Whom to believe?

That’s the question I’m left with this Tuesday morn, also whether to run first up with Trump’s reported 12 day journey from bombing to a ceasefire, with Carney’s announcement that he’s aligning Canada with the EU to bring in a NWO, with the bombed church in Damascus and aftermath, with the non-comp theatre in the UK parlmt … or the one I shall run with, below.

If I use the word “I” here deliberately, it’s because someone is certainly making those statements in the previous paragraph as if they’re true, valid, as if they hold water.

You the reader, on the other hand, are deciding by applying tests in your mind … does this appear at source X or not, is it corroborated or not elsewhere, just what sort of thing is this Higham pumping out anyway (Unherdables across the way) and many other checks you apply.

And Mary Tally-Bowden … that’s pretty big time to be on Rogan …pretty august company … how accurate is Rogan? And anyway, how did her voice rise to be heard? And why am I running that when there are any number of British issues?

Short answer is that the Americans aren’t shy at putting out the info.  Here tis:

Also, why am I using the Unherdables method of screenshots when I could have copied and pasted?  There’s more work with the screenshots … they use up far more space.

The answer is partly over at our place … Steve, a military man, mentioned the seismic readings of those three blasts in Iran, quite a distance away … can he be believed … whilst others are unsure there actually was any bombing … can they be believed? What is the hobbyhorse of each typer?

In the end, we come down to bona fides … whom do we believe on each question?  In this new way of gleaning information, seeking veracity, are we going to find that veracity in the MSM, with its reasons to conceal, or do we further explore what MTB said on Rogan, if she said it at all, if there even is a Rogan … don’t forget “AI” today?