Tuesday, 17 March 2026

The rotting corpse of the CofE not fit for purpose

Update as of 8 a.m. (the post was written in the middle of the night): that cow (excuse my French) is going to be there after all in the Lords it seems, but not the two clown bishops. Possibly the weather for Damn Sarah looked like being inclement, who knows, for Canterbury "pilgrimage".

......

An Oxford doctor, Calum Miller, writes:

Have received word that the Bishops of Winchester and Norwich are not attending Parliament to vote against ABORTION UP TO BIRTH due to unspecified "diary commitments".

Let's go back to yesterday and recap:


And so the clergy and laity started piling on:





The issue is far more than a minor doctrinal point:


Where am I on this? In younger days, I condoned the killing of my baby twice, with two different partners, some years apart, not having explored the topic in any depth, let alone the religious aspects.  In the first case, it was discussed, in the second, she said not a word but went during working hours. In both cases, it was soon after pregnancy tests.

So I explored the topic and it seemed there were certain watersheds, Rubicons with the issue.  First was that the baby began at conception, which was the traditional Christian view ... second was heartbeat being detected ... some went by trimesters, no one I knew would have seriously put full term, for all sorts of reasons. Wot ... ripping a full grown baby's head off in the womb?  What sort of monster supports that?

With this Mullally creature, she knew exactly what she was doing avoiding this vote in the Lords, as do the other Bishes who've taken the cowardly, antiChristian path ... and one can view it either doctrinally or else as the head of a national church which is clearly unfit for purpose as is.

Following on from Supreme Beloved Leader Chas3 who's been wearing checked tablecloths again and is about as fit for purpose as a "dragon worthy of your earthly worship" (his vow at installation as PofW decades back).

And don't exonerate Welby, Williams and Carey ... all were subject to charges of apostasy in various ways.

The aim?  Pretty obvious, no? To give everyone from the atheists and pagans to gnostics to the latest mass invaders the chance, finally, to crush the Christian church across Europe and its corollary ... to suppress the faith itself, as back in Roman times with the early church.

Now, your starter question for ten ... if the church is meant to be the last bulwark against satan (quiet at the back there, not specifically referring to the CofE here) ... then who do you think could possibly be the chief motivator of crushing Christian faith, since ancient times?  Bit of a headscratcher, that, innit?

It's not unlike feminazis desperately clinging onto the infinite mercy of bloodthirsty mussies ... or fabian tertiary academics extolling the very lot slavering to enslave them.

We're truly dealing with left loonies here, the bane of western "civilisation" since at least as far back as 1776.

3 comments:

  1. There's a video online. Maybe I saw it here. It has a Churchian type interviewed, accepting abortion as ok after the first trimester, necessary evil, right to choose etc, his justification being that the fetus isn't a human, a baby, till then, so it isn't killing a person.
    Ok, says interviewer, so you're saying Christ wasn't human until the fourth month of Mary's pregnancy then?
    Cue silence and a human blue screen of death.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The bishops are there to hold government to Christian morals and ethics. If they cannot do that then what are they there for? In fact, since stripping the Lords of the majority of hereditarily, who mostly had attachment to the country, the Lords as they are have little purpose.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Let's be blunt: the Bishops and archbishops have all been corrupted, along with the head of the CofE church, King Charles. There may be a single Bishop amongst them with true Christian morals, but their voice is lost in the corrupt, evil morass that is now the Christian Church of England.
    I thought pride was a sin. So is the false virtue signaling the Bishops spew out to prove their inflated sense of self worth.

    ReplyDelete

A reminder, dear reader, that you're welcome to comment as Anon but if so, please invent a moniker to appear somewhere in your text ... it tells Watchers nothing, it does help the readers.