Thursday, 2 January 2025

Rape gang dam wall seems to have been breached

Been a tad unwell, fellow Orphans, esp. right now, but have been keeping up with polit-reading.

Plenty across the pond but my delight is that it’s hit the fan on the rape gangs over here, courtesy of some Americans … now this is promising. All sorts of historical miscreants under the hammer, it’s all they wrote on X. Gab still to catch up.

I’ve thought for some years (and no doubt many of you have mentioned it too) that within one country, nowt much can be forced but:

  • if it comes from o/s
  • consistently enough
  • and the ladies get themselves organised across the west

… then dam walls can fall … it did happen in Northern Ireland, sparked by the women’s peace train. I’m watching and big names in the Brit firmament are now coming out over it. Good. It’s something at least.

How safe yet in Starmer’s communist dystopia is it to speak above a whisper?  Let’s see.

Tuesday, 31 December 2024

New Year's message

As neither Julia, Mike nor I have organised any formal New Year greetings to you all, dear readers, hoping these will suffice:

Hoping and praying this coming year will not be a washout for those of good will ... some good signs in America, none yet in Europe nor in the southern hemisphere ... but miracles do occur. 

Thx to all good friends here.


(Photo from Paris Secret)

The Great British “Honours” Scam

All the wrong people being “honoured” again:




No doubt there are worthy recipients but the whole thing is cheapened into tackiness by these sorts of nominations.  RH Tawney, long ago, refused one, asking what harm he’d ever done the Labour Party.

RHT … just being part of it is sleazy in itself, even worse, perhaps, than wet Tory sleazebags.

The NHS jungle

This was from two days ago but is nonetheless current afa I can see:


This is a personalised take on it but I’ll also summarise my mate’s comments, as they bring something to the table as well.  

While I did have a nominal GP, let’s call her Dr. J, she was a mixed bag (so to speak).  She was superfast at getting an ambulance to me way back on heart attack day, plus she was pretty efficient, plus very hands on in our last face to face “consultation” immediately pre-covid scam.

However, in speaking to the girl at the counter in reception, she dropped hints that I’d scored this GP as she’d been available … none of the others had been … they’d been snapped up by regulars at the practice and good luck to them, I say.

The one time I had a male doctor was mainly to answer “charges” of “abuse” by a female locum for “verballing” her. She disappeared from the practice soon after … seems she liked to do this sort of thing. So the female is a double-edged sword but the male is always a gruff, imperious speaker of RP who looks down on you, alpha male, which is fine, as I look down upon him.

Plus, to quote my mate who’d been given the wrong pills, I’m told … he asked the female doc why they’d been prescribed … she had no idea. An old male doc had prescribed them.

My own experience was that my doc at the time (female) had wanted to know if I accepted her expertise as doctor and I’d assured her I did … but was still capable of listing history, signs and symptoms for her to diagnose. As it was cardiac, she sent me to a major hospital, where an Indian doctor, charged by the NHS admin behind him to “reduce costs” by reducing my meds, had done so … arbitrarily, no explanation.

Result was my being unable to breathe. In my return appointment with the lady doc, she’d suddenly developed official “expertise” and had countermanded the cardio doc from the hospital.  “They’re not doing anything for you,” had been her parting shot though, in her version of a powerplay.  The EBM literature had told her they would not be much use. Actually, I was breathing right again but no matter.

A female nurse had taken me aside and advised the best place in town for med deliveries … if I wanted, she could change it now … it’s been good ever since. When I’d phoned over an annual blood test, it was a nurse I knew, not a receptionist per se … she said to go to such and such a clinic, not the major one … so I did.

Once there for my appointment, the clinic said they knew nothing about it, but the nurse would do me anyway. She’d read the screen about me and had said, “Ah, yes,” grinned and had done the test, chirpily.

The practice, a week later, had grumpily conceded I needed no further prescriptions nor medical procedures “for now”.

Now what am I to make of all this? Seems to me that doctors are to be avoided … too into the company admin procedures biz, most lucrative … the nurses were mixed. Some were nice gals, doing good things for us … some were in with the firm’s admins and docs and their advice was iffy at best.

Result?  I tend to trust the lesser female nurses most but they don’t necessarily trust themselves … and every further referral to the senior doc or nurse has thereafter been fraught in some way.  And that’s the situation right now. 

Having not turned up for vaxxes forever, an imperious senior doc (male, stern tones) texted recently to say he wanted me in there that day for vaxxing please.

I ignored it. Putting my life at risk?  Or staying alive? My mate added something interesting … the females tend to care, are more compliant, will do things by the book more … the males tend to have ego issues (don’t I know it) and are stubborn, therefore often more lethal.

In dentistry, I had a great male dentist who’d had to repair a twice botched female dentist’s treatment. The nurses though had been excellent … the best had gone off to have a child.  What to make of it all?  Everyone, by the way, wanted this male dentist … he then departed after refusing to shave the designer beard, plus other matters … is now doing well as a specialist somewhere.

Females do seem to care more but then they go and care for all the wrong people … shrilly, with purple hair.  Frankly, I don’t know what to make of it all.

Monday, 30 December 2024

Have They Tried Looking Down The Back Of The Sofa?

A pistol, rifle and deactivated World War One machine gun were among the items lost or stolen from Ministry of Defence facilities over the past two years.

Yikes! Usually, it's smaller, portable items that careless civil servants lose, isn't it?  

Figures uncovered by the Liberal Democrats show more than 700 phones, laptops, computers and USB sticks also went missing over the period.

Ah. That's more like it. Wait, back up! What have the idiots in the LibDems got to do with this? 

The party's defence spokesperson Helen Maguire said the losses were "deeply concerning", especially "at this time of heightened global security tensions".

Helen, sweetie, are you in the right job? You DO know that if the Russians or Chinese invade, they bring their own weapons, don't you? 

How much of a threat are these, should they fall into the wrong hands, anyway?

A deactivated World War Two Luger Pistol and Sten submachine gun were both lost in June 2023. In July 2023 an SA80 rife was also lost, along with a deactivated World War One German machine gun the following month, although both have subsequently been found.
Meanwhile, a Glock 19 Pistol was stolen in December 2023.

Well, the Glock's modern so obviously not deactivated but surely re-activating the others is a pretty difficult job, as would be obtaining ammo. 

And after all, it doesn't seem as if the modern criminal can't obtain firearms already. Terrorists prefer Henry Ford's invention these days, 

The Lib Dems called for an urgent inquiry into how the items were misplaced and what was being done to reduce losses and thefts. Maguire said: "The government is more butterfingered than Goldfinger when it comes to national security.
"The loss of these crucial resources is deeply concerning - especially at this time of heightened global security tensions.
"Sensitive national safety information may end up in the wrong hands, while precious public money is spent on replacements in the meantime. And the theft of dangerous weapons should seriously raise alarm bells when it comes to security."

Calm yourself, Helen. Nice soundbite, I know, but really, we don't even know these things ever left the premises - they could simply be misfiled.  

Saturday, 28 December 2024

Perfect example of shifting positions

Just as with real science, one’s positions need to adjust, one’s alliances over time. The core eternals, e.g. The Ten Commandments, the Beatitudes etc. stay the same and underpin “The West” … that is, we treat one another ethically, civilly … but human alliances depend on positions and voting records.

This is also why I for one am not into Political Parties, nor Cross Based Individual Denominations … criticising each one by one. In the case of the Uniparty, Tory branch, when I read today’s Daily Sceptic, bearing in mind that the soon to be Lord Toby runs it, and also bearing in mind this article heading and byline:

Kemi or Nigel: Who is Right?

By Anonymous IT Reporter

… firstly, the headline is expressed as a question, an old journo trick … I should know … then the old trick of the “anonymous writer” … this article is already showing signs of mendacity, of slyness and I’d guess that it would pretend to be “evenhanded” on the surface, an “honest attempt” at getting at “the truth of the matter”, whilst at the same time saying that because of doubts over Reform, “Nigel” might “clear it all up” by doing this:

Here at the Daily Sceptic we would be very interested to hear from the developer of the software as to what it actually does. One way to resolve this would be for Reform to open source that software. It is very likely in a repository on GitHub – just make it public (remove the secrets first guys, obvs). And proof of deployment would be good too.

Yes, you’d like that, Mr. Tory, whilst at the same time continuing to conceal your own and how Badenoch knew something … or didn’t. Also how in South Thanet, the boxes had not been opened until after 2 a.m. but at 11:30 p.m., a Tory spokesman was able to tell the MSM exactly who had won and roughly by how much.

Now for Nigel … clearly going for the PMship and that gong … there was also the little matter of selling out The Brexit Party to the Tories. On the other hand, he’s upped Reform membership wonderfully so far … but so have Rupert and Lee.

This post title and opening mentioned shifting positions and science. In science, one is always open to new data to be evaluated … ditto in politics. As things come to light, positions tweak, even marginally shift on the way Parties operate … but never on core verities which are part of what make us The West.

Friday, 27 December 2024

By Sacking The Morons Who Processed The Payment?

Gilly and Nigel Cutts' 'dream flat' in Arundel, West Sussex, turned into a nightmare when water started making its way inside the Georgian building. Whenever it rained water would pour through the ceiling and 'it got to the point where we'd dread the weather being wet,' the couple told the BBC.Together with their neighbours, the Cutts took legal action against the building's owner and were awarded £90,000 in compensation by a judge.

Hurrah, right? Well, yes. But…. 

But, the couple have not seen a penny and were astounded to learn that Brighton County Court handed the building's freeholder the money by accident. They said: 'To say we were speechless just doesn't cover it. 
'We won our case, so where's money? It was paid to the wrong person - it's pure madness.'

How can this happen, and no-one faces any consequences? 

Brighton County Court has since apologised for the error but has not yet paid back the couple. The defendant has not been contactable since. A spokesperson for Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service said: 'We apologise to the claimants for this administrative error and remain committed to resolving the matter as quickly as possible. 
'A judge has ordered the defendant to return the funds and we have additionally referred them to the police for investigation. 
'We've taken steps to prevent something like this from happening again.'

Does anyone really think the idiots responsible for such an error will face any sanction at all? 

Thursday, 26 December 2024

The traitors within the gates

Before starting this, Julia will be back tomorrow, OoL readers.

Now, a lady named Ann Kelly, on Gab, posted this:

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” ~ Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 B.C.)

Tuesday, 24 December 2024

Christmas wishes to OoL readers

Greetings from all of us at Orphans this 2024 season:



It’s been a rough year for many and shows no sign of abating but at least for now we can have a break and some nice dining and bonhomie tomorrow … for some, the Nativity uppermost in the mind.

Sadly, not all our readers are well and naturally, we wish that situation reversed … thoughts with them. Also, various readers are offering Christmas wishes to us and y’all … reciprocated, ladies and gentlemen.

We really hope you all have a relaxed, peaceful time now, unlike Amelia Carter on the NYC subway, who never made it to Christmas Day.

(Picture PNG tree)

Deep waters with Ginge and Whinge

This was run by patron IYE across the way at one of our sites:

“A federal court has denied the Stanford Internet Observatory, Atlantic Council, and Aspen Institute’s attempt to dismiss AFL’s class action lawsuit for conspiring with the U.S. government to conduct targeted surveillance and censor conservative political speech.”

https://x.com/America1stLegal/status/1870175433443914093

{Bad news for this one:

Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex
Member, Aspen Commission on Information Disorder
Co-Founder, Archewell”}

We’ve been following the doings of this pair for quite some time, as part of which I’ve been following the Me-Again “yacht girl” allegation but far more important is this interference in transatlantic politics and US internal politics, using Ginge’s position as errant royal son to interfere in all sorts of pokitics, inc. African.

Part of America First Legals multi-part item on X went:

The lawsuit alleges that these academic institutions, nonprofits, and researchers conspired with the federal government to surveil and censor conservative political speech regarding COVID-19 and elections on social media platforms.

Amid AFL’s lawsuit and

’s investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, the Stanford Internet Observatory was shut down in June 2024, and the Election Integrity Partnership did not operate during the 2024 election cycle.

Translated, it means that a class action was brought by a group including a Hoft (TGWP) against Fed weaponisation against conservatives. Some institutions on the far or Woke left attempted to dismiss the class action but a fed judge has denied their action … meaning that the question of Fed weaponisation against conservative thought is still very much alive.

One of the alleged weaponisers against conservative thought in the States is Harry’s set-up, which immediately grings his visa into question … esp. as DJT comes in power and the new border tsar has razor dharp teeth.

🍿🍿🍿