Plans to disclose the ethnicity and immigration status of criminal suspects in the UK have been condemned by race campaigners for setting a dangerous precedent for “dog-whistle politics”, which will make “Black and brown communities more vulnerable”.
To what? Those who don’t come into contact with the criminal justice system won’t have anything to worry about, so why should anyone concern themselves with those who do, since they got there by being criminals?
The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, has welcomed new police guidelines released on Wednesday which encourage forces to release the race and nationality of those charged in high-profile cases. It is meant to combat misinformation on social media, which spread last summer after the murder of three schoolgirls in Southport. False information about the killer’s nationality, religion and asylum status fuelled widespread unrest throughout the country.
It is, of course, all the usual suspects who are raging about it, which tells you a lot. Just look at this line-up of grotesques:
Enny Choudhury, the co-head of legal at the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, said: “Releasing the ethnicity of everyone suspected of serious crimes will … simply fuel mistrust, deepen divisions, and make Black and brown communities more vulnerable to prejudice and harm. “Some point to cases like Southport, where rumours were quashed by releasing specific information. But building a blanket policy around this is dangerous. It turns race into a variable in policing and public debate – when we know the vast majority of serious crimes, including sexual offences, are committed by white men."
Followed by yet another cosy clique:
Peter Herbert, from the Society of Black Lawyers, questioned the role of the police around issues of ethnicity and nationality when forces still face allegations of institutional racism.
And finally, an example of where it all started to go wrong for the police in this country:
The former Metropolitan police chief superintendent Dal Babu has warned of the “unintended consequences” of the new guidance, which he said could lead to more online speculation in cases where these details are not released. “The danger is there will be an expectation for police to release information on every single occasion,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
That’s three people who’s opinion on race should be discounted immediately , since they are all race hustlers extraordinaire.
What's that old saying, "A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged"?
ReplyDeleteThe problem with lefties is that these days, even after being mugged they still cling to their warped ideas.
Here’s another one commenting with no moniker in the text, as commenters have been asked to do. Disrespectful.
DeleteNo not disrespectful. More than likely someone coming across a post and wanting to leave a comment unaware of the blog operators fear of censure by the Google corporation.
DeleteSimply leave the offending comments in the spam. Life's too short to try and get random strangers to behave the way you want them too
Jesus
As to the post content.
Police force or constabulary?
For me the Police is now a mere enforcement department of government.
You were doing well up till “fear of”. With the greatest respect, leaving aside the provocative moniker which I’ll leave Him to sort out, not me, you have no clue about our history … losing 18 years of blogging to a maverick decision of ggl blgr is not “fear”, it’s cold reality.
DeleteYet I’m still here on a ggl blgr blog and Julia has hers too … the word you’re searching for is “protectiveness” … of our readers, of J’s, of Orphans itself, which we are keeping going.
Plus I do not like doing this under Julia’s post, better under one of mine, which is coming up by the way.
Unherdables relies heavily on youtube as well, so there’s no realistic choice but to accommodate ggl blgr for now. Neither Julia nor I are made of money … it’s the only realistic choice at this time.
However, I do ustd that it was not clear under a Julia post that there even was a request to put a moniker in comments … I assure readers, plus J herself, that it’s an emailed threat by the platform on file, multiple times, plus the nastiness of the demise of N.O. last year.
One of those things where ya juss gotta be there to know.
Good grief Jesus is one of my Christian names, which I had no part in choosing!
DeleteYou yourself wrote "no moniker in the text, as commenters have been asked to do. Disrespectful"
There we go, all good. Sorry, Jesus. ☺️
DeleteI'm assuming it's merely a coincidence that the people who are most concerned about the actions by black and brown criminals bringing vulnerability, prejudice, and harm to black and brown communities are themselves, black or brown? Just asking.
ReplyDeletePenseivat
I don't think it will make them more vulnerable, but it will make them more visible (especially the number of them engaged in criminal activity).
ReplyDeleteSorry James. The anonymous option is the default and I keep forgetting to change it.
ReplyDeleteStay well, John.
Delete