“It’s an award winning documentary (it won Best of Festival and Best Director at the 2025 Santa Monica International Film Festival) detailing the experiences of the vaccine injured. It opens with a public gathering of the vaccine injured, and a young woman speaking of her experiences, of going from being healthy to disabled. As she tells her story, she shakes uncontrollably due to her vaccine injury.
Numerous personal stories are shown, including of people who were participants in Covid vaccine trials. Maddie de Garay’s story is told – she was, at the outset, a healthy, active 12 year-old, who enrolled in the Pfizer trial with her parents’ permission, but is seen in the documentary in a wheelchair, with a feeding tube in her nose that she relies on, as a result of her rapid descent following her second vaccine.”
Yet the PTB and the greedy privatised medical profession continue to push Big Pharma. Yesterday, a friend wrote about an experience with such a doctor … really pushing, the doctor was, to medicate first, remedicate later, another customer. They themselves are under huge pressure from the cuckoo admin on huge salaries … push it or find another job, be blacklisted.
A news source which runs that answers its own question, just like the BBC which replies to an attested piece of evidence with auto “Fact Checking”, which of course results in gainsaying, auto-denial, unsubstantiated, naturally, except by its own sources.
Connected to that is a second strategy called “bluster”, where someone opens with “bollox” or “nope” then makes an assertion, itself unsubstantiated, then using the third strategy … demanding, “Source?” to which any halfway assiduous site replies to look through the site for all references to the matter.
It’s an essentially lazy strategy, demanding ‘source’, employed by one character in the Meredith and Knox case some time back. I was sent a list of 100 questions … you do see the strategy … huge, time intensive delaying … whilst they do zero. Do not respond to such tactics. Because the moment you do, they just auto-nay-say and then a second toerag comes in with the next objection … then a third is posed … tag team.
Which brings me to the fourth strategy of blaming a ‘rogue element’, calling it an ‘isolated case’, ignoring all the antecedent brainwashing which led that person to that place, also ignoring the strategy of agencies having hundreds of assets, sleepers, awaiting the call. I suspect Oswald was ine of those … doubling as a patsy.
A variation on that strategy is a fifth, which combines the second above … the variation being the bold, unsubstantiated assertion … with a variation on the fourth, asserting that you’re the only one on the planet who believes that … you being a quirky whackjob or else you being the embodiment of all wisdom in your own mind.
It plays on this:
On the topic of the early dating of the gospels, one participant in the debate later wrote:
Anyone coming into a debate is coming in from the angle which is the sum of his own experiences to that date … he is therefore quite kind to his own side’s case, making allowances in an easygoing way, letting this one or that go through unchallenged, whilst being narrow of definition and stringent, even pedantic, on anything at all put by the other side … it’s just human nature … as distinct from unethical.
To an actual case … let’s say someone sent an article in which the writer is clearly anti British Empire, putting in big letters that the Chagos Islands were stolen from the people of the islands in the 1960s by the British govt. Uh huh … what about this though:
Puts a slightly different complexion on it, no? Leading to:
We’re now descending into a right rabbithole of international or interbloc law, n’est-ce-pas? Long ago, on the issue of the traitors Heath, Wilson, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, Johnson, Starmer, to name a few, a chap I used to know, named Ian Parker-Joseph, sent me two opposed opinions on the precedence of legal judgments, directly related to sovereignty.
In a perfect example of double or triplespeak, the EU recognised the sovereignty of the nation, whilst simultaneously asserting the primacy of the various extra-national courts, e.g. the ECHR, whilst covering themselves by saying that it was nowt to do wi’them … different other body, mate.
Which is sheer sophistry, as they’re all part of the same bunch, even Gina Miller. They’re all aligned, in cahoots. And that’s before the “World” organisations kick in. Where’s English Common Law in all this?
The analogy I’d use is that of an uneven playing field … let’s say a home side’s playing field, deliberately tampered with to favour the home side, plus movable goalposts.
Solution? The only solution is to be in power, one way or the other. The opposition is always going to change the rules to prevent you ever getting that power back.
Judge Timothy Spencer said Heggs, who has autism and ADHD, was “probably too immature to be working as a police officer” as he jailed him for 12 months.
Actually, he probably ticked two separate boxes!
He said: “It is clear you did not lack enthusiasm and your policing was, at times, of an exemplary standard, but you lacked maturity.
“You had received extensive training, you knew the importance of data protection and knew you should only share materials for a genuine policing purpose.
“You knew the lines were drawn and the lines were very clear.”
It's not something the police should ever expect to have to teach recruits, is it?
Judge Spencer accepted that Heggs’s actions were not out of “wickedness”, but said the defendant’s claims that he accessed the material so he could learn from the experience and become a better officer were “far-fetched”.
He said Heggs’s actions had “significantly undermined” public trust and confidence in the police.
The two men convicted of chopping down the Sycamore Gap tree were suspects in an investigation into alleged homophobic assaults that took place around the same time they committed their infamous crime.
NOW will you be outraged, progressive press?
Nine days earlier, a man reported being doused in icing sugar and subjected to verbal abuse by two people at a layby in Cumbria often frequented by men seeking sexual encounters.
The CPS dropped the case more than a year later, but emails seen by the BBC confirm police prepared a file on Graham and Carruthers for prosecutors.
But…?
The victim said he had reported the incident to police the same night, giving officers a description of the vehicle and his recollection of the registration number. He was, however, unable to identify any individual involved.
The informant said he wished police had used his initial evidence to check CCTV at the time.
It doesn’t appear as though the police didn’t try their best, to be fair:
Cumbria Police said checks had been carried out using the registration number provided by the victim, but these showed the vehicle linked to that number plate – which differed from that of Graham's car by one letter – had not been in Cumbria.
Two men had been arrested in connection with the incidents and video evidence had been found on a phone belonging to one of them.
The victim was asked to watch "10 or 12" videos showing various men suffering homophobic abuse and, in some cases, having things thrown into their vehicles.After helping police identify some of the other men in the videos, and confirming his own appearance in some of them, he gave a formal statement in August 2024 but told police he could not definitively identify the driver.
What were they supposed to do?
In December 2024 a case was presented to the Crown Prosecution Service relating to three victims across six offences.
But the CPS decided against bringing charges due to insufficient evidence, difficulties identifying the perpetrators and too much time having elapsed since the incidents.
You heard the latest single from Cokehead Keir and the Rent Boys?
A side: Selling out the Farm
B side: Selling out the Nation
So the Bolshie playbook is being religiously followed step by step and the Reds areshowing that a nation with no parliamentary recall mechanism is no nation at all.
The UK foreign secretary, David Lammy, on Saturday spoke by phone with the Saudi foreign minister, Prince Faisal bin Farhan bin Abdullah, a fact released by the Saudi side. Details of the call, and whether Doush’s trial was raised, were not revealed.
I wonder if Prince Faisal raised the subject of Julian Foulkes, and if he did, what this bumbling idiot would have had to say...
The case again raises wider issues about Saudi censorship of social media and its use of anti-terrorism laws to suppress free speech. Doush has been represented by the civil rights group Reprieve.
In a response to a letter from Reprieve to Lammy concerning the case, a Foreign Office official wrote that “the UK government cannot interfere in another country’s legal processes and must respect their systems, nor can we get British nationals out of jail”.
This whole scheme from woe to go has been thought through for one of two reactions … either very little reaction, not unlike with the grooming gangs and raped girls, which are of little concern to Reform honchos, of zero concern to Uniparty policy drivers … but of immense concern to pundits online, those not Woke left and the ones especially on X …
… the alternative scenarion being civil unrest, civil war.
As Reform bragged yesterday though on X, who cares about a bunch of raped girls or immigration … and similar may well be the reaction about rental payers thrown out under Section 21 evictions because landlords caved to the temptation of the £5000 bribes.
Question is … how many actual Brits rent? As against paying mortgages? As for those with mortgages paid off … well why would they care about tenants now on the street anyway? There’s a social stratum below which Reform were correct … no one cares.
We lived in the shadow of factories bordering our beloved park. Companies such as the LeDoux Corporation, a chemical testing company that had worked on everything from the Manhattan Project to the moon landing, were just steps from the swings.
While I was consumed by the potential danger of some shadowy, gun-toting figure, the real pain I felt was internal. My reproductive system betrayed me month after month, leaving me doubled over in excruciating pain. While the world validated my fear of violence, my period pain – marked by ER visits, surgeries and more than 30 Aleve each cycle – was dismissed as “in my head”. No one asked questions or explored its cause, let alone its potential environmental roots.
I’ve seen this film, Julia Roberts was great in it!
Black people are far more likely to live in areas filled with environmental toxins that can harm fertility. We’re 75% more likely to live near industrial facilities and breathe air that’s 38% more polluted than what white communities are exposed to.
Discussions about toxins and the environment usually focus on cancer. However, a recent Human Rights Watch report found that air pollution is linked to gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia and fibroids.
And yet, there seems no discernible decrease in their fertility - as the US welfare bill would appear to indicate.
Last year, I began a documentary about how the climate crisis – flooding, heat, wildfires, hurricanes – affects Black people who are pregnant or trying to conceive. It was an urgent story that felt both intimately familiar and strangely distant, since many of their environments were marked by large factories, disastrous floods and devastating hurricanes.
I can’t help but feel this really isn’t something can could be considered a bad thing. If it is actually happening. She's pinning her hopes on that, because it's providing her a tidy living:
Reniqua Allen-Lamphere is a film-maker and writer. She created the documentary Infertile Ground and founded Oshun Griot, a digital platform for people of color navigating infertility. Her next book, Fertility Noir, on Black experiences with infertility, will be published by Penguin Random House.
Am I alone, Reader, in thinking that less black fertility can only be a good thing for society?
Long ago, at a blog called nourishing obscurity, later stolen by Blgr, there was a post on Groupthink and techniques used on individuals and groups to artificially “manufacture consent out of nothing”.
One way was the formalised Delphi technique, another was the notion of “well-formed outcomes”, a favourite of a govt body called Common Purpose, whose early motto was “leading beyond authority”.
One case study was the Scottish Arts Council meeting concerning funding, chaired by one Julia Middleton, who had gathered “leaders of art in Scotland” into a room to “thrash out” (read “impose”) Arts Policy for Scotland.
One “gathered” artist called her bluff by asking what on earth Arts Policy could possibly mean, given that he and others present were aspiring artists in a highly individual manner, not politicians. Murmurings of agreement around the room. The blunt Middleton (see a photo of her) then turned savage on the group, snarling is not too descriptive a word … that they did not know how good they’d had it and if they wanted continued funding, they’d best forget about this disruptive heckler etc. etc.
Not the slightest artistic sense in her brain, just command and control.
Today, Steve over at NOWP reader site included this:
A few decades later, Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman analysed how corporate media organisations were using a “propaganda model of communication” to further the agendas of elite groups. ‘Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media’argued that the US media were fulfilling “a system-supportive propaganda function, by reliance on market forces, internalised assumptions, and self-censorship, and without significant overt coercion.”
[…]
Based on a citizens’ panel convened by the CCC, chief executive Emma Pinchbeck claimed the recommendations had the broad support of the public: “The citizens’ panel were often ahead of even our advice on some of the things they were willing to consider. They are interested and want to do their bit. The public really are proud of the UK’s progress on climate action – we can’t see any evidence that the public wants us to slow down.”
In my report on this post at Unherdables, I add a short YT on the same topic, HT/Toodles McGhee.
