How legit is Politics on X

Meaning the name of the account, not politics in general. Contrary to possible expectations, I do not plan to call out Politics on X, whilst legitimising our own blog … but all the same, let’s see why. This was how it was presented:

Screenshot only

… and this was the text and a good graphic of DR(sr):

DataRepublican @DataRepublican just confirmed the quiet part out loud: Illinois Governor JB Pritzker@GovPritzker is explicitly named in the videos as one of only two governors willing to green-light the “illegitimacy memo”—a playbook for declaring a duly elected President illegitimate after the midterms so Democrat governors can claim they are the only legitimate U.S. authority.

This isn’t abstract “resistance.” NSL4A (the retired military and national security officials operationalizing the plan) and Pritzker’s own Governors Safeguarding Democracy group have been working the same sequence of redlines, including treating lawful federal pushback against coordinated protests as proof of illegitimacy.

Add the funding layer—his sister’s role in the Democracy Funders Network—and the coordination stops looking coincidental. Imported regime-change tactics, billionaire governors, and ex-military networks drafting the conditions under which states nullify federal authority: that is the actual document trail. DataRepublican has the receipts.

First off, I’ve seen footage a fair while ago of DR(sr) and it’s a pretty good likeness. Then Mike Engleman and others … consistent, legit MAGA or America First types.

The profile pic of PonX is irrelevant, except it suggests male, not female, it’s clearly supportive of “our side” in citizen journalism (antiWoke, pro-freedom of thought, word and deed, pro our own people).

It is followed by many, follows few (double-edged sword) and could be accused of “empire building”, as I call it, on the back of the current warrior out there. Big deal … “he” quotes her accurately, says he’s a “commentary account”.

Again big deal … so am I, so are our commenters. Nothing to see here. We call it getting the message out, also promoting her book, which I did via X retweet and like.

Any notes of caution?  🤔

Maybe … if you click on this X item, you’re not giving clicks to DR(sr), you’re giving them to PonX. Is that bad? Not necessarily … depends on the overall history of the account … started 2021.

Go to the profile, scroll down his content … cheeky chappy, similar topics overall … seems legit. Only thing I’d say is do explore who is saying it, not from what is put up front but through the sort of content over time, also the types of commenters. How does he handle conflict, will he incorporate later evidence?