As many as 300 London Underground staff are at risk of being deported after changes to immigration rules, it is feared.
And the Union is furious. No, Reader, not at the fact that these immigrants have taken jobs from British workers, of course not!
More than 100 union activists, led by Mr Dempsey, mounted a protest outside the Home Office on Wednesday morning. MPs John McDonnell and Zarah Sultana also attended the demonstration, while Diane Abbott tweeted her support.
All the usual suspect, of course!
Mr Dempsey told the protesters: “This is a really serious situation. We have got members working for Transport for London who are facing deportation in a few short weeks’ time.
”On Wednesday, Mr Dempsey accused the former Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, of making a “knee-jerk decision” toughening the rules on how long foreign-born workers can remain in the UK, in response to growing political pressure from Nigel Farage’s Reform party over rising immigration levels.
It does seem an answer to the questions of why so many Tube announcements are unintelligible, and why so little is ever done to prevent foreign fare dodgers from jumping the barriers - a significant proportion of the workers on the system are themdselves foreign!
But what has caused this sudden change?
The new rules increased salary thresholds for visa sponsorship to £41,700 a year for new applicants and removed key transport roles, including station assistant, from the “skilled worker” list - meaning it is harder for some foreign workers to remain in the UK.
Many TfL station staff began their employment on the London Underground on two-year graduate visa schemes believing they could move into skilled worker positions.He said: “Our members were employed with the full expectation that they would become full British citizens and would be staying here. They have brought their families, and bought their homes here. Now they could be forced to leave.
Oh dear, how sad, never mind.
“This is unfair. We are not for open borders. We are for a fair migration policy – one that is humane and fair and treats people properly. This doesn’t meet that test.
“So what we are calling for, as a bare minimum, is that this should be paused until the Migration Advisory Committee can finish its work. There should be transitional arrangements put in place.”
Good luck arguing that in this political and financial climate!
I thought we imported LEGAL immigrants to plug holes in job markets and then when the holes were plugged, they could wend their merry way back home.
ReplyDeleteOr has the definition of legal migration now changed?
Of course if the legal migrants wanted to become UK citizens, they are very welcome to do so. But to expect to stay a foreign visitor ad infinitum without becoming a citizen is unacceptable.
The Windrush "scandal" was caused by adults who came here with children, not making themselves or their children UK citizens, despite living here for decades. So in Adulthood the children found themselves foul of immigration laws and thus deported. Not the government's fault.
The problem is the "indefinite leave to remain" rule, which allows you to stay, but not become a citizen. At some point, we should require anyone staying over a certain amount of time to start the citizenship process, or leave the country.