Tuesday, 21 October 2025

Arabella

Before I even start this post, I'm quite conscious of Julia and I coming from different directions but overlapping maybe 80% ... I see her as rational libertarian first and foremost, incensed by corruption and those trying it on ... she has both feet on the ground and takes no prisoners ... what's not to like?

Me? I dive down too many rabbit holes perhaps, determined to get to the bottom of it and some of those rabbit holes lead to strange Alice in Dystopialand things.  Even across the way, I've probably pushed my luck too far and shall back off after yesterday's last quotes ... part of that appears below here. The bulk of this post concerns Arabella ... more about that further down.

Around about 2002, through to about 2005/6, pre-Cameron in the UK, we were privy, online, to fairly unfettered material ... they hadn't shut it down yet, the platforms hadn't joined in the total censorship.  Result was some pretty weird blogs and posts, from Honest John and his non-Citizen libertarian posts to dear old Capt Ranty whom I was privileged to count as a friendly fellow blogger.

Targets were mainly Them above, the PTB who don't give a rat's about the ordinary person in the land ... this post below is about such people, one named Arabella ... but first, two quotes from a lady in Toronto in the year 2000, an October interview with her on Centrex radio and she was obviously using a pseudonym, a moniker ... she was a known whistleblower, hence why she was invited on such programmes.  She'd be a sort of Sammy Woodhouse here, a Sam Smith ... except not an abuse victim per se ... she was one of the perps who'd had enough.

2000 is a quarter of a century ago now, remember.


Going to run a sshot of the No Kings protest in a minute or two and this is deep denial personified ... in 2025.  But first, let's finish with this lady's testimony:


I'd say the average person is of average intelligence but those who are flagged for recruitment ... Julia Middleton, Joyce Thacker, Cressida Dick, Angela Rayner, Rachel from accounts, Jess Phillips ... these people are essentially low level dumbos, like AOC in NYC ... and as such are prime recruitment targets, like Rebekah Brooks.  Without some corrupt suit above or some power-dressed boss woman, they'd never get the nod.

I was looked over at one stage, then overlooked as too difficult to control ... I was a SpAd behind a major city mayor of the time and as such, went to some of the "outer" festive parties, only once invited to the "inner" party later at another address. Escaping that was probably my upper trajectory over and done with ... thank goodness.  The Jess Phillipses of the world live for such "opportunities".

They're a bit different to the average Wokerati who are not overly ambitious, who would not crawl over their own grandmothers for precedence and promotion ... a woman such as this:


That clip can be found on X.  So what the hell was No Kings even about?  But more importantly, who funds these bleedin' things?  Well you know ... eventually things do come out:


Arabella?  Who's Arabella?


Go ahead, have a good look around, look into each section ... and then answer one question ... would you say these people believe "they are GOOD and doing a good work" or do they know they're destroying society, like pantomime villains?

And a second question ... just where does Arabella's money come from?  Judicious investments?  Or from exploitative inside running, from shady trafficking, from the whole corrupt carcass?  I'm suggesting nothing in the case of Arabella ... they might be totally innocent, pure, philanthrpic angels for all I know.

Someone behind the scenes though is providing the dirty money and they're being protected.

Here's what I'm about to launch at UHC-HQ after our first two chaps:


I'll then move onto the letters from the two raped girls who resigned yesterday.

Our work is never done ... must have been wicked, Julia and I, at some stage of our lives.

No comments:

Post a Comment

A reminder, dear reader, that you're welcome to comment as Anon but if so, please invent a moniker to appear somewhere in your text ... it tells Watchers nothing, it does help the readers.