Just what can you say online to criticise the deathcult?

This is the first of two posts from me today, the second being at 10:30 a.m. on Armistice Day Remembrance.  The two, to my mind, are not unrelated.

And so to this highly dangerous topic ... anyone remember Charlie Hebdo? Tina Peters?  Lucy Connolly?  Allison Pearson?  This post puts Lord Toby's view but of course, it's highly Libertarian, at odds with the reality, as seen by the cult itself, growing every day, as seen by the WEF and UN controllers of all western institutions, inc. the UK "govt" who direct that maximum prejudice be brought to bear on any westerner criticising the cult in any way.

Lord Toby of Acton, as head of The Free Speech Union, plus The Daily Sceptic, had a post up yesterday in emailed newsletter form and part of it read:

In a landmark Employment Tribunal case, a judge has ruled that criticism of Islam is protected under the Equality Act. The Sunday Telegraph has more. 

It is the first time a court has ruled that “Islam-critical” beliefs are protected under the Equality Act 2010. Previous claimants had been told such views were not “worthy of respect in a democracy”.

The decision follows a 2021 ruling that Maya Forstater’s gender-critical beliefs were protected under the same law.

Ms Forstater later won her discrimination claim and her case has reshaped public debate on gender ideology. Mr Lee, whose final hearing in February will decide whether his posts on X were an expression of his protected belief and whether the regulator discriminated against him, thinks his case could have a similar impact.

Now, is there anything else with a bearing on our ability to openly criticise in florid language about monsters and paedos? Well that depends if you're personally criticising as part of a public discussion, or if you are recording thoughts as a comment on someone's blog or vlog or whether you are the admin of a blog, a publisher, a platform owner or user, or an airspace provider, a device seller, e.g. Apple ... or any other link in the chain from you putting it until it being read by readers.

Lord Toby opines, protected, in parliament and in his online articles which offer him less protection ... yes go ahead, he says ... feel confident, emboldened by related cases.  A legal opinion, still to be tested in court.

On the other hand, there is ample precedent to show that the UK govt, plus local plod, take an entirely different but immediate (for you) view on it ... with maximum prejudice.

How does Radio Genoa get away with it? He's not UK based, it was on X, which is the U.S. ... whereas we, now, are in the UK, with a UK provider, and under ggl blgr rules.  Also, you did not have your 18 years of blogging summarily removed last year, you have not been temporarily banned.  We have.

And whose door are they attempting to bash in? The easiest target, yes? Will they look for the brave Anon behind his anonymity when he calls for burning this, destroying that?  Well you'd be surprised ... ggl blgr records IPs, even if the email is untraceable ... admins can't see them but ggl blgr can, plus (can) sell them on if it is their wont.

But to answer the question ... they're more likely to go for the blogger, vlogger or tweeter. Both Julia and I know that and we take the risks we each, separately, do.   It's one thing supporting Remigration, it's quite another badmouthing the cult originator, drawing bombs on his head.

We're dealing with serious, murderous nutters here, either at high masonic temple level or at stormtrooper ground level, machete between the teeth, gleam in the eye ... or else some female plod trying to bash a western citizen's door down.

There are two ways around it at this stage ... use different words which people know mean something, e.g. calling a loose woman a 304.  There is that. I use the word deathcult and avoid the M or I word afa possible.

There is also the method I ask you to employ ... by all means use Anon in comments but also include a moniker somewhere in there. You see, I have a particular understanding with ggl blgr in the light of last year's blog theft, and that's been an effective method so far.

Is it fear of multiplod, led by a little woman with no previous personal power, breaking the door down? It's far more the likelihood of the blog being stolen again and both perps banned from all blogging on the platform.  In this, I'm attempting to protect my partner's own blog.  Mine has a different set of obstacles, so that's another story.

The iniquity of it all?  Oh quite ... quite agreed, in line with Lord Toby, a libertarian stance, ra ra ra. But we're also realists at the same time and as Capt. Ranty well knew ... it's one thing being in the right ... it's quite another the way the State interprets this right.

Do I hide in a dark cupboard, unseen by any baddies?  Judge for yourself across all platforms and accounts. Do we look like we're hiding away? But there's still such a thing as keeping our powder dry in order to fight another day.