Medical lawfare dedicated to silencing doctors

It can’t get any more frightening  than being caught up in a nasty game for sport and it’s not your sport … you are the target. What worries me is those who get off on such things, vicariously, through nasty films and games, and there’ve been countless examples … Hunger Games spring to mind.

If I introduce the word “diabolical” here, it’s really not far from it. In real life, the Belgian paedo trials, written up in the OoL post The Missing Children, are reprised in the first item of TDS today and also in this article … real life stories in the past included Alisha Owens and Paul Bonacci in America, flatly denied by the perps … but it can be in any field … for example, find out about Dr. Ewen Cameron and Dr. Selwyn Leeks … Cameron was one of the early warning alarms for the world … details obviously suppressed in later media.

And now it’s the hunting down of doctors who speak out:

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/10/16/fifty-doctors-back-dr-aseem-malhotra-as-the-good-law-project-takes-the-gmc-to-court-for-refusing-to-strike-him-off-over-covid-vaccine-concerns/

Fifty doctors have voiced their support for Dr. Aseem Malhotra as the Good Law Project takes the General Medical Council to court over its decision not to deem him unfit to practise medicine after he spoke out about his concerns with the COVID-19 vaccines.

In a statement organised by the campaign groups Doctors for Patients U.K., U.K. Medical Freedom Alliance and HART and co-signed by fifty U.K. medics, the doctors say it is “deeply unsettling that the [Good Law Project], an entity funded primarily by the public, would turn its legal machinery toward silencing an ethical doctor”.

“By contesting the GMC’s decision to support Dr. Malhotra’s right to free speech and not to carry out a formal [Fitness to Practice] investigation (on the grounds that his statements were not sufficiently egregious to merit action), the legal action supported by the GLP risks undermining the resolve of medical professionals to speak candidly on serious health issues, a move that would have profound consequences for patient safety and the ethical practice of medicine,” they add.

The organisers say have drafted the statement “to demonstrate that there is a significant body of doctors in support of Dr. Malhotra, who are strongly opposed to and concerned about this case and its ramifications for the medical profession as a whole”.

The nastiest aspect, in my eyes, is that bit about the GLP being partly funded by the public. I wonder how far the public is aware how the funds are being used.
In comments under the article:

the GLP, an entity funded primarily by the public

This statement might give the impression it was in some way tax-payer funded. To be clear – it is non-profit funded by donations.

And a reply:

“We are hugely grateful to have received support from Avaaz, Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust, Lund Trust, a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin, Necessity, 38 Degrees, and Dale Vince, CEO of Ecotricity.”

The enemy.

All of which puts us right back where we were … with the elderly implicitly trusting the medicos, being dutifully jabbed and dying, as well as that other trusting demographic, the young … in many cases with no choice in the matter in their eyes. 

As for care homes for the elderly … sigh. And then our own Grandpa here at OoL and his departed wife.

More broadly over the pond, the lawfare against DJT reaches manic proportions, in clear contradiction of the practices and rules governing elections.

In short, the safeguards have entirely broken down … where’s the Supreme Court when you need it?  As for us … frightening getting older, as medical conditions start to set in.