Shapes of things to come

PD at our place across the way points to another alarming trend:

I have just tried to access Brian Cates (Rise of the New Media) on Telegram (t.me/s/riseofthenewmedia) and been redirected to a French gubermint website. Site blocked because Telegram might contain porn. I tried another one We The Media (t.me/s/wethemedia) with the same response. 

Also Chris Paul (t.me/s/imyourmoderator). Same response. So that is how they're playing the censorship narrative. Suddenly (since this morning) independent/alt news is now classed as "porn".

"You have been redirected to this page of the Ministry of the Interior website because you attempted to connect to a site containing images of child pornography.

For what ?

- To protect the dignity of the victims of the abuse visible in these images.
- To protect Internet users, especially the youngest, so that they are not confronted with shocking images.
- So that people who try to view these images can become aware of the seriousness of their attraction.
- To fight against sites that sell these images."

I have never encountered any such porn on any of the alt media accounts on Telegram nor was I aware that Telegram sells images. I am grateful to the censors for their protection of little moi. Rumble inaccessible here and now Telegram. Where next?

JH:  All right, the Soviet handbook comes in mighty handy, doesn't it, David Bell, Geoff Mulgan and Noah Voson?

Associate truthtelling with a personal crime which would nauseate the middle of society, make it the same in practice, follow up with legislation to define it as such.

In short, the next step is entering all pundits, bloggers and vloggers on the vague sex offenders register, along with grooming gangs and the like, and you have criminalised dissent.

Oh, and any of you reading this here now have just committed a crime, should they need to haul you in over some other issue at a later stage.

Late note from PD:

Anonyme Citoyen also blocked but can be found on twitter @anonymecitoyen