Monday, 21 July 2025

It Isn’t Even Breaking The Middle East


Oh, give me a break

Sereen Haddad is a bright young woman. At 20 years old, she just finished a four-year degree in psychology at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) in only three years, earning the highest honors along the way. Yet, despite her accomplishments, she still can’t graduate. Her diploma is being withheld by the university, “not because I didn’t complete the requirements”, she told me, “but because I stood up for Palestinian life”.

By making such a nuisance of yourself, and preventing the other students who just wanted to study without some screeching lunatic on campus disrupting their education, that eventually the police had to be called to remove you. 

Haddad, who is Palestinian American, had been raising awareness on her campus about the Palestinian fight for freedom as part of her university’s chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine.

Maybe ‘raising awareness’ isn’t quite the right phrase to describe what this organisation does?  

Israel’s war in Gaza is chipping away at so much of what we – in the United States but also internationally – had agreed upon as acceptable, from the rules governing our freedom of speech to the very laws of armed conflict.

I don’t think that anyone - well, apart from your mob - has changed their view about whether killing, raping and torturing or taking hostages is a legitimate warfare tactic though? 

This collapse began with the liberal world’s lack of resolve to rein in Israel’s war in Gaza. It escalated when no one lifted a finger to stop hospitals being bombed. It expanded when mass starvation became a weapon of war. And it is peaking at a time when total war is no longer viewed as a human abhorrence but is instead the deliberate policy of the state of Israel.

And funnily enough, the villain here is - of course - capitalism: 

“When students expose the violence of Israel’s occupation and genocide, institutions like VCU, which are deeply entangled with weapon manufacturers and corporate donors, become fearful,” Haddad said. “So they twist the rules, they rewrite the policies, and they try to silence us … But it’s all about power. Our demands for justice are a threat to their complicity.”

You're no threat to anything except your own futures, with the criminal records you're amassing. 

In 2003, the historian Tony Judt wrote that the “problem with Israel [is] … that it arrived too late. It has imported a characteristically late-19th-century separatist project into a world that has moved on, a world of individual rights, open frontiers, and international law. The very idea of a ‘Jewish state’ – a state in which Jews and the Jewish religion have exclusive privileges from which non-Jewish citizens are forever excluded – is rooted in another time and place. Israel, in short, is an anachronism.” Judt’s idea that Israel is a relic of another era requires understanding how the global push for decolonization significantly accelerated after 1945. The result was a new world – but one that forsook the Palestinians, leaving them abandoned in refugee camps in 1948.

Why do these articles always gloss over what happened in Arab countries that accepted Palestinian refugees, like Jordan

Saturday, 19 July 2025

Opening a cafe

Easy-peasy in the UK, according to Rupert:

“Starting and running a business in 2025 Britain - let’s walk through it. You’ve got a good idea, managed to save a few quid to invest and want to give it a go. Let’s say it’s a cafe. Generate wealth, create jobs and contribute to your local economy. Great idea. You just picked the wrong country to do it in. Registering the damn thing is complicated enough, and that’s the easy bit. Next up is the bank account? You’re treated like a criminal and it takes week - opening a cafe, not a terrorist cell. You manage to find a premise, good location. Oh, it costs a fortune. Rent through the roof and you’re forced to pay thousands to the council. For what? The filthy high street? The rapid customer service? Hmm. Yet another rip off. Inspections are a nightmare, it’s never-ending bureaucracy from people who have never created anything in their lives. But somehow you get it off the ground and things go well. You need to expand, hire someone. Ouch. PAYE, national insurance, pensions, HR policies, health and safety risk assessments. One wrong step and you’re facing an employment tribunal. Is it even worth the risk? It’s becoming more and more expensive, and risky, to hire people? Why bother? Maybe you try and get independent contracted help. Ah. IR35 puts a stop to that. We wouldn’t want any flexibility now, would we? That would make too much sense. Your accountants already cost an absolute fortune. They’re bleeding you dry just so you comply with the layers and layers of regulations. But let’s say it’s gone well, and your hard work is paying off. Turnover hits £90k. The dreaded VAT threshold. That means if you essentially then have to start charging VAT. That means everything gets 20% more expensive for your customers. Or you are forced to absorb the costs. Or you deliberately make less money to stay below the threshold. Just brilliant. Maybe you want to keep the cafe open later? Serve some alcohol? Have some music on? More licences. More costs. More inspections. More bureaucracy. Why bother? Waste collection even costs a fortune. Remind me, why are you already paying the council? You try and ring the council, you’re on hold for 30 minutes. Brilliant. Customers are waiting. You finally speak to someone. They’re rude, and haven’t got a clue what they’re doing. They promise they’ll get back to you, but they only work four days a week and on Thursday they’re working from home. No answer, you have to chase and chase and chase. Incompetence reigns. Right. We’ve got through all of that, now you want to pay yourself? Not unreasonable is it? For working 16 hour days to get the business off the ground? Corporation tax slices your profit down. Maybe there’s some left. Dividend allowance has been cut, so there’s less to take there. Tax rates are up too. Hmm. Okay, well let’s take a small salary and some dividends. Maybe you’ve got student debt too which takes a large chunk? It is brutal. Even making money costs money. It costs to deposit, it costs to accept card payments. No holiday, no protection, no respect. All risk, and you’re treated like dirt by the Government. You look at it all and just think, why bother? Why not work for the public sector as some irrelevant bureaucrat obstructing everyone else? Get 60k, 35 days holiday and you can literally never be sacked. What’s the point? Why take the risk? Just do that instead. We desperately need to back British enterprise. Reward those who take all of the risk. And actually, support local businesses where we all can. We should be slashing corporation tax, doubling the VAT threshold, increasing personal allowances, abolishing business rates for high street small firms, reducing national insurance contributions, cutting tax on salary/dividends, brutalising red tape and PLENTY more. If you do these things, you will generate MORE tax revenue. It is really not a complicated principle. Does Reeves understand that? No. The woman is clueless. Absolutely clueless. She does NOT understand what she is forcing on business owners. Let’s see if she can run our cafe for a week. Absolutely NO chance. I’m with the men and women who build businesses, create wealth, and generate opportunities. They have my full respect. The politicians running our country certainly do not. My message to our cafe owner? Keep plugging away, it will get better. Please know that at least one MP is fighting for you in Westminster.”

Thursday, 17 July 2025

If It’s Not Illegal, What Basis Can There Be For Fines?

They've not given up trying to stop the population from freely discussing things:
Social media business models endangered the public by incentivising the spread of dangerous misinformation after the 2024 Southport murders, MPs have concluded, adding that current online safety laws have “major holes”.“It’s clear that the Online Safety Act [OSA] just isn’t up to scratch,” said Chi Onwurah, the committee chair, after a seven-month inquiry. “The government needs to go further to tackle the pervasive spread of misinformation that causes harm but doesn’t cross the line into illegality. Social media companies are not just neutral platforms but actively curate what you see online, and they must be held accountable.”

Accountability is a good thing, but MPs seem to only regard it as such in other people

The committee called for fines of at least £18m if platforms do not set out how they will tackle significant harms that derive from content promoted by their recommendation systems even if it is not illegal.

I sincerely hope the big social media platforms treat this ridiculous overreach by these arrogant little pipsqueaks with the contempt it deserves. 

Further fallout from Afghani-gate

Just now, five topics are vying for punditry for me … Sandie Peggie, the Afghan thing here and in the US (at OoL from me), the failure of Reform to turn up to the rape gang meeting at Westminster for those girls, obviously Epstein … plus everything else that’s going on.

Right … the Afghani scandal:





Wednesday, 16 July 2025

Free Advertising!

The Met Office should name storms after fossil fuel companies, campaigners have said, after the weather forecasting service opened a storm naming competition.Climate campaigners have recommended the Met Office names its storms after various oil and gas corporations to remind the public of the link between burning fossil fuels and extreme weather.

Oil and gas companies promptly say "There's no such thing as bad publicity!" 

Hundreds of people have submitted ideas to the Met Office. While some have named specific oil and gas companies, others have suggested names such as “bigoil” and “fossily mcfuelface”.

Ah, that's the UK populace I've grown to know and admire...! 

The release of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere has made the storms we experience more extreme, research from the forecaster has found. An attribution study cited by the Met Office found that rainfall in the winter season of 2023-24 was 20% more intense due to human-caused climate change, and the amount of rainfall observed during the season was 10 times more likely.

Of course they did... 

Scientists predict that while the number of storms may not increase during climate breakdown, their intensity most likely will. This is because rising global temperatures contribute to more frequent weather anomalies such as the “Spanish plume”, which is when hot air from the Iberian peninsula moves northwards into the UK, creating unstable conditions that can lead to intense summer thunderstorms with heavy downpours and lightning.

I wish! I could do with a really good thunderstorm, haven't really had one in ages. Another of the scientist's promises that never come true... 

Tuesday, 15 July 2025

Why are normies, plus us at times, so politically mindless?

Just how spurious was this meme?


Obviously the Antifa mindless are mainly male and the soup and paint throwers over artworks are college/university girls, brainwashed from childhood by single mothers, teachers, the entire culture … and so it goes on.

Then the average voter, the normie, who thinks a BBC audience construct is actually fair debate. How did Labour get in? 20% of the vote?

We were all played, esp. those of us who, disgusted, did not vote. After all, Labour never openly said they would do all this.  Tories not quite as bad but still bad. And now Nige has hoodwinked Reform that he has no intention of handing over to Islam.

All right, meritocracy, in which only political thinkers vote … who sets the exam? Fabians?  Civil servants … which is the same thing?

Monday, 14 July 2025

Understandably, It's Enough To Put One Off One's Taxpayer-Subsidised Sausages...

Bertin has noticed that her desire to talk frequently and openly about extreme pornography is not shared by all her Westminster colleagues. “I’ve definitely seen people swerve at lunch, not wanting to sit next to me for fear of what they’re going to hear coming from my mouth,” she told fellow delegates at the launch meeting of her pornography taskforce this week, prompting a flutter of sympathetic laughter.

The jokes just write themselves with this one, don’t they? 

Since being appointed by the former prime minister Rishi Sunak to lead an independent review into the regulation of online pornography in December 2023, Bertin has observed how a double taboo has made most politicians extremely reluctant to engage. Some simply find the subject hugely embarrassing; others stay silent because they do not wish to appear prudish by criticising the proliferation of extreme and often illegal pornographic material online.

And some are just a little too enthusiastic about the subject… 

The government needs urgently to appoint a minister for porn, she recommends, to ensure that the issue gets the attention it deserves, rather than being passed reluctantly between the Home Office and the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology.

I recommend a hard-drive check for anyone who throws his/her hat in the ring for this role! 

Sunday, 13 July 2025

Fabians … there are just so many of em in power

GB Shaw was one, RH Tawney, Norman Geras (Euston) … so many more Wiki):


Lil ole me was one at 18/19 at university, woke up/grew up though.


Note the Israel flag there beside the Union flag.


Saturday, 12 July 2025

Reform’s Uniparty wing v the nonWoke in general

In the wake of Yusuf Farage’s latest stunt against Rupert Lowe:


… following all the others, inc. the gun collection, plus the latest stunt on James McMurdoch, it’s probably time to look at how blinkered Reform supporters are deliberately being, plus the normies not being aware in the least, hence they’ve heard that Reform are THE protest vote these days … I’ve seen this at ground level, with Farage cast as the bold warrior taking on the Uniparty, esp. Labour.

I tweeted earlier this week that I’m all for grassroots Reform and in an election, if no Rupert approved indie was on the paper, then yes, I’d put my mark in the Reform box.

So how can I reconcile that with our constant calling out of the gang of three … Yusuf and his acolytes Farage and Tice?  The answer is … with difficulty.  Yet there are indications of where the divide truly lies:


Someone writing that was possibly a C&UP voter back before all this blew up … might have been UKIP, Tory leaning.  A Douglas Carswell or Roger Helmer. Even using the word Tory is loaded … it brands you immediately, whereas if you run a Union flag in your profile … that in turn has connotations.

Then there is the Sarah Pochin type … LibDem, having been typical leftwing-Conservative, almost social-democrat. Good job in the city or home duties, property, respectable but playing the radical, a conservative kipper sort of person, maybe even libertarian.  None of this low class Tommy Robinson “nonsense” … shops at Waitrose, civic-minded … a middle to upper-middle centrist.

Rupert?  He’s still quite loaded at this point before Labour steals it, he’s not really “of the street people”, is not really the demo-going type to see Tommy.

There’s yet another divide: 


And therein lies the divide … almost the class divide. In my case, I was public school, ra ra, Boat Race, cricket, rugger, sailing, Conservative voter for decades, a good address … but my beginnings were humble … a Yorkshire builder father and visiting nurse mother … not exactly east end or Gorbals but not in line with my education either.

Point is that I can feel at ease in either social situation, happily living in this Labour stronghold, with a nice abode with nice views.  I’m not sure everyone is of that mind and thus Tory 2.0 is a nightmare scenario.  For other antiWoke, the notion of Rupert leading these forces is anathema … what’s the resolution?

Well, under FPTP voting … there is no resolution, even in the face of the invaders en masse. One half of us antiWoke do not want to even hear such far-right talk from me.

In some ways, we can get around it by calling ourselves Brexiteers … that was pretty broad in definition.

Hmmmmm.