Political jigsaws are best completed by the collaborative effort of a few, each with his/her own angle, his/her own pet theory ... using a roundtable approach or brainstorming, with a genuine desire to know that which they currently do not.
It's essential that certain groundrules apply in that room ... egos be left at the door upon entering, the contributions perhaps forthright but nevertheless civil. At the end of the session, all can just gaze at what's on the table and the truth is probably somewhere in amongst all that.
What you do not need is diametrically adversarial voices in there ... for example, a Woke devotee or two in the same room as the antiWoke is not going to work. A proHamas Candace in the same room as a Jewish Shapiro is not going to produce anything but a clash.
Those at OoL certainly have diverse ideas on whom the ultimate bete noire is but short of "final proof", there's much else which does become apparent if it's allowed to.
The truth can come out of anywhere ... look at this one for example:
That was at Roobee's place and I added:
If a person such as an old Witanagemot colleague posts a "whoever could it be" tweet, listing all sorts of possibilities, it's obvious he's not been watching, which Roobee was. When his whole focus is independence for England ... fine, ok, no argument beyond saying it just increases the sum total of politicians paid from the public purse and all the wrong ones preselected again ... it does mean though he's not watching the bigger picture.
I can't get the whole picture myself either, because of my own set of betes noires ... but a roundtable with respected, not mocked contributions might just uncover some interesting connections ... and that's what it needs.
And always, some have gone into it in far greater detail than others. That's just the nature of things.
Another mind or two at work:
The questions have to be: Why now? Why ISIS? Isn't ISIS a busted flush now, or is it still viable? If it is still viable, what of those serving-age men arriving in boats to the UK?
ReplyDelete