No Amount Of Laws Will Prevent This!

Holly Bramley's life was barbarically snatched away when she was murdered by her husband of nine years. The 26-year-old had been isolated from her family by 'evil monster' Nicholas Meston, who convinced her that her family didn't love her. He moved her 50 miles away from them without telling anyone - and the pair eventually tied the knot.

It's a sad story, and a familiar one, a woman so lacking in self-confidence and a sense of self-worth that a man becomes everything to her, no matter what he does... 

In the nine years Holly was with Metson, she was alienated from her parents, who were never invited to her wedding and didn't know it was happening. Tragically, it would only be 18 months later that he would cut up her body into 224 pieces at their Lincoln home before dumping her remains in a bag for life in a river. In the run-up to her murder in March 2023, Holly had reported Metson to the police for killing her pets in a gruesome fashion. On one occasion, she found her new puppy dead inside a washing machine with the drum still spinning after her husband dumped the dog inside. Another time, she fled to a police station with her rabbits in a bid to escape after he had killed her hamsters by putting them in a food blender and a microwave oven.

And did the authorities act? Well, they tried.  

However, according to her mother, Annette, the RSPCA were never able to bring any charges against Meston because her daughter had withdrawn her statement.

And, unwilling to accept that she's somehow bred and raised a woman so lacking in the instincts of self-preservation, her mother wants to make it everyone else's fault, hence the inevitable demand for legislation: 

Her grieving mother, pushing for a new law, said she had done everything in her power to convince her youngest daughter to walk away from the deadly relationship.In a bid to help others in a similar situation to her daughter, Annette is now calling for Holly's Law. The proposed legislation would see a nationwide animal cruelty register created for individuals who harm or kill animals, to be brought into legislation.

Personally, I'm in favour of such a law, but purely on it's own merits, not to try to prevent more deaths like this one. Nothing will do that, except raising daughters to have enough self-worth that they don't subsume their entire personality to a brute.  

Annette's petition for an animal cruelty register has reached over 50,000 signatures as she remains hopeful it will be brought into legislation similarly to Clare's Law.

And when the next murder happens despite this, what will be demanded then? 

The brazen arrogance of worthless usurpers

When you look at these utterly bizarre, brazen reactions of the pollies, at odds with any form of reality at ground level, then it leads to certain conclusions:

Just what has brought on this full-on brass-neckedness, openly thumbing the nose at people?

Well yes ... directives from HQ, whoever the deep state actually is. But where's their confident arrogance from?  What has happened to make them so open in their brazenness?

In 2000, in Toronto, an ex one of them gave an explanation ... they will go open around 2020 and roll out the new order ... I've posted that radio transcript a few times since 2006.  They have total faith that they are safe, that they need not pretend anymore, that parts of western society being set at each other's throats ensures the invasion and perma-power..  A Clinton type of safety . Either stop those who know or "we'll all hang".

Revolution?  Yep, that will do fine say the honchos ... that's factored in ... either way, western culture is swept away, melting pot stuff.  That lady in 2000 was asked ... how to dtop these lowlifes in power?

She mentioned two things which can stop them ... errors, overplaying their hand ... then a resurgence of faith in the old culture plus its underpinnings.

And that is precisely what Gen Zees are starting to do, with some Gen Xs helping.

Yes, Jamie, Haven't They Made It Perfectly Clear That's What They Are Doing?

The former Royal Marine, who is suing the authorities for £25,000, told The Telegraph: 'It makes no sense. It just seems to me they want to punish me because of my opinions and because my views don’t align with theirs.'

Bingo! As with the Joey Barton trial, that is indeed the deciding factor behing the decision - 'how dare you question your rulers' Even medieval kings didn't weild their power so cavierlierly, because they knew their castles weren't totally impregnable if the citizenry were riled enough...

Jamie Michael, from Penygraig in south Wales, was charged with inciting racial hatred following comments he made in a 12-minute Facebook video. The 47-year-old described some migrants as 'scumbags' and 'psychopaths' as riots spread across the UK in the aftermath of the Southport murders.

Some undoubtedly are. So what he said wasn't even wrong. 

Despite his acquittal Mr Michael was told a 'child protection concern' made against him had been 'substantiated' less than a fortnight after the jury delivered its not-guilty verdict. As a result the Football Association of Wales has now barred the father-of-two from coaching his daughter's team following a meeting held in private with a safeguarding officer and South Wales Police.

The Free Speech Union is taking up his case: 

Lord Young, the union's founder and director, said: 'Citing safeguarding concerns to silence people you disagree with is a scandalous abuse of the system.' He added the FSU has '15 people on our books' branded a risk to children due to their political views.

Safeguarding boards were established in 2004 following the murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman in Soham by a school caretaker.

A crime that  wouldn't have happened without the incompetence and laziness of the police record-keeping, and which lead to a host of shutting-the-stable-door legislation to prevent wrong un's with criminal histories slipping through the cracks in future. It was never intended to silence critics of the government's plans to flood the UK with boat people, but that's now how it's being used.

Venues for the two London rallies-meets today

The anti-DID is at 1300:

The second is TR's Christian service at 1400:

We need to promote the up and comers, plus any newbies of good heart

Had a quick look at my 17 items waiting to be posted and saw that there were no real Brit items ... they usually kick in late morning. This is not strictly a Brit blog, Orphans, but it's certainly Britcentric ... I'm thinking tomorrow morning's post will cover one of the Stasi issues.

Please remember the two London rallies today ... No to Digital ID at 1 p.m. and TR's prayer meeting st 2 p.m.

Meanwhile, the only non-US issue I currently have is a "hiding to nothing post" on promoting fellow pundits, esp. Gen Zee.  On X, about two-thirds of my interaction is with females of all ages, being closest to Gen X, while Unherdables is heavily male-centric, Gen X/Boomer, though not exclusively.

Seems to me, and of course it would given my last twelve years of working life teaching, on average, 115 girls and 5 boys a year at university ... it seems to me that anyone either parent and/or teacher would be vitally interested in promoting "good" females of all ages, plus newbie males like Young Bob, plus ourselves of course ... our readers being our lifeline.

One gal downunder I try to promote is Kobie ... this below is disjointed, no thanks to X, but you might get the idea.  I'd commented on her post on the "far right":

This was that article.

By the way, that last one was our Julia having a weekend respite in York.  If you're going to venture into the gateway to God's Own Country, hope you drive out into that country ... try the North Riding and the NY Moors.

It's An Ask Now, What Will Happen When They Decline?

India’s telecoms ministry has privately asked smartphone makers to preload all new devices with a state-owned cybersecurity app that cannot be deleted, a government order showed, a move likely to antagonise Apple and privacy advocates.

And the people in the market for a smartphone, surely? Or don't they count? 

In tackling a recent surge of cybercrime and hacking, India is joining authorities worldwide, most recently in Russia, to frame rules blocking the use of stolen phones for fraud or promoting state-backed government service apps.

How long before Britain joins them?  

Apple, which has previously locked horns with the telecoms regulator over development of a government anti-spam mobile app, is among the companies, such as Samsung, Vivo, Oppo and Xiaomi bound by the new order.  The 28 November order gives major smartphone companies 90 days to ensure that the government’s Sanchar Saathi app is pre-installed on new mobile phones, with a provision that users cannot disable it.

What about existing phones? Oh they have a plan for those too!  

For devices already in the supply chain, manufacturers should push the app to phones via software updates, the ministry said in its order, which was not made public and was sent privately to select companies.

Who ptromptly leaked it, shoeing just how likely they are to comply. 

A lawyer specialising in technology matters said India’s move was cause for concern, however.

“Apple has historically refused such requests from governments,” said Tarun Pathak, a research director at Counterpoint.

And they aren't about to start going along with this nonsense now... 

The eternal, conflicting schedules of antiWoke forces

There are two conflicting rallies in London this Saturday afternoon, as you'll see below.  Across the pond, there's the Erika versus Candace fight coming up on the 15th.  That latter I'll cover over at Unherdables ... the conflicting London rallies here.

All right ... I've written to both parties at X:

Unlike the forces arrayed against us, we of the anti-enemies-of-the-people are hopelessly disorganised, different groups proposing their own solutions, wanting support.  The bright among us would notice Emma's is at 1 p.m. and Tommy's at 2 p.m.  why are they not combined?

There's been a reply on X ... here tis:

That's reassuring.

Cut-Price Zebra Crossings?

A scheme that trialled the use of “unlawful” zebra crossings on side roads has been hailed a success after increasing the number of motorists who stop to let pedestrians cross the road.

But if they aren’t legal, why are they putting them in? Why aren’t they putting in legal ones? 

The initiative was launched by Westminster council on 11 side roads, at junctions with main roads such as Millbank, Horseferry Road, Pimlico Road and Wardour Steet. Typically, drivers exiting side roads – or turning in from main roads – tend not give way to pedestrians waiting to cross the road, despite being required to do so under a recent update of the Highway Code.But when “side road zebra crossings” were introduced, the trial found that drivers stopped on about 80 per cent of occasions – about double the number prior to their introduction.

So drivers aren’t recognising that they aren’t legal, clearly. Well, most of them, anyway! 

Westminster believes the results are so compelling that it is urging all 32 other London boroughs to follow its lead and introduce similar measures. Southwark is believed to be the next in line to do so.

A council urging other councils to do something illegal! Gosh, why isn’t this considered a scandal? Is it because it’s working?

Max Sullivan, Westminster’s cabinet member for streets, said the idea was “a rare unicorn… effective, popular and cheap”. He said: “I would like all boroughs to engage with it.”

You forgot ‘legal’, Max! Why isn’t it legal then? 

Mr Sullivan said that traditional zebra crossings cost £60,000 to £120,000 each to install, due to the electrical connections required. By comparison, the “side road zebras” can be installed for £20,000 to £25,000, a “fraction of the cost”, including the cost of monitoring, he said.

And when someone's eventually run down on one of them, what are the CPS going to charge the driver with? What is the victim going to sue the council for, for encouraging a belief that this was a safe road crossing? 

A tale of our beloved NHS

 

And today:

The NHS Is On It's Knees, Yet Has Time For This?

The HIV action plan, to be unveiled on World Aids Day on Monday, aims to re-engage the thousands of people who have left HIV care, bringing them back to lifesaving treatment. The £170m package also includes funding for opt-out HIV testing at A&Es during routine blood tests in areas with the highest rates, including London and Manchester.

I thought the NHS was struggling to treat the people that WANT to be treated, without worrying about the ones that don't want to be treated? 

A steady decrease in HIV diagnoses was recorded in England from 2005, but progress faltered during the pandemic, with testing disrupted and an increase in the number of new cases. As a result of new treatments, HIV is now a manageable condition.

Given the plethora of evidence around to show how to avoid infection, why is it rising? New ‘Britons’, perhaps. 

There are also as many as one in 10 people living with diagnosed HIV who are not under medical care, according to a National AIDS Trust report published in September. The latest action plan aims to renew efforts to re-engage people with treatment and boost testing to ensure that transmissions continue to be pushed down.

Why do they need to be reengaged?

The Department for Health and Social Care said it would target its support towards the approximately 5,000 people living with HIV who had fallen out of medical care, for reasons including mental health issues, addiction, poverty and fear of judgment. Hospital staff in trusts where the opt-out scheme is in place will receive anti-stigma training, so patients can access care without fear of being judged for their HIV status.

So what demographic area are we focussing on here? 

Prof Susan Hopkins, the chief executive of the UK Health Security Agency, said the latest figures showed progress towards the 2030 target, with about 95% of those living with HIV now knowing they have the virus. “But about 4,700 people remain undiagnosed, including one in three in Black African communities and higher rates of late diagnosis in older age groups,” she said. “People need testing that meets them where they are, in ways that feel safe and accessible.”

I say we cut them loose, if they don't want to benefit from modern medical advances, that's their choicw.