Tuesday, 7 March 2023

How sharper than a serpent's tooth ...

The fuller quote is from King Lear:


Young people debating how to dispossess the elderly in their last years:


Not just dispossess but try to kill off:


A reminder from one reader who was in the military, defending this land:


Without labouring the point, our Steve across the way has just lost his mother in such a climate for the elderly as we now find ourselves. This is a file pic of one such lady from the war years:


Unforgivable.

Monday, 6 March 2023

This Should Not Be A Surprise, Should It?

The ban on buying new petrol cars after 2030 will not be enough to meet green targets because polluting vehicles bought today are 'very likely' to still be in use, the RAC Foundation has said.

Well, of course they will! And why? Because we're making better cars

Vehicles have become less prone to corrosion and serious mechanical failure, while the cost-of-living crisis has made buying a car less affordable, even preowned.

What does the RAC suggest? Scrapping the ridiculous green targets, perhaps? 

That would be sensible, wouldn't it? That would be what your members surely want, wouldn't it?

The RAC Foundation has urged the government to encourage new car buyers to go electric, or at least choose a vehicle with low emissions.

Oh. 'More of the same'. So much for representing your members interests...

Electric cars can cost less to run and most experts agree that they are better for the planet.

 And where do they find these 'experts'..? 

Saturday, 4 March 2023

Apes with smartphones

Guest post by Ripper:

Everything is linked to the same cause if you look hard enough. I've said before that:

 a) the human race are no more than apes with smartphones. If you think that we are civilised think again, we all retain those primitive instincts of survival. 

b) we never grow up, we remain as children our whole lives regardless of IQ. That particular penny dropped here a long time ago, when Peter Gabriel made this track. He was also of the idea that politicians and world leaders are just like kids in the school playground.


If we go with this reasoning we can see what drives everything. The USA is just the schoolyard bully, with a few mates hanging around to watch the fight. Russia is the kid who's not going to give up his dinner money without a fight. Well, in my day, the strategy was to take down the ring leader with no messing around. 

Once he cries uncle his mates no longer feel that they can take you on. Should you be the victim of a pile-on and lose, then you get them one by one, at a time when they're on their own. Everything is political, even in the school yard.

In order to be a school bully, first you must gaslight your potential supporters into believing that you are all powerful. You brag and boast without actually doing anything to back it up. 

You choose the easiest targets, or push other kids around while your little gang is there, thinking that you will protect them against anything, when in fact its them protecting you. 

Slowly, you come to rule the whole school, until one kid sees through your veil of lies. The tiny dot principle.

I've posted this before, but the lyrics are bang on the money. The cabal, the coof, the Ukraine, Antifa, BLM, Climate Change, all in one.

Friday, 3 March 2023

Maybe Disabled People Should Stop Paying Council Tax?

Four councils are responsible for bringing more than half of the prosecutions in England for people abusing the use of disabled parking badges.
So, does it only happen in these four, which are Lambeth, Birmingham, Hammersmith and Fulham, and Bromley? Or are the other councils not doing their job?
The AA has raised concerns that councils do not take enforcement seriously, after the data also showed that more than two-thirds of councils, 110 out of England’s 140 local authorities, had not prosecuted anyone at all for misusing them.

Ah. Like I figured.  

Thursday, 2 March 2023

A Storm(ont) is coming

Consider:

Whom and what to believe on this matter?

In an exercise in stating the bleeding obvious, there is a crisis of confidence and trust going on during these times.  For example, there is this:

The discovery was made in the first deep sequencing of the mRNA products, carried out by Dr. Kevin McKernan of Medicinal Genomics and his team. The researchers found that the vaccines were contaminated with significant quantities of biological agents known as plasmids.

Dr. Anthony Brookes, Professor of Genomics and Health Data Science at the University of Leicester, told the Daily Sceptic: “This is a solid piece of research by a very knowledgeable team.”

Are you, personally, expert enough to take that idea and run with it, quoting from this or that study to support your findings?  What will you conclude, personally?  It's obvious to someone from a different field, or even a different branch of that same field, that we just don't have the knowledge ourselves, so we must gather it from 'trusted' sources.

What are these trusted sources?  For me, it starts with those from within the medical profession vaguely in this area.  Even Leggy needs to be considered.

But the Fauci/Whitty/Hancock side trot out all sorts of studies with charts to argue the opposite, ignoring studies such as these above as aberrations. Logic would seem to indicate you don't run with something as dangerous as injecting an entire population on the strength of one side's politicised, govt preferred data, when there is more than enough counter-data to demand thorough 'independent' investigation over five to ten years.  Remember thalidomide?

 And you especially don't trust a govt which ups the ante with bull-in-a-china-shop rushes at this mass solution or that ... internment camps (otherwise known as care homes or nightingale hospitals), straight out of the USSR or nazi Germany and loss of jobs, refusal of medical treatment for other ailments ... and so on.

People who are perfectly happy to turn savagely on those questioning anything, screaming that we're far right fascist, racist, disablists.  I'm not an anti-vaxxer from some sort of camp?  I'm a 'gather all available data-ist' and see which way the discoveries lead. Empirical science in other words.  Officially, in NHS records, I'm 'vaccine hesitant'.

Wednesday, 1 March 2023

I Don't Think You're Making The Argument You Think You Are, Laila...

If insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result, then perhaps coming to the Baftas looking for diversity is an exercise in madness.
Well, yes, Laila, since it's just a luvvie's award show. If you want diversity, trip down your local enriched high street (if the cops haven't sealed off the road for another machete attack) instead and marvel...
...awards are fundamentally subjective exercises. Trying to get film fans to unanimously agree that Cate Blanchett was more convincing as a lecherous conductor than Deadwyler as the bereaved mother of a lynched child, or vice versa, is a fool’s errand.

And yet here you are, a fool... 

Some of our best filmmakers, such as Terence Davies and Joanna Hogg, are studiously ignored by Bafta voters, and Black British directors Menelik Shabazz, Horace Ové and Ngozi Onwurah innovated without the support of many of the bodies that purport to champion British film.

Excellent! They can be scrapped then. Since they are obviously not required. Eh, Laila..? 

Awards are only as prestigious as the public perception of them, and by the time the Bafta inclusivity targets are met in 2025 it may be too late to claw back any cultural relevancy.

Guess the public have spoken. 

Tuesday, 28 February 2023

The tightening of the ratchet by the Statists

A few years back ... maybe even a decade or more ago ... I was speaking with my mate in Russia about how things were.  There was no need to remind him of the secret police and the climate of "denunciation" which meant that you watched your words ... very, very carefully.

In every town, in every kvartel or subsection of a huge block of houses bounded by main roads, were all sorts of things ... a crisscross of narrow lanes, open play areas with playing equipment and railings for beating rugs ... and always, near the school, the little office where you went to denounce your neighbour for absolutely anything at all.  Could be that he/she walked past you offensively.

Which then kicked off a bureaucratic nightmare for the accused. Paperwork was the least of it ... the main issue was that the laws were so many, so extensive, so overlapping, that not only could anything at all be a pretext for "the visit" (as in Terry Gilliam's "Brazil") of the equivalent of the Stasi but it was actually impossible by then to keep the law at all ... one law conflicted with another and so they had you. In complying with one traffic regulation, you could well be breaking another.

This was still so in my time there ... there was a particular corner near the city which the police watched by rotation and it meant that to get by some parked cars and the near side of a tram, you, by definition, had broken two or three laws or regulations.  They could have you if they wished but mostly they did not wish.

Unless they were on a revenue drive that week or they needed their quota by month end.

Anyway, I said we in the west were approaching that point, maybe around 2010-12, following on from Gordo's RIPA extensions and that the Tories had no intention whatever of reining in such excesses. I'd blogged about it, losing many Conservative party friends in the process.  My mate over there was in denial and comparatively (the USSR had had quite a head start), he had a point but it was certainly heading in that direction here ... the buzzword we used at the time was Statism ... and thus Orphans was born on WordPress.

Then I watched as the Libertarian Party itself ripped itself to pieces over a sheer impossibility. The issue was that the anarchist end, though in denial, were for "don't dare try to stop anything whatever I do, think or say, for any reason, in other words do as thou wilt" ... through to the more small "c" conservative classical liberalism, anti-statist, which nevertheless recognised "some" constraints of "harm to others".  The example Inused was your next door neighbour blasting music and partying to 3 a.m. every night, when you yourself had to work next morning.

Softspoken classical liberals called it "respect" and "disrespect", respectively.  And now here's the next turn of the ratchet. Interestingly, Kemisabi was the preferred choice for PM of a close friend and colleague, on libertarian grounds. Hmmmmm.

The Government is introducing new legislation aimed at protecting employees from harassment in the workplace.

But critics fear the change will have far-reaching consequences for free speech and will lead to employers having a “legitimate legal interest in policing what members of the public say”.

An amendment to the Equality Act, backed by ministers, will make employers liable for third-party harassment – meaning from members of the public, as well as from their fellow staff members.

Under clause one of the Bill, employers will be required to take “all reasonable steps” to protect their employees from harassment of any kind, and failure to do so will leave them vulnerable to being sued by their employees in the Employment Tribunal.

The ratchet lock is never released in a statist society, it's only ever paused, pending a more conducive time to give it another wind.

Monday, 27 February 2023

Maybe They Are All In A River Somewhere..?

It'd explain their failure to find them, wouldn't it?

It has emerged that senior officers believe there are still “many” firearms in the hands of people who should not have them, despite the former home secretary Priti Patel ordering them to look again at cases where they returned firearms to people after confiscation.

If I disobeyed my boss I'd expect to have a very uncomfortable conversation. Why is that never the case for failing police farces? 

Alarm bells have also been rung because the number of shotgun certificate applications Devon and Cornwall are rejecting has doubled since the Plymouth shootings but the rate in the rest of England and Wales has remained at just 3%, suggesting some forces may still be looking too leniently on applications.

Maybe. Or maybe Devon & Cornwell, realising they had not just dropped the ball but then drop-kicked it into their own goal, were overzealous? 

The new chief constable of Devon and Cornwall, Will Kerr, who came into the post the year after Davison’s attacks, is among those calling for fundamental change.
He said the firearms legislation, introduced in 1968, was “no longer suitable”, arguing that the emphasis was on “permitting rather than preventing gun ownership”.

As indeed it should be. In a modern capitalist democracy, that should always be the default, shouldn't it? Whether we are talking about cars, second homes or guns...