Definition of a “human right”

There’s a thing we hear chanted about “manifest destiny”, a political invention to justify outrageous intrusion … and another one used to justify, to cover up, to exonerate, is “human rights”.

Which is not to say that the U.S. Founding Fathers should not have written it to aspire to, just as Christians have the gospels to aspire to, though close to unachievable, just as this Magna Carta thing sounded good at the time.

There are at least three glaring dangers though imho:

1.  What about aspirations bundled in with it which a large proportion of the population do not embrace, no way, e.g. communistic talking points a la Starmer?

2.  All well and fine stating our own aspirations but unless backed by brute force, by political will, then that stairway lies on the whispering wind.

3.  And if the enemy’s aspirations involve dispossessing the industrious who have built nest eggs for posterity, then right there is a set of enemies who will ultimately tear down the communist ideal … people start asking, strongly, en masse:

But if people are not willing to put themselves at least partly in danger to defend their own aspirations such as industriousness, incentive, stability, protection of what is ours, then a rough and neanderthal set of thugs and vandals are most certainly going to tear them all down, steal them, give them to the feckless bottom feeders.

As we ourselves moan our way into penury and slavery.