AKH posts over at his place an item on the Nudge Unit:
That unit I'd label insidious but of course, it all depends on the history of one's reading over a couple of decades as to how you'd characterise it.
A disclaimer - this in no way ropes in AKH, Julia, Grandpa or CM over at OoL, they by no means endorse what I write below and I could understand them sighing and wondering about guilt by association, which would be a misplaced conclusion. All right?
I did comment, over at AKH's:
Your angle is slightly different, AKH, but it boils down to the same thing - manipulation - and to this end, years ago I ran a post on groupthink, NLP, all of that, which is what nudging is all about.
Sounds innocuous, which it's meant to be until one looks at the source, well over a century old, the rabbithole in the UK being Chatham House, thence Internet of all things, Demos, Tavistock, and the creation of the illusion that we decide in a state of free choice. Tell that one to advertisers.The only thing left is the individual's decision as to whether this is legit or insidious.
The post referred to in there is:
To that, I'd add:
... which leads here:
... to which can be added:
... and:
... to which can be added thousands of posts under the N.O. moniker, let alone OoL. It's not nothing, it's very much something which these bozos have been up to for a long, long time, with the simple aim of keeping manipulated normies as karens, under central control without knowing it, in fact being hostile to the notion of manipulation if applied to them by people they don't much care for, e.g. us.
This is more particularly so for those who pride themselves on their thinking processes, that trick is ancient - to offer limited choices and foment vigorous debate within those choices, in a controlled forum [community standards], whilst characterising other debates outside that as tinfoil hat, swivel-eyed loonery.
If that technique does not produce "well formed outcomes", then roll out the coercive measures. If we're looking for a core goal for all this, beyond the day to day of keeping people on edge, with the ruling cabal providing the solution to those in fear, which solution only works as long as you do as govt says through all its persuasive organs ... if we're looking for that core goal, one place it can be found is in Weishaupt's 1776 list of things to be abolished.
1773 - Mayer Amschel Rothschild assembles twelve of his most influential friends and convinces them that if they all pool their resources together, they can rule the world. This meeting takes place in Frankfurt, Germany. Rothschild also informs his friends that he has found the perfect candidate, an individual of incredible intellect and ingenuity, to lead the organization he has planned - Adam Weishaupt.May 1, 1776 - Adam Weishaupt (code named Spartacus) establishes a secret society called the Order of the Illuminati. Weishaupt is the Professor of Canon Law at the University of Ingolstadt in Bavaria, part of Germany. [This date, May Day, is to become highly significant to the Soviet Communists. They held festive military parades on this day.] The Illuminati seek to establish a New World Order. Their objectives are as follows:1) Abolition of all ordered governments2) Abolition of private property3) Abolition of inheritance4) Abolition of patriotism5) Abolition of the family6) Abolition of religion7) Creation of a world governmentJuly 1782 - The Order of the Illuminati joins forces with Freemasonry at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad. The Comte de Virieu, an attendee at the conference, comes away visibly shaken. When questioned about the "tragic secrets" he brought back with him, he replies: "I will not confide them to you. I can only tell you that all this is very much more serious than you think." From this time on, according to his biographer, "the Comte de Virieu could only speak of Freemasonry with horror."1785 - An Illuminati courier named Lanze is struck by lightning and killed while traveling by horseback through the town of Ratisbon. When Bavarian officials examine the contents of his saddle bags, they discover the existence of the Order of the Illuminati and find plans detailing the coming French Revolution. The Bavarian government attempts to alert the government of France of impending disaster, but the French government fails to heed this warning. Bavarian officials arrest all members of the Illuminati they can find, but Weishaupt and others have gone underground and cannot be found.Oct. 11, 1785 - Bavarian authorities raid the home of an Illuminati member named Von Zwack. They discover Illuminati documents which show quite clearly that they plan to bring about a "universal revolution that should deal the death-blow to society...this revolution will be the work of the secret societies, and that is one of our great mysteries."1789 - Violence erupts in France. The French Revolution not only overthrows the existing government but also attempts to eliminate Christianity from the nation. A half-naked prostitute is placed on the altar of the Cathedral of Notre Dame and extolled as the "Goddess of Reason." Revolutionary officials do away with the seven-day week and replace it with a ten-day week.1796 - Freemasonry becomes a major issue in the Presidential election in the United States. John Adams wins the election by opposing Masonry, and his son John Quincy Adams warns of the dire threat to the nation posed by the Masonic Lodges: "I do conscientiously and sincerely believe that the Order of Freemasonry is, if not the greatest, then one of the greatest moral and political evils."
And so it goes on. Thing is, were you to take a taxi and ask your driver, with drivetime talkback radio on for his daily reality, if he knew about any of the above, you'd know the answer, would you not?
How to attack the quote above? Easy - focus on, for example, on "A half-naked prostitute is placed on the altar of the Cathedral of Notre Dame" and then quote the name of the local woman who was not "placed" but chose to join in festivities and there is your core objection.
If whoever wrote the quote above could not get that right, then surely all the rest of it can be equally dismissed?
Which most readers at this site know to be bollox. But normies do not.
It will not have escaped your attention that timing is a great part of all this. Churchill referred to the French Revolution as his starting point for subversive movements but of course we can go back much further and look, for example, at the Venetian agent Sarpi in London ... but we have to start somewhere - the French and American revolutions are a good watershed.
What is manifestly apparent is that this thing does not start with the Frankfurt School, nor the Lincoln School and Wundt, nor with the Suffragettes, nor with Moses Mordecai Levy - it goes back way further than that.
Why? Well, there we get into metaphysics and I'm loathe to muddy the waters with that but we could say it's quite ancient, this thing. In terms of 2022, the climate scam, the Ukraine, the one before that [cv, masks, vaxxes, mandates], nudge units, GCHQ, CCHQ and all the rest of today's blights - there is nothing new under the solar minimum and global cooling.
It's about trillions of $$$$ in wodge-bunging, plus creation of and manipulation of the normies on the grand scale.
My final question is - just who exactly are the swivel-eyed loonies in all this?
I completely endorse it!
ReplyDelete