Which hill do we die on?

 DAD, at NOWP, brings us news of Jordan Peterson. My first reaction was to check his chief detractor online Vox Day, there was nothing on it yet, but there was this:

That one in itself we can discuss in another post but certainly, this should not be tolerated:

Playing devil’s advocate for a moment … if the devil sets the rules through his cowardly yet vicious minion Soy Boy and in turn by even more cowardly head of a department, then JP can’t be surprised if the same person who approved the killing of the elderly in hospitals is behind this one too … although such monsters have always been with us.

We’ve been critical of JP for his strange positions on the very God he is now in desperate need of.  Vox has articulated these at his place … use the search engine over there.

But there is also the question of JP’s flawed view of the world, with no ostensible warrior spirit on display, a Harry Hewitt without the belligerence and I’m not going to gloss over it and say it’s neither here nor there. After all, that’s precisely why we attack the OneThink professors and teachers in universities and schools.

Also, when the Trucker Convoy was killed off, was any hell raised anywhere in the world by us?  For weeks, months, years?

For a few days, yes, then other issues swamped it.  And yet that same divided attention was all the encouragement Soy Boy needed to bring in his draconian measures, knowing no one could now stop him.  The USSR was worse, … but give Soy Boy time.

Now, the Canadians themselves … soft left liberal bunch in towns and cities, less so in the countryside … they just roll over and moan, as we do in Britain.

However, in the US, the 20 in Congress are taking a different stance, just as the Canadian truckers did.  Some Americans are ornery, to use their term.  Not enough though to kill off the iniquity though … too many cowards now surround the brave.

Our advice to JP?  How would that help when the enemy is right behind snuffing him out and their line is going to be … “Well here is the official line … you, Dr. JP, do not toe it, therefore you are dismissed.”  

The issue is that official line in the first place, innit, and what a society can do against iniquitous laws?

But against that, there is the question of flawed teaching … and he is a teacher with wide reach.  Put simply … if he teaches a flawed notion of God, then why would God come to his rescue? Not for us to say, as we’re not God.

Alternatively, just who would come to JP’s rescue?  I’m thinking it’s a combination of God through mass protest, starting with these online outlets such as blogs and vlogs.  Take it from there.  Consider where the 20 rebels in Congress are playing out the battle … it’s on the Congressional floor, then on Twitter.

Make no mistake … all major players are on Twitter … all of them.  That’s why Musk wanted it.

Dr. JP?  Poor sod.  Look, whatever we think of him, pro and con, it really is our job, on the crocodile eat me last principle, the Pastor Niemoeller principle, the Voltaire principle, to shout it out loudly. 

Were it a pagan on the subject of Stonehenge, I’d still have to support him in his freedom to do it his way … otherwise there’s no freedom at all … for any of us.