Has Kate gone Woke?

The dissemination of information is becoming more and more difficult for us pundits due to censorship, shadow banning, removing of data sensitive to the PTB's case plus, in the UK, laws against those telling the truth ... that was one of the key factors in the Sep 13 London march.

Julia is wise to take a topic at a time and thoroughly address it in her own way, with limited time as she works mainly away from home. I operate from home and have more time to be prolific on a range of issues current at that time ... but health/sleep also comes into it, getting enough breaktime etc.

One really difficult part of info gathering is it's so fragmented ... one of the reasons also behind digital ID ... and we can gather maybe six or seven snippets but along come three more which significantly question where the first six were headed ... this is pure Sherlock Holmes. And diving down rabbit holes is not for everyone.

Then we get to the manner of reporting. Ignoring the faux MSM, there are two main ways after 140 character soc-med tweets or grabs ... for any in depth, it's either blog or vlog.  No prizes for which I use more, quite frustrated at the way vloggers seeking monetisation for droning on and on, padding out to sometimes forty minutes or more, when all we needed were "the facts, ma'am".

Thus, in the latest Grifty on the young Royals, even the first few minutes were a horror story of Woke framing ... Grifty herself is ok but she was soon into Kate aligning with global institutions to reshape the royal image, wellness, various other pure Wokerati terms dreamed up by the Fabians ... you know, equality and diversity, gate crime, racism, this phobia or that.  Horrifying to think Kate is succumbing to Woke faux politics, as she'd been relatively aloof up till then.

This was Grifty's vlog on it (h/t Toodles at UHC across the way)

"Shaping" and "Transforming", using the participle form that way, a la corporations and Obama, is a key strategy of the globofabian SpAds.  Kate also wrote: "The power of human connection in a distracted world" ... vague bollox like that always disguises the nasties inside and who is she planning teaching it to?  Yes, kiddies  ... think you're getting the idea. Nasty.

Kate did not write it alone. Grifty said she "collaborated with" a Harvard professor, meaning he shadow wrote it.  And what does he do at university? Explores happiness and relationships in a god-free way, with lots of "wellness" (a key framing weasel word), neuroscience, as in "well formed outcomes" and NLP.

And what is Kate being used to sell?  "From tradition and faith to Science, Wellness and Global Partnership" ... I would only need to explain any more to the already Woke brainwashed or normies who've not hitherto thought much about any of this claptrap ... same old same old fabianism and feminazism, straight from the WEF and EU playbook.

Kate, the least unpopular royal, tutored by an east coast US American professor.

Obviously there is to be backlash and as always, the Christian writers are straight onto it.

Just clicked in to double check and he's saying "if you want to pull down western civilisation" ... so again, you can predict what he'll say about substituting a flawed, destructive ideology for the trad code of western living.

There's nothing new in any of this ... what's new is Kate being coopted to push it.

End of post. However, below the line is the reason I deleted two recent comments which were well iut of order for different reasons ... same two people every time.

......

Whoa!  Not quite end of post ... just saw this seconds ago:

Uh huh.

Pacific Palisades fire brief summary:

This is in response to the statement by a reader that the fire defences were overwhelmed. For a start, that is wrong. Secondly, the issue is whether it was just misinformed or disinformation.

That in turn involves time and effort on a distraction from what is being posted today ... namely Kate ... plus it's already been dealt with as an old but ongoing (low cost migrant and derelict accommodation) issue.

There are copious sources, of which I quote but a smattering below. It's an old trick of the fact-free mob to send what they see as their enemy off on a wild goose chase for what is now suppressed data, with the MSM only supplying counter-data.

I only do this now for Julia to show there was good reason to delete and thank goodness I was able to fairly easily find it. During the Meredith Kercher killing issue years ago, those defending Berlusconi and three known perps or suspicious characters sent me a list of 100 questions to answer, as if I had time for that, having already covered many of them.

One of the key authors took the first ten and found where they'd been answered at TJMK site (pro-victim site), said don't waste your time on what someone drops on you, while dozens of others have explored and posted on each point. The strategy is dead easy to see.

......

Gavin Newsom dumped water into the Pacific.

Jonathan Rinderknecht set fire to push the Climate Change Agenda. Karen Bass had 0 operational fire hydrants in the Palisades area. Then they fundraised, kept the cash for their causes and wouldn’t let people rebuild.

There was a couple from Portland, Oregon, and they drove into the Palisades Fire scene in a decommissioned fire truck. They had emblazoned this fire truck with the name Rolling River Fire Department. — They got into the scene two days in a row before they were stopped and arrested.

Spencer Pratt exposed every outright lie, with evidence, Gavin Newsom told during his New York Times interview about the Pacific Palisades fire Newsom’s lie: “You had 100 mph winds” Truth: Weather data confirms 38 mph winds Newsom’s lie: The fires were “unprecedented in the middle of the winter” Truth: In an official letter Newsom wrote “California has long faced a year-round fire season." So what does it matter that it was in the middle of the winter. Newsom already acknowledged fires are a year around threat Newsom’s Lie: He said he had fire trucks pre positioned Truth: I’ve personally posted multiple videos of residents saying no fire trucks showed up huge amounts of time and showed the fires burning Newsom also talked about all the equipment he had bought and ready. We know that’s all a lie because most of the equipment was non operational. There was an entire yard of non operational fire trucks and ambulances. As well as other departments having to come and help.

Spencer Pratt requested communication records from the Office of the First Partner (Gavin Newsom’s wife) about the Pacific Palisades fires and fire aid money, and the office flat-out denied producing them. They admitted the records existed but claimed they’re protected as “governor correspondence” and “attorney-client privilege.” Even worse, they said no records exist for where the millions in fire aid proceeds went — no nonprofits, no organizations, no financial breakdowns. Nothing.

......

Ad hominem comment:

This was the second deleted ... no moniker put in as requested, not in proper English and talking about "you people" along with insults to readers, despite previous requests not to lay this on my partner Julia and our readers. Again, regular offender.