Sorting out true allies and enemies is crucial at this point

Again this is Julia’s day at OoL and rather than leave it blank, I’m going to do that which I really do not wish to … repost here this morning’s post at N.O.

It would take the wisdom of Job to sort this one, matey.  Or the wisdom of God. I’m going to tackle this in “real time”, rather than present a constructed journo or academic article.

Woke up, literally, did whatever, checked emails, youtube and Gab and wham … suddenly, there was this:

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/answering-the-critics-of-died-suddenly

Right, as a generalist who gathers and puts together a blog, I see the incoming but there’s just too bleedin’ much of it, esp. given my age and not being 100% well, to be expected in this situation.  So, still thinking about knitting, there’s IYE at NOWP and it’s sickening, nauseating.  Then I saw the Wyatt gab and posted it last thing last night.

So there’s that to bloodhoubd … the paedo thing, plus this clots thing where all major players are sniping at each other, plus Lake and Murkowski and the rank cheating, p,us Biden’s secret oil move (yet to break), plus domestic things here demanding time. All this is just to point out that the situation facing a generalist admin is that he can’t devote the proper time to any topic … and ge should, in order to avoid the glib, trite and journalistic.

So, for now, this Dr. Joe, Steve Kirsch, John Looney, Robert Malone thing, something Dr. Joe said strikes a chord, rings a bell.

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/11/23/died-suddenly-is-typical-trash-from-stew-peters/

From the get-go, he’s getting stuck into Stew Peters but he also writes:

But unfortunately it tainted that and other good information (such as presented by Dr. Ryan Cole, Steve Kirsch and Dr. James Thorp) by covering it with a lot of garbage.

Uh huh.  So he’s praising SK and damning SP, yet Steve Kirsch himself (url one more time) now writes:

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/answering-the-critics-of-died-suddenly

Then you can read the rebuttal I just got from Ryan Cole, MD and decide for yourself who is telling you the truth and who is lying to you.

Something is overwhelmingly wrong with the “clot shot.” If he were half awake, his conjecture would not be reflecting  the myopic view of the inside of his inexperienced anus.

Now, in this matter, I am Joe Public.  How the hell can I suddenly become (whatever those big words are) in the medical field and yet there’s sufficient functioning brain in my head to see the anomaly of Dr. Josh attacking Stew P who is presenting the Steve K supported line about these clot shots being abnormal.

Sounds like a whole lot of confusion and confounding going on on the dissident side and who’s rubbing the hands gleefully and chuckling at it all?

Why … Fauci, the depts like CDC etc., the Pepfar Pence boys and gals, the Demrats, anyone supporting this whole Covid narrative … Klaus and all of them are adoring all this.  What is happening here is that a whole lot of hotheaded alpha males are headbutting  over something and I come back to my own criticisms again in this post:

https://orphansofliberty.blogspot.com/2022/11/total-minefield-this-is.html

The substance I still support but my own manner is uncomfortably like those of the hothead males I’ve just been calling out.  Yet these and the Simone Golds, Naomi Wolfs and so on are precisely the sorts of “hotheads” who move things forward, who address real grievances of a ling-suffering public.  It’s the fearless globo slayers who make the progress, not the vile Schwabs and treasonous Pences.

And as readers of N.O. know, I’m a fan of the female of our species, thinking Kari Lake, Kathy Gyngell, Laura Perrins … that sort of gal, esp. mothers protecting their young.

And yet … of thecsame species are the Clinton horror, Murkowski, Harbag for PIE here and all those single pregnants who are quite happy to use full term abortion as a lifestyle fix.  Rachel Chandler mentioned on the paedo issue.  Alisson Mack.

And then there’s this morning’s Canadian monster, not yet posted, via MftWC:

Chrystia Freeland: The dangerous WEF devotee behind Trudeau’s Canadian project

Was she not the cow charged by Soy Boy with taking down the truckers while he was in hiding?  Or was that another “woman”, using the term advisedly for those Cressida Dicks and Joyce Thackers of limited brain, overweening egos and zero moral compass?

Dangerous?  In that she’d certainly do her worst to ordinary people in order to serve her masters … yes she is.  But as we found out in the case of big-noting Rebekah Brooks, lording it over the now dead NotW publication … when that master says lampshade time, where’s your power then?  Eh, Liz Truss?

So where does all this leave us?  I’d say between a rock and a hard place, staring down the barrels of the globo fiends unless the unhetdable cats like Steve Kirsch and the rest of us can suspend our own frustrated impatience ling enough to combine, as allies.  And I do include men plus women, combined, in that too.

Total minefield, this is

The first thing to point out in a much needed rebuttal of a certain “doctor” is that there’s all out war for hearts and minds going on … and I do mean “all out” war.

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/11/23/died-suddenly-is-typical-trash-from-stew-peters/

The second is that we … you, me … have information overload … if you glance at the amount we post at our site across the way (N.O.), it can get up to twenty or thirty items a day … and even that’s mostly linking or summaries.

The third is the cursory reader … the one who works full time and who holds a mix of “healthy” scepticism as a rule, plus a bullish mindset I call “Colonel Harrumph (retired)” who asserts, “I’ve read all the literature and nowhere does it say …” which really means “nowhere did I find coz I wasn’t looking with any degree of laser penetration, I just wanted to be able to debunk the conspiracy theorists, a priori.”.

This latter, this mindset, the absolute importance, in your public field, of your bona fides being wholly accepted because upon that lies your very livelihood … this causes anyone in Britain at least, called “doctor”, to be scrutinised to the nth degree by retired people like us who are very much distrustful in the wake of the covid and vaxx debacle, esp. of Ferguson, Whitty and the NHS.

Remember, I mentioned hearts and minds, rather than the “science itself being settled” … they can diverge.

And as a consequence of all the above factors combined, we get a fourth factor … the 80-20 syndrome.  

This is where a person, quite disinclined to have his trust in what and whom he personally knows and trusts upturned, comes in, a priori, and commits confirmation bias simply through dislike, detestation of the messenger/ferreter, along with not being up to date, not being at the cutting edge for that last 20%.  

How could he be up to date if he works fulltime in a different area to that which we work in … our field being investigation 24/7, 7/52.  Yet he “bowls in” (my own emotive word construct) and opens with “typical trash from”.  

Now, we do not quote Stew Peters as a rule for the same reason we do not touch Before it’s News, Epoch, multiple johnny-come-lately “conservative” sites which look and sound good, except that there is something iffy in the manner, the poor navigation, the 24/7 demand for money “to keep us afloat”, a host of reasons we’ve learnt bitterly over time.  We’re still wiping egg off our faces.

We’re talking here of those “cashing in” or if not that, then at least infiltrating in order to steer debate, and using our own nomenclature and buzz phrases in order to control our output.

Which gets into a highly dangerous field … defamation.  Rightly or wrongly, this “doctor” has defamed Stew Peters and his article goes into why.  I was open to this “doctor” for a few reasons.  One is that the Daily Sceptic has a good name on our side, he has an article in that publication, on the strength of his being a “doctor”.

Doctor of what though?  I do not personally like that Naomi Wolf, a feminist author, calling herself doctor, which she is … a doctor in academia but not a medical doctor in the least … does not go out of her way to underscore that point, unlike Dr. Simone Gold, recently released from prison, who is very much a medical doctor.

But is she a doctor within this field of epidemiology?  

And can someone working in labs equally see that something is untoward in the research, someone for example like Judy Mikovits whom the Woke Wikipedia has in first place on ggl search, “… an American former research scientist who is known for her discredited medical claims …”

… which in itself is highly suspect but to know why, you’d need to wade through the former sites of ours now taken down from above, now a plethora of sites, all involving digging and input from readers.  

In short, this thing is a minefield, the fifth factor.  

If you are 100% in this line of work … ferreting, aggregating, sifting, discarding, keeping, gradually building lists of the trustworthy, the iffy and the downright discredited, then you can perhaps nail 80% of it but still not get that last 20% … there are endless twists and turns.

For example, even if you establish this man’s medical qualification as being within this field of epidemia, he’s still of a certain name, from a certain continent and from a certain ethnic/religious group which OoL for one is neither openly touching nor condemning … it’s simply too dangerous for this site, for me, for our other people.  You have eyes and a scrolling finger … do it, find out for yourself.

And the sixth factor (six factors being by no means complete and exhaustive, given the constant twists and turns) is the iceberg factor.

Meaning that what people say, write, do, in the open public space by no means says anything about the rest of the iceberg below.  Which leads to a seventh factor … ancient enmities and a person needing to be of a certain caste, group, ethinicity, beluef system, to know thst bullsh is being perpetrated here.

Look at two things … firstly the good “doctor’s” title … from which discipline it is, from where, geographically, from where they themselves emanated … and then look at whom he attacks immediately in the heading.

If I say that I’d lay odds he’d also attack Andrew Torba, are you any closer to tumbling to it?  A new testament scholar certainly would be … instantly.  But try telling that to the secular, rationalist or Woke masses.  And as I say, it’s too dangerous for me to continue.

My concluding request is … be very much aware of that iceberg and all the other factors. There is an expression about “knowing them by their fruits”, by those they hang around with.  Nuff said.

Thanksgiving

Putting this up now, on behalf of Julia and Grandpa, for tomorrow, wishing our American readers:

... giving the food a head start if they'd like:

The suppressed story often speaks differently

This post is on a hiding to nothing, simply because there are quite strong emotions involved and two diametrically opposed sides. I'm quite cognisant of Julia's libertarian views on speech and I concur ... but the only thing which would happen today is an all out slanging match where both sides would come in with their organised selection of incidents and slant ... ne'er the twain will meet ... utterly pointless, given the purpose of the post.

Which is this ... it's not a debate, it is just me presenting from material supplied by both pro Russian and my Ukro mate, material I'd say not many would have seen.  As for my stance ... it's part of my overall stance that a nation has every right to defend itself from neighbours when its real enemies have gone into that neighbouring nation and put in missile silos, a string of biochemical and anthrax labs, where that foreign power has installed and bolstered a puppet clown leader ... and all the rest of it.  Where that neighbour dumps boatloads of the unwanted in British waters.

The UN in Darfur, the USSR during the Cuban missile crisis, Argentina claiming something quite bollox about sovereignty over the Falklands … Argentina never existed when this all happened ... obviously Russia and the Ukraine ... and so many more.  Even Israel and daily rocket attacks from Philistine (sic) territory (Gaza).

In no way does my stance exonerate that big nation, not in the least ... violations abound, they need addressing ... but a nation, any nation, does have the right to defend itself, that's if you believe in "nations" per se and their peoples.  As I say, I'm not interested in debating something where one side - globo and its MSM - present one narrative only.  Here's something from the suppressed side for once - not a "view" but what did occur.

Consider this map:

For readers

The sharp-eyed among you would expect a post from Julia this morning but it seems there are currently tech issues in Ambush Predator land, although she's still overseeing the blog from her phone (moderating).  We wish her PC the very best of health and also herself ... I also know she's under pressure in various ways just now.

Julia usually leads Monday, Wednesday, Friday and I tend to post Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday ... it's not that there are not enough issues ... a glance at our blog across the way shows there's no shortage of current issues ... it's just that we're loathe to alter the format.  We also have Grandpa doing the occasional but no one knows when those will appear. :)

My post will appear tomorrow as usual, all being well, Julia's asap.

Just who are these psychotic criminals ordering us about?

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/this-is-the-greatest-crisis-of-our-lives-hunts-budget-makes-it-worse/

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/sunak-and-hunt-civil-servants-for-a-davos-government/

To this, let me add, from Sunpak’s controller:

And this from a social media watcher:

You see, there comes a point where we can no longer hide the head, unless we want it chopped off.

We're being betrayed by what's supposed to be our own side.

 Firstly, Kathy Barnette sums it up

Kathy Barnette is the lady who went full-on MAGA but Trump decided to endorse RINO Oz, himself eventually cheated on by the vegetable's Demonrat minders.  

She writes:

The same sex abomination

50 Republican scumbags voted with the Demonrats in the House to push same sex "marriage", despite such a thing being an impossibility.

It went to the Senate and this just happened:

Here are the Republicans who voted with the Democrats: : Roy Blunt-Missouri; Richard Burr-North Carolina; Shelley Moore Capito-West Virginia; Joni Ernst-Iowa; Cynthia Lummis-Wyoming; Lisa Murkowski-Alaska; Rob Portman-Ohio; Dan Sullivan-Alaska; Mitt Romney-Utah; Thom Tillis-North Carolina; and Todd Young-Indiana. Burr, Blunt and Portman are retiring.

Now there is a crucial point being missed here

Though the Demonrats and RINOs are evil muvvers, they're known-knowns and though they should be executed, yes, that needs to be later down the track.  Something else far worse is happening.

Most Republicans voted in McCarthy as House Leader.  McConnell was voted back in by secret ballot.  There were Republicans who did that.

Secret ballot, just think about that.  That included MAGAs.

Betrayal BY MAGAs, not of MAGAs

We're not meant to notice.

MTG, who previously sent cheques to McCarthy, the RINO, was one who voted for him in to be house leader.  (She's also currently being divorced but that's another story.  So she betrayed Lake, Boebert, all the others cheated out of their seats.

Steve Bannon just did a Rumble in which he tells everyone just to accept the losses ... they happened, just forget about it. He goes into deep depression and wants his viewers to as well.

He then interviews MTG, who sent cheques to McCarthy and voted for him, onto his programme and she bangs on about all the OTHER things ... but NOT on her betrayal of her voters by backing McCarthy.  And Bannon never asks. 

Readers, this is BIZARRE, even while Kari Lake is assembling a legal team to FIGHT it.  Does Bannon help?  Does Trump?  Does anyone help her?

Let me restate it.  Kari Lake is TAKING ACTION.  Meanwhile, Trump is listing all his achievements to his fans, Bannon is saying tut tut, have a rant on video, MTG, show em your MAGA credentials as I am.

Do you see what is so wrong here?  Eternal victims, never taking any action whatever.

Meanwhile, in Brazil, millions are MARCHING, their bank accounts threatened by the Supreme Court.  In America and here?  Just a whimper, a "woe is us".

You can depend upon the Muslims…..to say exactly the Wrong thing at the Wrong time!

As far back as 2010, when the totally corrupt criminals who headed FIFA handed QATAR, one of the wealthiest Arab States in the world, the 2022 World Cup, I sat back and prepared, even planned for a really good laugh when this bunch of royal despots’ plans came to fruition. 

The possibilities of corruption upon an industrial scale were widely exposed and realised: mainly because ALL Muslims accept that bribery and corruption are acceptable, and are indeed slightly puzzled by Western ideals that bribery is just unacceptable in both public and private life.

I worked alongside two Muslim civil engineers on a construction site; two men whose education and knowledge of their jobs was superb: but both men saw absolutely nothing wrong with paying or indeed accepting a bribe. Escalate that skein of thought to a Nation State; and I believe that is how Qatar won the right to stage the highest event in the world of professional Football. 

Immediately upon receipt of the Award news, the Qatar bandits threw their first verbal hand grenade Into the works by declaring that maybe some commentators were maybe right, and having all of the world’s best players going down with heatstroke upon Arrival in Qatar, never mind playing several matches in heat measuring 45 degrees Centigrade, wasn’t the best plan in the world, and could FIFA move the World Cup games to be played in the Qatar winter, where it is only 30 Degrees C. in the evening?

So FIFA, Sepp Blatter and all his corrupt colleagues, who had taken the Qatari gold, found themselves having to go to the FIFA membership, and murmuring that the Committee had unfortunately forgotten that Qatar is a DESERT country, extremely hot, and would they excuse this oversight, break up the traditional winter schedules for some 100-odd national teams, and set them down in the bloody desert because the wogs are building the stadia, the hotels, and everything else.

But fast forwards to 2022, FIFA were almost relaxing, with all the roadblocks moved away, everything seems fine, the teams are arriving: yes there are a few murmurs about the ban on homosexuals, but nobody’s going to go home over the way a bunch of shirt-lifters is treated, and then the bloody Qatari Royal Family gets the word, a bit late in the day, that FIFA has signed a multi-million dollar contract with Sponsor Budweiser, to sell BEER in humoungous quantities, at all seven arenas! 

AND THEY GET THE BEER BANNED!

Cow Wars!

Almost 20 years ago, hundreds of furious New Zealand farmers jumped into their tractors, farm bikes and trucks and ploughed up Wellington’s main street towards parliament to kick up a stink against the so-called “fart tax” – a levy on livestock methane gases, proposed by the then-Labour government to reduce emissions.

A cow named Energy was led up the building’s granite steps and left an unwelcome mess in her wake. In doing so, she provided the opposition movement with a powerful, if indelicate, visual metaphor: rural New Zealand was ready for a mudslinging match with the capital.

Just months later, the government abandoned the tax.

That was then. And the government bided its time: 

But last month – 19 years after Energy’s memorable performance – the current Labour-government proposed a not-too-dissimilar plan to the ill-fated “fart tax”, with a crucial difference: it had been broadly created by farmers themselves. 

All the farmers? Well, maybe not: 

“As everyone knows, the farming lobby is one of the strongest,” says Dr Adrian Macey, an adjunct professor in climate change research at Victoria University of Wellington and senior associate at the Institute for Governance and Policy Studies. But there is growing division within the sector, he says – those who are “ready to be part of the solution”, and those who feel “very oppressed by not only climate change measures but all government regulation”.

Who can blame them? 

Macey says the plan could pave the way for other countries to follow suit. “[New Zealand] is probably the first country to set a hard target on agricultural methane and the first country to put a levy on it,” he said. “We’re showing world leadership on what you can do with the sector – no one has gone there before us.”

Don't mind if we all just sit back and watch to see what happens, then, Adrian? 

Home and away

Home

UK Refugee Council demands British lawmakers NOT disclose names of migrant hotels to general public, citing safety concerns for the (the) invaders. The charity’s call for anonymity regarding where new arrivals are situated raises concerns over public safety after a number of crimes and rapes involving asylum seekers.

It is understood that the charity’s chief executive, Enver Solomon, wrote to the House of Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle, expressing “serious concerns” over the safety of those arriving in small boats across the English Channel.

Away

In a study of 12 face masks, every mask contained titanium dioxide (TiO2) particles in at least one layer, at levels that “exceeded the acceptable exposure level.” The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies titanium dioxide as a Group 2B carcinogen, which means it’s “possibly carcinogenic to humans” by inhalation.

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2022/11/16/scientists-studied-12-masks-every-one-contained-this-cancer-causing-compound/?mc_cid=2d0b05e41c&mc_eid=72f6686472