Due diligence

Our special unnamed one at N.O. points out:

Remember this guy? Peter Daszak. "Dr. Peter Daszak is President of EcoHealth Alliance, a US-based organization that conducts research and outreach programs on global health, conservation and international development.." <<< From his bio at EcoHealth

Here's a character reference. H/T L on gab.

https://www.newspapers.com/image/936079556/?clipping_id=146829438&fcfToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJmcmVlLXZpZXctaWQiOjkzNjA3OTU1NiwiaWF0IjoxNzE1MjM4OTM2LCJleHAiOjE3MTUzMjUzMzZ9.j6RXplThRb9No9WB-jMQkZIVaBaWKFMgLr_Q5PZp3NQ

Crims of one form or another.

JH: Ok, I went there and screenshot(ted) most of it:

Some more from earlier days from our special unnamed:

There’s plenty more. As the post title suggests, due diligence is the name of the game for our bona fides.  Why do people not apply due diligence? Here are some suggested reasons imho:

You’ve become lazy, expecting it to be handed to you on a platter, unquestioned.

You actually don’t know where to look, given that most search engines are now Woke … you might not even know how to ask the right questions.

You are a working person, not yet retired nor unemployed … there is genuinely not the time.

You’re weary of the whole damned thing … dazed.

You decide which or all are you. I’d suggest that this militates against any real finding out. As for “fact-checkers” … the less said the better.

Due diligence, people … due diligence.