Satire versus genuine malevolence

The Slog, via Andy over at NOWP:

This is an extract from a genuine press release yesterday from the World Health Organisation:

‘Globally, half of all preventable harm in medical care is medication related, a quarter of which is severe or life-threatening. In the lead up to World Patient Safety Day on 17 September 2022, WHO is emphasizing the global burden of medication harm. The elderly population is one of the most at-risk groups of medication harm, especially those taking multiple medications. High rates of medication-related harm are also seen in surgical care, intensive care and emergency medicine.

“Medicines are powerful tools for protecting health. But medicines that are wrongly prescribed, taken incorrectly or are of poor quality, can cause serious harm,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. “Nobody should be harmed while seeking care.”

And the Slog’s comment:

Throughout the entire release, there is not a single mention of the World Record rate of side effects, epidemic statistical levels of unexplained early death, heavy fat neosolid collections never before seen blocking key circulation points and mobile nanodebris associated with mRNA vaccines both in trials and general use.

Yes … we’re not speaking here of just inefficiency, wrongful interpretation of data and ordinary human folly, are we? We are actually faced with wilful malevolence-aforethought in a jocular manner, as with The Joker [Nicholson] in that film.

That’s what we have here. 

And given Tedros’s antecedents … then the world itself, when subject to “World” anything today, be it churches or medicine or climate, is under genocidal intent and machinations.

The implications cross many fields, do they not and require quite a few posts to cover. Plus we’re getting deeply into core beliefs, which in the west for a start today, are at odds, at loggerheads - confounding and confusing the societies, such that they simply cannot combine to mount a viable defence.

Were I to go any further now, with my own slant, interpretation, my own call to action, then there is no doubt it would be opposed and therefore stymied.

So let’s just end this post here, with the realisation, above, of what we really have in our hands, plus thoughts, hard thinking before we go any further, as to who the enemy truly is.