Duelling studies

The whole area of studies and polls has now been so tainted, so debased and undermined that it quite depends from where a study emanated, rather than what it actually concluded.

Years ago now, I did Yougov polls, invited to, perhaps on the strength of my Conservative Party affiliations.  Rather than being flights of fancy, this, I was asked specifically, four or five times, that if I'd voted in the last whatever election, which would Inhave voted for?

After I'd clicked UKIP or typed in TBP a few times, the survey emails mysteriously ceased.  Problem is ... impossible to prove something was untoward ... and who was the little collator who'd nominallyvdecided that?  Or maybe it was no person but the algorithm, based on responses ... who wrote that?

South Thanet, when the Tory spokesman predicted with remarkable accuracy thecdemise of Farage at 11 p.m., when the boxes were not due to be opened until 2 a.m., was a point not noted by the MSM at the time.

In the field of medicine, any study on the Covid, SARS, vaccine field is looked at askance if it comes from Oxford or appears in the Lancet today.  

Voila:

Of course, once a potential risk of myocarditis was identified there were some attempts by epidemiologists to sift though available data to try to identify the impact of this risk on the vaccinated population. The most recent paper to study this side-effect appeared in late August out of the Nuffield Department of Medicine in Oxford Radcliffe hospital by a team led by Julia Hippisley-Cox.

The rest of the article deals with the claim.  Meanwhile, VAERS and so many others at ground level are reporting things quite differently:

This year, FDA’s VRBPAC (Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee) members have been complaining about being given less and less data as they are asked to sign off on vaccine programs for younger and younger ages.  VRBPAC member Dr. Paul Offit, a professor of paediatric infectious diseases at the University of Pennsylvania and co-inventor of a Rotavirus vaccine said last month that “the fix was in,” implying that the committee’s deliberations were a sham because the White House announced it was purchasing the vaccine right after the meeting ended.

Dr. Offit was quoted last week as saying the mouse data were not sufficient to roll out the new boosters. So, FDA chose not to give him and the other members a public venue where they would predictably complain about FDA’s laxity – what some might call recklessness, insubordination or even gross malfeasance.  After all, according to the FDA’s mission statement, FDA “is responsible for protecting the public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices.”  Not rubberstamping untested vaccines.

It's as much the jawdropping behaviour in pushing something and mandating it when there is great cause for concern being reported in from places around the world, from America to Tasmania that should, at a minimum, give pause and time for thorough testing:

The press release quoted IU School of Medicine professor Dr. Lana Dbeibo as saying that the Covid-19 vaccines were “extremely safe and effective.”

Less than two weeks later, on June 1, 2021, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) showed that 73 people in Indiana between the ages of 18 and 29 had gone to the emergency room following vaccination with one of the Covid-19 vaccines — either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine.

In late December 2021, Scott Davison, the CEO of Indianapolis-based life insurance company OneAmerica, said that the entire life insurance industry was dealing with an unheard-of 40 percent increase in deaths among working-age people 18-64 in the third quarter of 2021.

The third quarter of 2021 included July, August and September — the same period in which the three IU students, two paramedics and IU Trustee Melanie Walker died suddenly and unexpectedly.

At a minimum, there are consistent overtones of Russian roulette being played with trusting, MSM abetted people's lives here.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/kevindowneyjr/2022/09/06/embalmers-are-making-shocking-discoveries-in-the-blood-of-the-dead-n1627105

Perhaps the most appalling aspect is trolls trying the old "isolated incident" shtick or attacking social media as inferior in reportage to the self-prize giving MSM in collusion with govt "experts" like Fauci and Ferguson.  Really?  How would we even have known of blood clots without responsible social media, as distinct from the shlock?  Responsible sites such as this:

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/vaccine-injuries-and-our-floundering-blundering-scientists/

Perhaps one of the worst exanples of callous disregard for the truth is:

Yet they still run the Rems-death and intubation whilst we were attacked and taken down for daring to suggest "horse tranquilliser" or HCQ and Vitamin C.

It's not just the war over what works, it's the behaviour, the tactics, of one side only in this.