway driver. That's pretty gangster, isn't it?
Leighton, of Sydenham, Ulysses, of nearby Catford, and three youths, aged 14, 15, and 17, have been charged with Levi’s murder.
Usually with these street killings, the cry goes up 'What hope have the parents got..?'
Imran Mirza, whose 19-year-old son Mohammed was fatally stabbed in Ilford in 2019, said: “Nothing has changed since my son died and if anything things are worse. These boys are becoming desensitised to violence. In the schools they need to teach them some humanity at an early age… The kids are living in fear, more action is need at all levels.”
If you're relying on schools to teach the basics of being human, rather than reading, writing and sums, you failed as a parent from the moment of conception.
At another place, I wrote that I don't care where this lady is from - US, UK, Canada, Oz, NZ - she is my countrywoman and I agree Them above should keep the hell out of our lives and if we want them, they can apply for membership from us:
I haven’t posted on anything important in the past weeks, as I have been going through a rough patch at home, (personal, family stuff, which obviously takes preference over fun things; such as posting and taking the piss out of the lefties who are drawn to the flame): but I noticed Patricks post on ATW regarding Bruce/Caitlyn, and the comments thereupon, which, as somewhat usual, ignored the basic facts, and wandered around O’Houlihan’s Barn about the bloody virus.
I have been looking at the news and views, and my attention was caught by this bloke who, because his publicity machine declared that it was; decided that he should be considered female: aided by a massive amount of cash buying dresses, make-up and his former position as the ‘father figure’ of that weird bunch of self-publicists known as the Kardashians.
As I wrote some five-odd years ago, ‘You are just a man who has had plastic surgery, hormone treatments, an enormous clothing and cosmetic allowance: but you are still just a man wearing women’s clothing!” But, there again, if thats what he wishes to do, fair enough.
But here’s the thing. When Bruce, or rather Caitlyn, was saying all the things which the lefties adore, such as the whole Tranny garbage routine, he (or she, or it) got nothing but plaudits from the Woke crowd.
But when Bruce/Caitlyn states that men, Biological Men, should not be allowed to compete against Biological Girls in Track and Field, or indeed in anything else, the whole Woke pile of crap descends upon his/her shoulders.
Personally, my opinion of this bloke was always that he was just dicey in the extreme: but I have to revise my opinion, because he had the sheer guts to state his beliefs sincerely: NO MATTER THE CONSEQUENCES!
The review calls for “critical lessons” to be “translated into action”.
Hmmmm. Yes, it's this case:
Despite previously assaulting police and a restaurant worker, and hitting support staff with a brick, Bravery was not considered a risk to others at the time.
Shows how much they knew, eh?
Bravery, who told horrified onlookers that social services were to blame for the atrocity, is currently serving a 15-year minimum prison term for attempted murder.
It's hard not to think he's partially right, while also being horrified that throwing a child off a high rook only attracts 15 years in the slammer...
...the review also found that, while Bravery’s case was characterised by “appropriate efforts by professionals from across agencies to access assessment and treatment for (him)”, those efforts “were stymied due to the lack of services, placements and provisions that were suitable for his needs as an autistic young person with a co-existing conduct disorder diagnosis”.
Yes, he's the 'victim' here, according to these people. Doesn't that emphasis explain - at least partially - how things like this happen?
A psychiatric report in 2018 said Bravery had learnt to use his autism as an excuse to evade responsibility for dangerous behaviour.
He's not the only one, is he?
This is on the govt site, h/t Andy:
https://committees.parliament.uk/work/1104/covid-19-vaccine-certification/
This inquiry is currently accepting evidence
The committee wants to hear your views. We welcome submissions from anyone with answers to the questions in the call for evidence. You can submit evidence until Monday 3 May 2021.
Still thinking about it, are they? This came through from the NHS yesterday:
Meanwhile, courtesy of Bill Sticker:
https://billsticker.wordpress.com/2021/05/02/what-he-said-2/
Remember, folks, the main ones NOT to have the jab under any circumstances are women and girls:
https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/what-all-women-and-girls-need-to-know-video/
Nuremberg Code
When you can just send in Plod to arrest anyone on any pretext whatever?
https://www.spiked-online.com/2021/04/30/why-are-the-police-handcuffing-street-preachers/
According to news reports and his colleague’s own account of events, on 23 April he preached from the closing section of the book of Genesis, which contains the allegedly offensive statement:
‘So God created mankind in his own image… male and female he created them.’ Building off these verses, he spoke about marriage being between one man and one woman – a view once held by the vast majority of Brits and the law of the land until the very recent past.
Police officers surrounded Sherwood, took away his Bible, and pulled him off the streets for an alleged breach of Section 5 of the Public Order Act (which, incidentally, does not criminalise offence or insult).
He was detained, questioned about his views on sexual morality, and held overnight. After 21 hours, police released him ‘under investigation’.
The same story has been told on countless streets across Britain in the past decade. A person says something allegedly offensive, heavy-handed police intervene, the person is arrested, detained, released, and the CPS choose not to prosecute.
And – unless there is far more to this story than what is available in the footage or multiple accounts of the event – it is hard to imagine the CPS moving forward with a prosecution.
.......
So that’s that. Move on. Just be thankful not to be in jail.
I was consulting with me old mate Niemoeller's ghost about the nazis coming for you and about whom crocodiles eat last - he told me to watch what happens with our freedom loving mates and matesses when it's the right to preach [Hyde Park Corner] in question, when the topic is, say, Christianity.
He said to me, quite cynically methought - watch all these free speech lovers go deathly quiet.
The old cynic was of the opinion that they'll only defend you if it aligns with their own main concerns, a bit like feminazis failing to care about women in other countries, i.e. outside the sphere of their own power grab.
I hotly disagreed, saying that all my colleagues would defend any free speech at all, irrespective, providing it did not urge people to harm others.
He smiled and just said, 'Watch.'
A spokesman for Devon and Cornwall Constabulary said: "Police received a report that two dogs had allegedly attacked a horse, which was said to have sustained superficial injuries, at a rural location in the Helston area at around 3pm on Wednesday 31 March.
“An allegation of a public order offence was also made. Officers carried out enquiries into both allegations and no further action will be taken.”
Are they all incompetent in this police farce?
I mean, I know they give up easily when faced with anything likely to raise a sweat, but good grief, this isn't the sort of incident you'd expect them to swerve, is it?
Hope claims the owner encouraged the canine and even threatened to shoot her and her brother with a hunting gun, Cornwall Live reports. The dog became so violent it "dangled" off the horse by its teeth, Hope alleges.
The teenager said: "We asked the owner’s name and why he was there. He claimed he had permission and was getting up in our faces, making threats. His dog was on my big mare, and he was saying ‘go on, go on’, while blocking the foals from getting to her.
"We jumped over the gate to get away from it, and the dog went into the fields to attack the other mare.
"He [the owner] was throwing abuse at us, threatening to shoot us with a hunting gun, and then went away after 15 minutes of just staring at us."
Someone with dogs attacking livestock and then threatening to shoot the owners of said livestock, and they won't take action? Why not?
Yep. Break out the fizz!
https://thylacosmilus.blogspot.com/2021/04/twelve-years-can-you-believe-it.html
Now for the next twelve.
