In which I try to reply to Ada Lluch

Ada is the Spanish lass who spoke at the September 13th rally and fiesta in London. She was popular. Ada is on X and appeared in this exchange:

As with most issues, it's yes and no ... plus it quite depends on what sort of man ... an idealised knight in white armour? Or a satyr, brute, milquetoast, perv, creep or simp? A slob?  Too well fed? Couch potato?

So it's obvious we're talking a reasonable contender for the hand of a fair maid with a moral compass. If I might illustrate with a tale of the noughties ... I was asked to join a faculty in a university teaching English ... it was the language faculty in that city and what became obvious quickly was that 900+ girls went through that place each day and about 50 boys. 

I would say the only reason that wily dean let me anywhere near them was that I had a certain someone at home who was a headturner, not unlike Ada or Leonarda. It was blindingly obvious that I'd have to go one of two ways ... either sleazy professor, availing himself of the obviously constant offers, simply by being the only male in that department ... or else be the bastion of chivalry, which is what Ada's referring to.

You'd agree though that that was a highly unusual situation, almost artificial and without my upbringing by my pre-Boomer parents, plus a good education ... it was never going to be possible to survive. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the central problem with Two Tier's invaders brought in under cover of night ... but also don't forget the white, often older satyrs, brutes, milquetoasts, pervs, creeps and simps.

These things can only be, as in the fall of the Roman Empire, when those at the top are depraved psycho creeps, hating the people who themselves have lost all moral direction ... the men as violent predators and the girls trained to be 304s ... that's before we even get onto the mutilat-ants.

Throw in hypergamy where female 5s or 6s see themselves as worthy of 10s ... chads and adonises. To my mind, they're all zeros to 2s ... we're in the Kardashian Era.  Just glance over some of these sshots below, in no particular order:

Also, ask yourself another question and then go back to Leonarda's opening statement about females making it impossible ... I don't mean to love them but by putting themselves in naive positions, either glued to cellphones, unaware of their surroundings, or meeting an online creep in a park at night or going to Morocco and then wondering why their throats get slit ... just ask Lara Logan about all that.

Often, the ladies and girls are nowhere near sufficient men who can then step in and rescue the damsel surrounded by rapists ... yes, even Lola and Ruby Moir were nowhere near sufficient white knights.

For all we now revere Lola, why was she even there, unprotected in this day and age?

Which does not answer the main question Ada asks ... there actually were some men around ... so why would they not?  My first reply is they were probably unemployed "modern men", woke left liberals, useless specimens. My second reply is men have had chivalry knocked out of them since toddlerhood now and if they did step in, alone, to stop these imported and local creeps, blades do come into the equation.

But it's not just that ... it's standing up on public transport, opening doors, even caring for females any more ... look at that sshot with the power chick in shades ... it's not that I would not step in ... I'm actually foolish enough to do it, same with many mates ... it's that long before that moment, I'd have crossed the road and gone another route.  This is the reality, girls.

And men ... which of the descriptors used above for us men do you actually aspire to? Which allow you to live with yourself in your head?  Satyr? You do see the issue.  And yet, my fellow men point to having been taken to the cleaners by bad women bringing little to the table. Also true.

Xer Moosh and I were discussing love and partnerships last evening ... she made good points ... I replied that the first requirement was that both in the arrangement, each, first extract ego from the equation. She retweeted that bit.

Anyway, nuff for now.