Enoch said

The tweeter who put this below up on X I'll have to go searching for to attribute. Just grabbed the text on the run and here it is, from Enoch P, way back when.

Has Kate gone Woke?

The dissemination of information is becoming more and more difficult for us pundits due to censorship, shadow banning, removing of data sensitive to the PTB's case plus, in the UK, laws against those telling the truth ... that was one of the key factors in the Sep 13 London march.

Julia is wise to take a topic at a time and thoroughly address it in her own way, with limited time as she works mainly away from home. I operate from home and have more time to be prolific on a range of issues current at that time ... but health/sleep also comes into it, getting enough breaktime etc.

One really difficult part of info gathering is it's so fragmented ... one of the reasons also behind digital ID ... and we can gather maybe six or seven snippets but along come three more which significantly question where the first six were headed ... this is pure Sherlock Holmes. And diving down rabbit holes is not for everyone.

Then we get to the manner of reporting. Ignoring the faux MSM, there are two main ways after 140 character soc-med tweets or grabs ... for any in depth, it's either blog or vlog.  No prizes for which I use more, quite frustrated at the way vloggers seeking monetisation for droning on and on, padding out to sometimes forty minutes or more, when all we needed were "the facts, ma'am".

Thus, in the latest Grifty on the young Royals, even the first few minutes were a horror story of Woke framing ... Grifty herself is ok but she was soon into Kate aligning with global institutions to reshape the royal image, wellness, various other pure Wokerati terms dreamed up by the Fabians ... you know, equality and diversity, gate crime, racism, this phobia or that.  Horrifying to think Kate is succumbing to Woke faux politics, as she'd been relatively aloof up till then.

This was Grifty's vlog on it (h/t Toodles at UHC across the way)

"Shaping" and "Transforming", using the participle form that way, a la corporations and Obama, is a key strategy of the globofabian SpAds.  Kate also wrote: "The power of human connection in a distracted world" ... vague bollox like that always disguises the nasties inside and who is she planning teaching it to?  Yes, kiddies  ... think you're getting the idea. Nasty.

Kate did not write it alone. Grifty said she "collaborated with" a Harvard professor, meaning he shadow wrote it.  And what does he do at university? Explores happiness and relationships in a god-free way, with lots of "wellness" (a key framing weasel word), neuroscience, as in "well formed outcomes" and NLP.

And what is Kate being used to sell?  "From tradition and faith to Science, Wellness and Global Partnership" ... I would only need to explain any more to the already Woke brainwashed or normies who've not hitherto thought much about any of this claptrap ... same old same old fabianism and feminazism, straight from the WEF and EU playbook.

Kate, the least unpopular royal, tutored by an east coast US American professor.

Obviously there is to be backlash and as always, the Christian writers are straight onto it.

Just clicked in to double check and he's saying "if you want to pull down western civilisation" ... so again, you can predict what he'll say about substituting a flawed, destructive ideology for the trad code of western living.

There's nothing new in any of this ... what's new is Kate being coopted to push it.

End of post. However, below the line is the reason I deleted two recent comments which were well iut of order for different reasons ... same two people every time.

......

Whoa!  Not quite end of post ... just saw this seconds ago:

Uh huh.

But There Aren’t Enough ‘People Who Value Authenticity And Are Willing To Pay For It’

More recently, Wedgwood’s challenges have mirrored those of British manufacturing. The business boomed in the mid 20th century, and by 1986 it employed about 12,000 people worldwide. Many were based in Stoke-on-Trent, where Wedgwood’s “paintresses” trained young apprentices to create curling floral designs. Today, Staffordshire’s potteries face an existential crisis. Four ceramics firms have gone bust or shifted production overseas in the last two years. Last week, the Fiskars Group, Wedgwood’s parent company, announced that it was pausing production for 90 days, putting 70 workers on temporary leave.

The world has changed, and businesses that can't change will go to the wall.  

Fiskars has said that this is merely a “short-term measure” caused by a lull in demand. But Wedgwood’s challenges are longstanding. As Tristram Hunt noted in his 2021 biography of Josiah Wedgwood, executives began a debt-fuelled acquisition spree in the 1990s, paying themselves handsomely while laying off more than a thousand staff. They outsourced much of Wedgwood’s manufacturing to Tangerang, Indonesia, in the mid-2000s. While Tangerang enjoyed a $25m investment, Stoke-on-Trent haemorrhaged jobs to workers who were paid just an eighth of the wage of British employees.

And wiser heads immediately reversed these decisions, banking on the cachet of UK design and heritage: 

Prevailing wisdom holds that businesses can’t compete without outsourcing labour to cheaper locations. Wedgwood shows the opposite can be true. Relocating manufacturing overseas helped destroy the brand’s heritage value: “made in Indonesia” did not have the same ring (particularly for customers in Asian markets) as “made in England”. The success of Burleigh and Emma Bridgewater, both of which still make pottery in Stoke, demonstrates that people value authenticity and are willing to pay for it.

Unfortunately, there's not enough people like that any more, thanks to Rachel from Accounts. 

Fiskars, the Finnish group that has owned Wedgwood since 2015, has been a more stable steward, investing in a tourist destination, World of Wedgwood, in Staffordshire. Nonetheless, much of Wedgwood’s pottery is still made overseas, and in 2019 the company cut 103 jobs. Further redundancies in Stoke would be a blow to artisanal craft skills and to one of the remaining pillars of the Staffordshire potteries.

Sadly, not enough people are willing - or able, in this economy - to pay Wedgewood prices when they can eat off Next or Tesco Home dinner plates. 

Wedgwood’s pottery is a reminder of the skills that Labour should be trying to protect.

Relying on Labour to protect something quintessentially English? A fool's errand! 

Even a Tory can now and then get it right

Fourteen years too late … realising they’ll never return to power unless they overcome WEFer BadEnough and do this.

Motive for archiving Robert Jenrick’s speech here is for later retrieval in whole or part:

We have some of the best lawyers, barristers and judges in the world. But we’ve got a problem. I have concerns that some judges have strongly held beliefs which have the potential to subvert the impartiality of the judiciary.

More than 30 sitting immigration judges have former links to the very activist groups that have ground our court system to a halt. Can judges who have supported and volunteered for organisations and charities such as Bail for Immigration Detainees – whose stated policy is to “work towards a world free of immigration detention” and where no one is “deported from their homes” – be considered to be neutral and unbiased?

Maybe they can, but it is time that we raise these questions. These are not isolated examples; they point to a judiciary where activism and adjudication seem to go together.

The problem goes beyond the effect of any decisions these judges have reached. The rule of law relies on the public having confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary – that the person hearing the cases they bring appears to be a neutral arbitrator.

If judges are tweeting political opinions that directly touch on the policies they’re charged with mediating upon, that confidence is shattered. That’s why I feel so strongly that these people should have no place in our justice system.

Plan to overhaul appointment of judges.

So, yesterday, I announced a bold new approach for how judges are appointed and how they’re removed. At present, judges are appointed and disciplined by quangos.

The first problem is that the Judicial Conduct Investigation Office routinely hands biased judges warnings rather than dismissing them.

The second problem goes much deeper, though – who picks the judges in our courts. Tony Blair handed the job to the Judicial Appointments Commission. Many of the Commissioners are doing a good job, others less so.

Our new plan would see judges appointed again by the Lord Chancellor – an elected minister accountable to the public. A new vetting board will scrutinise their background for any sign of bias, of whichever political hue.

Meanwhile, biased judges will be sacked automatically. If necessary, Parliament will invoke its ancient power to remove judges from the senior courts.

These reforms aren’t radical; they restore the position we had in this country before Blair’s constitutional vandalism.

But to members of the judiciary who object, let me say this. If you had kept your house in order, there would have been no need for these reforms. The public expects the courts to be impartial. Nothing less is acceptable.

Last edited7:49 PM · Oct 8, 2025

156K Views

LINK

In plain sight in film

 ... and even in the humble bible. It's one of those things we currently have, globally, which has been hidden in plain sight at least for two decades "for those who can see".

Speaking personally, I joined thousands of pundits around 2003 (long before the blog) and our sidebar pic today is not wrong on most of it ... not all, as investigation turns up truths but also clever mistruths which can fool us for sometime, e.g. on climate, on vaxxes.

When we get to the outer reaches of conspiracy though ... that's where the "respectable middle" jumps ship and say, as with a dear friend of mine: "I'm not going there."  And to a point she was right, because there are so many trolls, false prophets about in the dying days of civilisations that it's easier to ignore what's really happening in the dark recesses of the human sewer. That's written in the bible by the way, as well.

This is one such "person" who's easier to understand in Gitler brownshirt or antifa terms:

The leftist caught encouraging attacks on ICE agents, challenging Trump supporters to physical fights, and threatening tribunals against the current administration is, in fact, a convicted felon who is now a radical left-wing activist online. Meet Jason T. Brooks, a man who was sentenced to 32 years in prison for running a $10 million Ponzi scheme out of Colorado. He ended up serving only 10 years — just enough time to get out and rebrand himself as a leftist digital warrior.

Many of our left libertarian colleagues ... and there are many former Labour and left Tories with the mass of us westerners now whom Stasi calls "far right" would be uncomfortable with the word "left" used disparagingly, as they saw "left" as a noble cause, refusing to see the ideological duping, just as I did in student days, being briefly a Fabian, even an anarchist.

Yes it's true ... we started up Anarchist Revolutionary Students in Education (an acronym for the ages, we thought. We sent our demands on loo roll, as befitted such a club. And it seems this Brooks character also had posterior problems in prison, winning a huge payout from the state, natch.

As Arlo Guthrie might have put the words in the mouths of the army, recruiting a new killer: "You're our boy."

Which are the same sentiments in The Parallax View, with Beatty as Joe Fraidy. A reviewer with moniker Puccini wrote:

Terrifying conspiracy thriller that opens a new set of hypothesis in the most infamous and debated political crimes of the twentieth century in the united states. An obscure corporation and its dirty plots to prevent the rise of a different political force, fearing it would destabilize everything the big shots in power have worked for. Both Pakula and cinematographer Gordon Willis know how to heighten the sense of paranoia and anxiety

Obscure corporation? Public Private Partnership? Quango? Or a group working for the deep state, rather than for Stasi type puppets, all "elected" leaders being puppets after all ... just how did they even get into office? Look at Kemi BadEnough, WEFer through and through, just like Tony and the Dark Lord who just lost his job.

Or go to Quantum of Solace and the mysterious Mr. Green drying up the Bolivian water supply for residents ... no hang on ... that was Newsom and Pacific Pallisades ... no, hang on ... Oprah and Maui ... etc. etc. dot dot dot. Chicago police chief teaching antifa new tricks. Oh golly gosh, Donald might need to send in the National Guard.

Every level of western society has its traitors to the nation ... just look at the corrupt activist judges ... Julia usually has that topic in hand.

The things I was repeating in 2003 of course had me categorised on the conspiracy nutter list ... how much of this post so far has been fictional? Calling Net Zero climate bollox ... is that fictional any more? Calling out MKUltra ... was that fictional? Given the 1973 court case and verdict in the US?

What did the state claim? That it was a psych-experiment which has now been shut down. Just as the group Bourne was part of, before a Senate Committee, used those same words at the end of that Bourne episode.

Now hang on ... which is fact here ... which is fiction? Have a lovely Thursday, readers.

Well, They Could Start By Listening?

In June, the London Review of Books published a superb article by the academic and writer William Davies, referring to this phenomenon as “Faragist TikTok”. He described opening an account and sampling what then poured into his “for you” feed: “Clips of masked men cutting down ultra-low emission zone cameras with angle-grinders. Clips of supermarket shelves displaying inflated new prices. Clips of fights breaking out in the street.” More than anything else, he said, he was presented with footage that constantly conveyed the same flailing fury: “Clips of men and women addressing their phones while sitting in cars or out walking, lamenting the state of ‘Starmer’s Britain’, their words appearing in TikTok’s distinctive pink-highlighted font.”

Ah, yes. Of course. It's all the fault of social media. Not government or organisations that have failed the people, and not the people's wishes for a change to their lives and the way they are governed themselves. 

That's not a reality people like this ever want to face.

When I read this, I instantly recognised what he was talking about. On the occasions I had tried to digest what Musk had done to X, scenes of that kind were exactly what I had found. Scrolling through Instagram was sometimes similar. I then did the same thing as Davies and got half-immersed in TikTok (at 55, I had previously assumed it was not for me). Soon enough, what I was expecting materialised: a disused warehouse in Manchester that had been set on fire, a group of hooded youths being arrested by a gaggle of cops, and a crowd of neo-Nazis, marching in front of a union jack and joylessly reciting the chant that echoed around the capital at the weekend: “Keir Starmer is a wanker.”

Do you think he isn't, then, John? You didn't seem too keen when he was threatening to get your hand out of the taxpayer's pocket.

What does this do to people? Where you live might seem stable, uneventful and full of people who are law-abiding. Most places, after all, are like that. But if you are one of the social media users in Britain who spends mind-boggling amounts of time on TikTok (on Android devices, the average was recently put at 49.5 hours a month), the spectacle that erupts on your screens might suggest that venturing outside will soon plunge you into disorder, crime and chaos – and that those things really do define life elsewhere. This, I think, at least partly explains the place of the archetypal city in some people’s modern paranoia: the idea that multiculturalism has turned London into a crime-infested no-go area, or that Washington DC, Chicago and Los Angeles are in such a state of social disrepair that Trump has no option but to send in the national guard.

All social media accounts do is give people a voice, John. Why is the Left always so agin that? Is it because they know what they'd say? 

In 2008, Gordon Brown attempted a rebuttal in the speech he made at the Labour party conference. “The Conservatives say our country is broken – but this country has never been broken by anyone or anything,” he said. “This country wasn’t broken by fascism, by the cold war, by terrorists. Of course there are problems, but this is a country being lifted up every day by the people who love it.” When I read those words and thought about that great ocean of online video, a thought came to mind: these days, could anyone imagine a Labour politician saying anything similar? And, if they did, would they not look like the epitome of complacency and denial? And then I once again realised how absurd all of this is, and how much the supposed reality that politicians have to deal with is now confected, overblown and often completely illusory. Such is life in the modern society of the spectacle, and such is the huge change in how people understand the world and their place in it that it starts to look like a sinister kind of magic.

Yes! It must be the technology that's wobven its sinister spell over the populace! It can't possibly be that eventually, they realise what the Left's gameplan is and reject it, can it?? 

We need to have our practised battle plans ready, personally

Over at t'other place, I did touch on October 7th and various thoughts on that and on CK/EK. I was also unfortunate enough to see the footage of Iryna again ... yes, the animal certainly stabbed her, slow execution might be the way, also long prison time for Lola and Ruby's menacers.

Having said that, am going to put something else this morning ... the NHS and Chesterfield

That's all well and good, most noble but is it going to keep your household alive when the creatures attack en masse once the word is given?  There are two aspects of defence imho ... men need to harden up, whatever the age, and have the attack plan ready, plus realise it's microseconds between overcoming and gruesome death.  We do need to be back in WW2 mode again, rationing etc.  Not going anywhere unless necessary, can't be avoided ... and then the route needs planning and your attack mode ready.

Now to the girls from babies to 70 ... we have a major issue in this country ... the females are either worth defending, are onside, therefore need to have their own attack plan practised ... girls, I keep saying that this is all about microseconds, not the slow motion videoo advice you sometimes see.

All right ... now we come to the second biggest problem ... violent soyboys and stoopid girls, mental, man-hating girls, both brainwashed through and through.  Defend them? Even the females are violently attacking now.

That's the more difficult plan for us ... how to deal with our brainwashed indigenous?

This Nonsense Is Why Why We Have 'Contains Nuts' Warnings On Packets Of Nuts...

A Dublin woman was fatally electrocuted while holding a charging mobile phone in a bath last year, an inquest has heard.

🤦‍♀️ 

Her husband, Joe O’Gorman, expressed concern that many people are being lulled into “a false illusion of safety” by mobile phone manufacturers that promote that their equipment is waterproof.

It is, but there’s a reason you don’t have electrical outlets in bathrooms! So how was she charging it? Glad you asked: 

He outlined how a three-metre extension cable had been plugged into a socket in the bedroom. Mr O’Gorman complained that there is no warning on certain phones about the danger of coming into contact with water while being charged.

Why would there be? There’s no warning on my oven that sticking my head in it and turning on the gas isn’t a good idea either! 

Mr O’Gorman told the inquest he wants the message to go out about the hazard created by charging a mobile phone in bathrooms.

No need, Joe, we already know this! 

He said warnings about such a hazard should be displayed prominently on the outside of packaging of all electronic devices.

“The only thing you hear about is how these phones are great in up to six feet of water. It gives people the idea that you can have your phone near water,” said Mr O’Gorman.

And you can! It wasn’t the shock she got from the phone, it was the cable connected to the National Grid that did for her! 

H/T: Angry Exile via Twitter

Drawing a line in the sand

... otherwise known as red lines" or "crossing the Rubicon".

A long, long time ago, in a galaxy far far away called the noughties internet, there was a blog group called Bloghounds, which had people from Old Labour to High Tory in it, probably from devil worshippers and marxists to High Anglicans. And the only way that could survive was first of all, civil discourse at all times, or else blocking and giving reasons why. 

That group did survive for quite awhile but eventually, inevitably succumbed to the actions of the same sort as the current Fabian leaderships in the west, identifying the redlines of western society which some have called cultural Christianity, which meant that you didn't overstep other's lines or as Tim Worstall called it ... classical liberalism ... and trying to wreck them, turning civil society into sodom, gormorrah and permabloodbath on the streets.

Thus you didn't shag goats, knife anyone you didn't like, harass others in the streets and tell them it's your land now, you didn't feel free to gang rape girls as young as kids with the participation of plod, you didn't invite in rainbow coloured drag queens to your class to address seven year olds about anal sex. TDS today:

Why were we westerners against such things ... in fact, never countenanced them? The majority were hardly deeply religious, and yet we'd observe unwritten lines in the sand all the time. Hypocrisy?  Maybe ... Christine Keeler and Mandy Rice Davies, we weren't too impressed by Lord Lucan or Arnie getting his housekeeper preggers. We drew the line at rent boys at the home of the denizen of n10.

Those among us who saw ourselves as libertarian, meaning no holds barred, do as thou wilt and to hell with your neighbour thought it quite a wheeze to bait the high churchies and thus one (an averred marxist by the way) came over to my site or emailed or whatever a cartoon of Jesus urinating ... oh what a hoot. Think I was meant to go all Mary Whitehouse or Bishop Fireandbrimstone but my first thought was that that was God's Department, He could deal with it on Judgement Day.

Lines in the sand. I draw the line at railing against something and then wallowing in that very thing online, saying look at this filth globopsycho's into ... go on, rub your nose in it, throw up.  Or to go all Tolkien about it ... imagine you're in Hobbiton and one night, the dark riders come through, slaughtering like Hamas or whoever.  Or Orcs. Or Morlocks in The Time Machine.  Or like scenes from Podesta cartoons.

Incidentally, this was flying across my window this morning ... what sort of monster is it, would you say?

Then someone thinks wouldn't it be a wheeze to do some spirit cooking or create cartoons of monsters and get someone to send them to "civil" sites with lines in the sand.

We’ve all read The Hobbit I guess. These are some illustrations produced for an unpublished version. | https://monsterbrains.blogspot.com/2020/04/peter-klucik-illustrations-for.html

And what about High Catholicism's Vatican receiving hall's ceiling "art"? Really Christian, dontchafink? On a par with Denver Airport's "art" ... compare to church art over the past eight hundred years, once past the stage of Hieronymus Bosch.

Bottom line of this post is that everyone has personal lines in the sand, red lines, Rubicons we don't cross ... it's just that we each have different lines. I'd argue that even fifty years ago in Britain, most denizens' lines more or less roughly coincided ... at least enough to luve civilly with one another.

Then along came the High Malcontents, Fabian or demonic as you will, and thus we get, this morning, via our author across the way DAD:

Macron deflects.

During a trip to Saarbrücken, Germany, Emmanuel Macron delivered a blistering speech on Friday, October 3, on the responsibility of social media in the weakening of Western democracies. “We were extremely naive to entrust our democratic space to social media that are controlled either by major American entrepreneurs or by large Chinese companies whose interests are not at all the survival or proper functioning of our democracy,” he declared, calling on Europe to “suddenly awaken.”

(In other words – we want to control it.)

I'd say far more than that. To quote Lara Logan:

Lara Logan masterfully deconstructs the architecture of modern control. She reveals a simple, repeating pattern used to dismantle society: the weaponization of our most fundamental truths. The elite create "problems" that are inherently unsolvable. Your race, your biological sex, the very CO2 you exhale—these are framed as existential threats. But how do you "solve" your own skin color? How do "fix" your innate masculine or feminine nature? How do you eliminate a gas that is the bedrock of all plant life? You cannot. That is the entire point. By turning natural human instincts and biological realities into crimes, they manufacture perpetual conflict. They isolate us, break down communication, and ensure we are too busy fighting amongst ourselves to see the real threat. This is the core of the race narrative, the climate agenda, and transgender ideology. It is a deliberate attack on creation itself, designed to foster division and self-loathing so that we become easier to control. They must control our food, our movements, and even our thoughts. Logan reminds us of a simple, powerful truth: it is natural to gravitate toward your own, to find comfort in shared culture and understanding. This is not a war crime; it is human nature. They have made it one because a divided people cannot conquer their oppressors. The tactic is ancient: Divide and Conquer. The solution is to recognize the pattern. Once you see it, you cannot unsee it. It’s not about being a genius; it’s about having the courage to reject the lies and reclaim what is natural, true, and beautiful about our shared humanity.

To overcome the bstds directly threatening us now, there needs to be a situation in society when our lines in the sand are once again tolerable to others at a slight distance ... and for those other fanatical lines refusing to tolerate us ... expunged from our land.

The limits of socmed reporting and debate

This might become one of two posts from me this weekend, shall see. It came this Saturday morning out of the blue from a lady called Toodles (one of only two ladies across the way willing to speak out ... the other more about gardens and produce).

It's Grifty (long time antiWoke critic) and within 4m 44s into the video, there was a standoff between Kash Patel and the letter agencies versus us (that is, the antiWoke, antiThem online pundits ... that is, the people of the land(s) interested). This is very much an OoL type discussion about the limits of freedom ... shall watch it through and return (it being 0633 at this moment).

Right ... at 0656, I've watched and have not explored the van behind bullet evidence, plus the scramble instantly to get him into the car and to a faroff, not nearest, hospital.

Now, we can go down that route of discussion ... or down the route of my questions about EK, her horned sign onstage plus the maltese cross around her neck beside the Christian cross, plus concerning Ben Shapiro ... or we can go down any route you bring to it ... or we can come back to Kash Patel's very letter agency/Starmer/western head honchos' stance from the start of the video.

Naturally, the letter agencies are privy to far more dirty doings, dirty dealings than we can be under this censorship and that's an argument they can put that we should therefore leave it all to them.  They would also argue that our very interference and "crazy" socmed speculation only hampers their investigations.

Against that is that the Pandora's box opened with JFK 1963 or 911, or since people stopped believing news media ... up to the current day ... and Patel's Ahern attempt at "single point of truth" or Starmer's "jail any dissent" does not wash anymore ... we can even include the million plus march on Sep 13.

Difficult putting the lid back on that box, difficult putting the toothpaste back in the tube.