Watch out for those rabbit holes

This is duplicated across the way ... confession ... but as it seems germane to current events ......

There are certainly overt and covert agendas going on by those getting their messages and theatre to us, one way or the other ... the covert being the difficult one to get a line on ... they're far more subtle.

Schultz, Gates, Fauci ... textbook villains, plus the SpAds behind them writing and directing ... their theatre is easy enough to see, they're up front pantomime baddies.

We also know about the sleeper betrayers such as Barrett on SCOTUS who are either deliberately doing it because they're henchmen-myrmidons or else they've been so long in the company of bad people that they fail to nail ... or else there's blackmail involved (paedo island and similar are examples) ... or else they're dogood people doing essentially bad things, such as cherry-picking "Christians", gaia/shamballa pagans/treehuggers ... wanting so much that everyone loves each other, often in sick ways ... actually doing bad, doing destructive things which in aggregate brings down the society itself.

But we also have to examine the messengers, such as that Spaniard in the US:

... who makes his living, it seems, being an "expert" at examining footage and then doing longish analyses in vlog form, always exhorting us to like and subscribe, hitting the bell and joining Patreon, the moneymaking racket such as Gofundme, remember them?

No analysts are going to talk total bullsh ... just as the left wokerati see and hear feelgood buzz phrases and the blurbs of the messengers have a veneer of verisimilitude, of rightness ... there are always morsels of truth which are taken, they utter wise things until you delve further ... what happens after that or down the track is too often a twisting, like Welby or the antiPope misusing biblical passages to support unbiblical wrongdoing.

All of us are trying to make sense of what's going down but we're coming from quite different angles, which adds bias ... no two ways about it.  Each has his/her hobbyhorse.  And our choice of what to examine first, second, third, depends on those angles we're coming from, that bias.

There's an analyst I was watching for awhile who said many things which chimed in with men's grievances but it became apparent by the nth vlog that she was very iffy indeed ... having a room of black baddies with her lounging about, in order to attack a lone feminazi ... that was twisted, yet she was grinning ... and personally sloppy.

There's an analyst I saw last night:

... and that was an expanded About page ... you'll notice the everpresent like, subscribe, plus the patreon gimme money thing.

What I clicked out for was not about him specifically, and certainly not the sender to me ... the latter I'm sure had the purist motives ... no, it was dwelling, for well over fifteen minutes, on Anne bloody Hathaway's verbal diarrhoea.

Yes, he should have called it out, even given one or two short examples... but 16:23 of our time on AH's bollox, or Katy Perry or ehoever in the celeb cult?

This becomes very much what I call the Podesta or Elton John syndrome. There are things such as the Barbara Streisand syndrome, the Trump Derangement syndrome ... well why not a Podesta or Elton John syndrome?  It's where something is put up, which cannot be unseen, which nauseates all day, even for a few days, reducing our ability to function, to fight the good fight ...

... and it was unnecessary. Quick glance, yes ... not wallowing in the thing, almost to the point of prurience.  Trouble is, all our patrons in the tavern have come from different directions and are at different stages of ferreting ... IYE put it well at NOWP:

Just fallen down another rabbit hole.

Never a truer word in the conclusion:

Seems it is getting harder to trust anything or anyone. Them have their gatekeepers everywhere.

Every one of us, having become an inveterate ferreter, meets slip roads to oblivion, rabbit holes to go down ... trick is not to dwell, which is one motivation behind the N.O. way of covering a lot of ground ... unfortunately not in great depth ... for the depth, all we can do is provide links or hints, as in this post ... mini screenshots.

We're inundated, guys and gals, so many rabbit holes to fall down.

And motivation ... what is the motivation of the examined, the real motivstion ... the agend? IYE again:

never come across him before. Not liking what he’s into or his funding connections or his supporters

Whom do we trust ... and even then up to the point of his or her hobbyhorses? I do feel we're getting there and yet ... and yet ... on X, I tweeted some pretty provocative things about airdropping the miscreants over mecca etc. ... zero pushback, unless I'd been shadowbanned and it had never actually made it to print outside my timeline.

That's the state of play ... suspicion, caution, are not bad modes to be in for now ... never taking at face value, even if it comes back to bite us. I was wrong on thst Pearl, I could well becerong on other prophets and scribes ... time might tell.

Meanwhile, we sre pretty well agreed across soc-med about certain core ideas, e.g. on the vaxxes, on celeb culture and the MSM, on the courts now ... on who is controlling world policies.