The utter bollox Brits have swallowed over the Ukraine

If there’s one topic on which there’s so much hand-me-down prejudice emanating directly from our “ruling class” since at least the Crimean War, it’s that Russia per se is our natural enemy.

The complication is the Bolshevik CCCP or USSR … what was said about that (see Yuri Bezmenov), being quite true. 

The average older Russian of the 1990s was quite proud of the Red Army.  How do I know? Twelve years in the area, hearing them.

But then a third type of Russia arose, which enabled me to live there and it’s such a mix of different forces, elements … from straight Russian pride in country to the incursion of modern western Wokery.  

What is the current Russia afraid of?  Two things … Vostock or the east, meaning China/Japan and in the other direction … the US close to the Russian border … specifically US agencies such as NATO and the CIA.  And you can’t blame Russia for that, given the reverse situation in October, 1962 … Cuba, Bay of Pigs, Kruschev, Kennedy etc.

The southern geopolitical area … the deathcult republics and nations … are handled by strategic alliances, hence good relations with Turkey and Iran.

What’s Russia aiming to protect in it’s immediate backyard, that is … the Ukraine or the nearest border state? Just look at the map of the region yourself:

The Russians have always wanted the Mariupol corridor from Rostov down to Odessa. Problem is that Odessa itself is hostile, particularly since groups such as Azov battalion marauded freely there, with CIA NATO backing and funding.

Let’s bring these two in at this point:

Not just beyond the Ukraine but past specific points within the Ukraine … there is a thing called topography, defendable areas, plus those requiring vadtly more resources. The Dnieper River is a natural boundary, with buffer zone north-west.  The two Donbass republics, largely Russian speaking, are two others. The natural resources of those areas too.

And so the political map sorts itself out as to what Russia wants. For example, why would Russia go further west than the Donbass border area? Simple … CIA NATO Zelensky has the bunkered saltmines full of weaponry, transport, from where, Hamas style, they’ve been shelling towns in the Donbass daily.

The source of the rockets must militarily be taken out.  Why not just take out Kiev? Here you need to know history … Kiev is the birthplace of the tribe Russ … it’s every Russian’s ancestors’ graves. CIA NATO Zelensky know that full well, as do all the corrupt leaders from Biden to Boris Johnson.

Why are they even there, CIA NATO, apart from the official military strategic threat to Russia? Well the money laundering centre of Europe, biolabs and human experimentation, child trafficking and abuse … mega trillions of dollars/Euros.  The corrupt western leadership (WEF etc.) must get their cash from somewhere to implement their Wokery.

Is Russia angelic? Is Putin a saint? Of course not … Russia is a nation, innit, the UK is, the US … are they perfect? Of course not … every single nation has it’s good, its bad.

But it IS a nation. Now, brother Ukraine would also be seen as a sovereign nation by Russia, were CIA NATO in there doing their hostile worst.  Let’s just say Belgium turned on the UK, massive resources, child trafficking, bristling militarily and every day they shell Dover, London, Colchester, Ipswich, defence bases there.  What would Britain do? Just happily accept daily destruction of its infrastructure?  

Would it hell … it would take out Belgium.  No nation is going to tolerate enemy on the doorstep … it’s disingenuous to suggest otherwise.  “Invader!” would scream the EU and everyone trying to get a rise out of Britain. Utter BS … Britain would be defending herself.

Ditto Russia in the western parts of the Ukraine. Does that make me a Putin lover? If that’s your line, you really need to take a closer look at yourself.