Housing OR remigration

… or housing PLUS remigration?

There is no way to build enough homes to house them all the way they’re multiplying now.  I ran a youtube on worst seaside towns now and one was Southend. Our Julia wrote:

The thing that’s killing Southend and many other seaside towns is HMOs- and London councils shipping their undesirables to them!

One commenter on the tweet above replied to the question:

What if govt kept building at a lower rate, nicely designed places … PLUS remigrated, say, 20 million within 5 years?

……

Anyway, that’s a bold idea but the implementing of it is, at this time, pie in the sky … even were some enterprising strong leader to remove the “illegal” numbers, what of those who went about it the right way, some generations back?  In short, they’ve very much integrated?

Plus, in a ramshackle, rundown country where even the RAF planes are leased from a hedgefund these days … whose army is going to march into the ghettoes and do this thing?

I for one suspect that economic necessity is going to decide it all … and not that much further into the future either.

The Fabians

First bombshell … I was one, once, in university, but not for long … as a student, I then went all anarchist (we used to send our demands to the admin on loo roll).  However, I rebelled against the Fabian Party as it was at university, me being radical and all.

Oh, and gradually I grew up … went Tory most of my political life … now I’m a rebel against Yusuf, Farage, Tice … such is life.  Here’s something on the Fabians I’ve been saving up two days:

Whom to believe?

That’s the question I’m left with this Tuesday morn, also whether to run first up with Trump’s reported 12 day journey from bombing to a ceasefire, with Carney’s announcement that he’s aligning Canada with the EU to bring in a NWO, with the bombed church in Damascus and aftermath, with the non-comp theatre in the UK parlmt … or the one I shall run with, below.

If I use the word “I” here deliberately, it’s because someone is certainly making those statements in the previous paragraph as if they’re true, valid, as if they hold water.

You the reader, on the other hand, are deciding by applying tests in your mind … does this appear at source X or not, is it corroborated or not elsewhere, just what sort of thing is this Higham pumping out anyway (Unherdables across the way) and many other checks you apply.

And Mary Tally-Bowden … that’s pretty big time to be on Rogan …pretty august company … how accurate is Rogan? And anyway, how did her voice rise to be heard? And why am I running that when there are any number of British issues?

Short answer is that the Americans aren’t shy at putting out the info.  Here tis:

Also, why am I using the Unherdables method of screenshots when I could have copied and pasted?  There’s more work with the screenshots … they use up far more space.

The answer is partly over at our place … Steve, a military man, mentioned the seismic readings of those three blasts in Iran, quite a distance away … can he be believed … whilst others are unsure there actually was any bombing … can they be believed? What is the hobbyhorse of each typer?

In the end, we come down to bona fides … whom do we believe on each question?  In this new way of gleaning information, seeking veracity, are we going to find that veracity in the MSM, with its reasons to conceal, or do we further explore what MTB said on Rogan, if she said it at all, if there even is a Rogan … don’t forget “AI” today?

The difficulty in Iran “rising up”

Yes, it would be very nice if they did, the ordinary folk:

… but I’m not sure it will happen that way. Thing is, it’s not just the oppressed women, is it?  And so many of them have Stockholm Syndrome.  

Then there are the men, quite happily wifebeating, blinding their women in one eye, raping, burning, multiple “wives”.

How will the girls of Iran overcome all that?

Sarah Pochin v Reform

The matter does need to be looked at in Britain.

As for me, Reform members, workers, helpers, supporters, are on the whole good people … on most issues, we’re at one.  Most issues.

But not the gang of three at the top … and now, certainly not Sarah Pochin, the ex LibDum:

There’s a broader aspect to all this, split into these points and more:

* FPTP is a nightmare within which, along with gerrymandering, a “Party” with 20% or so of eligible votes gets to say what the 80% don’t want, with no comeback whatever due to the rules.

It’s said that proportional leads to weak govt but look at two systems … first ours … has strong govt helped us withe the likes of Starmer and the Uniparty?  Then there’s Europe which has its own ways of stopping the most popular candidate.

*  What about false manifesto claims? Being elected on one platform, then suddenly doing the opposite, arbitrarily?  There are no laws in the UK to stop this … so the monster destroys the country … legally.

*  The British are far too docile and compliant … even resigned to things … sign of a defeated population, as with the Time Machine Eloi. Why?  Lucy Connolly, Bernie Spofforth, Allison Pearson.  It’s bullying culture, from schooldays.  Also look after n1, hoping the crocodile gets to them last.

*  “Party” by definition, in this 1984 context, is an impossibility. Take five people agreeing perhaps on half the current issues. Sarah Pochin even agrees with most of the coubtry on half the issues. What of the other half?  This is where “Party” is a tyrannical monster, bludgeoning, via whip, anyone disagreeing on this or that.

Rather than calling that “strong leadership”, how about calling it suppression of valid views?  Slippery slope.

*  The loss of decency, ethics, moral compass from discourse and doings. Which morality characterised the west?  Basic Christian precepts … how many turned away just now, didn’t want me to continue with this line?  Now look at what fills that vacuum out there … a better society?

Look, I’m the first to hide in a back room if two men in suits, carrying a bible or book of mormon or whatever rock up to my door … or if we get onto pointy hats and incense, chanting, paedo priests, the Crusades, Torquemada, Bergoglio, Welby, purple haired weird female parsons … count me one of the multitude when that sort of thing comes at us.

So … what of the new Slamophobia blasphemy laws about to be dropped on us?  Nuff for now.

Chamber of Ghouls

Here are some reactions to the week’s doings in the killing chamber:

John in Cheshire:

Celebrity Witterings

Presenter and campaigner Katie Piper has told an audience at the Hay Festival in Wales that "ageing can be compared to a bereavement."

why would anyone say anything so daft? 

Piper's latest book, which is published on Friday, is titled Still Beautiful: On Age, Beauty and Owning Your Space.

oh, say no more! 

The 41-year-old said: "Women age out of the male gaze. I was ripped from the male gaze at 24. I didn't just become invisible. I became a target for people saying derogatory things."

Derogatory things like ‘You’re talking bollocks, love’ perhaps? 

Piper, who is also a presenter on the BBC programme Songs of Praise and ITV's Loose Women. said she had recently been asked if writers minded if they mentioned her age. "It was shocking, but not surprising. This was because I had been reminded at such a young age the currency and the power a woman holds when she is considered either beautiful or young, and now here I was going through the second phase of youth slipping away and feeling, once again, society's judgement and the label that they were going to put on to me."

It’s a familiar refrain. Because we are all getting older - some of us with dignity and acceptance, some of us...clearly not!

She said she felt positive about getting older. "I'm going to be 42 in October. I'm still incredibly young to many, and old and past it to some. You realise, 'I know who I am.' I have a strong sense of self and identity. This is the heyday. This is the time of my life. So I can only imagine what's on [for the] 50s and 60s and the decades beyond. I feel excited by that second chapter."

She said if she had to give one message to her younger self, it would be: "If you've ever felt less than... you've hated yourself or felt ashamed, it was never you. It was society, consumerism and capitalism. It was beneficial to someone, somewhere, to hold you down.

Oh, boy, capitalism is forever the big bogeyman in some people’s eyes, even as they earn a nice living from it, isn’t it? 

“Blowtorch” and the art of hyperbole

Is it the insanity of Net Zero and related psychoses, is it that Them are stuck for surpassing their last hyperbole, is it that it’s in the hands of Gen Zee at the Met office … or is it their own notion of humour, at a bizarre juncture of our Nu Lab Society, and this is to appease the Beloved Two Tier?

Can They Claim Back Their Council Tax Precept?

A couple whose Jaguar was stolen were forced to steal it back after police took too long to investigate. Mia Forbes Pirie and Mark Simpson discovered their car had gone missing from near their west London home in Brook Green on Wednesday morning. The pair had it fitted with an AirTag locator meaning they were able to track the vehicle to an updated location in Chiswick at 10.30am.

So, an open and shut case, one even today's modern coppers couldn't possibly screw up? 

But police informed them after dialling 999 that they did not know when they would be able to investigate and so could not offer immediate assistance.

What 'investigation' really needed doing? It was handed to you on a plate! 

The couple took matters into their own hands when Ms Pirie, 48, discovered the AirTag had last pinged on the road outside their home at around 3.20am.Mr Simpson, 62, was nervous as he made the four-mile journey with his wife to the car's new location. The pair discovered the vehicle on a quiet back street with its interior and carpets ripped apart by thieves who had attempted to access its wiring.

In a post to LinkedIn, Ms Forbes Pirie admitted it was 'kind of fun' stealing back the car but questioned 'why we should have had to do that'.

You shouldn't. You have done everything the police tell you to do to safeguard your property, after all. Now it's their turn to hold up their end of the bargain.

She added: '[Is] it right that the police seem to have no interest in investigating what is likely to have been a reasonably sophisticated operation involving a flat bed truck… if there are no consequences, what is the incentive for people not to do more of this?'

None, which no doubt helps the Met to demand more from the Treasury to 'stem the crime wave' that's ever present in London. due to things like this. 

Last year, the Met Police allegedly told a Londoner who had his car stolen to recover the vehicle himself as they didn't have the manpower. George Nicolas had his Maserati Levante stolen from outside his home in May after the thieves removed his steering lock with an angle grinder. Luckily the classic car fan had installed a tracking device in the car - which costs more than £93,000 when new - and he rang up the Met to inform them of the motor's location. But Mr Nicolas claimed he was subsequently told that the force 'didn't have anyone available' and instead recommended that he recover the vehicle himself since he knew where it was.

Perhaps if he'd phoned them again when he got to the car and threatened to shoot the thieves they'd have sufdenly found some manpower after all? 

The main threat(s)

Had a feeling Blgr would not let this expand:

https://x.com/ChanelRion/status/1934823170021954025

... inter-platform rivalries trump good communication. On the other hand ... to actually watch Chanel in the UK might be an actionable offence in Communist Starmerland, so it might be a blessing in disguise.

Then we have this:

Reports say US military "assets" are on their way but that might be DJT bluffing, it might not. Remember ... Gateway, Memri and Laura are from the same Nethan stable. Russia took in top Iranian nutter brass? Well, those are long time treaties ... I saw reports saying Russia is getting the hell out of Iran.

Which is more vital to bring readers iyho ... that above or the ongoing rape gang awkwardness for the perps, now that it's certainly gone viral on the net and in parlmt?

I'd suggest they're connected by an ideology which wants you dead. And I don't mean just the religious nutters in the ME, now spreading around the west ... never forget the WEF, the Rothschilds etc. ... they want you dead too.

In the UK, the assisted dying abomination is current, plus full term abortion (Creasy is simply evil), plus all the rest of it ... dispossessing people of their homes, esp. farmers and pensioners.

Have a lovely Tuesday shoring up your defences.

(Julia's posts, by the way, are currently being Xed from Ambush Predator and from here.)