Sunday, 31 August 2025

Careful what you sign

… when going into hospital.  This is in the U.S. … wonder what it’s like here.

Valerie Anne Smith:

Beware...The Affordable Care Act Declares All Vaccines To Be 'Medical Biogenics.' Hospitalized, You Or Your Loved One Will Be Injected With Vaccines While In Surgery...While Under Anesthesia...Without Your Knowledge. Never Sign Any Form Agreeing To 'Receive Medical Biogenics.' Beware of 'informed consent' & know what you are signing... When people go to a hospital, a health care clinic, or a doctor’s office, they are almost always given a written informed consent form to sign prior to receiving medical treatment.  In recent years, these consent forms have begun to include statements asking the patient to agree to receive biogenics/biologics. However, many people do not know what the term biogenics/biologics means. According To The US FDA...Examples Of What Is Considered A Biologic/Biogenic & Can Be Administered To You Without Your Knowledge: Monoclonal antibodies Growth factors Vaccines Allergenics Antitoxins Blood products, such as red blood cells or platelets Botox Gene therapies Hormone replacement therapy Immunotherapy Recombinant proteins, such as insulin Stem cell therapies T-cell therapies Vaccines are biologics/biogenics, but new consent forms do not explicitly state this. If you provide your consent for you or your family member to receive biologics/biogenics in a hospital, doctor’s office or other facility that administers pharmaceutical products, you are giving medical personnel permission to administer any vaccines they deem necessary while you are under their care. If you’ve consented to biologics/biogenics and it is “flu season,” for example & you are receiving medical care, you may be given the influenza vaccine without specifically being asked or informed beforehand, even if you happen to be under anesthesia. If you do not want vaccines to be given to you, your child or a family member who has entrusted you with making medical decisions for them, you have the legal right to sign a statement on the written consent form refusing any type of vaccine. The concept of medical informed consent stems from the ethical principle of autonomy & patients have the legal right to be fully informed about the benefits, risks & failures of a physician-recommended medical procedure prior to making an informed & voluntary decision about whether or not to accept the risks. Like freedom of thought, speech, conscience & religious belief, informed consent to medical risk taking is recognized internationally as a human right. No one, including your physician, has the right to coerce you into agreeing to a medical intervention, such as vaccination, which could result in injury or death. You have the legal right to exercise informed consent by carefully reading written informed consent forms prior to any medical procedure, including receipt of biologics/biogenics (vaccines). Informed consent is protection against violation of human rights in the medical system. πŸ‘‡Biologics & Biogenics In The Medical WorldπŸ‘‡ congress.gov/crs-product/R4 πŸ‘‡What Are Biologics/Biogenics ProductsπŸ‘‡ geisinger.org/health-and-wel πŸ‘‡Innovation Policy & Market For VaccinesπŸ‘‡ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC73 Video: uncovering_hidden_truths

Maybe Because You Pre-empted It?

 The Met Police congratulate themselves:

This year's Notting Hill Carnival had "far fewer" incidents of serious violence than in recent years, the Metropolitan Police has said. As of Monday evening, there had been 423 arrests over two days. There were two stabbings, but the Met said neither led to serious injury.Met Assistant Commissioner Matt Ward said the use of live facial recognition, metal detectors and stop-and-search had "prevented some of the serious violence we have seen at previous carnivals".
But hang on. Does that include your pre-event arrest tally?  Because maybe that played a part too?

Police have arrested 100 people ahead of the Notting Hill Carnival, and say they have taken dozens of weapons off the streets as part of an operation to ensure the safety of all those attending Notting Hill Carnival this weekend.

Or maybe we should accept that ‘only two stabbings’ is some sort of great result, and not call for the closure of this ridiculous event which panders to black culture at the expense of the taxpayer? 

Saturday, 30 August 2025

Are the mRNA jabs the scandal of the century?

With such a plethora of issues to tackle right now on both sides of the pond and downunder, even in South Africa ... we can't do everything, sigh ... and most pundits tend to hover around one or two key problems.

Over at Unherdables, we (correspondent and I) are looking at parallel internet ... Julia's looking at yet another Rachel and the paucity of competence, plus mendacity plus, we're about to look at Melania and pre-crime (with Redacted) and so it goes on.  The climate bollox is always hovering there, esp. with Mad Miliband, the burger king.

My n1 issue, personally just now, is supporting the raped and abused girls up and down the country ... mainly as not many are jumping on it beyond the great "flag-upping" we're seeing.  The Scottish girls need the tale not to die away on the attention deficit internet ... those girls up and down the country need major support.

The one below is, understandably, Andrew's and well done sir.  As someone about to be dragged in for medical evaluation (started yesterday), it's increasingly heading up the rungs of my priority list, esp. the treatment of older people by the NHS, in care homes etc.

Just how bad the mRNA shots were and still are, still pushed by the establishment crims, is maybe the n1 scandal of this century so far, apart from the great invasion.


https://x.com/ABridgen/status/1961570059316289773

Friday, 29 August 2025

Answered Your Own Question There, Ayman...

                                     


Well, how did you get here? 

I spent 10 months in Calais trying to get to Britain. It was before small boat crossings become the main method of getting here, but the smugglers were there. We all hated them because they made it more difficult for us to cross the Channel without them. I tried every way I could: lorries, cargo trains, sneaking into the port to try to conceal myself on a ferry.

There you go then. You're a criminal. Just as if, had you climbed in through a window or jemmied a back door, no-one would call you a guest, but a burglar. 

Although I had been granted leave to remain by then, I was really scared that the government would come after me too and deport me. That fear has grown even more since the Home Office changed its policy this February: people like me who entered irregularly will now “normally be refused citizenship”.

Good! Let's hope they catch up with you, then, since you've devoted your time here, not to repaying us for our generosity, but ensuring that you assist more of your kind to evade checks and balances on who enters the country: 

I work as a cinematographer and also volunteer with a charity as an Arabic interpreter. I speak to a lot of age-disputed young people who the Home Office insists are adults and have been placed in adult hotels. It is so obvious when I listen to them speak that they are children. They cry down the phone to me. They hate being in hotels, forced to share rooms with adults they don’t know.

It's really puzzling. There must, simply by the law of averages, be genuine asylum seekers out there, who have sought that status lawfully and are grateful to the country, yet the 'Guardian' never seems to be able to find any for these pieces... 

Thursday, 28 August 2025

The real story of those three young girls

... plus Reform v Advance breaks out.

Sorry about running a second post today, plus it must eclipse even the Elon and Ben chat ... plus the keypost about Andrew Torba must now also wait until tomorrow.

First ... about the girls:


You're going to read and see much today about how the whole tale was psyops ... bollox! It happened and was even worse than we at first knew. Plus calling those girls NEDs and thugs was beyond the pale. Yes, I'm angry.

And here's the second part of this topic:


And on X, I asked NF to explain Annabelle Fuller and that drinks party they were at.

......

Now, what I really wanted to discuss today was about a worrying thing to the Uniparty ... they sent out Rottweiler Arron plus Darren plus the MSM, to badmouth:

- Elon
- Many US pundits, plus congress-people e.g. MTG and Nancy Mace
- Many pundits of some following over there
- Tommy's supporters
- The whole Advance thing with Ben and Elon
- Ordinary people from Scotland to Wales to NI, let alone England
- People from further abroad than that, e.g. in Europe and downunder

With a major rally coming up on September 13th in London.


Here are their head honchos at Reform:


Thank you Yusuf, Nigel, Arron, Matt ... you just decided me.

Elon, Ben, Rupert and all that …

Probably best to let the screenshot(s) do the talking:



As with any of you, I’m watching closely for my own voting intentions actually, still undecided.  Musk in the mix is powerful, policy platforms need scrutinising too. Who’d be leader?  Ben?  Rupert?  One aspect which heavily sways me is Samantha Smith and the abused girls … not in blind devotion but in always heeding when they’ve something substantial to say (well ok, in being soft on sane ladies):


Wednesday, 27 August 2025

Oh, Charlotte, If Only You Had A Different Issue...

Weighing six stone and on the brink of organ failure, Charlotte Chapman-Hart is admitted to hospital in excruciating pain. It's assumed the former model and dancer has an eating disorder. But Charlotte, who repeatedly denies she's starving herself, has a rare disease. She's been prescribed a new pain relief medication, which should have been monitored by her GP and wasn't. A side effect is rapid weight loss - but it's been overlooked by those treating her. Charlotte's experience over the next three months would leave her adding post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to the list of her symptoms. She now fears the care that she needs to stay alive.

Charlotte is unlucky enough to have a genuine issue, and not the type of mental illness that doctors would be falling over each other to verify and agree with… 

"I think the hardest thing I've ever had to face is trying to convince people that I am of sound mind, and that what I'm telling you is the absolute truth," says Charlotte, sitting in the garden of her home in Cuckney in Nottinghamshire. "I told them that I've never had an issue with eating. I'm just not hungry. Things don't taste the same. "But rather than think differently, I was put into a diagnosis box that was wrong."

It’s a pretty common thing that doctors don’t believe patients, except of course for those who are flavour of the month. If she'd simply told doctors she was really a man, they'd have had no hesitation believing her.  

At the age of 21, in 2014, Charlotte was diagnosed with chiari malformation type 1 - a condition in which part of the brain pushes down into the spinal canal - and syringomyelia, a rare neurological disorder.

And now she’s turning it into a crusade:  

This year, Charlotte became an ambassador for the charity Medics4RareDiseases, and is helping to raise awareness among health professionals."What people are asking for over and over again is to be listened to, is to be believed, is to be involved in their healthcare," says Dr McKay. "If technology, fast diagnosis and treatment alone were going to improve the lives of people with rare conditions, then we would already be fine." According to Medics4RareDisease, more than 3.5 million people in the UK live with rare conditions and often face the burden of constantly explaining themselves.

Just like people with non-rare diseases. It’s just what the NHS does.  

Tuesday, 26 August 2025

All of us must protect our women and children

Was going to run something on the St George flag and his history but a different topic has hit X and I feel we should get right behind it too … along with the flag-upping revolution.  Best way I can do this is just in screenshots:







Monday, 25 August 2025

Then Claw It Back!

More than £300m given to English councils to help Ukrainian refugees into accommodation has not been spent, while thousands of them face homelessness. Freedom of information requests to 150 councils in England, shared with the Guardian, identified that £327m – about a third of the £1bn budget – was still sitting in council bank accounts more than three years after Russia invaded Ukraine.

So get it back - Rachel Thieves needs every penny she can get her clumsy hands on, doesn’t she?  

Most of the funds councils have spent have been used to pay staff and partner organisations. Only £22m has been spent on temporary accommodation for Ukrainians and £15m to help them into private rented accommodation.

So the councils are just sitting on the cash? Why? Do they get to spend the interest earned on other things?  

Baljeet Nijjhar of UKrainian Refugee Help, who obtained and collated the FoI data, said: “Local councils are allocated thousands of pounds per Ukrainian arrival, yet the guests we support seem to struggle to access this directly when in need. “The most common issue is inability to rent privately and people often don’t know anyone in the UK who could act as a guarantor, so it’s the local council that they must rely on here to solve this problem. “Our research shows that many councils have significant levels of funds left, but have helped very few people to rent, whereas others have demonstrated a ‘can do’, proactive approach and have helped significantly more.”

Is this just usual local council incompetence or are they benefiting from this in some way? 

Dr Krish Kandiah, the director of the Sanctuary Foundation, which provides support for Ukrainian refugees, praised the British public for their hospitality. “It is now vital that the UK builds on that generosity by ensuring that every Ukrainian has the security and dignity of their own front door,” he said.

Personally, I think it’s vital that they ensure that every Brit has that before we look at providing it for foreigners. 

Sunday, 24 August 2025

Getting around inheritance tax

This is from Australia, from one of the most respected conservative alt-journos … Spectator Oz I believe sacked her, just as the UK controlled opposition sacked Mark Steyn … she is vilified all day by the Wokerati down there, plus the globopsycho “elite” … those are fine credentials for the lass.

Issue here is … is Alex referring to Oz or GB? If Oz, then Labor there are clearly following Starmer’s minders’ lead.  They’re scumbags down there too and still people re-elect them because the alternative … the faux Tory equivalent, are just as bad. Uniparty.


🍿🍿🍿🍿