The countryside is for our people ... plus their dogs

There's Wokery plus its nasty, loony, Fabian narrative, yes ... and then there is Globo-psycho-devilry ... the latter I don't post against here, preferring to address it at UHC where readers have been following the occasional snippets getting out, over a period nearing two decades. With the Epstein flood in the past few days, finally people can see we were not quite the whack jobs we were dismissed as.

The source of both the Wokery and anti-human devilry is the same ... and it does come from high up, as the Queen made reference to.  This post is about the latest Wokery. If I could have written it better than Jim C, I would have but as he did a fine job, then here it is below, followed by Lucy Connolly.

...........

Comments thread

Each of the sites your humble blogger writes at has its own system of commenting … half a decade ago, I understood that a “forum” is not the way to get any for’arder in increasing knowledge for various reasons.

One is the ideological idiocy of half the population, as exemplified in Minneapolis of late but there’s an added second factor … trolling, paid or unpaid. It’s designed to get in the way, to obstruct learning.

Plus there’s my own mindset … I’m there to learn, not to lecture. Yes, as one of our bloggers here, I have to choose topics … many suggest themselves, so do readers … but it’s my job to dig a bit, find out, present. Ditto with Julia and Grandpa.

I then rely on readers, e.g. Mark Matis, James Wilson (at another site), to add to the story, maybe even put an angle I might not have seen. The model is not “adversarial camps”, as in assemblies and in academia, but more that we’re in a room with a table … and on that table we put what we’ve found.

Readers then can decide for themselves which make sense now, which later, which never at all. The thing which will destroy that meeting of minds is someone with an agenda, e.g. the Wokerati, the Fabian, the chip on the shoulder Hostile.

Therefore, at our other sites, Wokery and Globopsychosis do not find a platform. Any new commenter is welcome to add sane takes on what’s happening but if he/she is clearly a woke nutter … bye bye.

Even within our own “80% in the same direction folk”, there is that 20% which two people will disagree on. For example, this morning, on X, there’s a raped girl from grooming gang days who does not like Rupert Lowe as a leader … maybe as he’s a strong, “toxic male”, who knows?

Thing is, reader … it’s going to happen, innit? There’s no way to make everything idyllic but there are some moves, as mentioned above, which at least make commenting and replying possible.