Choose your terrorist organisation of preference

There are known terrorist organisations such as Hamas, the three letter agencies in the west, gangs such as the WEF, Mexican drug gangs ... Obama was taught by one, led by one Bill Ayers ... universities are rife with them, students are highly susceptible, hence the wheeze of getting the most hopeless brains into university, owing huge amounts of money, accruing debt, making ends meet by antifa activities and the like, girls doing OnlyFans ... BLM is another.

Running these two again to give an idea of the sheer scale:

And then there are all the support services facilitating them ... easing their way through, even escorting them ... organisations such as these:

They themselves are not independent, in neither fear nor favour ... they're clearly beholden to, in thrall to, some supra-organising body.  In short, someone is pulling strings from afar, using money, blackmail and threat.  And this body is global.

So, while some sicko kid may have been the patsy, may even have been the Oswald and joined in, there were many others involved.  How good was Kirk's security?  How onside? Did he cross some line which sealed his fate, as with both Kennedys and Lincoln?

Not sure about Diana ... with Chas III's proclivity for checked table cloth headgear and allo snackbar, why would he have wanted to see her deathcult dalliance stopped? Or maybe it was Phil the Greek?  Who knows?  Maybe Chas really was the jealous hubby.

Then we get to councils, police and the rape gangs ... just as antithetical to society but there we're getting into another aspect ... moral degradation of a society ... again across the west. Is the target Christian values, is it the west itself?  Is it all to do with rich resources to be plundered, as with Russia?

......

A reminder, dear reader, that you're welcome to comment as Anon but if so, please invent a moniker to appear somewhere in your text ... it tells Watchers nothing, it does help the readers.